Originally posted by Ben2503
View Post
Listen son, If youre going to accuse me of "nicked" work, it BETTER BE from someone I agree with, ........and not someone I have NO respect for, nor their conclusions.
at 5:24 to 5:30 of that specious and fallacious video (like the rest of the video) he like MOST, speaks about magnetism as if magnetism is driving magnetism.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](http://www.energeticforum.com/core/images/smilies/rolleyes.png)
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](http://www.energeticforum.com/core/images/smilies/rolleyes.png)
![Rolling On Floor Laughing](http://www.energeticforum.com/core/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
He likewise speaks about the "intrinsic nature of magnetic fields influencing his plasma" experiments.
Ergo, hes dead wrong, he has no idea what dielectricity is.
He is committing the fallacy of reification, in giving Prima Causa to magnetism, rather than (hes clueless) knowing (which he doesnt) that magnetism is "the dielectric field"- Faraday, is the RADIATION, the DISCHARGE of dielectricity.
He has reified magnetism as an autonomous entity
![Rolling On Floor Laughing](http://www.energeticforum.com/core/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![Rolling On Floor Laughing](http://www.energeticforum.com/core/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![Rolling On Floor Laughing](http://www.energeticforum.com/core/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
He is well meaning, but his conclusions are specious, his premise dead wrong, his intent is well, but intent has no bearing on accuracy or validity of anything.
run along
Comment