Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    You have decided to attack the Pope, Mother Mary and effectively God and all who believe in God in the first few pages of your book.
    I thought it was supposed to be about Magnetism.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Netica View Post
      You have decided to attack the Pope, Mother Mary and effectively God and all who believe in God in the first few pages of your book.
      I thought it was supposed to be about Magnetism.

      Mmm, nope. Intro is only 2.5 pages long. The other attack I got was for attacking the fool Richard Feynman.

      Nobody should EVER "try to be all things to all people"

      If you don't like the intro, don't read it. However what you refer to is merely ONE sentence

      You certainly didn't pay for it

      Logically , attacking 1 to 2 sentences out of 110 pages, is patently absurd.
      But thats ok.

      Additionally, I made no such 'attack',....... what you refer to was merely an analogy to the "Cult of Quantum" explanation of magnetism as regards "Virtual photons". (i.e. nonsense).

      If however, you assume I am some atheist, nothing could be further from the truth.
      However none of THAT, has anything to do with magnetism.


      I've never judged any book by its cover, OR its intro. This might be a rule to follow.
      Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-08-2014, 03:50 AM.

      Comment


      • #33
        I like your theory, even just for the simple fact that it does not agree with current electromagnetic theory. I'd be glad to know that has a practical application, that brings something new in a practical way, not just theoretically. I got to page 41 and so far everything you wrote is ok for me, many common things to Keely, Russell, Shauberger, Meyer, Grebennikov, and also many others who have sustained dynamic helical of ether as fundamental dynamics of universe.

        After I'll finish reading the whole article, I will return with some questions, comments, suggestions if I deem necessary. Of course if you agree.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by sadang View Post
          I like your theory, even just for the simple fact that it does not agree with current electromagnetic theory. I'd be glad to know that has a practical application, that brings something new in a practical way, not just theoretically. I got to page 41 and so far everything you wrote is ok for me, many common things to Keely, Russell, Shauberger, Meyer, Grebennikov, and also many others who have sustained dynamic helical of ether as fundamental dynamics of universe.
          After I'll finish reading the whole article, I will return with some questions, comments, suggestions if I deem necessary. Of course if you agree.

          Kind regards, I am already well into the 3rd edition


          New sections including formulas,
          and a section on field incommensurability
          section on divergent and convergent gradients etc.
          And a section on 'fields vs. space'

          Something amounting to 40+ more pages.



          However I'm currently busy building a new type of motor. (and its killing me).

          Today I was experimenting more with some instrumentation on a borrowed 6" by 2" thick Neodymium magnet

          Id buy one, but they're $800 EACH

          1 Neodymium Magnet 6 x 2 inch Disc N48 Huge Strong | eBay


          It is just an "INSANELY DANGEROUS" beast.... Its one magnet that could just about KILL YOU.

          I already have 100s of magnets, I dont need one of these titanic beasts.
          Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-08-2014, 06:56 AM.

          Comment


          • #35
            I've actually thought about the magnetic flux lines being one with space some months ago in order to explain some thought experiments and the nature of induction in coils, to tell you the truth this is just another way to calculate things it doesn't bring new results just make you more flexible in terms of motor design e.t.c..... elinas ise re?
            Last edited by tachyon; 07-08-2014, 07:29 AM.
            The pure in heart will see the light.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by tachyon View Post
              I've actually thought about the magnetic flux lines being one with space some........just another way to calculate things it doesn't bring new results

              In conventional motor design and calculations that is true.


              However the far reaching implications in other arenas, other designs, ...is immense and mind boggling.

              Best of all (well, not best, but wonderful ) it takes relativity and its insane reifications OF SPACE "as something" that "does something" etc etc.

              ....and flushes it at the speed of C-squared right down the toilet.

              Comment


              • #37
                what's interesting is how this relation relates xD to space contraction of earth itself and how this perserves energy in the end I will let you think about it, think xD about what happens when particles fall down to earth, in a sense the voltage potential of earth can be deduced from it, about the photons you say I remember some guy Lapoint making videos about this structure but some say photons are really fast (time dilluted) electrons which may be more true than this.

                feynman is a smart dude that makes everything overcomplicated

                what do you mean "However the far reaching implications in other arenas, other designs, ...is immense and mind boggling." about mass and gravity?
                Last edited by tachyon; 07-08-2014, 10:12 AM.
                The pure in heart will see the light.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by tachyon View Post
                  what's interesting is how this relation relates xD to space contraction of earth itself and how this preserves energy in the end I will let you think about it, think xD about what happens when particles fall down to earth, in a sense the voltage potential of earth can be deduced from it, about the photons you say I remember some guy Lapoint making videos about this structure but some say photons are really fast (time diluted) electrons which may be more true than this.

