Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[sadang]

Therefore how can we have counter space if we don't also have space ?

And what if I ask "Therefore how can we have space if we don't also have counter space ?" Sense the difference! It is real or apparent?

[TheoriaApophasis]

And what if I ask "Therefore how can we have space if we don't also have counter space ?" Sense the difference! It is real or apparent?

I will be done late morrow on the scans,.....alas due to some awful creature that gave me a deathly case of the FLU that barely kept me lucid the past 5 days.


some disease ridden subhuman creeping with cooties.


Im already halfway done.



yes yes on counterspace, however such a term is mere contrivance, as is space.


Space is nothing, is a privation, by which we define "something", ie inertia, or energy, the "Field", etc.

space being neither force nor field, it is nothing by which we measure that which is 'something' which IS NOT part nor parcel to space which = nothing.


Space, like a shadow, is NOTHING but the contrivance we deem as a boundary and region where LIGHT IS NOT (= shadow).

such too is space, of course.

[Ufopolitics]

About a North and South definition?

Hello Ken,


In all your drawings showing the true magnetic field spectrum and dynamics, if we use the Dielectric Plane to establish what is above and below it...we see a perfectly symmetrical structure, where dielectric plane 'mirrors' same above as below,including its rotations and counter rotations, centripetal and centrifugal emanations and returns to center plane...:

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

And believe me, I have read your book many, many times, and still doing it, lots of respect for your excellent work friend!, as I agree 100% with your proven theory about EM Fields...meaning, I know Voidance and Counter-Voidance as "Attract" and "Repulse" known terms...as what causes it to effect both:

[IMG][/IMG]

From where we could call (as you do on page 30)...A Convergent Voidance where we include the 'acting force' to effect an Attraction or by 'tendency' to dissipate motion by increased motion...right?

So, Convergent forces generate Voidance (Attraction), while Divergent Forces create Counter-Voidance or Repulsion.

Now, going back to previous Diagrams...if this EM Field Spectrum is Symmetrical in all Dynamics given a dielectric center plane...

My question is...how is it possible the 'permanent status' of a magnet side off the symmetric plane always acting with Convergent Forces...while the other side of this 'apparently identical' sides...always acting with Divergent Forces?

According to your Diagrams every magnet should have both forces acting within the same spaces on both magnetic poles, meaning in every North Pole there is always a South side within its inner space...and viceversa?

So, in order to define a North or a South pole will consist on which Force (Convergent or Divergent) would be stronger than the other?

Better said...'predominant' than the other force?

But then...it would not be a Symmetrical System from the Dielectric Plane point of view...

I will get a bit 'surrealistic' about this...so, say we found a mass less material that carries a magnetic field within...so we approach two pieces of this exotic material and suppose they are approaching in voidance mode or by attraction sides...and we let them collide each others to a 'null space' of the sphere...now, since material is mass less...they will exactly become one single piece aligned exactly by their center dielectric plane...taken there by the convergent forces.

So actually a mass magnet is actually 'trying' to do just that...but the body or mass does not allows it to intersect dielectric planes perfectly but getting as close as body dimensions would allow.

So tell me, without any hesitation...am I just completely out of my mind...or is this the way it takes place...

Regards Friend and thanks in advance for your answer!


Ufopolitcs

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hello Ken,


In all your drawings showing the true magnetic field spectrum and dynamics, if we use the Dielectric Plane to establish what is above and below it...we see a perfectly symmetrical structure, where dielectric plane 'mirrors' same above as below,including its rotations and counter rotations, centripetal and centrifugal emanations and returns to center plane...:

We/you/etc. need to know the TRUE definition of POLARIZED.


There is no "mirror(ed)" S vs. N "pole". Rather that magnetism is FORCE and divergence OF WHICH inertia, the coherent FORCED AT, not located dielectric inertial plane of said magnet is always, obviously so OPPOSITE of ALL FORCE and divergence.

i.e. the center and OPPOSITE to all space ( that 'center' of course =counterspace).


One/anyone needs to spend 20 mins. thinking about the fact there there is NO SUCH thing as a "N pole" vs. a "S pole", rather the necessitated opposite of space and divergence = inertia and counterspace.


