Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[ewizard]

Hi Ken,

Yes, I accept your criticism (I made it in a hurry because I have to go out) and I'll repeat the experiment using spherical and discoidal neodymium magnet, but unfortunately using only the scalar method of measurement with the Hall sensor from my phone and an another external sensor. I did not have any professional gaussmeter in home right now, but taking into account that actual gaussmeters use the same Hall sensor as detector I am sure the results will be the same even using a dedicated gaussmeter. Anyway, excluding physical deformities of the magnet I don't see any reason the spatial geometric shape of a ceramic magnet to be different from that of a neodymium magnet. I'll keep you informed.

Thanks,
SaDAng

I'm jumping in here without being certain this is related but long ago I read (and found from experience) that ceramic magnets have a longer 'reach' than neo's while not being nearly as strong at close distance. Ceramics seem to have more effect at a distance than neo's.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi Ken,
SaDAng

Oh , and i forgot, you used a ring magnet

[TheoriaApophasis]

I'm jumping in here without being certain this is related but long ago I read (and found from experience) that ceramic magnets have a longer 'reach' than neo's while not being nearly as strong at close distance. Ceramics seem to have more effect at a distance than neo's.

Yes, which is why VERY VERY high gauss stacked pyramid magnets have VERY VERY SHALLOW mag fields



its all pressure mediation.



You can get EXTREMELY POWERFUL , up to 3 Tesla permanent mag fields by stacking magnets and directing the centrifugal flow

large magnet, bit smaller, bit smaller, bit smaller……they form a pyramid.



They're being used for medical testing, go you YOUTUBE USER "Supermagnetman" and see his video on these he makes.


Hes best friends with my associate

[tachyon]

Pyramid Magnets - Focusing Flux to a Point - YouTube

3 teslas

how about charged bodies the E field must be similar to B field of magnets

[TheoriaApophasis]

Pyramid Magnets - Focusing Flux to a Point - YouTube

3 teslas

how about charged bodies the E field must be similar to B field of magnets

Phi (magnetism) X Psi (dielectricity) = Q (planck, ELECTRICITY)


electricity is the product of BOTH mag and dielectricity.





Thus Electricity, in order to manifest, a
UNION must develop. This is the union of the "male", or projective, and
"multiplied by" the "female", or receptive. Hereby, the male is the dielectric
field in counterspace (of per centimeters), and the magnetic field or female
in space (of centimeters squared). Space in cm squared is what you pay for
in "real estate", counterspace in per cm is the space between the lines on a
ruler, or between molecules in a crystal.
For the Electricity extant between a pair of wires in your lamp cord, the
closer the wires, the more capacitance, and thus the more Dielectricity.
Conversely, for the same cord, the farther apart the wires, the more
inductance and thus the more Magnetism. Therefore it is seen that the
smaller the space (the more counterspace) the more Dielectricity that can be
stored, and conversely the larger the space between the wires (the more
real estate) the more Magnetism that can be stored. Very simple, do not let
your mind make it any more complicated than that!

Continuing then it has been given that the total electrification Q is the
union, or product, of the total dielectric induction Psi, and the total
magnetic induction Phi. In other words, the dimensional relationship Q,
the total electrification, is the product of the dimension of total dielectric
induction Psi, and the dimension of total magnetic induction Phi. Hence we
have FOUR primary dimensions in electrical engineering. These are:
1) Time
2) Space
3) Dielectricity
4) Magnetism
Every other relation, quantity, or expression, Volt, Amp, Ohm, etc. is
derived from these FOUR dimensions. Time and Space are the metrical
dimensions; Dielectricity and Magnetism are the physical dimensions. It is
that basic!

----Eric P Dollard




You should buy his book

[Dog-One]

Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Dielectricity

electricity is the product of BOTH mag and dielectricity.

Well Ken, you have done a nice job with "Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism", you think you could or have a desire to do something similar for dielectricity?

Because this is counter-spatial, my grey brain has a bit of a difficult time taking the concepts and evolving them into useful structures. Take for example lightning. To look at a strike, all I see is a very large spark plug zap. Now I know the two are entirely different, but I can't break the association between a man-made event scaled-up and the natural event.

