Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[Dog-One]

@Dog-One:
Is it like accelerating to full throttle, a very fast vehicle...developing high speed to end up hitting a dead end street where a solid steel wall awaits...(dead end wall= counter-space= dielectric plane)

I wish Ken played with coils, diodes, capacitors as much as he has with magnets.

Now counter-space, that one has got me thinking...

Here's my from-the-gut reason why I think it must be so.

Consider the design of a capacitor. More surface area means larger capacitance. That one is easy. Putting the plates closer together (making the volume of the dielectric smaller) also increases the capacitance. Hmmm. Less is more. That could only mean one thing. Less space must equate to more counter-space. Hence, the so-called charge we think of lives in a different dimension.

Yes, no, maybe so?

[TheoriaApophasis]

I wish Ken played with coils, diodes, capacitors as much as he has with magnets.

COILS YES, Ive got more coils than a dog has fleas


that and spools and spools of copper wire.


( I HATE WINDING COILS)






Counterspace SHOULD have you "thinking",



ALL GEOMETRY IS PROJECTIVE GEOMETRY


meaning it "all begins with counterspace/ inertia".

[Dog-One]

COILS YES, Ive got more coils than a dog has fleas

that and spools and spools of copper wire.

( I HATE WINDING COILS)

Ha! Good, now we're getting somewhere.

Counterspace SHOULD have you "thinking",

Most certainly.

ALL GEOMETRY IS PROJECTIVE GEOMETRY

meaning it "all begins with counterspace/ inertia".

I'll go back to W.B. Smith's Quadrature Concept. He states everything comes from Nothing-At-All. The first Quadrature from nothing, is spin.

Sounds very similar to me.

[TheoriaApophasis]

He states everything comes from Nothing-At-All. The first Quadrature from nothing, is spin.

Sounds very similar to me.

thats the dumb mistake everyone makes


nothing doesnt = NOTHING (nihil ex nihilo)


Not a THING (NOT PHENOMENA)........doesnt mean "nothing", rather NOT-phenomena.


Negation only serves to posit something, NOT ABCDEF........... but X



not this not that not that not that (.......therefore its 'this').

[Dog-One]

thats the dumb mistake everyone makes

nothing doesnt = NOTHING (nihil ex nihilo)

I have a hunch W.B. didn't actually mean Nothing-At-All. If someone would have whispered in his ear, "Counterspace", I'll bet it would have made sense to him.

If we can accept the possibility he did have communications with advanced living creatures from other worlds, it's very easy to assume he had difficulties understanding what they were telling him. A perfect example is me trying to understand everything you say Ken. I want to know what you know as well as you know it, but it's going to take time and while that is happening, you will continue to advance beyond what I can keep up with. I can take every mental pill there is and still never be your peer in this research. The only chance I have is if you are able some day to find the set words that I fully grasp, where everything actually does become simplex. Something that just clicks and puts all the pieces together. I'll keep trying and hopefully you'll do the same.

[Ufopolitics]

About a Spectrum 3D Screening...

Hello Ken,

Was wondering if anyone has build a 3D Screening 'apparatus' to observe/film the Magnetic Field Spectrum...

I was thinking to use some Beam Guns from an old back screen projection TV...since it has the three R,G,B Guns separated with independent circuits...and designed to project on a flat special plastic screen...so, we could set them following the x,y,z 3D axis, enclosed within a clear plastic volume and fill it with smoke (from a smoke gun)...creating a holographic effect.

As I believe using six guns from two TV sets, will render out even better results by axis alignment of blue with blue, green to green and red to red face to face equidistant from center placement of field...or:

BlueGun(x axis)>>>>(magnetic field here)<<<<(x axis)BlueGun

RedGun(y axis)>>>>(magnetic field here)<<<<(y axis)RedGun

GreenGun(z axis)>>>>(magnetic field here)<<<<(z axis)GreenGun

In order to intersect all beams at center space (0,0,0) where field would be set...

Maybe somebody has done it by now...

I believe it would be very interesting to test this...



Regards



Ufopolitics

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hello Ken,

Ufopolitics

not let it be said you cannot be both entertained and educated at the SAME TIME

[TheoriaApophasis]

Now counter-space, that one has got me thinking...