Natures "sphere" begins with the hyperboloid. A sphere is already = space, a posterior ABSENCE of both inertia and the Field.


space is nothing, is neither force nor field , and can "have no properties" - TESLA




LIKEWISE we/you/etc. need to define what a magnet is, its a mass of polarized atoms (as are ALL atoms) that are likewise COHERENT and operating in polarized unison.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hello Ken,
From where we could call (as you do on page 30)...A Convergent Voidance where we include the 'acting force' to effect an Attraction or by 'tendency' to dissipate motion by increased motion...right?
Ufopolitcs

No, the dissipation of force and motion (= magnetism) is increasing inertia / acceleration, said voidance is the 'erasure' of space/force/ motion.

As for dielectric voidance, there is no force involved, just the inverse.


there is no force involved in a falling object (to earth, etc), rather the elimination of the posterior attribute of force and motion, ie space, as expressing Counterspace.

only 2 principles in the universe, Force/motion (divergence) and inertia(the Field/Ether)/acceleration (convergence).

So, Convergent forces generate Voidance (Attraction), while Divergent Forces create Counter-Voidance or Repulsion. Ufopolitcs

Its a bit diff. than your implication, its mirrored cancellation (M.C.) of which Im writing much about currently.

like on like you have force and motion (incorrect BS deemed "magnetic repulsion") .

and of course the inverse of that.......

Now, going back to previous Diagrams...if this EM Field Spectrum is Symmetrical in all Dynamics given a dielectric center plane...

My question is...how is it possible the 'permanent status' of a magnet side off the symmetric plane always acting with Convergent Forces...while the other side of this 'apparently identical' sides...always acting with Divergent Forces?
Ufopolitcs

Not always symmetrical, obviously, but that is SIMPLEX phase shift as also seen in magnetic reciprocation.

Even tesla talks about this and co-eternal INSTANT action-reaction, a see-sawing of transverse EM phenomena around a dielectric 'center'

LIkewise as spelled out in the book, light IS NOT, CANNOT be "electromagnetic", additionally the Photoelectric effect for the first time is accurately and logically and hyper-rationally explained as contrary to the BS conclusions of that mental midget einstien.

According to your Diagrams every magnet should have both forces acting within the same spaces on both magnetic poles, meaning in every North Pole there is always a South side within its inner space...and viceversa?
[/B] Ufopolitcs

All space is a posterior attribution of the EXPRESSED (past tense) force(s) of magnetic divergent reciprocation.

remember that NO field nor field divergence can or MAY HAVE space as a terminal for themselves, its illogical and impossible.


There is rarefaction on the N "pole" and compression on the S "pole", but this is simplex phase shift due to gyromagnetic precession necessitated to the polarized system of either an atom of a coherent MASS we deem the "magnet".

So, in order to define a North or a South pole will consist on which Force (Convergent or Divergent) would be stronger than the other?
Ufopolitcs

nope, nothing like that at all. All is defined by either force cancellation or force compounding, remember simplex ADDITIVE or CANCELLING wave analogies, M.C. or mirrored cancellation is very simple if you think about same.

But then...it would not be a Symmetrical System from the Dielectric Plane point of view...
Ufopolitcs

Its pressure symmetrical, but not TEMPORALLY symmetrical due to the necessitated phase shift of spatial (in creation) reciprocation.

I will get a bit 'surrealistic' about this...so, say we found a mass less material that carries a magnetic field within...so we approach two pieces of this exotic material and suppose they are approaching in voidance mode or by attraction sides...and we let them collide each others to a 'null space' of the sphere...now, since material is mass less...they will exactly become one single piece aligned exactly by their center dielectric plane...taken there by the convergent forces.

So actually a mass magnet is actually 'trying' to do just that...but the body or mass does not allows it to intersect dielectric planes perfectly but getting as close as body dimensions would allow.
Ufopolitcs

You have to mentally consider why counterspace is counterspace by definition and what SAID definition DOES, its just simplex like fluid and pressure dynamics, or why "water flows downhill", or why the dielectric inertial plane will ALWAYS self-seek to the "center" or opposite of both "poles" Its very simplex.