If you have the desire, certainly count me in as a student.

[sadang]

Hi Ken,

Here is another video about the strenght difference between the poles of a magnet. Here I got a value of about 25uT as difference between N and S poles for 10, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1 disc neodymium magnet, 10mm diameter and 40N strength. I still want to make the same test using an independent linear Hall sensor, which unfortunately I do not have it in the house right now. I ordered 10 pcs. and wait to arrive. Meanwhile I made a movie using a Hall switch, but the result is not relevant due to the many variables involved, so I will not make it public.

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSzsDrxiorY

Regards,
SaDAng

[sadang]

I liked the video about the self spinning magnet made by WaxingRadiance and I made one similar using a ball neodymium magnet, 10mm, N40, a cube neodymium magnet 5mm, N42 and a small piece of plastic to emphasize the direction of rotation. I used my flat glass table and under the glass I used a bar of 11 neodymium disc magnets, 10mm, N40 to drive the upper magnet assembly. The rotational effect and changing the direction of rotation depending on the direction of motion is very clear, and I think I emphasized in the last part of the movie the precessional angle of 21.246 degrees specified by Ken.

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN5Kz-LmAO8

[ldrancer]

one thing i didnt get and i dont get is the concept, that magnetism is radiation and then the thing about polarity.

the first thing, thou that i thought of when the idea what is a magnet, and you say, a magnet isnt a this thing or that thing, its magnetism, which is radiation. Ok so we got past the fake word they put on it, then you say polarization. which makes no sense much really but also makes me think.. of the sun.

dollard says the sun is a portal to another dimension.

[TheoriaApophasis]

one thing i didnt get and i dont get is the concept, that magnetism is radiation and then the thing about polarity.

the first thing, thou that i thought of when the idea what is a magnet, and you say, a magnet isnt a this thing or that thing, its magnetism, which is radiation. Ok so we got past the fake word they put on it, then you say polarization. which makes no sense much really but also makes me think.. of the sun.

dollard says the sun is a portal to another dimension.

Its CALLED a magnet because of how it "works" on things from its polarized field

polarization = creates space = radiation = discharge.


radiation ATTRACTS NOTHING, it displaces things, but not attract them.


Just think for a bit in your head about what the term "polarization" MEANS.


A "magnet" isn't a magnet, its a dielectric object with (a perfect case of one created from cap bank discharges) 3.23606 parts dielectricity to 1 part magnetism.


What is "driving/ running" a magnet is NOT magnetism, but something else (dielectricity)


Faraday ---- "MAGNETISM is the dielectric field"


Magnetism is the horse poop, dielectricity is the horse




Read the book (or not), its all in there, and MUCH more to come.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Well Ken.

Check out the latest two videos where I solved a "PUZZLE" people been wondering about.


Explanation video #1 here>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVw3xhPZywc


SECOND VIDEO RECREATION HERE:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlMYTL_6hA0

[Dog-One]

Field Spin

Check out the latest two videos where I solved a "PUZZLE" people been wondering about.

Check me here:

"Field spin is locked into place at the time of the creation of the magnet."

Okay, so it's a terminology mind screw. I think of it as the threads on a bolt--they are also locked into place at the time of the creation of the bolt. They don't "spin" at all, they a have a fixed twist and pitch. It's the exact same for a magnet, true? The fields are fixed in their centripetal and centrifugal pattern and lock into place the dielectric inertial plane.

Now...

Does the dielectric inertial plane (accretion disk) spin? rotate? Or is it locked into place also?

It's the subtle details that make understanding this somewhat difficult, because it so radically different from the hogwash we have been feed. I feel TinMan's pain. It isn't easy teaching an old dog a new trick, especially one like this.

[ldrancer]

Its CALLED a magnet because of how it "works" on things from its polarized field

polarization = creates space = radiation = discharge.


