Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[ldrancer]

Your the one who said its what a magnet is and you explained magnetism.

no to me i might as well just listen to, but i wont quantum qauackkk ery.

becuase its still magical fairy dust.

lets see what the definition is.

Polarization is a concept that comes from science, and it involves light, radiation, or magnetism moving in specific directions. Outside science, polarization usually refers to how people think, especially when two views emerge that drive people apart, kind of like two opposing magnets

oh boy i read all that.

its a science concept. so your relying on quantum quackkk ery.

thanks a lot thank you thank you. ohh

right after you wrote

time to read up then Bye.

ok. so who doesnt know the meaning of the word polarization? who is talking without even knowing what theyre saying?

polar means the sun which ive already said. theres no other definition.

except mine i just told you.

your inventions have been stolen and your langauge was stolen too, to get you to not produce anything.

think of what polarization means. thats what I want. since you have no understanding of magnets then quit giving me this jigger jabber. words are things.

or definition of words, are things.

[sadang]

And what are things idrancer? Don't tell me a kind of words! Can you make the difference between a noun and a verb?

Try to deepen these two pages:
- Polarization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Polar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and then translate the meanings of the word "polarization" in the context used by Ken to explain the magnetism, as he see it.

Stop messing this topic with silly arguments!

thanks,
SaDAng

[David G Dawson]

The Bismuth Shrine

The Bismuth Shrine:

Bismuth the Metal - Moshe's favourite element - Bismuth metallicum

We have an extended and adapted David Lowrance Rainmaker here, two in fact that use Bismuth and I counted the number of 8x12 pellets and it added up to 36 pellets at 10 grams each = 360 grams.
The Rainmaker consists of two TV Neck Ferrites, back to back with the lower loaded with some 80 Neos measuring 5 x 20 mm - 8 stacks of 10.



Plastic ring behind the Magnets contain Garnets for 'calm'.
Coil is a Mobius, Crystal Ball is Amethyst with a Calcite Pyramid on top.
Everything is wired up but has never been needed as the device is believed to be self powering through 'Conscience Intent' (CI) - Witchdoctor stuff!.
North out for rain in Southern Hemisphere, South out for sunshine, reverse for NH.

Two of the Bismuth packs just sit on the outside but the melted one is in the middle of the Ferrites at the Neck and believe I had 20 pellets (200 grams) here which I melted into a 3" Aluminium tube.
These all have coils around them for pulsing but little has been done to that effect.
So what we have is a Bismuth pack being consistently bombarded with very strong and focussed South magnetism through the Ferrites.
I was very much aware of where Bismuth stood in the Periodic Table and was probably then, simply fascinated why something so placid could sit in the middle of a veritable bomb and am still very unsure of Bismuth.



This is 'Pyramid Something', similar construction but smaller and was activated to bring in a line of thunderstorms into the front right Pyramid leg (NW) and in this was a pulse curve of the storms over a set distance as yet not understood why but probably a multiple response to many combined energies.

These Rainmakers have been here active since 2006 and the second in 2007.
I do tend to prefer to use the ANU (Absolute Nuclear Units) or UPA (Ultimate Physical Atoms) when consulting a Periodic Table but my ANU table ends at Gold at A79 where Bismuth is A83 with Lead, Thallium and Mercury in between.
ANU appears to be a taboo subject.
However UPA has more information from Crookes and Occult Chemistry and tells me that Bismuth is at 3753 units and Polonium at 3789 and Thallium at 3678 - hard to read.