So tell me, without any hesitation...am I just completely out of my mind...or is this the way it takes place...
Ufopolitcs

No, rather people just werent brought up to THINK about / IN such terms...........however I was due to intense study of Platonic dialectic (not dielectric!, a diff. term here) retroductive thinking methodology


Ufopolitcs[/QUOTE]



copyright 12-15-2014 Ken L Wheeler
A vortex is a compounded or compounding spatial force vector expression within which or by which magnetic-force vectors are expressed against its/their originating counterspatial dielectric locus (inertia) along a curvilinear force-and-inertia pressure mediation as against the counterspatial locus of said divergent curvilinear expression. Compounded macrocosmic natural phenomena vortex (fluid, environmental) events are void or vacuum convergences against a pressure stasis. Cosmic vortex phenomena are left for another discussion, however are likewise akin to magnetic hypotrochoid expressions. As per magnetic vortex hyperboloids, force and space-creation are torsional (‘inertial-friction’) along golden ratio extrapolations and are additive, whereas convergences are dielectrically multiplicative. This is expressed as space is additive and synonymous with magnetic divergence, whereas counterspace is multiplicative. A magnetic vortex is a dielectric projection of force vectors, which follows a hyperboloid.

A vortex, in simple, is merely a curvilinear expression of force-against-dielectric-inertia reciprocation whereby which no straight lines exist in the universe, in that all force vectors are ‘tethered’ at a counterspatial locus within which and by which any and all divergences are torsional convergences as against a necessitated polarized locus (micro [atomic], or macro [magnet, a coherent mass]) which exists against all space by definition. The hyperboloid is the curvilinear expression of the loss of inertia which is extrapolated as a 3D hypotrochoid, or spatial torus. All geometry is projective geometry; likewise the magnetic hyperboloid is an inertia-and-loss-of-inertia phenomenon by which pressure reciprocation necessitates spheroidal convergence by means of hypotrochoid reciprocation. Negative pressure dynamics mediate pressure force reciprocations towards inverse counterspatial sink. The magnetic hypotrochoid is a convergence by means of polarized divergence vortex by nature, however the center of any and all torus formations, is the hyperboloid. The counterspatial ‘center’ of the torus is dielectric inertia, or counterspace from which the magnetic vortex, or torus is expressed necessitatively.

Even a centrifugal vortex is centripetal, in that it MUST reciprocate the geometry of the hyperboloid to converge centripetally at the opposite spatial displacement of centripetal convergence (“opposite pole”). There are no straight lines in the universe, all force vectors are curvilinear and move along a spiral around one or more counterspatial “tether-points”. Contrary to the pontifications of pseudo-science, there exists NO open vortex phenomena in the universe, all force vectors are CLOSED.

Ultimately a vacuum created vortex (water vortex, water down the drain) or a magnetic vortex are both expressions of counterspace, one a localized void, the other an Ether-convergence. No force ends in space, because space is NOT a receptacle for force, rather the posterior attribute of divergences. All force vectors terminate at the origins, in inertia, or as meant counterspace.

Coherent magnetic reciprocation expressed by a magnet’s (polarization collective with coherency) divergence exists as a pressure-force hyperboloid as necessitated by the dielectric counterspatial locus so-deemed by modern inept and defunct physics as a “Bloch wall”. Inertia is the counterspatial ‘tether point’ at which and by which all force vectors, magnetic and otherwise express curvilinear reciprocations as defined by the space they create in so doing.

The absolute inverse of inertia is nothing, which is space. Space is neither a FIELD nor a FORCE, and has no properties, is it is purely a posterior attribute of the force reciprocations of magnetism. Force is nothing whatsoever, and the expression which gives definition to all phenomena in the universe.


“Under” the spheroidal field (really a force, not a field, only dielectric is the true field, magnetism is purely a force only) of magnetism, either atomic or the magnetic (coherent single mass) exists the spatial-counterspatial HYPERBOLOID, failure to understand this will make your compression of what the term “polarization” both IS and IMPLIES in the definition of what both magnetism IS and is meant, and how this applies to the magnet itself.

[Ufopolitics]

Wow...

Thanks Ken for the fast and detailed answer...

So...could we define all this text in a 'simplified' way?...

Just kidding, I believe I am just starting to understand...

Then, (trying to summarize just some parts of what you wrote)

The Counterspace defined by the Dielectric Plane...is the one having the 'choice' of seeking alignment in only one direction related to another dielectric plane?...so, the convergent and divergent flows are just the forces that -equally disbursed [from and to] the center plane- 'execute' the dielectric 'commands'?...is this right ¿?

Divergent and Convergent are symmetrical from the M.C., but not the dielectric plane itself...

According to Dielectric Plane Counterspace... it acts as an Implosive force inwards a radical gravitational center...trying to nullify field

About Space, Magnetism and Compression (of field) in counter-voidance...is it wrong to express "Spatially Compressed Field"?