.

you avoided my question didnt you.

that doesnt expalin what a magnet is. its an attractor which doenst explain anything.

i put it down for your simple. using your own statment.

magnetism a thing we can understand its like magnets but its a thing and we know what magnetism is. cause its material we understand it. you said its radiation. ok understanding energy, i understand that. you must understand it too to say that.

then youd say stuff and i just said this and you avoided my question, its, something something, polorization.

so i said polarization is, like the sun?

then you give us this after avoiding my question

polarization = creates space = radiation = discharge.
that little line.

ok, replace polorization with sun. the sun, creates space, or radiation, discharge.

sure but it doesnt answer my question. what's polarization.

you say what it is, but not how it does anythign that it does. like magnetism. might as well go back to saying,
stick the north pole to the south pole woo wee look thigns sticks together they can be used for absolutely nothing its witch craft.
stick north to north, see they dont wannaa go together, see more proof of absolute witch craft.

look at it its weird isnt it.

i said the magentism is radiation. ok? but then it cant be two things, you then say, something something polarization.

polarization reminds me of the sun, the word. polar. it never reminds me of the cold.

where are the polar regions. 2 answers, its up north where its cold, and its where the accumulation of the whatever thats called near the top and bottom of magnets is.

but i never relate, polar, to cold. i think of polar bears but dont care about them being cold or not.

im trying to create global warming hehehe, and melt allll the ice. ahahahheheh. there we go.

no i dont relate the word polar to cold. i think of sun. it comes from somewhere too. im just sayign the common sense way. becuase im too not wanting to hunt down the word, it can be got wht im sayign if you understand.

so i dont understand what you say, cause i dont understand what the sun is.

[TheoriaApophasis]

It's the exact same for a magnet, true? The fields are fixed in their centripetal and centrifugal pattern and lock into place the dielectric inertial plane.

EXCEPT for soft iron "magnets", as you can see in one my video, I can reverse polarity on a FERRITE magnet in about 1 second with the GIANT NEO.


Kinda, but you can "strip the threads" on a magnet easier than you can a bolt.

but a Neo is like a Tungsten BOLT,…….much harder to "strip the threads"

Now...

Does the dielectric inertial plane (accretion disk) spin? rotate? Or is it locked into place also?

Look in the book on the section GYROMAGNETIC PRECESSION,…..the plane wobbles a bit, the "Larmor frequency" of gyromagnetic precession is at the nucleus which creates the necessitated radiative field (= magnetism)

all radiation, of course, is MOVING, it must definitionally.

It's the subtle details that make understanding this somewhat difficult, because it so radically different from the hogwash we have been feed. I feel TinMan's pain. It isn't easy teaching an old dog a new trick, especially one like this.

Wait for video #45 tonight (LATE) and it will make things much clearer



space is the FLIES buzzing around the horse poop (magnetism) of Dielectricity (Horse)


Space is the posterior product of fields.

Humans are FLIES, we eat, sleep and sh*t SPACETIME every "second" (haaaa!!!) of every day.


Space is the dirty hooker with a disease ROTTING the brains of all empirical creatures

[TheoriaApophasis]

you avoided my question didnt you.
that doesnt expalin what a magnet is. its an attractor which doenst explain anything.

Maybe reading the book would help

magnetism a thing we can understand its like magnets but its a thing and we know what magnetism is. cause its material we understand it. you said its radiation. ok understanding energy, i understand that. you must understand it too to say that.

No, NOT "ok energy", …….magnetism is the DISCHARGE (=radiation) of energy.


So, why did Faraday call magnetism the "dielectric field" ?


all spatial fields are radiative defintionally, so what does THAT tell you?

so i said polarization is, like the sun?
.

Polarization OF what BY what……where did the discharging radiation come FROM?

sure but it doesnt answer my question. what's polarization.
.

I answered it, you didn't understand it.

you say what it is, but not how it does anythign that it does. like magnetism. might as well go back to saying,
stick the north pole to the south pole woo wee look thigns sticks together they can be used for absolutely nothing its witch craft.
stick north to north, see they dont wannaa go together, see more proof of absolute witch craft.

Polarity is an illusion, go SPIN your dog, your wife, your cat, your remote control, its moving CW on one end, and CCW on the other end.

but the ENTIRE "X" is moving in the same direction.





[/QUOTE]