Occult Chemistry Introduction



Just to show that I am no slack:
This is a picture of the outer Lab area and shows from bottom left, a David Wells Machine, artifacts of Nature in the Platonic Solids, Quartz Crystals (Stonehenge), Shells, pinecones, Wheels of Destiny - ring of thunderstorms, alien entities and other abnormal observations - only one of its type on the Planet, The Tesla Magnifying Transmitter (TMT) - Eric P Dollard's 'Crystal Set Initiative' (CSI) and back round to the DL Rainmakers showing their makeup.
Do I know what I am doing, sometimes and sometimes not and its not easy at 72 when you have gone through a lifetime of electrical technology full of lies and deceit.
The inner Lab is full of Magnets, Vacuum Tubes, a Lester Hendershot Generator and currently working on my version of the Steven Mark TPU/TEG (Torsional Energy Generator).
Outside the Lab is full of Wilhelm Reich and TJ Constable rainmaking devices and current count is at 17 mostly different operational devices that are capable of making rain and makes current technology in Cloud Seeding look a little sick.
Another totally new device is on the dawing boards with more planned.

I am here because I need to know how to make a magnet self oscillate in such a way that it is able to induce voltage into coils and this being the heart of the Hendershot device in his horseshoe/iron bar/twin coil 'resonator' and probably also the Mark TPU.
A pdf was released some time back saying not to use Iron in a TPU but I will disagree with that statement in that the phenomena can work in two ways, expansive as I believe the Mark TPU is and contractive as was the Chicago colour TV event where everything was attracted into the TV at the Neck Ferrite area - an implosion.
The phenomena can work both ways.
No simple problem here working out that I will be using the TV Neck Ferrites and going the contractive way.
I am hoping that Ken may be able to assist in opening some doors into these mysteries and believe he already has and it is only going to take time and an understanding before some magic may happen.
The hardest part is eliminating the untruths of the past and grasping a new comprehension.
Thanks Ken.

Smokey

[sadang]

Hi David,

I want to express here my appreciation for your work! I'm not alien to any of the devices you describe here, their inventors and the mentioned books! I just want to say I see an analogy between Hendershot ot TPU devices and the Linden experiment made by Paul Baumann the "father" of Testatika:

- Testatika Linden Experiment

Again, my congratulations for your hard work!

SaDAng

[TheoriaApophasis]

The Bismuth Shrine:

Rarity:
Very common: LEAD = 14 parts per million in the earths crust. COPPER = 60 parts per million in the earths curst.
Moderately rare: SILVER = 75 parts per billion.
Extremely rare: BISMUTH = 9 parts per billion. GOLD = 4 parts per billion. PLATINUM = 5 parts per billion.



All indications are that bismuth does not exist natively whatsoever rather is the end product of depleted Neptunium. likewise is the case that most lead is depleted uranium. Additionally current plentiful presence of uranium with virtually non-existent Neptunium is further indication of this. Neptunium eventually decays to form bismuth-209, unlike most other common heavy nuclei which decay into lead isotopes. Unlike most metals bismuth expands on cooling from its molten state. It is no coincidence nor anything other than perfectly logical that the first transuranic element, Neptunium degrades into the LAST heavy stable element, bismuth.


While you can read that “bismuth has a half-life of roughly 19,000,000,000,000,000,000 years”, this is based upon a spurious test. What is fact is happening is a few stray neutrons exist in a very few atoms of bismuth of any grade, and this small bit is that of bismuth-210, which decays into polonium 210; polonium 210 is a very strong alpha particle emitter. Likewise there could be a very few atoms of polonium 209 with a half life of 102 years that are in the samples which decays into lead 205 via alpha radiation which was detected. Polonium is virtually non-existent in nature and one can more accurately call it a hyper-state of bismuth than innumerate polonium as a wholly different element.


As for the defunct experiment, the equipment used by the Orsay team consists of two “heat and light” detectors that are enclosed in a reflecting cavity and cooled to 20mk. The first detector- containing bismuth-209, germanium and oxygen – undergoes a slight temperature rise when it absorbs an alpha particle. This temperature change is measured in the form of a voltage pulse whose amplitude is directly proportional to the energy released. The second detector, made from a thin disk of germanium, registers the light flashes from alpha-particle events.



The team performed two measurements, one with 31 grams of bismuth in the detector and the other with 62 grams. The scientists registered 128 alpha-particle events over 5 days and found an unexpected line in the spectrum at 3.14 MeV - now attributed to bismuth-209 decay. The half-life was calculated to be (1.9 +/- 0.2 ) x 1019 years, however this conclusion was based upon a false premise and understanding.



