Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[Allcanadian]

@TA

3 TESLA perm. maggies can be made by stacking magnets into a pyramid, theyre used in special needs, medical testing etc etc etc.

see here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNtZ...QsEFmAh-TAWwrw

That pyramid magnet reminds me of the work of Karl Schappeller, I read most of the literature I could find on his work almost ten years ago now. At the time I was also reading Victor Schabergers work and I found both to be very in-depth and abstract...enlightening. Maybe that was when I lost my mind...or possibly gained it... sometimes it is hard to say relatively speaking.

In any case I have probed most magnet geometries with hall effect senor arrays I have designed and all are not created equal. In the far field maybe so but the near field is quite another matter...interesting stuff.

AC

[TheoriaApophasis]

@TA


That pyramid magnet reminds me of the work of Karl Schappeller, I read most of the literature I could find on his work almost ten years ago now. At the time I was also reading Victor Schabergers work and I found both to be very in-depth and abstract...enlightening. Maybe that was when I lost my mind...or possibly gained it... sometimes it is hard to say relatively speaking.

In any case I have probed most magnet geometries with hall effect senor arrays I have designed and all are not created equal. In the far field maybe so but the near field is quite another matter...interesting stuff.

AC

I know that guy in the video, hes close friends with my associate.

He USED to be the biggest maggie seller in the USA

now hes invented some top secret stuff for cleaning pollution using magnets


Hes been making a fortune in China doing work.

hush hush.




Pyramid maggies work as a dielectric constriction portal for centrifugal divergent magnetism, its nothing "incredible", and yet it is at the same time.



someone asked me "why do pyramid maggies have such HIGH GAUSS fields?"

explain it they asked.....


so I posted this:

[David G Dawson]

TPU & Vacuum Tubes & More Questions

Ken,
Two back to back 4" TV Neck Ferrites with 60mm Ferrite Magnets attached N&S for experiment and I would swear that when I load a 12 pack of the 9mm Bismuth pellets down their throat, I can feel some sort of attraction or opposition.
Something going on there but not understood nor obvious - yet!
Have made these up for some experiments for my TPU version.

Noted your references to photons and your description but how would you explain what we had prior as the 'electron' flow from Cathode to Anode in a Vacuum Tube and the release of 'secondary electrons' from the Anode/Plate.
Can you please put that into words to match your equivalent expressions of a Magnet.
I am into Tubes for reason of the Steven Mark TPU and many other similar projects where pristine pulses are required without the 'noise' and lack of harmonics of solid state.

Also of interest is how you would now describe what 'plasma' is as I feel this phenomena is the last visible electrical manifestation before the unseen Aether comes into the picture.
Can we say that the unseen Aether is actually 'counterspace'?

It never ends - Walter Russell in all of the 25 unseen Elements below Hydrogen which I associate as Aether forms - what is your best guess as to what they actually are?
I only ask these questions because of your deductive ability and will assist in the overall understanding.
Thanks.

Smokey

[TheoriaApophasis]

Two back to back 4" TV Neck Ferrites with 60mm Ferrite Magnets attached N&S for experiment and I would swear that when I load a 12 pack of the 9mm Bismuth pellets down their throat, I can feel some sort of attraction or opposition.
Something going on there but not understood nor obvious - yet!

See video 89
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SaW2otbxAE

bismuth is AS attracted to a magnet , centripetally and along the dielectric inertial plane as is another "magnet"

bismuth only repells centrifugal divergent magnetism , as such the concept of bismuth being "extremely diamagnetic" is only HALF accurate


nothing like laying out 180 POUNDS of bismuth for testing.



Noted your references to photons and your description but how would you explain what we had prior as the 'electron' flow from Cathode to Anode in a Vacuum Tube and the release of 'secondary electrons' from the Anode/Plate.

as per what? the photoelectric effect?

secondary discharge is as expected as flying concrete is when shooting the pavement beneath your feet on the road with a machinegun.

both logical and to be expected.

Also of interest is how you would now describe what 'plasma' is as I feel this phenomena is the last visible electrical manifestation before the unseen Aether comes into the picture.

ionized gas,..... cart before the horse, plasma is already the phenomenal, the 'seen'.

Can we say that the unseen Aether is actually 'counterspace'?

that and dielecticity is, yes.

