Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hello TheoriaApophasis,
As I understand it, you are saying that the field goes out centrifugally on the outside of one side of the magnet and then centripetally goes in at the middle on the other side of the magnet. If the field is continuous from one side to the other and there are two opposite at the same time then these fields must cross each other going through each other in opposite directions. My question is how are these fields doing this and what effect does it have?
netica

No, BOTH 'sides' of the magnet leave the EDGE centrifugally (divergence) and return to the CENTER of the other side centripetally (convergence)



a centripetal vortex is like your drain draining, fastest at the bottom slow at the top

a centrifugal vortex is like cracking a whip, your wrist doesnt move much, but the END of the whip is breaking the sound barrier

(as a crude analogy)

You can also see this edge velocity on magnetic viewing film, which is really velocity viewing film.

This is ALSO how George Mizelle creates 1.5 Tesla magnets by stacking smaller and smaller magnets on top of each other to a point like a pyramid, taking the FAST centrifugal velocity from the edge of the bottom magnet to the top and it amplifies exponentially, these pyramidal stacked magnets have medical uses.

This centrifugal velocity gets directed to the next smaller magnet, then the next and next........
(see youtube video on this).

I explain this premise with many analogies in the book with many diagrams.

There are no opposites, spin ANYTHING you have close at hand in ANY direction, one side is going clockwise, the other side is going COUNTERclockwise.

obviously however the entire "X" object is spinning in the same direction, but CW from one "end" and CCW from the other "end".



Space is the ultimate mind bender and 'lie'.


they ARE "crossing" each other, but not intersecting each other, think of 2 corkscrews going 'into' each other going in opposite directions.

I posted 2 new videos on a illustration-discovery I just made proving this that should clear things up some:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dilk8gcDxac

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fwn3CqvRumg


This is the image ON the WALL taken from the camcorder to the TV set:

which is a printed CLOCKWISE vortex


If the outside centrifugal is ALSO clockwise LIKE the printed vortex, THEN IT MUST move the vortex in the SAME CW direction

But, it must create a centripetal center that is moving opposite, counterclockwise



CCW centrifugal DISTORTING the printed CW ring, AND showing a CW centripetal



CW centrifugal spinning the printed CW ring, AND showing a CCW centripetal



also.......CCW centrifugal DISTORTING the printed CW ring, AND showing a CW centripetal



Since the printed vortex is CW, then a CCW centrifugal MUST distort the printed and projected vortex

[Netica]

The way I understand it is what you are saying, maybe my explanation wasn't clear enough.

As you have said
"they ARE "crossing" each other, but not intersecting each other, think of 2 corkscrews going 'into' each other going in opposite directions"

This is what I'm talking about. They have to cross each other to reach opposite ends of the magnet. And this is what I was questioning how they do this but you are saying that they corkscrew each other so the field from opposite directions must be able to pass through each other.

[Siggi1974]

Best stuff

Hi Theo,

Thank you for this brilliant book being the best I have ever read according to this topic I still try to get this stuff hammered in my brain as it is completely different from what we have learned at school. The Videos do help very much and are proof at the same time.

I am wondering if this Gravity Repulsion generator would also then fit in your context. Here is the link Gravity-Opposing Repulsion Generator

Besides I am wondering how your new theory would explain the Casimir effect.

Any answer on that would be very much appreciated. Keep up this brilliant work.

Best regards
Siggi

[TheoriaApophasis]

The way I understand it is what you are saying, maybe my explanation wasn't clear enough.

As you have said
"they ARE "crossing" each other, but not intersecting each other, think of 2 corkscrews going 'into' each other going in opposite directions"

This is what I'm talking about. They have to cross each other to reach opposite ends of the magnet. And this is what I was questioning how they do this but you are saying that they corkscrew each other so the field from opposite directions must be able to pass through each other.

Nature doesnt work against her own pressures, ...as also mentioned in the book, INTERMEDIATE pressures dont have the velocity to get passed the inertial plane and a portion of the centrifugal fields returns AT the inertial plane RATHER THAN to the center of the other side.


You keep using the word "through" , but as is the case with transverse field reciprocation in TEM, the pattern is mutually "through AND around" each other since both are moving in opposite vortexes.

like interlacing fingers never touching but moving around and through.

there is no "crossing" only passing. its not like two cars moving by each other on opposite sides of the road.

rather like two hamsters moving "passed" each other in a pair (endless trillions of pairs) helical tubes.




