@cikljamas
Your responses were predicted.
Now consider the two exemplary efforts of the two school projects:
Some conclusions might be drawn from these:
1) Helium was used to loft both cameras to ~93,000 to 95,000 ft. (Well above your cheesy lower-atmosphere aircraft photo taken at the cloud layer).
2) The helium expanded immensely at this altitude, bursting it's sole restraint (the balloon).
Look at both again to see it! Really cool! (Of course you will say that NASA later CGI'd those frames too. Poor kids! )
Your previous posts imply however, that the expanding helium, during ascent, may manifest a static 'anti-ether' bubble around the whole experiment, thus influencing the etheric medium itself to defeat the characteristic (well, for most anyway) 'gravitational' influence that, on this planet as you perceive, does not exist.
Yet, when the balloon allegedly bursts, what happens? The static ether-defeating bubble collapses, and it starts falling towards Earth again. Now, how could THAT be? Clearly, new nomenclature is required for this one: REMF (Reverse Ether Motive Force). Yeah! That works.
What a glorious descent these toys had though. All the while capturing, in elegant simplicity, the curvature of our home world for all to see during the spiral downward over and over again.
'Twas a wonderful example that reminds me of the importance of pliable perspectives during our rapid 'advancement'. [yikes!]
Sorry, but did anyone see the 400,000 mile long seawater-fall spilling her guts into the Sun's (in orbit around us?) corona during the return spiral down (or is it UP), hmm? I think not.
3) The payloads (camera, gear, and attached toys) begin their journey (falling?) BACK to Earth (needing a parachute to slow its descent, though. hmm) so that those junior mission-planner parents could take out 2nd and 3rd mortgages on their homes (either before or after) to Professionally ALTER the videos to hide the fact that their 12 year-old children (and teachers and support crew) suddenly came to the conclusion that the Earth IS once again flat! Yes, these damaged associates must be protected from the impending defamation campaign!
Sorry, our fellow humans (represented above) AND NASA playing THAT game is a stretch for me, and I'm hoping you might concede that notion!
Anecdotally:
No need to get your camera wet at the beach (boldly accusing a University of fudging the visual departure of a 100+ ft masted Clipper over the distant horizon) in lieu of these TWO examples.
And YOUR exemplary 'jets' flying low over the water at high speed!
Impressive, but come now!
I'm betting (as a pilot myself) their hands are all over those joysticks making 'minute' adjustments (as one MUST at that altitude) or God help them, they are flying on auto-pilot (radar-altimeter) to ensure things stay nice and [s]flat[/s] err ... sorry, relatively level.
Seek YOUR TRUTH! Are we round, flat, or something better?
As you cannot trust ANYONE with a camera these days, why not give those kids a call, borrow their balloon and SEE FOR YOURSELF!
Build a team! Yes, LEAD and ASSERT instead of filling your basket with suspect fruit!
Slap a GPS(.gov-owned gear though, hmm), altimeter, and supporting gear on several of them, triangulate, and prove that what those deviant children accidentally photographed - is totally wrong. Should only cost a few thousand crowd-funded dollars for a little piece-of-mind, no?
Are you ready to be the likes of Columbus all over again?
Your responses were predicted.
Now consider the two exemplary efforts of the two school projects:
Originally posted by Beamgate
View Post
1) Helium was used to loft both cameras to ~93,000 to 95,000 ft. (Well above your cheesy lower-atmosphere aircraft photo taken at the cloud layer).
2) The helium expanded immensely at this altitude, bursting it's sole restraint (the balloon).
Look at both again to see it! Really cool! (Of course you will say that NASA later CGI'd those frames too. Poor kids! )
Your previous posts imply however, that the expanding helium, during ascent, may manifest a static 'anti-ether' bubble around the whole experiment, thus influencing the etheric medium itself to defeat the characteristic (well, for most anyway) 'gravitational' influence that, on this planet as you perceive, does not exist.
Yet, when the balloon allegedly bursts, what happens? The static ether-defeating bubble collapses, and it starts falling towards Earth again. Now, how could THAT be? Clearly, new nomenclature is required for this one: REMF (Reverse Ether Motive Force). Yeah! That works.
What a glorious descent these toys had though. All the while capturing, in elegant simplicity, the curvature of our home world for all to see during the spiral downward over and over again.
'Twas a wonderful example that reminds me of the importance of pliable perspectives during our rapid 'advancement'. [yikes!]
Sorry, but did anyone see the 400,000 mile long seawater-fall spilling her guts into the Sun's (in orbit around us?) corona during the return spiral down (or is it UP), hmm? I think not.
3) The payloads (camera, gear, and attached toys) begin their journey (falling?) BACK to Earth (needing a parachute to slow its descent, though. hmm) so that those junior mission-planner parents could take out 2nd and 3rd mortgages on their homes (either before or after) to Professionally ALTER the videos to hide the fact that their 12 year-old children (and teachers and support crew) suddenly came to the conclusion that the Earth IS once again flat! Yes, these damaged associates must be protected from the impending defamation campaign!
Sorry, our fellow humans (represented above) AND NASA playing THAT game is a stretch for me, and I'm hoping you might concede that notion!
Anecdotally:
No need to get your camera wet at the beach (boldly accusing a University of fudging the visual departure of a 100+ ft masted Clipper over the distant horizon) in lieu of these TWO examples.
And YOUR exemplary 'jets' flying low over the water at high speed!
Impressive, but come now!
I'm betting (as a pilot myself) their hands are all over those joysticks making 'minute' adjustments (as one MUST at that altitude) or God help them, they are flying on auto-pilot (radar-altimeter) to ensure things stay nice and [s]flat[/s] err ... sorry, relatively level.
Seek YOUR TRUTH! Are we round, flat, or something better?
As you cannot trust ANYONE with a camera these days, why not give those kids a call, borrow their balloon and SEE FOR YOURSELF!
Build a team! Yes, LEAD and ASSERT instead of filling your basket with suspect fruit!
Slap a GPS(.gov-owned gear though, hmm), altimeter, and supporting gear on several of them, triangulate, and prove that what those deviant children accidentally photographed - is totally wrong. Should only cost a few thousand crowd-funded dollars for a little piece-of-mind, no?
Are you ready to be the likes of Columbus all over again?
Comment