Thanks friend


Regards


Ufopolitics

[TheoriaApophasis]

The Counterspace defined by the Dielectric Plane...is the one having the 'choice' of seeking alignment in only one direction to another dielectric plane?...so, the convergent and divergent flows are just the forces that 'execute' dielectric 'commands'?...is this right ¿?

Ufopolitics

DIRECTIONALITY is a quality said of spatial/ temporal things, which is the opposite to the Field / Ether/ inertia / counterspace, .....

ergo it has no application to same.


As for the rest, no......you need to look into and think about the Poincare' disk model.

likewise understand that all geometry is PROJECTIVE geometry.

Euclidean geometry applies to phenomena, now you have to understand the "point" from which ALL GEOMETRY emanates.

According to Dielectric Plane Counterspace... it acts as an Implosive force inwards a radical gravitational center...trying to nullify field
Ufopolitics

Gravity doesnt exist as a 'unique' or autonomous field modality,

Gravity is a BS term applied to counterspatial inertia/acceleration.

No forces are involved in the BS we call gravity.

About Space, Magnetism and Compression (of field) in counter-voidance...is it wrong to express "Spatially Compressed Field"?

Ufopolitics

Pressure mediation phase differentials between "poles" are necessitated to the system of which is expressing a spatial divergence.


Tesla talks about this as well, .....ill find his quotes on same and post them.

[Ufopolitics]

Dual or One Way X-Change?

Hello Ken,

Thanks for the answers...even though I "see" most of the 'complete picture'...is still not really a 'full screen' yet...

I am trying to create a 3D Model, animated of the whole thing...meaning all dynamics of this spectrum, in order to simulate a 'possible' projection(s) on the fluorescent screen of a color CRT...based on the magnetic deviations that the 3 guns (RGB) Deflect into it.

I understand the 'not linearity' or not perfectly 'directional' attributes to the interactions or actions-reactions from convergence-divergence...however, if we try to 'feel' a magnetic force whether voidance or counter-voidance we notice it has a 'center' where accumulation of stronger forces are located, and of course is easier to 'feel' it at counter-voidance...and this 'center' is actually a sphere-like volume, like you cite in your excellent book.

On the 'reciprocation' of two magnetic forces...say at voidance ("attraction")...we have:

[IMG][/IMG]

A Magnet A and A' of identical properties in strength and volume/shape...strength given by a force F=1 on both ends (poles)

Now, it is very well known that when we set them on voidance through an air gap, they BOTH increase strength at the opposite ends of 'bridge' or air gap, I denoted as F>1, just because I could not exactly say the magnitude of increase (have not measured it...yet), but I am SURE is higher than original forces=1.
Obviously as we close the air gap towards a complete voidance of sphere, where they will contact or stick together...then forces will increase to Max values.

From this test... could we conclude that within that 'bridge', there is an even exchange of forces between both ends taking place?...since both 'poles' increase equally in strength greater than one (F>1)...

Now,taking this 'exchange' into electronic circuits vocabulary...we have "Drain" and "Source" NOT ONLY at one point on each face (pole)...BUT, we have Drain and Source constantly exchanging, switching from one point to the other?

In your 'vocabulary' could we say that centripetal forces from one pole are 'networking/channeling' to centrifugal forces from other end pole?

And 'viceversa'?...meaning the centrifugal from previous end is flowing through centripetal of the other side?

Meaning:

Centrifugal 1>>>>Centripetal 1'
Centripetal 1<<<<Centrifugal 1'

Centrifugal forces are flying away from center point, while Centripetal are 'sucking' towards a center (point)(in dielectric of course.

while understanding that rotations and counter-rotations are 'included' in this 'translational exchange' from one pole to the other...

Say this exchange occurs at very high speeds...very high.

Now, if we would only have a 'One Way' flow/exchange...considering 'North' as rarefaction or 'vacuum' and 'South' as opposite...then only one end 'should' become stronger than the side 'sourcing' right?...

however, it is not so, both ends become stronger equally to a full contact(max value) where they will add both magnet strengths to form one stronger magnet than a single one. As well as Dielectric Plane would be 'moved' at the 'seam' from the two surfaces in voidance...like you show on page 91 Image:

[IMG][/IMG]

As I also understand that while the two magnets are closing air gap, the inner 'poles' at bridge are acquiring the properties of becoming closer to a 'future' common dielectric plane/point to become one at full contact, so this poles at bridge are traveling to become null/extinct/gone...

I see this as only two possibilities...dual exchange or single (one way) exchange, of course, looking in 'black and white'..

