Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[TheoriaApophasis]

I was referring to the work you nicked from David LaPoint
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EPlyiW-xGI
Ben

Listen son, If youre going to accuse me of "nicked" work, it BETTER BE from someone I agree with, ........and not someone I have NO respect for, nor their conclusions.

at 5:24 to 5:30 of that specious and fallacious video (like the rest of the video) he like MOST, speaks about magnetism as if magnetism is driving magnetism.

He likewise speaks about the "intrinsic nature of magnetic fields influencing his plasma" experiments.

Ergo, hes dead wrong, he has no idea what dielectricity is.

He is committing the fallacy of reification, in giving Prima Causa to magnetism, rather than (hes clueless) knowing (which he doesnt) that magnetism is "the dielectric field"- Faraday, is the RADIATION, the DISCHARGE of dielectricity.


He has reified magnetism as an autonomous entity

He is well meaning, but his conclusions are specious, his premise dead wrong, his intent is well, but intent has no bearing on accuracy or validity of anything.


run along

[zapzap]

Programmed magnets?

"Correlated magnetics is a fundamental scientific breakthrough that enables magnets to be programmed with patterns of magnetic elements to produce novel behaviors far beyond the simple “attract” and “repel” of conventional bulk magnets."

Mini MagPrinter | Correlated Magnetics

[TheoriaApophasis]

"Correlated magnetics is a fundamental scientific breakthrough that enables magnets to be programmed with patterns of magnetic elements to produce novel behaviors far beyond the simple “attract” and “repel” of conventional bulk magnets."

Mini MagPrinter | Correlated Magnetics

nothing is being programmed, theyre creating multi-pattern polarization regions by inversely polarizing adjacent sections.

the problem is this format lends itself to depolarization at a rapid pace.


Its no diff. than scaling up what a hard drive write head does, except deeper and much much larger



what ticks me off, is their video, because they ZAP the flat disk magnet with LOTS of little circular polarizations, it creates the pattern of 85 - 137.5077 degree etc etc reciprocation that I discovered



you can see it below, but they have NO IDEA what theyre looking at, I noticed it immediately.

[Ben2503]

Listen son, If youre going to accuse me of "nicked" work, it BETTER BE from someone I agree with, ........and not someone I have NO respect for, nor their conclusions.

at 5:24 to 5:30 of that specious and fallacious video (like the rest of the video) he like MOST, speaks about magnetism as if magnetism is driving magnetism.

He likewise speaks about the "intrinsic nature of magnetic fields influencing his plasma" experiments.

Ergo, hes dead wrong, he has no idea what dielectricity is.

He is committing the fallacy of reification, in giving Prima Causa to magnetism, rather than (hes clueless) knowing (which he doesnt) that magnetism is "the dielectric field"- Faraday, is the RADIATION, the DISCHARGE of dielectricity.


He has reified magnetism as an autonomous entity

He is well meaning, but his conclusions are specious, his premise dead wrong, his intent is well, but intent has no bearing on accuracy or validity of anything.


run along

In my view we are all trying to find a way through a complicated maze. Nobody has found the way yet and it doesn't make any sense to call somebody stupid for trying another road.
Sorry, wrong link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpI6...Ty1wCMbCFlhHmQ
I think he is trying to explain something whereas you are just making statements. You just go around cherry picking and present you basket with nicked ideas as your own.
You are not answering questions, probably because you simply cannot, as you do not comprehend the reasonings behind these copied statements.

Best of luck
Ben

[TheoriaApophasis]

I think he is trying to explain something whereas you are just making statements. You just go around cherry picking and present you basket with nicked ideas as your own.
You are not answering questions, probably because you simply cannot, as you do not comprehend the reasonings behind these copied statements.
Ben

More insane statements on your part, that foolish video is about PHOTONS, which also do not exist.

Theyre a misgrasp that all light , or EM has a Z axis radial dielectric component.


You make lots of claims son, but you cannot back up or support any of them.


I answer all questions on the matter, there are however still 100+ more videos and another 200 pages to add.

Tell you what, go write a book about it.



