Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[TheoriaApophasis]

I'm pretty much stuck in a rut thinking of practical ways to use bismuth. How about a little kick in the right direction.

next level semiconductors are being developed with bismuth

also see here:

Landau spectrum and twin boundaries of bismuth in the extreme quantum limit


its properties still confound people.

[mikrovolt]

Dielectric Inertia

Edison added Bismuth to his nickel battery, the oxide formed had interesting properties and beneficial.

RE: Ken Wheeler on Dielectric Inerta.
Thinking differently about what happens with magnets in a different way is a challenge.

Many of us are familiar with the term electromagnetic induction used by Michael Faraday 1831
Electromagnetic induction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Because the existence and nature of negative electricity has unanswered questions the idea of a dielectric inertia may be relevant.
Maxwell thought displacement current was sufficient and that aether would need to be proven first.
Since aether was considered unnecessary I went further back to Faraday as a point where sufficient terminology exists.


In exploring and introducing " Dielectric Inertia " is there a definition ?

[TheoriaApophasis]

In exploring and introducing " Dielectric Inertia " is there a definition ?

magnetic reluctivity

Resultant to bismuths high dielectric inertia, it logically has extremely low magnetic permeability. All magnetic reluctivity is based upon dielectric inertia, a repulsion and resistance to magnetic field ‘breaking’ of inertia. Magnetism itself, being the dielectric field in discharge is definitionally a loss of Ether-inertia and represents the Ether-modality of magnetism, but denotatively this is the spatial vectorization of dielectricity due to its discharge /loss of inertia.


But, all that is just still a miserable explanation (by myself).



denotatively its a hyper-stable radial inertia of the most fundamental Ether modality, dielectricity.



Bismuth, the Universe's heaviest stable element sits at a inter-atomic MAXIMUM magneto-dielectric perfection with the HIGHEST POSSIBLE dielectric inertia in an element


as we know (or as i said in the book) protons being magnetically dominant, the addition of ONE mere proton causes Bismuth to transform into Insanely deadly radioactive Polonium.


1 proton separates out bismuth with a half life of 20 BILLION BILLION YEARS, safe, non-toxic....

from Polonium, incredibly deadly, radioactive,
.....and the extra proton of polonium throws bismuth’s dielectric inertia into chaos, (which is how polonium is created, by bombarding bismuth)

.....so out of harmony that bismuth (as now polonium) becomes an extremely lethal tool of assassination and a short-lived deadly radioactive element where ONE one millionth of a gram becomes fatal





I would say that , as analogy, that Bismuth is the "fastest lamborghini element" the empirical cosmos can produce.

all else is incredibly unstable and flies apart at the seams in a less than a heartbeat (in the grand scheme of 'time') and desperately wants to kill and/or poison you and all else that lives.




by sheer deduction, bismuth SHOULD become a NEW BREED of nuclear weapon which is initiated to explosion not by conventional atomic bomb means of critical mass or compression/implosion but by both compression pulse and intense magnetomotive force.
But that is of course speculative.




WHAT IS DIELECTRIC INERTIA???????????????

you only have to ask yourself "WHAT IS THE EXTREME OPPOSITE IMPLICATION OF RADIATION/MAGNETISM" ?


Looking at a hypercube formation of a bismuth crystal should tell most people that answer after a bit of intellectual deduction.

[aljhoa]

The Stewart–Tolman effect is a phenomenon in electrodynamics caused by the finite mass of electrons in conducting metal, or, more generally, the finite mass of charge carriers in an electrical conductor.

It is named after T. Dale Stewart and Richard C. Tolman, two American physicists who carried out their experimental work in the 1910s.[1] This eponym appears to be first used by Lev Landau.[2]

In a conducting body undergoing accelerating motion, inertia causes the electrons in the body to "lag" behind the overall motion. In the case of linear acceleration, negative charge accumulates at the end of the body; while for rotation the negative charge accumulates at the outer rim. The accumulation of charges can be measured by a galvanometer.

This effect is proportional to the mass of the charge carriers. It is much more significant in electrolyte conductors than metals, because ions in the former are 103-104 times more massive than electrons in the latter.[1]
Stewart–Tolman effect - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fifty Theories of the Aether
Aether Theories - Collation of Scientific Theories of the Aether


Al

[Dog-One]

A step further...

magnetic reluctivity

Resultant to bismuths high dielectric inertia, it logically has extremely low magnetic permeability. All magnetic reluctivity is based upon dielectric inertia, a repulsion and resistance to magnetic field ‘breaking’ of inertia. Magnetism itself, being the dielectric field in discharge is definitionally a loss of Ether-inertia and represents the Ether-modality of magnetism, but denotatively this is the spatial vectorization of dielectricity due to its discharge /loss of inertia.

denotatively its a hyper-stable radial inertia of the most fundamental Ether modality, dielectricity.