                  Feynman is a smart dude btw

                  what do you mean "However the far reaching implications in other arenas, other designs, ...is immense and mind boggling." about mass and gravity?


                  Nope, Feynman was a lobotomized insane asylum patient and a genuine mental midget.


                  I suggest you look AROUND you, at your TV, computer, lights, etc etc etc etc. All that was invented by Tesla, Faraday, Steinmetz, Heaviside, JC Maxwell and some others.

                  The idiots in the religion of quantum generate NOTHING but piles of fictional TRASH. 99% of them do NO experiments, they create NOTHING, then invent NOTHING and their writings would make a drunkard scoff in protest.

                  The ONLY difference between these insane fools of GR and QM and Arthur C. Clarke, for example, is that Arther C Clarke ADMITTED he was a fiction author.




                  When the supposed ‘expert’ and Hollywood-scientist and academic fraud Richard Feynman was asked to explain what magnetism is, how it works, sitting in his chair, he twitched and squirmed like a frog on a hotplate, wiggling and dodging the question, then deflects, and finally says its too complex (for mere mortals) to understand. Eventually he concedes he cannot explain these “forces”. This rather infamous video of a worm on a hotplate can be found everywhere. Likewise, his book so highly praised by his hubris filled academic stooges, “QED strange theory of light and matter” explains magnetism away with angels and unicorns, or rather I should accurately say “virtual photons”, of which there is no quantitative difference between unicorns and the ‘sage’ academic explanation of “virtual photons”, both are patently absurd and offend even the common sense of a ten year old child and people collectively.

                  This is all of course is against Feynman’s own proclamation that “if you can’t explain it to a six year old, then you really don’t understand it”. In this case, the absurdity of unreal particles and mythical abstractions might be enjoyed conceptually by someone with the mind of a six year old. All these mathematical reifications, sadly, fall in line with the unscientific and irrational mythos of mathematical physics (Greek Atomism in reality) of which one of its key proponents declares ......“when common sense fails (to explain things rationally), uncommon sense must be created” L. Susskind

                  Translation?? "When we dont understand something, we make up insane fictional quasi-plausible answers"

                  Nothing was more perturbing and aggravating than watching the demon Richard Feynman sitting in his chair twitching and squirming and fidgeting like a frog on a frying pan when being asked very simplex and logical questions “how does magnetism work?”, “how does one magnet attract another, and what is the medium of this attraction?”. Finally after flopping like a fish on dry land for an enormous amount of time he states: “I cannot answer it in a manner in which you can understand it or that is familiar to you”. That idiots with degrees and acclaim are looked to like a empty-headed religious icon, a clueless fool put on a pedestal, is a timeless human failing, and can be forgiven. However when people assume they know what something is (if they care at all), they do not go looking for the answer to what they already assume they know.

                  That Feynman and others have declared (as he has done in his mystical book: QED strange theory of light and matter) that magnetism is mediated by “virtual photons” is no different than evoking unicorns and angels. Humanity has placed, as dept. chairs in countless universities and likewise, heads of mathematics and physics, people who are quite literally insane, are deep thinkers, but insane ones. The insane asylums of the world are full of genuinely deep thinkers, however it is not for sake of deep thinking they are locked up and away from others! So, taking a cue from Quantum mysticism we then ask the expert (fool) relativist “since you declare magnetism to be mediated by ‘virtual photons’, what is same?”.

                  Answer received? Yes, here we have it: “A virtual particle is an abstraction, which facilitates in calculations and understanding, the term is very vague and loosely defined, they never appear as inputs or outputs of experiments, their existence is questionable at best,…however they are very useful in rendering concepts and making equations balance out”. Well, insanity has been reified, at last!

                  Isnt that a "cute" answer? One would be hard-pressed to find a drunkard buy such religious-level twaddle.


                  Feyman was 100% exactly the.... "deep thinking insane fool" - Nikola Tesla made mention of.

                  The one good thing about Feynman is, that he isn't generating anymore quantum insanity "Negative momentum gluons" etc etc. Poor sad science fiction writer that he was.



                  If Feynman was still around, I would 'kiss' him with a tire iron.

                  I HAVE his books, I HAVE his videos. He is genuinely a fool of the highest magnitude. Like Carl Sagan, he was nothing but a "Hollywood scientist".
                  Smooth talker, personable, makes jokes. 100 Charisma points, and 0 wisdom points.