I am sure you could 'picture' all this events taking place...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[TheoriaApophasis]

testing...... this site has issues.

I keep getting this::::

Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 25956601 bytes) in /home/esmforum/public_html/dbtech/dbseo/includes/class_core.php on line 4436






ANYWAY::::


I WOULD have posted this to the OTHER thread on Krafft, but this website is messed up, I keep getting this::::

Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 25956601 bytes) in /home/esmforum/public_html/dbtech/dbseo/includes/class_core.php on line 4436







anyways:::::


Thank Sandag for these::::


never before digitized works of Carl F. Krafft !!!


I just scanned them in


[B]Hey!!!!!! here it is:




I WOULD have posted this to the OTHER thread on Krafft, but this website is messed up, I keep getting this::::

Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 25956601 bytes) in /home/esmforum/public_html/dbtech/dbseo/includes/class_core.php on line 4436







anyways:::::


Thank Sandag for these::::


never before digitized works of Carl F. Krafft !!!


I just scanned them in


[B]Hey!!!!!! here it is:


KATHODOS DOT COM / KRAFT.pdf


THIS IS THE ONLY WAY I COULD POST THIS::<<<<

[Ufopolitics]

Making some testing...

testing...... this site has issues.

I keep getting this::::

Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 25956601 bytes) in /home/esmforum/public_html/dbtech/dbseo/includes/class_core.php on line 4436






ANYWAY::::


I WOULD have posted this to the OTHER thread on Krafft, but this website is messed up, I keep getting this::::

Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 25956601 bytes) in /home/esmforum/public_html/dbtech/dbseo/includes/class_core.php on line 4436







anyways:::::


Thank Sandag for these::::


never before digitized works of Carl F. Krafft !!!


I just scanned them in


[B]Hey!!!!!! here it is:




I WOULD have posted this to the OTHER thread on Krafft, but this website is messed up, I keep getting this::::

Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 25956601 bytes) in /home/esmforum/public_html/dbtech/dbseo/includes/class_core.php on line 4436







anyways:::::


Thank Sandag for these::::


never before digitized works of Carl F. Krafft !!!


I just scanned them in


[B]Hey!!!!!! here it is:


KATHODOS DOT COM / KRAFT.pdf


THIS IS THE ONLY WAY I COULD POST THIS::<<<<

Hello,


This is a test...

Just testing robot for memory allocation at command <4436> run out of RAM

Processing FTP Transfer>>>>completed


Over>>>


Textbot

[TheoriaApophasis]

I understand the 'not linearity' or not perfectly 'directional' attributes to the interactions or actions-reactions from convergence-divergence...however, if we try to 'feel' a magnetic force whether voidance or counter-voidance we notice it has a 'center' where accumulation of stronger forces are located, and of course is easier to 'feel' it at counter-voidance...and this 'center' is actually a sphere-like volume, like you cite in your excellent book.
Ufopolitics

There is no "center to/of force", rather the INVERSE , a privation of force, counterspace.


You still havent thought LONG and HARD about the term "polarized" .


A magnet does not have "poles", rather the necessitated antinomy of force, the 'center' of which is inertia or counterspace.



Likewise, youre making the same error others do in thinking of a sphere, the magnetic / dielectric geometry is a Hyperboloid.

The sphere is LONG "after the fact" as 'drawn' out by the force reciprocations.

You need to mentalize the hyperboloid to 'get' what magnetism and the magnet is.

On the 'reciprocation' of two magnetic forces...say at voidance ("attraction")
Ufopolitics

There arent two magnetic forces, only one which is inverse to counterspace, anything which is FORCE = "creating space" (incorrectly thought of as "in space"), by which denotatively it is "of a dual/ polarized nature".


once again, the hardcore hardass definition of polarized is not defined in the minds of human critters.

Now, it is very well known that when we set them on voidance through an air gap, they BOTH increase strength at the opposite ends of 'bridge' or air gap, I denoted as F>1, just because I could not exactly say the magnitude of increase (have not measured it...yet), but I am SURE is higher than original forces=1.
Obviously as we close the air gap towards a complete voidance of sphere, where they will contact or stick together...then forces will increase to Max values.
Ufopolitics

all forces are eliminated in voidance, Mirrored force cancellation is increasing inertia and decreasing space/ force / motion.


CONTRARY to sensible "logic", increasing acceleration = DECREASING MOTION (what????? yes, think about that).


in the same fashion as this, gravity is NOT A FORCE, rather the inverse.

no FORCES are involves in "gravity". Gravity has no qualification as a force.