[spacecase0]

I have a hunch W.B. didn't actually mean Nothing-At-All. If someone would have whispered in his ear, "Counterspace", I'll bet it would have made sense to him.

If we can accept the possibility he did have communications with advanced living creatures from other worlds, it's very easy to assume he had difficulties understanding what they were telling him.

I read everything I could find that wilbert smith wrote or was said about him at the time,
Wilbert said that he had a hard time understanding them,
and that they kept pointing him in the correct direction when he got lost.
I have the same issue understanding Wilbert and Ken, all new words, and hard to get at what they are thinking
I have verified a good deal of Wilbert's ideas and it seems to be as he says
Ken does not talk of what his hardware is, so it makes it much harder to figure out what he is talking about
but my real problem is how long it takes to build the hardware for each test

[ldrancer]

words work like getting more power out of something you put in it. if you can talk about it, you can do it.

[Dog-One]

words work like getting more power out of something you put in it. if you can talk about it, you can do it.

I highly doubt Ken bought a truckload of Bismuth just for financial security. He's got something up his sleeve.

BTW Ken, that hourglass representation of Counterspace is quite intuitive. I also think as I mentioned previously, we need to come up with another one using a capacitor as an example. As space is crushed down from two sides towards Counterspace, charge potential increases. That's a dead-ringer for where this particular electrical phenomena sources its energy. It's undeniable. It also explains ol' Bearden's, "Don't kill the dipole." To me it looks like you can't kill the dipole, but you can move away from Counterspace and the energy of the dielectricity is lost. You want it back, you need to move towards the source...

Counterspace.

It's becoming very clear to me now why a permanent magnet is relatively permanent. It is quite literally leaking the energy in Counterspace. With some serious thought, it seems more than possible to imagine a battery doing much the same thing as a permanent magnet. You don't suppose Bismuth might be just the material we need for such a gizmo do you?

[TheoriaApophasis]

It's becoming very clear to me now why a permanent magnet is relatively permanent. It is quite literally leaking the energy in Counterspace

its a permanent wavefront in the ether.


Its an invisible tear in the Ether which both 'leaks' itself and "drains" itself on the other 'side'.....and likewise vice versa from the other 'side'


as a crude analogy.

You don't suppose Bismuth might be just the material we need for such a gizmo do you?

i wont comment on that one



yet

[ldrancer]

i didnt say nothing like that. didnt mention the bismuth and talked about words you have ot have a problem. im talking, about talking, not you or anyone elsei just made that comment but you got to find somehting wrong with what i say and associate it with something completely not related, bismuth.

what is bismuth?

[ldrancer]

dont say i said something i didnt say. get mad about this but i dont got to hear it, then some big long drawn out explanation about something, about bismuth then for ken to say he won't say anything.

your right you can sell somethign that works to people but not anyone can understand it. and you're also the smartest person and noone else can find out this either.

bismuth comes out of the earth, so you don't own it.

[aljhoa]

its a permanent wavefront in the ether.


Its an invisible tear in the Ether which both 'leaks' itself and "drains" itself on the other 'side'.....and likewise vice versa from the other 'side'


as a crude analogy.




i wont comment on that one



yet

Nature of Properties of Material Bodies.—It thus appears that the doctrine of atomic material constitution and the doctrine of a universal aether stand to each other in a relation of mutual support; if the scheme of physical laws is to be as precise as observation and measurement appear to make it, both doctrines are required in our efforts towards synthesis. Our direct knowledge of matter can, however, never be more than a rough knowledge of the general average behaviour of its molecules; for the smallest material speck that is sensible to our coarse perceptions contains myriads of atoms. The properties of the most minute portion of matter which we can examine are thus of the nature of averages.
1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Aether - Wikisource, the free online library


The Red Rectangle shines like a squarish jewel in this Hubble image.
The actual structure of the nebula is a double cone.
Its rectangular appearance is an optical illusion.




The Butterfly Nebula
The bright clusters and nebulae of planet Earth's night sky are often named for flowers or insects.
Though its wingspan covers over 3 light-years, NGC 6302 is no exception.
With an estimated surface temperature of about 250,000 degrees C, the dying central star of this particular planetary nebula
has become exceptionally hot, shining brightly in ultraviolet light but hidden from direct view by a dense torus of dust.


Al