Its extremely simple. Now imagine another LIKE BELOW moving in the opposite direction "around and through" the one pictured below.




I assume you have taken 2 coils and screwed them into each other before? a low friction reciprocation.

(however that analog is a tad crude specifically) since tight helical interlacing is NOT what is going on in magnetic field reciprocations.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi Theo,
Thank you for this brilliant book being the best I have ever read according to this topic

Kind regards for your comment , there is a bit of polishing to do and to add some more "coffin nail" proofs (see videos above as one example)

However Ive already got a LOT of coffin nails in that arena.

also a few more sections and about another 30+ pages to add.

I still try to get this stuff hammered in my brain as it is completely different from what we have learned at school.

Well, we were all taught the same trash in school. No need to slap the teacher. However there are a FEW I would like to slap, kidding.

They are STILL teaching the same "opposites attract" trash, and STILL teaching that "look iron dust, this is a mag field" , well, NO, its NOT.


Other than magnets and magnetism and how THEY work, the worst SIN is that the 800 pound gorilla to GR and QM is the word "field"

Fields don't have squat to do with particles, or virtual particles (i.e. unicorns and pixie dust).

Go find the "best" relativist in academia and ask him/her to "define a field"

I am wondering if this Gravity Repulsion generator would also then fit in your context. Here is the link Gravity-Opposing Repulsion Generator

Ill go look at the link.


Gravity repulsion, in pure retroductive proof MUST MUST be based off a dielectric field(s).

Dr. Oleg D. Jefimenko with enormous cred and endless math proof speaks about same in his work. He won multiple math and physics awards but later in life he wrote a LOT against the nonsense of relativity and people wouldnt publish him, his work is brilliant.


Gravitation and Cogravitation: Developing Newton's Theory of Gravitation to its Physical and Mathematical Conclusion: Oleg D. Jefimenko: 9780917406157: Amazon.com: Books

[shylo]

Similarities

Hi Theo, I've been reading your book, but I have a hard time understanding.
Seems quite similar to how Russell was creating hydrogen?
Also Eric Lithiwaite (sp).
Are you saying that mixing two different vibrations , makes a new vibration.
Sorry , everything is just vibration or frequency?
Tesla said things have to be tuned or they won't work, matching frequencies?
Wish I was smarter.
artv

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi Theo, I've been reading your book, but I have a hard time understanding.
Seems quite similar to how Russell was creating hydrogen?
Also Eric Lithiwaite (sp).
Are you saying that mixing two different vibrations , makes a new vibration.
Sorry , everything is just vibration or frequency?
Tesla said things have to be tuned or they won't work, matching frequencies?
Wish I was smarter.
artv

Thats as per energy production.

My only aim was/is to explain correctly, rationally, and with many angles of proof HOW / WHY/ WHAT a "magnet" is, how it "works" etc.

I am working on building a motor, but none of this specific to magnetism has (ultimately yes of COURSE) anything to do with direct energy production.

There are precession frequencies as mentioned within the work.

Such frequencies are known to MRI makers , magneto-gravimetric precession and frequencies.

but they dont really know its implications, or meanings, just what it is and HOW to use it.

You could see the ongoing videos for clearer visualizations.

maybe starting at video 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-WgxGc_vcA

Up to 6, with maybe 10 more to make getting deeper etc. , more detailed.

Kind regards to you.

[sadang]

Hi Ken,

As I said I read again the book, very slowly analyzing word by word and phrase by phrase all sentences and meaning, as deeply as I can, making a lot of analogies withh all that I learned until now from others and from my own experiments about magnetism.

Without any intention to correct your work or to upset you somehow, I want to draw your attention to a design that I think is wrong: On page 6 at the bottom of the page is a picture about the real shape of magnetism for Cw and CCW dielectric planes. In my opinion the second shape, with CW spinning dielectric plane has the bellow centripetal vortex in a wrong direction. It should be opposed to centrifugal external vortex.

If such types of comments annoy you, I'll stop doing them. But I'll keep continue the analysis of the book.

SaDAng

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi Ken,
Without any intention to correct your work or to upset you somehow, I want to draw your attention to a design that I think is wrong: On page 6 at the bottom of the page is a picture about the real shape of magnetism for Cw and CCW dielectric planes. In my opinion the second shape, with CW spinning dielectric plane has the bellow centripetal vortex in a wrong direction. It should be opposed to centrifugal external vortex.