Bismuth, the Universe's heaviest stable element sits at a inter-atomic MAXIMUM magneto-dielectric perfection with the HIGHEST POSSIBLE dielectric inertia in an element

WHAT IS DIELECTRIC INERTIA???????????????

you only have to ask yourself "WHAT IS THE EXTREME OPPOSITE IMPLICATION OF RADIATION/MAGNETISM" ?

Looking at a hypercube formation of a bismuth crystal should tell most people that answer after a bit of intellectual deduction.

So laying the puzzle pieces out on the floor, we have:

1. A permanent magnet that is a dielectric object radiating magnetism.
2. Bismuth, that would appear to shield magnetism due to its high dielectric inertia.

Hence, it would seem to me that if a permanent magnet was incased in bismuth, with only one end of its centrifugal edge exposed, you would have the equivalent of a magnetic rocket engine. And if such a composition were to be either mounted on a wheel or positioned at an acute angle to a wheel, you would have the first steps completed in a dead-simple magnet motor.

Now to blow this whole idea out of the water, surely many people have tried this and had disappointing results. It cannot be that easy. Why would there even be such a thing as Mu-Metal if we already have Bismuth? Granted, Mu-Metal is used to redirect magnetism instead of insulate from it.

[TheoriaApophasis]

So laying the puzzle pieces out on the floor, we have:

1. A permanent magnet that is a dielectric object radiating magnetism.
2. Bismuth, that would appear to shield magnetism due to its high dielectric inertia.

Hence, it would seem to me that if a permanent magnet was incased in bismuth, with only one end of its centrifugal edge exposed, you would have the equivalent of a magnetic rocket engine. And if such a composition were to be either mounted on a wheel or positioned at an acute angle to a wheel, you would have the first steps completed in a dead-simple magnet motor.

Now to blow this whole idea out of the water, surely many people have tried this and had disappointing results. It cannot be that easy. Why would there even be such a thing as Mu-Metal if we already have Bismuth? Granted, Mu-Metal is used to redirect magnetism instead of insulate from it.

bismuth only repels centrifugal magnetism, not centripetal.

*****Hence, it would seem to me that if a permanent magnet was incased in bismuth****

Some of critters have thought of that "PLOY" already

[Bob Smith]

bismuth only repels centrifugal magnetism, not centripetal.

Just trying to understand what this means... I'm going to assume that bismuth attracts centrifugal magnetism (while repelling the centripetal), and this is what is meant by dielectric inertia?
Bob

[TheoriaApophasis]

Ken,
I can't help but consider what value bismuth might have in circuits in terms of negative resistance, given its high dielectric permittivity.
Bob

cast some bismuth ingots, each 24 ounces



a bit ugly but still 99.99% pure


it ships in CAKE FORM, which is refined, but it melts and cools more dense than the "fluffed" cake form its refined in.





working my ASS OFF on the newest edition of UNCOVERING THE MISSING SECRETS OF MAGNETISM.


I have some real stunning stuff to add i havent talked about in here.






NOTICE THE MIDDLE OF THE B on the bar, where the Bismuth cooled in a vortex against the depression of the "B"


same premise of the "hopperized crystals of bismuth", but this is NOT an explaination, only a description. What is going on it so much important.


Apparently less than a dozen people on earth or so have considered deeply that the universes MOST dense STABLE element has some "magic" properties far yet still UNdiscovered.


100% of everything heavier than bismuth is both absurdly unstable and deadly and usually both.





The next stable element, uranium, used in D.U. (depleted uranium) armor etc, is still 'very' unstable relatively and all eventually depletes itself into lead.

The primary radiation danger from pure depleted uranium is due to alpha particles, which do not travel far through air, and do not penetrate clothing. However, in a matter of a month or so, a sample of pure depleted uranium will generate small amounts of thorium-234 and protactinium-234, which emit the more penetrating beta particles at almost the same rate as the uranium emits alpha rays. This is because uranium-238 decays directly to thorium-234, which with a half-life of 24 days decays to protactinium-234, which in turn decays in a matter of hours to the long-lived uranium-234. A quasi-steady state is therefore reached within a few multiples of 24 days





However it did dot the "I" for me on its own

[Dog-One]

Add one more to that...

Apparently less than a dozen people on earth or so have considered deeply that the universes MOST dense STABLE element has some "magic" properties far yet still UNdiscovered.

A permanent magnet is a dielectric object.
Dielectricity terminates as magnetism.
A PM has a dielectric inertial plane.
A PM has three centripetal (entry) and two centrifugal (exit) locations, with the dielectric inertial plane located at the third centripetal entry location.

Bismuth has high dielectric inertia.
Bismuth displays dielectric counter-voidance to centrifugal magnetism and dielectric voidance to centripetal magnetism.

Therefore,

Bismuth is one example of a material that illustrates magnetism terminating as dielectricity. Are there any more...?

[TheoriaApophasis]

Therefore,

Bismuth is one example of a material that illustrates magnetism terminating as dielectricity. Are there any more...?