                  What Photons? what Electrons? these are unreal reifications of field and charges.

                  No, "far reaching" as meant that space is purely attributional to fields and not something in "which a field is", rather is an attribute OF a field.
                  "no fields in space", only space IN a field.



                  “The more you see how strange nature behaves, the harder it is for us to make a model that explains even the how
                  the most simple phenomena works. Theoretical physics has given up on this pursuit.” – R. Feynman

                  Such a statement (as above from Richard Phoneyman) deserved a backhanded slap with brass knuckles.
                  Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-08-2014, 10:48 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Edit Duplicate post


                    (this site has a serious issue double posting when using Firefox)
                    Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-08-2014, 10:20 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      However the far reaching implications in other arenas, other designs, ...is immense and mind boggling.
                      This is exactly for what I like alternative theories! Because the answers in the actual scientific paradigm are totally useless and circular answers. Really far from the real, simple and beautifull explanations, just descriptions of some only predictable results, explained in terms as more complicated as possbile as to not understand anything and just give the impression of depth of thought and research. Unpredictable results are not paid any attention. This model was used and aplied by J.J. Thomson when imposed (by Cavendish Laborator and its financial supporters) the electron as a particle. The same was used by Milikan when imposed the value of the electric charge of the same electron as particle (against the Ehrenhaft who using the same path of thinking proved the existence of magnetic monopoles, magnetic current and the helical movement of magnetic flux). The same method was used by Menshutkin from University of Petesburg when in 1907 removed the ether form Period Table of Mendeleev (to prepare the field for the new relativistic paradigm). Also the same method was follwed for the original 20 ecuations of Maxwell, which today are just four, and by which is modeled the entire actual sci-tech world, and examples can continue. I'm tired and disgusted by actual science, its founders and their way to interpret the experimental results, and to neglect what was not according to their predictions.

                      To understand magnetism based on ether dynamics is really mind boggling! To understand the world, seen and unseen, based on ether, means to change totally the current paradigm of thinking. The horizonts are truly infinite as space, time and... speed! And all these are merely limiting human terms, which are in fact manifestations of eternal and everlasting and eternal ether.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by sadang View Post
                        Unpredictable results are not paid any attention.

                        Indeed so, I have been saying for years and in a lecture that NOBODY

                        A: goes looking for something they DENY exists to begin with

                        B: goes looking for answers regarding something they ASSUME (due to academic hubris which is TITANIC) they already know the answers to.


                        Academic methodology is PURE TRASH. 10,000%

                        “I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties.” - N. Tesla

                        “Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. ” - N. Tesla


                        Tesla's "bible" was the work of Roger Boskovich THEORY OF NATURAL PHILOSOPHY, who himself was a hardcore student of the Retroductive method of Plato and the Platonists.

                        Boskovich's main source was the PERIPHYSEON 5 Vol. work (which most people have never heard of).



                        Originally posted by sadang View Post
                        To understand magnetism based on ether dynamics is really mind boggling! To understand the world, seen and unseen, based on ether, means to change totally the current paradigm of thinking.

                        When I get flack from those in the Cult of Quantum, I remind them that their "crowd" has produced NOTHING, invented NOTHING, and their writings offend even a drunk fool.


                        If it was created, designed or inspired , it was made by Tesla, Faraday, Maxwell, Steinmentz, Heaviside etc etc.

                        All these people outright admitted the Ether, even the demented fool Einstein (before he lost his mind) admitted to the Ether/Aether.

                        "When the electric current comes into being, it immediately sets the surrounding Ether into some kind of instantaneous motion, the
                        nature of which has still not been exactly determined. In spite of the continuation of the cause of this motion, namely the electric
                        current, the motion ceases, but the Ether remains in a potential state and produces a magnetic field. That the magnetic field is a
                        potential state [of the Ether] is shown by the [existence of a] permanent magnet, since the principle of conservation of energy excludes
                        the possibility of a state of motion in this case. The motion of the Ether, which is caused by an electric current, will continue until the
                        acting [electro-] motive forces are compensated by the equivalent passive forces which arise from the deformation caused by the
                        motion of the Ether itself." –(“Concerning the Investigation of the State of Ether in Magnetic Fields” by Albert Einstein)


                        Here is the REAL TRUTH of the matter well put:

                        “The word Ether has extremely negative connotations in theoretical physics only because its past association with opposition to
                        relativity. This is unfortunate because stripped of these connotations, it nicely captures the way most physicists actually thin about the
                        vacuum. The modern concept of vacuum space confirmed by every experiment is a relativistic Ether. But we do not call it this because
                        Ether is a taboo term.” - Robert B. Laughlin


                        What GR and QM have done, in their insanity, is reify an attribute of a (or any) FIELD, that being space, "as something" that "does something" and "acts on X"


                        Its like saying "anger" kicks a rock (i.e. space did it)
                        The answer is ...... "no, you demented fool the PERSON (Aether) WITH the attribute of anger (space) kicked/moved the rock".