If such types of comments annoy you, I'll stop doing them. But I'll keep continue the analysis of the book.

SaDAng

Youll have to be a LOT more specific, which image? page 6 (the pages are not numbered) has some iron filing photos etc.


I never mention anywhere "CW and CCW dielectric" anything

Only CW and CCW magnetic centrifugal divergent, and centripetal CONvergent fields.


Why would you anger me? No, you are not annoying me.

There are typos in there, and a genuine truth seeker LOVES to be proven wrong because that brings one closer to the truth, and being accurate (or proven accurate) does the same.

So, being proven wrong OR being proven right are BOTH beneficial.


However, what you mention,..... I never say any such thing anywhere in the book about "CW / CCW dielectric"

centripetal, radial, inertial, counterspatial dielectric, yes. but not the above mention.





take a peek at this video and see if you get what Im stating

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dilk8gcDxac

[sadang]

Hi Ken,

Sorry, my mistake! It is about dielectric-inertia plane.

The picture occur righ bellow the following phrase "Below: Look at these, and I will explain them a bit later" and has on the right side of it a screen capture. Bellow these two pictures is a new title called "A very brief historical glimpse of earliest magnetic comprehension". It would have been much easier if I put the image directly here, but do not know if I'm allowed.

In this picture, for the second magnetic field shape (on the right side) the centripetal convergent field located bellow the counterpsatial-inertia plane has its rotating vector in the wrong direction. It should point to the left not to the right. Because the left magnetic field shape should be the mirrored image of the right one, and of course vice versa.

Again, my intention is just to help, not confuse. I'll be back this week with some experiments on my delta CRT.

SaDAng

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi Ken,
the centripetal convergent field located bellow the counterpsatial-inertia plane has its rotating vector in the wrong direction. It should point to the left not to the right. Because the left magnetic field shape should be the mirrored image of the right one, and of course vice versa.

You ARE correct, I did that I believe in 2 diagrams, not out of laziness or error, but actually just to show the direction of CONvergence and the ultimately direction of DIvergence (centripetal and centrifugal).


You were the first to notice that.

I dont want to sound like I am making an excuse, but In explaining it in detail in print, of the 2 diagrams (I recall) in which that error is present,...... I assumed (incorrectly obviously!) .......I was merely showing the superficial layer of "what is moving OUT and what is moving IN" even though (as you correctly state) the arrows should be reverse at the bottom of your indication.




It shall be remedied. Kind thanks. The 'devil is in the details'.


I wanted to give a "good mental image" from SOME of the diagrams without TOO MUCH detail, ....but in leaving out the "fine" detail on a couple things......., I was making an ERR.

[machinealive]

Hi TheoriaApophasis

Just started reading your PDF. Looks like you've tide lot of things together, nice.

Also, thanks for there rare books link, never thoughts would get to read those.

What causes the large black area on the CRT screen?

So you feel the the field travels from outer edge on one end of magnet to Center on other end, corkscrewing through each other.



So, they also corkscrew through the dielectric plane?

I would have thought that the dielectric plane was an input as well as output like the ends. When we see pictures of tornadoes, from the outside, it's a centrifugal movement, into the apex at ground level, up and out the top. But if we look at a whirlpool, we see the centripedal force, the inside, now things go down the vortex toward the apex, where it gets discharged.
More like this



Sorry for crappy pics but I'm in a hurry.

Just curious?

Machinealive

[Pembelton]

Hi Theo,
I have been reading your paper, and there is one question I have for you, I don't believe it is answered in your paper if I missed it I am sorry.

I was just wondering what aether modality accounts for the diaelectric plane. If everything is composed of the aether working in different modalities. then the diaelectric plane must be developed by some aether modality. I think you are saying there is a static or bipolar charge across the diaelectric plane that gives rise to the magnetic field, if I'm wrong then I don't understand what you are saying and I apologize and back to reading.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi TheoriaApophasis
What causes the large black area on the CRT screen?

Centrifugal magnetic displacement of the charge MEANT to illuminate the CRT phosphorus of the screen. I speak about this in detail in the upcoming 3rd edition Ive been working hard on.

However making many videos also recently.

So you feel the the field travels from outer edge on one end of magnet to Center on other end, corkscrewing through each other.

