Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[TheoriaApophasis]

The problem with your book is that it doesn't explain anything

This slot machine doesnt accept baseless claims as payment.

additionally, there are roughly 140 more pages to add to the book. Likewise another 100+ videos.

So, you have said absolutely nothing.

I have read Eric Dollard's books and seen his videos, but it left me with more questions than answers and so far I haven't seen anything of practical use in his writings.

That comment alone speaks volumes about your "capacitance"

[nutzNvoltz]

Fascinating video!

I assume by that comment you havent seen my video #22


however i WILL NOT comment on that video

Just watched the video. Very interesting effects. Would there be a pancake coil involved anywhere in this experiment?

[TheoriaApophasis]

Just watched the video. Very interesting effects. Would there be a pancake coil involved anywhere in this experiment?

Ehh, I wont comment on that video. I merely state effects that are present.


I leave it at that.

I can assure you of one thing, the effects easily felt really ARE THERE.



Now I have to wait until the 25 of August when the moon is under the earth again. ....late at night.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Just watched the video. Very interesting effects. Would there be a pancake coil involved anywhere in this experiment?

Here is one I will leave a mystery for the 3rd edition to be answered.


VERY FEW PEOPLE even know these exist....


I wonder if people can figure THIS OUT......PYRAMID magnets, simply by changing the shape of a square magnet to a pyramid >>>>>>>>>>>>RADICALLY increases its gauss rating



Theyre used for medical testing, experimentation


See video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNtZ...QsEFmAh-TAWwrw

Pyramid Magnets - Focusing Flux to a Point

SuperMagnetMan



Yes, he even built a pyramidal array that reaches 3 TESLAS in power from just permanent magnets.


No "pyramid power" etc etc. etc. You can do the same thing by stacking smaller and smaller magnets into a pyramid as well.



Well, really IT IS "pyramid power!" ((( NO, I dont do any new age nonsense)...


( i know how, but lets see if others know)

[nutzNvoltz]

Yes, concentrating all of the magnets flux into one small area kinda like a Halbach array?

[TheoriaApophasis]

Yes, concentrating all of the magnets flux into one small area kinda like a Halbach array?

thats a description.


now the explanation


The REAL question is, what is the physical boundary that restricts the magnetism and causes HIGH gauss ratings at the "pointy end"


The physical MAGNET shape isnt constricting the magnetism, rather something else present at the boundary of the physical magnet.


one is translational to the other, but the shape is one thing, what the shape affects is another. Magnetism is secondary to a primary , so what is in the shape that alters the primary and resultantly the secondary.

[ldrancer]

Well, I thought his "explanation" was perfect. And why did you say you were out and then come right back with another post?

just to make sure everything was clear.

[Ben2503]

This slot machine doesnt accept baseless claims as payment.

additionally, there are roughly 140 more pages to add to the book. Likewise another 100+ videos.

So, you have said absolutely nothing.








That comment alone speaks volumes about your "capacitance"

you seem to be unable to answer questions and have a strong need to offend people. why is that?
Why do you use material from other people without mentioning the source?
How does diamagnetism fit in your model?
Which part of EPD writings is actually practically used by you?

A smart guy like you should be able to give clear answers in plain language that can be understood by simple guys like me.

[Dog-One]

The REAL question is, what is the physical boundary that restricts the magnetism and causes HIGH gauss ratings at the "pointy end"

Just from the gut I would say it's the close proximity of the centripetal and centrifugal fields entering/exiting respectfully near the point being driven by a rather large dielectric inertial plane centered... Probably near the center of mass. If we assume the Phi angles you have calculated are constant regardless of physical shape, that's the only rational answer I can come up with.

Honestly, I'm really not too certain with shapes other than the ones you have placed next to your ferrofluid material and taken video of. Still a little tough for me to think like God would.

A step at a time...

[TheoriaApophasis]

you seem to be unable to answer questions and have a strong need to offend people. why is that?
Why do you use material from other people without mentioning the source?
How does diamagnetism fit in your model?
Which part of EPD writings is actually practically used by you?
.

A: I do mention the source in the book, Dollards PICTURE is even on the last page. So , dead wrong again

B: You said earlier.-------so far I haven't seen anything of practical use in his (Dollards) writings."......... You are the one doing the insulting.

C: I have offended noone, as Proclus said "the unwise cut themselves with the tongue of ignorance and blame others for the wounds"


D: A Yttrium barium CO-ox disk at LN2 temps is a SUPER diamagnetic object, not a "superconductor". Get it?


Dollard nowhere explains how a magnet works, that is all my research. His FULL grasp of dielectricity gave me the final 10% I needed for the ENTIRE PICTURE.


I state that in the book as well.

A smart guy like you should be able to give clear answers in plain language that can be understood by simple guys like me.

Thats what the book and 62 current videos are for. If you do not grasp it, that is no fault of mine whatsoever.

Do as you wish.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Just from the gut I would say it's the close proximity of the centripetal and centrifugal fields entering/exiting respectfully near the point being driven by a rather large dielectric inertial plane centered... Probably near the center of mass. If we assume the Phi angles you have calculated are constant regardless of physical shape, that's the only rational answer I can come up with.

Honestly, I'm really not too certain with shapes other than the ones you have placed next to your ferrofluid material and taken video of. Still a little tough for me to think like God would.