4 Ether modalities,

dielectricity
magnetism (dielectricity in vectorization/ polarization/ creating space)

and 2 Ether hybrids

electricity and gravity


ole' Eric P Dollard is most assuredly right on one thing (far more than one of course), that being the comprehension of electricity and magnetism and Electrical theory is 100% IMPOSSIBLE without grasping counterspace.

Hes more right than even HE HIMSELF knows.

It never ends - Walter Russell in all of the 25 unseen Elements below Hydrogen which I associate as Aether forms - what is your best guess as to what they actually are?
Smokey

Russell was working on harmonic deduction of what is "to be expected" along his line of reasoning of what "should be there".

Russell was 90% or more correct on things, however he makes more than a few errors.

but compared to everyone elses 20%, hes a genuine example of what is best to strive for.

The fundamental particle is the neutron, of which 'free' becomes , due to its own acceleration/ perturbation necessitates it become a proton within, as i recall 7 to 9 mins. as an autonomous particle.


to say "hydrogen" is just to say " a free neutron that becomes a proton and therefore hydrogen within a few mins."


Harmonics below hydrogen are attributional motions of the Ether that cannot be defined, except for 2 that I know of.

one I wont talk about, it would take to long, the other is expressed by: 1/Phi^-3

discovery I made 12 years ago that I have 100s of pages of notes on.

it and its byproducts (phi, 1/phi/ 1/Phi^-2, Phi squared) pop up everywhere

including gyromagnetic precession, divergence and field pressure mediation, growth on and on and on.

[sadang]

Harmonics below hydrogen are attributional motions of the Ether that cannot be defined, except for 2 that I know of.

This sentence makes me think to the 2 elements which are before hydrogen in the original periodic table of elements of Mendeleev, from 1906. I know he made the mistake (so far as I read about him and his work) to assimilate the ether to matter and/or chemical substances, but on the other part he was right when assumed the ether as the generator of everything, being the quintessence of everything in this world, and from which results the formation of all matter.

Finally I received the linear Hall sensors, so next week I hope to have time to make the measurements of the strenght of N and S poles of different magnets.

[TheoriaApophasis]

This sentence makes me think to the 2 elements which are before hydrogen in the original periodic table of elements of Mendeleev, from 1906. I know he made the mistake (so far as I read about him and his work) to assimilate the ether to matter and/or chemical substances, but on the other part he was right when assumed the ether as the generator of everything, being the quintessence of everything in this world, and from which results the formation of all matter.

Finally I received the linear Hall sensors, so next week I hope to have time to make the measurements of the strenght of N and S poles of different magnets.

not only N and S but as ANY gauss meter will show you have wholly diff readings on

1. centripetal

2. centrifugal / the edge

3. the intermediate


all hyper-logical and completely expected as per the accurate model of magnetism.

[MasterBlaster]

Theo,
I tried downloading the latest book from the link on your first post in this thread.
Sorry but the download seems corrupted. I tries several times.

thank you

[TheoriaApophasis]

Theo,
I tried downloading the latest book from the link on your first post in this thread.
Sorry but the download seems corrupted. I tries several times.

thank you

3rd edition will be out in a week or so.

but the second is here on another site:
https://archive.org/details/magnetism1small

Embarrassingly, having made 90 videos in the past couple of months I should have been more busy on expanding the 3rd edition.

I have about 180 pages MORE to add, but will only reach about 1/3rd of that in addition in the 3rd edition.

Getting the fluffy easy stuff out of the way first, and then formation all the notes of the 'hardcore' tougher stuff for 4th and 5th editions.

Im glad I have another 180 pages of genuine substance, however am utterly pissed at myself for

1. needing to sleep every few days
2. having spent too much time in videos and experimentation rather than 100% on the book

but at least I have the 180 pages in my mind and also in notes, its all there and ready.

[MasterBlaster]

3rd edition will be out in a week or so.

I have about 180 pages MORE to add, but will only reach about 1/3rd of that in addition in the 3rd edition.

but at least I have the 180 pages in my mind and also in notes, its all there and ready.

Looks like the distractors and trolls are succeeding!

[TheoriaApophasis]

Looks like the distractors and trolls are succeeding!

getting the flu and running into some rental property emergencies doesnt help



some saying about "life is what happens when you're making plans"

[sadang]

Hi Ken,

Today I finally managed to complete the experiment that I told you! I mean the experiment to measure the magnetic filed strength at N and S poles. As I expected, the value are different, ie the N pole is stronger than S pole with an average of 25 Gauss. But what is more important is the measurement made revealed an astonishing structure of the magnetic field, which is according to your theory.