While strictly inaccurate, a crude way of speaking of same analogously would be 'corkscrewing' thru each other.

Think of how a creature moves INWARDS (centripetally, CONvergently) into its shell as against the nature of how the shell move DIvergently (centrifugally) outwards as it is grown





XRAYS of shells:

So, they also corkscrew through the dielectric plane?

No, they are 'consumed' at that point at which the Field Incommensurability re-integrates same for repeating the process.


As I mention in the book, HOW a magnet (so-called) is created is from discharged capacitor banks, what this does to EVERY atom, like a clay sphere SQUEEZED at its equator, is CINCH it dielectrically and create a "flywheel and dumbell" shape in endless trillions and trillions of inter-atomic magneto-dielectric volumes.

this INCOMMENSURABLE FIELD effect creates the "magnets" we are so fascinated with.


All field modalities , dielectric, magnetic, electric, gravity are just Ether/Aether modalities.

carbon, graphite, pencil , diamond......(crude analogy), all one Principle

This specific point is outlined in the book, however further details on MY part in explaining same are in order for the 3rd edition.

I would have thought that the dielectric plane was an input as well as output like the ends. When we see pictures of tornadoes, from the outside, it's a centrifugal movement, into the apex at ground level, up and out the top. But if we look at a whirlpool, we see the centripedal force, the inside, now things go down the vortex toward the apex, where it gets discharged.
More like this

It is, I mention that in great detail in the book. The dielectric to magnetic in a PERFECT magnet with PERFECT conditions is 3.23606 parts dielectricity to 1 part magnetism.

(crudely) imagine a gyroscope in which you could only see the 2 "ends" or each axis. The "flywheel" is 'invisible' (without magnetic viewing film).

The GIANT controlling the "magnet" is the dielectric "flywheel", or the dielectric inertial plane.


All us crazy humans are like children watching a puppet show, we see the pathetic little puppets (magnetism), but the GIANT running the "show" in any "magnet" is the puppet master (dielectricity) "behind the curtain"


Dielectricity literally IS "behind the curtain" because dielectricity is centripetal, counterspatial, radial, and inertial.


We only see a "magnet" as Magnetism because magnetism is spatial (= POLARIZED).

space and polarization are (almost) ultimately one and the same thing.

When we see pictures of tornadoes, from the outside, it's a centrifugal movement, into the apex at ground level, up and out the top. But if we look at a whirlpool, we see the centripedal force, the inside, now things go down the vortex toward the apex, where it gets discharged.
More like this

A tornado is a centripetal vortex LOW speed up in the sky, HIGH speed below where its tossing grandmas house in the air.

Centrifugal is like cracking a whip, LOW speed in wrist movement, but breaking the sound barrier at the end.

Pulling the plug in the drain in your tub, yes, thats a centripetal vortex, fast at the bottom near the drain hole.


Rather than "discharged" reintegrated. However thats just splitting hairs, close enough.





YOUR LAST DRAWING, showing centrifugal magnetism NOT RETURNING to the other side of the centripetal is due to INTERMEDIATE pressure centrifugal (from the intermediate zone of EVERY SIDE of any magnet) pressures which do not have sufficient velocity to get beyond the edge of the centripetal inertial plane of reintegration and do not make full reciprocation.

This view is wrongly seen by some to "prove a magnet has 4 poles", but this is merely a misunderstanding of pressure gradient variations and field icommensurability where all movement is mediated by lowest seeking pressure reciprocation and reintegration.

I speak about this in the book.

However also....., you indicate arrows (in your last diagram above) coming OUT from the inertial plane TO the centrifugal (/edge) magnetic location, and that doesnt happen.

As for intermediate pressure magnetic reciprocation, .....think of a sick jumper (low pressure centrifugal magnetism) who, upon leaping, smacks into the fence wall (inertial plane) face-first instead of making it (around and over) to the other side.

[TheoriaApophasis]

I hope I don't sound like an ASS in saying this.....

but if you really like my book. I dont WANT A SINGLE CENT



IF YOU LIKE my book, since I owe great thanks to a 'divine' understanding of some key points to Eric P Dollard.


Donate $5, (or whatever you want) TO ERIC P DOLLARD


Eric P. Dollard – Official Homepage | The only man who has replicated Tesla's wireless transmission technology.




I dedicated the last page to him and a few others for a reason.


3rd edition due out in a month or so.

Lux et Veritas Kinds regards to all you people.