Tell me again how I would copy ANYTHING from someone I have no agreement with, namely ANY of his videos. Hows that work again?


Pathetic.

Nobody has found the way yet
Ben

Speak for YOURSELF in such matters.

[TheoriaApophasis]

FLIR , thermal IR

Hmmm, is that a 6" giant neodymium that has NOT been touched in days just "sitting there" hotter than the environment???


YUP

Is that thermal reflectance? Nope.





The object sitting there not moving is SPINNING at tremendous speeds.


I took these FLIR pics today

[TheoriaApophasis]

FLIR,


showing more light being 'sucked' in along the dielectric inertial plane


more light, more heat




I made these pics tonight

[TheoriaApophasis]

Well, nobody has EVER seen a magnet doing this before


2 part video series........

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZJvIMU7JYM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=synLMIGGLk4


……………..Better yet, i EXPECTED THIS to happen before doing it.



Lux et Veritas

[Dog-One]

Kill the CRT

Well, nobody has EVER seen a magnet doing this before

……………..Better yet, i EXPECTED THIS to happen before doing it.

Ken, can you start the recording focusing on the heat dissipation and kill the CRT. I'd like to see verification the magnet is actually absorbing and re-radiating the dielectricity. If I'm correct, the hot spot should extinguish fairly quick after shutting off the CRT, but leave just enough residual to notice it was there and where the source was coming from.

Thanks much.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Ken, can you start the recording focusing on the heat dissipation and kill the CRT. I'd like to see verification the magnet is actually absorbing and re-radiating the dielectricity. If I'm correct, the hot spot should extinguish fairly quick after shutting off the CRT, but leave just enough residual to notice it was there and where the source was coming from.

Thanks much.

GOOD IDEA, I will do that tonight

[TheoriaApophasis]

Thanks much.

I was replicating this one tonight
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJ7fMVp_O5s#t=10

using light to manipulate pyrolytic graphite over magnets

however their understanding of HOW or WHY it works is dead wrong.



it literally causes the pyrolytic graphite to "shoot" magnetism out the other side, which impels its motion TOWARDS the light and away from its own magnetic ejecta.

[sadang]

WHY must divergent centrifugal magnetism reciprocate and return centripetally and convergently into the center of the "other pole"?
Why should not magnetism, like particle radiation and Transverse Di-electromagnetism (what is incorrectly deemed EM, / light etc) just "go out". Why return at all?

Due to their helical dynamics and specific kind of interaction, and also because it will allways follow the lowest pressure path! From divergent centrifugal magnetism (highest ether pressure state) to convergent centripetal dielectric plane (lowest ether pressure state). Faraday, Maxwell, others and more recently Lyne have right in their assumptions.

Just my opinion...

[TheoriaApophasis]

Due to their helical dynamics and specific kind of interaction, and also because it will allways follow the lowest pressure path! From divergent centrifugal magnetism (highest ether pressure state) to convergent centripetal dielectric plane (lowest ether pressure state). Faraday, Maxwell, others and more recently Lyne have right in their assumptions.

Just my opinion...

there are many reasons, .... Reason one being that no line of magnetic divergence can terminate in space. (said by many, including Dollard and many others).


Space is never, can never, never could be a terminus for any Ether modality.


That alone says a lot about the space we reify from birth to death.


Many other reasons, .....Because even divergence must discharge its own divergence after passing the dielectric boundary of the physical magnet.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Lets see anyone explain this one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulmlXKYbjSU


Yes, ONE MAGNET, and a bismuth disk, more and more and more and more proof of inverse spin.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi TheoriaApophasis

Machinealive

I built a crude (yes yes, this is a CRUDE prototype) prototype for a friend to build and sell for himself (hes got 2 kids).


I just needed all the angles right with this crude prototype, then it can be painted and a proper BASE be made for it, and change the screw lengths a bit.



Anyway, its finished, now he has the angles etc, he can build them himself and make it look very nice, easily.



My programmed bismuth will allow for, what it appears from 3 test lifter NEOS, an average of 10mm GREATER separation than the one shown here using standing bismuth casts.