Spatial vectorization of loss of inertia in discharge (ala Poincare' disk model which dielectricity MUST follow necessitatively) is not a termination, only a (posterior creation of space as both meant , implied, and connotated by the term polarization) vector of reintegration to 're-initialize' the loss of inertia to maintain a stasis of the Ether-modality of dielectricity denotated as magnetism in its polarized state of 'resetting' its own pressure mediating inertia by spatial vectorization and radial assimilation to its original radial inertia.


otherwise centripetal magentism could not exist, nor would there be any logical reason or necessity for its existence.

in which case magnetism would be like ANY OTHER radiation which goes out and STAYS out.

but we of magnetism as per "going out and staying there"........

1. know this is not true

2. likewise know that no Ether modality CAN or HAS ever terminated "in space"

3. Space itself is a posterior attribute of polarization and IS not , CANNOT be a terminal of discharge of any Ether modality.




Moseley's experiments [using X rays] demonstrated that what distinguishes one element from another is its atomic number, the number of protons in the nucleus of its atoms, not its atomic weight, which is a measure of the total number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus. The correct way of ordering the elements in the periodic table was, therefore, by their atomic number, and not, as Mendeleyev had thought, by their atomic weight.


The appalling scandal of such a theory is easily exposed in the case of the final stable element bismuth. It is stable with 43 extra neutrons, but with 42 or 44 neutrons it is unstable. Similar cases can be found for many other elements."

High mag fields over bismuth should create extremely tiny amounts of polonium 210



Logically polonium , while an element is NOT really an element at all, but a hyper-state of de-stabilized Bismuth


ALL Polonium is created from nuclear radiation, which is why the Russian SUB crew were poisoned, NOT from Uranium etc, but the Bismuth coolant which some had been transformed into Polonium from nuclear radiation and turned into wicked deadly as living fried hell Polonium

I believe the movie about that is K-19 with Harrison Ford.


this likewise is the reason for the false reports of super-miniscule A-emissions of bismuth.


The equipment used by the Orsay team consists of two “heat and light” detectors that are enclosed in a reflecting cavity and cooled to 20mk. The first detector- containing bismuth-209, germanium and oxygen – undergoes a slight temperature rise when it absorbs an alpha particle. This temperature change is measured in the form of a voltage pulse whose amplitude is directly proportional to the energy released. The second detector, made from a thin disk of germanium, registers the light flashes from alpha-particle events.

The team performed two measurements, one with 31 grams of bismuth in the detector and the other with 62 grams. The scientists registered 128 alpha-particle events over 5 days and found an unexpected line in the spectrum at 3.14 MeV - now attributed to bismuth-209 decay. The half-life was calculated to be (1.9 +/- 0.2 ) x 1019 years, which is in good agreement with the theoretical prediction of 4.6 x 1019 years.

[Dog-One]

Confusing me with the facts

Spatial vectorization of loss of inertia in discharge (ala Poincare' disk model which dielectricity MUST follow necessitatively) is not a termination, only a (posterior creation of space as both meant , implied, and connotated by the term polarization) vector of reintegration to 're-initialize' the loss of inertia to maintain a stasis of the Ether-modality of dielectricity denotated as magnetism in its polarized state of 'resetting' its own pressure mediating inertia by spatial vectorization and radial assimilation to its original radial inertia.


otherwise centripetal magentism could not exist, nor would there be any logical reason or necessity for its existence.

in which case magnetism would be like ANY OTHER radiation which goes out and STAYS out.

but we of magnetism as per "going out and staying there"........

1. know this is not true

2. likewise know that no Ether modality CAN or HAS ever terminated "in space"

3. Space itself is a posterior attribute of polarization and IS not , CANNOT be a terminal of discharge of any Ether modality.

Yes, I knew that. I was testing you.

[sadang]

Hi Ken,

After all these explanations, what about the Sun and its created space (centrifugal dielectric field) in which the Earth is sunk like a boat? And what about the Earth's own created space? And what about the all other spaces created by our galaxy or the entire Universe? Is the magnetic field of the Earth only a native one, only an induced one, or both? What is the ratio between the Earth's native magnetism, and that induced by the sun? What are we humans after all? And why? Just a bunch of few rhetorical questions from many, many others floating in my head!

And I would like to see a personal point of view of you Ken, in the context of last messages about the conversion of bismuth in a radioactive element, about the people which leave with/in radioactivity, like the spouses Iradia! Which relevance have the common terms such as alive, live and life in this new context?

- Interviews - Spouses Irradia

Thanks,
SaDAng

[ldrancer]

polorize isnt a real word

[TheoriaApophasis]

polorize isnt a real word

you spelled it wrong son.


Yes, polarize IS a word

Polarize - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary



Grow up

[ldrancer]

word means to define something.
polar is the sun
now define magnets again.

im the one who put the definition... according to that up here. why don't you grow up.
and start using language. people who use words to communicate with.