Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[ldrancer]

why do you put copyright on it when their aint nothing there. we dont know what it is.

[sadang]

why do you put copyright on it when their aint nothing there. we dont know what it is.

Is a toy showing a levitating neo magnet between two bismuth diamagnetic disks. Ken melted a piece of pure bismuth to create some disks, here use two of them togheter with another magnet on the top to create the levitation of the small neo magnet in between the bismuth disks. He also managed to programm the bismuth disks to increase their effect.

[boguslaw]

Is a toy showing a levitating neo magnet between two bismuth diamagnetic disks. Ken melted a piece of pure bismuth to create some disks, here use two of them togheter with another magnet on the top to create the levitation of the small neo magnet in between the bismuth disks. He also managed to programm the bismuth disks to increase their effect.

Remember this ? :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchhausen_trilemma

Long time ago I proposed experiment. I wondered if it's possible to levitate magnet alone if constructed as a powerfull magnet covered totally by a tiny **** of diamagnetic substance. In other words if a light magnet inside a sheet can be pulled up by combined action of magnet and diamagnetic sheet even if low temperature is required it would be like Baron Münchhausen pulling himself and the horse on which he was sitting out of a swamp

[TheoriaApophasis]

Remember this ? :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchhausen_trilemma

Long time ago I proposed experiment. I wondered if it's possible to levitate magnet alone if constructed as a powerfull magnet covered totally by a tiny **** of diamagnetic substance. In other words if a light magnet inside a sheet can be pulled up by combined action of magnet and diamagnetic sheet even if low temperature is required it would be like Baron Münchhausen pulling himself and the horse on which he was sitting out of a swamp

The geometry would have to be PERFECT, but surrounding it would NOT work.


the universe's MOST diamagnetic element, bismuth is ATTRACTED to a powerful magnet at the dielectric inertial plane AND at the centripetal point.

Feeling this using a neo and one of my cast Bismuth disks is VERY apparent.

you can feel the "attraction" (dielectric voidance) between the bismuth and that part of the "magnet".


Bismuth only pushes away centrifugal edge-velocity magnetism.


also casting bismuth like convex surfaces is ideal for stable repulsion of the centrifugal magnetism, making it a more stable model to bump about etc

[TheoriaApophasis]

...

[sadang]

Hi Ken,

Nice images! I understand very well what you try to explain here! Now I think I'm acustomed with the meaning of the words you use. On all these images would be great to draw the boundary of the physical magnet, in this way what your explanation would be a bit more clear for newbies.

What you drew there is indeed the centripetal convergent magnetism, but it is only a projection at 90 degrees on the ferrofluid window of the true centripetal vortex, which has its place on both ends of the magnet. The outher bright rim is the centrifugal divergent magnetism, and the inner darker zone is the centripetal convergent magnetism. The light doesn't pass the bright rim of the centrifugal divergent magnetism because the ether speed is max at the cone on one part, and on the other part the tiny ferrofluid particles are very tight joined due to the max density of the dielectric (of course the max speed at the surface of the magnet). Is this right?

SaDAng

[TheoriaApophasis]

What you drew there is indeed the centripetal convergent magnetism, but it is only a projection at 90 degrees on the ferrofluid window of the true centripetal vortex, which has its place on both ends of the magnet. The outher bright rim is the centrifugal divergent magnetism, and the inner darker zone is the centripetal convergent magnetism. The light doesn't pass the bright rim of the centrifugal divergent magnetism because the ether speed is max at the cone on one part, and on the other part the tiny ferrofluid particles are very tight joined due to the max density of the dielectric (of course the max speed at the surface of the magnet). Is this right?

SaDAng

Yes, thats right.


Its amazing you can see a deep "BOWL" formation on a FLAT side of a cube magnet via 1-2 micron THIN (insanely thin) diluted ferrofluid


all due to the light being twisted like a vortex from the mag fields.

[sadang]

Hi Ken,

The light is twisetd in a specific way, due to its own internal structure. The interaction of two helical dynamics give these specific resultant colours, I mean changes in the steps (aka wavelenght) of the resultant gradients of reflected/diffracted helical dynamic of ether. In this configuration of ferrofluid cells and the RGB strip of LEDs, happens the same kind of interactions like in a CRT display, only in this case the three RGB colors are generated from the side, not behind the screen as with the CRT screen.

Exactly as in these images of yours in which the white line of the center of ferrocel appears due to the unpolarized ether, of the dielectric inertial plane, and the bluish-green on the left and redish colour on the right due to the induced CW or CCW magnetism on the tiny particles of ferrofluid which make the induced magnetism to interact with the light coming to them, and to result these specific colours.

Of course to comprehend these kind of helical interactions, is required a non-linear way of thinking and a bit of imagination and 3D view! Or to study the work of Henry Coanda and his well known effect. Or to put hands on two srews and paly with them!

SaDAng

[TheoriaApophasis]

Of course to comprehend these kind of helical interactions, is required a non-linear way of thinking and a bit of imagination and 3D view! Or to study the work of Henry Coanda and his well known effect. Or to put hands on two srews and paly with them!