                        Typical bass-ackwards counter-logical pseudo-intellectual reifications and false causation-processing conclusions from the insanity of GR and QM.



                        “The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one century than in all the previous centuries of its existence.” – Nikola Tesla (referring to Ether science)


                        “In order to understand electricity, you have to have an understanding of counterspace, otherwise it’s impossible.”- Eric P. Dollard
                        Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-08-2014, 05:37 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          I haven't read much of feynman but I have his book an online version is here FLP Vol. II Table of Contents so I don't have an opinion about your writings. He seemed smart to me because it's hard to understand him lol :P
                          Last edited by tachyon; 07-08-2014, 10:27 PM.
                          The pure in heart will see the light.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by tachyon View Post
                            I haven't studied feynman very much but it's the virtual photons that pisses off everyone that I know for sure :P

                            Thats only part of it. They explain EPR away with "particles traveling from the future to cause effects on the results"
                            Sometimes these insane folks in QM academia say "sometimes its like there are ghosts affecting the results"- Susskind


                            negative momentum particles that 'cause gravity'
                            Unicorns, angels, leprechauns....... maybe Zeus did it?

                            Math doesnt zero out? NO PROBLEM, create a NEW PARTICLE which MAKES it zero out.
                            Taa-daaa (well, nature doesnt work that way). Nor does rationality and common sense.


                            GR and QM contains an enormous pantheon of BS so absurd, so insane, so irrational that a drunkard on crack would (and should) scoff.


                            Human creatures believe these demonic fools because they're "peer reviewed" demons. Which merely means If the person under you writes the SAME STUFF (in agreement) then its "professionally peer reviewed" nonsense.
                            Its like 2 dung beetles agreeing how much they love the smell and sight of fecal matter.

                            Quackademia brain washing the sheeple
                            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvUD6MWufIc

                            hilarious<


                            “Scientists today think deeply rather than clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane. Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander thru equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no basis in reality.” – Nikola Tesla

                            “You can always recognize a relativist, they will either ask you for your credentials, or offer their credentials without you asking for or about them.”

                            “Nothing is more fantastical and a travesty of how nature works than is quantum theory. Its very basis has no relationship to reality.” – W. Russell


                            “Where common sense and intuition failed, we (the insane relativists) had to create a new form of intuition based upon abstract (unreal) mathematics. When common sense fails, we must create uncommon sense.” -Leonard Susskind, professor theoretical physics, and priest of the cult of Quantum

                            Quantum insanity: “Everything we call real is made up of things that cannot be real.” – N. Bohr
                            Quantum insanity: “The more you see how strange nature behaves, the harder it is for us to make a model that explains even the how the most simple phenomena works. Theoretical physics has given up on this pursuit.” – R. Feynman



                            Mother Nature does not calculate, does not do math, she only knows of three pairs, spatial-counterspatial, centrifugal-centripetal, and charge-discharge. With these three conjugates, the entire cosmos is painted in full detail.
                            Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-08-2014, 10:37 PM.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Deleted duplicate post
                              Last edited by thx1138; 07-09-2014, 03:18 AM.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                @TheoriaApophasis

                                I've often wondered why Dr. Tesla went to the trouble to patent his fountain.
                                TESLA PATENT 1,113,716 FOUNTAIN

                                Thank you for the insight into Dr. Tesla's later work being about dielectricity and counterspace.

                                That gives a whole new perspective of his "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" and "DIAGRAM b. OBTAINING ENERGY FROM THE AMBIENT MEDIUM".


                                I have been looking for over a year for the source of the Tesla quote “If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6, and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.” and have yet to find it. Have you come across it in your researches? I'm looking for the context.

                                Mother Nature does not calculate, does not do math, she only knows of three pairs, spatial-counterspatial, centrifugal-centripetal, and charge-discharge. With these three conjugates, the entire cosmos is painted in full detail.
                                That covers the 3 and the 6.
                                3X1 = the fundamentals: space, force, & charge
                                3X2 = the fundamental conjugates
                                3X3 = ?
                                Any ideas about the 9 or is the quote hogwash invented by numerologists? Without the context it is meaningless jibberish.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X