If at the starting distance from the Hall sensor I read a N field, at another specific shorter distance the field suddenly changes its polarity becoming S pole having two maxim values exactly on the middle of the two arc segments, and a minim value exactly in the center of the magnet. This case is happening for both sides of the magnet. The only difference is in the strength of the poles, ie N is stronger than S pole.

I made measurements for the types of speaker magnets and a neodymium magnet. The same astonishing structure is repeating for all three magnets, with the observation that the neodymium magnet field is more concentrated around the magnet distances where the field is changingbeing much reduced compared to the speaker magnet.

The above image is an animation (relative dimension and not at scale) of the experiment. I can also upload an excel file with values measured and more explanations. Only for who is interested!

however, I will need to repeat this experiment with as many magnets, various shapes, powers and composition. I need to convince myself that I'm not mistaken somewhere, perhaps setting up the experiment or the interpretation of results. Anyway, first impression is overwhelming, totally different from what can be seen with compass and magnetic film. I am open to all the suggestions and recommendations.

Hope tomorrow to make a video file with the entire measurement. I have to find a best angle to fit the entire configuration.

SaDAng

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi Ken,
But what is more important is the measurement made revealed an astonishing structure of the magnetic field, which is according to your theory.

there will be a gyromagnetic precession offset as necessitated, but also check that you're performing the experiment perpendicular to the earths poles also.

Some of my acute experiments were flubbed because I forget I was performing the experiments in alignment with one or both poles.

But you are correct as per the difference between both poles.

The biological experiments I have performed (which are ENDLESS) show time and time and time and TIME AGAIN a serious difference.

There are 2 other biological experiments I wont talk about with similar findings.


The poles are pressure flux quantitatively the same, but qualitatively different

however as per the gauss difference there is a necessitated gyromagnetic diffusement between flux density as measured by the gauss meter between the two poles in discrepancy.

However also this can be reversed in a soft magnet.


The polarity hyperboloid is offset in flux density between either pole, as must necessarily be the case for gyromagnetic precession to even have a pressure equalibrium, this spatial flux density difference is both measurable and quantifiable.


and my biological experiments 'report' back amazing agreement


I can ACTUALLY SAY WITH 10,000% CERTAINTY I CAN TASTE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN N AND S POLES.




See below:






See also my discovery I expected to see,....proving and showing diff. light dispersion along polarity


This discovery of mine has been already confirmed by 2 others.

[Bob Smith]

check that you're performing the experiment perpendicular to the earths poles also.

Some of my acute experiments were flubbed because I forget I was performing the experiments in alignment with one or both poles.

Hi Ken
Just to be clear, if the magnet is perpendicular to the earth's poles, then do I need to ascertain with a compass the direction of the earth's poles, and then make sure the magnet's N and S faces are up and down, rather than facing N and S? Sorry, I'm a little confused, and would like to consider this as an option for physical healing (a tooth).

Bob
BTW Thanks for posting the books.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi Ken
Just to be clear, if the magnet is perpendicular to the earth's poles, then do I need to ascertain with a compass the direction of the earth's poles, and then make sure the magnet's N and S faces are up and down, rather than facing N and S? Sorry, I'm a little confused, and would like to consider this as an option for physical healing (a tooth).

Bob
BTW Thanks for posting the books.

Just do your working experiments, depending on WHAT that experiment is (???) perpendicular to N and S pole of the earth



As for your tooth goodness knows if that sensitive nerve will be affected, but the N pole retards (namely the whole body is water) growth, pain , etc etc.


but not JUST the pole, the EDGE of the north pole.

(same as the pole on ANY magnet).


Any gaussmeter will show this as well, you use the EDGE of either pole you want to use (for experiments etc etc).


People only think in terms of polarity, but ANY and ALL magnets have multiple pressure zones, centrifugal divergent, convergent centripetal,


So, every 360 degrees of a single cycle of the turn of a magnet you have:
2 Ether-field modalities: dielectricity and magnetism (of course).
6 total pressure domain fluctuations, 2 centripetal, 2 centrifugal, and 2 dielectric
10 field-boundary gradients

[Bob Smith]

Thanks Ken!
Bob