No force is applied in letting a ball drop off a cliff, etc etc.


Gravity doesnt exist, its simply a misnomer for Ethero-static tension, an expression of the equilibrium of inertia



Gravity doesnt exist as some autonomous or unique Ether-modality, nor is Gravity a field, and NOT a force.


The co-gravitational field equations of Dr. Jefimenko and others prove that logically Gravity is just a human BS term given to an expression of counterspatial acceleration INHERENT to matter.

In your 'vocabulary' could we say that centripetal forces from one pole are 'networking/channeling' to centrifugal forces from other end pole?
Ufopolitics

there exists no centripetal forces, thats the opposite of force.

Now, if we would only have a 'One Way' flow/exchange...considering 'North' as rarefaction or 'vacuum' and 'South' as opposite...then only one end 'should' become stronger than the side 'sourcing' right?...
Ufopolitics

such a scenario is impossible.

As I also understand that while the two magnets are closing air gap, the inner 'poles' at bridge are acquiring the properties of becoming closer to a 'future' common dielectric plane/point to become one at full contact, so this poles at bridge are traveling to become null/extinct/gone... .
Ufopolitics

increasing potential, = inertia = acceleration = decreasing motion

not really, but youre close enough.

[Dog-One]

CONTRARY to sensible "logic", increasing acceleration = DECREASING MOTION (what????? yes, think about that).

That's going to take some work yes, as it appears to be in conflict to the well known kinematic equations. So are there two definitions of acceleration and we are using the incorrect one? Or is it because we assume acceleration means increasing speed, i.e. increasing change in position over time?

[TheoriaApophasis]

That's going to take some work yes, as it appears to be in conflict to the well known kinematic equations. So are there two definitions of acceleration and we are using the incorrect one? Or is it because we assume acceleration means increasing speed, i.e. increasing change in position over time?

Simplex in comprehension if you look at it from curvilinear reduction where increasing acceleration = decreasing divergent motion.


Ahhhhhhh the simplex stuff is to "complex" to comprehend.


We dumb humans equate speed with speed, and speed has NO qualification really.


Just as WEIGHT HAS NO MEANING,


weight is LOCATION SPECIFIC and MEDIUM SPECIFIC


A 5 year old can, for example, move around a 800 pound lard-ass with ease if both are in the water.

[Ufopolitics]

increasing acceleration = DECREASING MOTION

That's going to take some work yes, as it appears to be in conflict to the well known kinematic equations. So are there two definitions of acceleration and we are using the incorrect one? Or is it because we assume acceleration means increasing speed, i.e. increasing change in position over time?

Simplex in comprehension if you look at it from curvilinear reduction where increasing acceleration = decreasing divergent motion.


Ahhhhhhh the simplex stuff is to "complex" to comprehend.


We dumb humans equate speed with speed, and speed has NO qualification really.


Just as WEIGHT HAS NO MEANING,


weight is LOCATION SPECIFIC and MEDIUM SPECIFIC


A 5 year old can, for example, move around a 800 pound lard-ass with ease if both are in the water.

@Dog-One:

To 'interpret' T.A properly...we will need a lot of 'abstract mind' as a lot of 'surrealism' as well...

Even with all of that...am still far away...

Let me see...

Is it like accelerating to full throttle, a very fast vehicle...developing high speed to end up hitting a dead end street where a solid steel wall awaits...(dead end wall= counter-space= dielectric plane)

Is there a 'formula' to calculate from a 200+ MPH MASS accelerating towards a >>>FULL DEAD STOP before calling it a 'terrorist"?...

We were taught to simply calculate acceleration along with speed developing towards an open straight drive...or a circle, where we see acceleration vectors traveling away at certain angle...while speed keeps developing within the circular path...

@T.A: Now...I made some mistakes in the example above...and am writing it before you call it...like 'speed'...which 'has no qualification here'
As well as Mass related to Weight considered to 'increase speed'...Nonsense!!
'weight' is another 'Medium and Location Specific' term.

Now, T.A...why don't you like to use the simple term..."Relative" here?

Is it because it was first employed by the fool of Einstein=One Stone?...

However, it is easier to understand from 'Weight Relativity' depending on location and medium...

Now watch how fast T.A says am completely wrong here...

Take care Guys!


Ufopolitics

[TheoriaApophasis]

Is it because it was first employed by the fool of Einstein=One Stone?...

Ufopolitics

dont mention that demon