A step at a time...

I think one picture can explain HIGH gauss fields on a pyramid magnet

(proving I have a sense of humor) ...

[Ben2503]

A: I do mention the source in the book, Dollards PICTURE is even on the last page. So , dead wrong again

B: You said earlier.-------so far I haven't seen anything of practical use in his (Dollards) writings."......... You are the one doing the insulting.

C: I have offended noone, as Proclus said "the unwise cut themselves with the tongue of ignorance and blame others for the wounds"


D: A Yttrium barium CO-ox disk at LN2 temps is a SUPER diamagnetic object, not a "superconductor". Get it?


Dollard nowhere explains how a magnet works, that is all my research. His FULL grasp of dielectricity gave me the final 10% I needed for the ENTIRE PICTURE.


I state that in the book as well.





Thats what the book and 62 current videos are for. If you do not grasp it, that is no fault of mine whatsoever.

Do as you wish.

I wasn't referring to work that you nicked from EPD, I was referring to the work you nicked from David LaPoint
for those interested check
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EPlyiW-xGI

I agree with Proclus and like to add: A fool thinks he knows it all, a wiseman comprehends he knows nothing at all.

You keep repeating yourself and avoid answering questions, like so many of the old school scientists.

Please make a video on your model addressing diamagnetism, that could answer many questions.


Take care,
Ben

[nutzNvoltz]

thats a description.


now the explanation


The REAL question is, what is the physical boundary that restricts the magnetism and causes HIGH gauss ratings at the "pointy end"


The physical MAGNET shape isnt constricting the magnetism, rather something else present at the boundary of the physical magnet.


one is translational to the other, but the shape is one thing, what the shape affects is another. Magnetism is secondary to a primary , so what is in the shape that alters the primary and resultantly the secondary.

Would that something else present at the boundary of the magnet be the ether flow following the magnets shape?

[TheoriaApophasis]

I wasn't referring to work that you nicked from EPD, I was referring to the work you nicked from David LaPoint
for those interested check
Ben

Bit of insanity there, I disagree with 95% of the premise of those videos.


His well made videos are clueless nonsense and never discuss ANYTHING about field dynamics, or about the conjugate nature of magnetism and dielectricity

IN FACT he never even mentions dielectricity



So, your premise is i "stole" work from someone i have 5% agreement with????
Tell us how that works?


He is CONSTANTLY referencing trash Quantum, "strong /weak" nuclear forces and non-existent electrons in those videos.


I have no agreement with him, his premise, or his fancy plasma experiments


Its bull cookies.

Nikola Tesla November 1928 interview:
On the whole subject of matter, in fact, Dr. Tesla holds views that are startlingly original. He disagrees with the accepted atomic theory of matter, and does not believe in the existence of an “electron” as pictured by science.
“To account for its apparently small mass, science conceives of the electron as a hollow sphere, a sort of bubble, such a bubble could exist in a medium as a gas or liquid because its internal pressure is not altered by deformation. But if, as supposed, the internal pressure of an electron is due to the repulsion of electric masses, the slightest conceivable deformation must result in the destruction of the bubble! Just to mention another improbability...” - Nikola Tesla
Article: “A Famous Prophet of Science Looks into the Future” (Popular Science Monthly)

Please make a video on your model addressing diamagnetism
Ben

Its easy, grasp this "Super-dielectric" = super-diamagnetic


tough eh?

[TheoriaApophasis]

Would that something else present at the boundary of the magnet be the ether flow following the magnets shape?

Fields dont see magnetic shape, looking under a ferrocell, you will see the same from a sphere, block, etc etc etc magnet



fields see fields, not physical objects, however if that physical object has a special field nature, like a pyramid magnet that 'chokes' magnetic recriprocations, then yes, but its still fields,

what exists with that physical shape is the dielectric capacitance choking the magnetic


comments to PICS below:


James Clerk Maxwell’s “idle wheel” analogy:

Below: I only recently came across J.C. Maxwell’s vortex analogy and ‘idler gear’ comparison, which mirrored mine, except J.C. Maxwell did not grasp that unlike a mechanical idler gear which plays only a passive-effective interactive part in movement, the dielectric inertial plane, or ‘idler’ gear is the actual mover, the driver, so to speak. As is necessarily, logically, and absolutely the case to which dielectricity is by nature, being inertial, counterspatial, and creating magnetism as an Ether-modality in the discharge of itself. Also unfortunately J.C. Maxwell, while a strong supporter of the Ether, makes an Atomistic comparison of the “idler” gear of vortex reciprocation.



Below: On left redrawn correct analogy of dielectricity as the inertial driver (inverse to mechanical ‘idler’ gears). Middle and right are mechanical idle gears which mediation a passive-interactive role in movement and mechanical reciprocations.

Below: My discovery and formula for magnetic reciprocation given a perfect situation. To add to J.C. Maxwell’s analogy, as I have discovered, that unlike machines, the “idler wheel” of what is ‘driving magnetism’ is the stationary inertial dielectric which is the prima causa, the Prime Mover of magnetic reciprocations; just the inverse to a mechanical ‘idler gear’. This is the fundamental nature of dielectricity being the ‘electrical inertia’, and fundamental Ether-modality from which the other 3 are derived.