SaDAng

Yes, thats where 25 years of study of ancient Prakrit and especially ancient Greek "HELP" (like, a LOT).


non-linear retroductive logic. There is a wholly lost "thinking" art called Apophaticism used by Tesla, his guru Roger Boskovich, Plato, Plontinus, Pythagoras, Faraday, etc etc etc.



You can think of the dielectric inertial plane of the "magnet" as a vacuum cleaner sucking up ALL the light (hence WHITE there)

.......and the other two "ends" or poles are , as per the light there, "getting their necks twisted" inversely

[Peter0001]

Hi Ken,
Thanks for the great free book. I have been enjoying your threads.
I keep trying to visualize the 3d magnetic field and the dielectric plane.

Does this animation from a Nassim Haramein lecture have any similarity to the magnetic field as you see it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYOIBtxxark

The dielectric plane is not shown in the animation but i see the field spinning out from the dielectric and spinning in at the pole back to the centre of the magnet.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi Ken,
Thanks for the great free book. I have been enjoying your threads.
I keep trying to visualize the 3d magnetic field and the dielectric plane.

Does this animation from a Nassim Haramein lecture have any similarity to the magnetic field as you see it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYOIBtxxark

The dielectric plane is not shown in the animation but i see the field spinning out from the dielectric and spinning in at the pole back to the centre of the magnet.

Currently the book is merely an INTRO.


It will be very soon (end of year) 3X the current size, I already have all the data.

Im adding another 40 pages or so to be done by mid-Sept. Mostly done with that.

Ill have to check his video.

[ldrancer]

ok my question. in comparison to a magnet, directly, how does AC electricty work? whats the difference between it and DC? does ayone have just a good understanding and can give a quick explaination? as compared to all this stuff that theoriasis has been saying?

and then what was telsa trying to do? how is it compared to a magnet? i guess, noone knows since people are trying to do it right?

because, everything revolves around a magnet. HAHA.. no pun intended. wait no joke intended.

anyway, so how is ac and dc related to a magnet and what theorosasis has been talking about here. so if you understnad, how a magnet works and things are related to it, i think i wathched a show where it kind of showed how tesla came up with AC current. watching a sunrise. or something like that, sunset.. ehm or something.

itd help me if i knew what was already out there. and a comparison to a magnet how theorasis has explained it, in his showing their ways they turn and move and stuff.

itd help to look at this too to understand how tesla was working on stuff too

[Dog-One]

The Curl of Spin

3.4 ~ The Curl of Spin

Having seen that the divergence of spin results from the mathematical operation of the scalar product of del and spin, we may next look at the vector product of these two quantities. This produces the curl of spin, and again the detailed mathematical developments will be deferred until we study the properties of the magnetic field, because the curl of spin is the magnetic field. This may come as something of a shock, particularly in the light of certain of our preconceived ideas regarding the structure of magnetic fields. However, skepticism has never yet made a fact go away, and the magnetic field is still the curl of a spin.

Incidentally, at this point we may inject a comment that was directed at our science and in particular of our knowledge of magnetism: "Scientists of Earth know an amazing number of things about magnetism which are not so!", and in the light of the understanding of the true nature of magnetism this statement is most appropriate. The two things that are possibly closest to our daily lives of the entire physical science are magnetism and gravitation, and these are the things about which we have the wildest misconceptions. One of our queer ideas about magnetic fields is that they are made up of lines of force that loop around and close on themselves. Undoubtedly we got this idea from playing with iron filings and a magnet. What we didn't see, however, was what happened inside the magnet. In fact, the field does not close on itself and inside the magnet it has exactly the same sense of direction as outside. These and many more features of the magnetic field will be demonstrated later.

Wilbert B. Smith: The New Science

[TheoriaApophasis]

Wilbert B. Smith: The New Science

In fact, the field does not close on itself and inside the magnet it has exactly the same sense of direction as outside.






Yes, thats the incommensurable nature of a "magnet", really a dielectric coherent object, either by increase in capacitance of by coherent induction from another to soft iron for example.

thats point non-specific self-similarity.


It all follows the Poincare' disk model wherein loss of dielectric inertia (ie dielectric radiation /discharge) necessitates a spatial divergence.


THE LOSS OF DIELECTRICAL INERTIA, IN DISCHARGE NECESSITATES ITS SPATIAL VECTORIZATION INTO POLARIZATION, THIS IS THE ETHER-MODALITY “MAGNETISM”.





The most "RADICAL" thing I have said, time and again, I have recieved no backlash on.

That being that "there is UTTERLY NO SUCH ENTITY as magnetic attraction"



Either they

1. think it too crazy to respond to

2. too radical to approach

or 3. both 1 and 2

[Dog-One]

THE LOSS OF DIELECTRICAL INERTIA, IN DISCHARGE NECESSITATES ITS SPATIAL VECTORIZATION INTO POLARIZATION, THIS IS THE ETHER-MODALITY “MAGNETISM”.


The most "RADICAL" thing I have said, time and again, I have recieved no backlash on.

That being that "there is UTTERLY NO SUCH ENTITY as magnetic attraction"


Either they

1. think it too crazy to respond to
2. too radical to approach
or 3. both 1 and 2

So if ol' Wilbert gained his understanding from "The Boys Topside", I have to ask you Ken, did you just rediscover it, or did those same "Boys" pay you a visit too?