Bismuth does NOT naturally occur in the primordial earth rather is the "end road" of Neptunium



Henry Moseley's experiments [using X rays] demonstrated that what distinguishes one element from another is its atomic number, the number of protons in the nucleus of its atoms, not its atomic weight, which is a measure of the total number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus. The correct way of ordering the elements in the periodic table was, therefore, by their atomic number, and not, as Mendeleyev had thought, by their atomic weight. As for bismuth, it is stable with 43 extra neutrons, but with 42 or 44 neutrons it is unstable. This key point as per diamagnetism and stability cannot be overlooked. Bismuth also exhibits overunity since its 209 nucleus has a higher energy state that the sum of its components, which would be of thallium 205 and helium-4 nucleus. Meaning bismuth breaks the rule of conservation.


The thorium series begins with thorium-232 and ends with the stable nuclide lead-208. The neptunium series is named for its longest-lived member, neptunium-237; it ends with bismuth-209. The uranium series begins with uranium-238 and ends with lead-206. The actinium series, named for its first-discovered member, actinium-227, begins with uranium-235 and ends with lead-207. Meaning ‘all roads end in lead’, except for neptunium which ends in bismuth! From this we can deduce that of lead we know it is naturally very abundant however almost all of it is the product of long-term uranium depletion; whereas neptunium is the only element that degrades into a non-toxic hyper-stable element, bismuth which is likewise on part with gold and platinum in rarity. Uranium degrades into lead, and neptunium into bismuth. Both neptunium and bismuth are extremely rare, all natively existent neptunium that was present at the formation of the earth has since degraded into bismuth, that it exists alongside lead in mining is no coincidence since neptunium is found alongside uranium as well naturally however it is extremely rare. The universe’s rarest heavy unstable element degrades into the universe’s rarest and most heavy stable element bismuth.

Bismuth is the HEAVIEST STABLE ELEMENT that exists in the universe. Everything else is unstable, radioactive and typically highly toxic, not to mention thallium and lead just below bismuth, it has an atomic weight of 209, although it has the atomic number 83. If you subtract the number of protons (83) from the number 209 (the atomic weight) you get 126. That is the exact number of neutrons in the bismuth atom. Since protons are magnetically dominant, merely adding one proton to bismuth to create polonium creates both an incredibly lethal, short lived, toxic and radioactive element that virtually does not exist in nature. Polonium when inhaled or swallowed takes merely on millionth of a gram to be lethal. This is the very methodology used by Putin to murder Alexander Litvinenko. The Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory has to its premise that the “Strong Nuclear Force” and Dielectricity/ Gravity are one and the same force. Bismuth crystals grow extremely fast for a reason.

Typical investigation will not divulge the relative picture of bismuth, and its special ‘seat’ on the periodic table, being so unlike its neighbors. Resting between extremely toxic and incredibly rare and radioactive polonium with a mere handful of days of half life, and astatine with a mere 8 hour half life, bismuth is so stable that its half life is 20 billion billion years, infinitely longer than the calculated age of the universe, however this conclusion is spurious, since bismuth is entirely stable. Additionally, sitting on the periodic table, stable, non-toxic in its pure form, and so incredibly non-radioactive it is virtually inert denotatively, it rests between both the extreme incredible toxicity of lead and thallium, and the incredibly rare and worse still dangerous and unstable radioactive polonium and astatine. Thallium is so deadly, mere handling proves fatal and it was at one time used as a poisoning agent of animals and of murderers. Literally in the middle of hell and worse hell, is a safe and stable element with incredible dielectric properties some characteristics only recently being uncovered, one of which by myself in experimentation. Resultant to bismuths high dielectric inertia, it logically has extremely low magnetic permeability. All magnetic reluctivity is based upon dielectric inertia, a repulsion and resistance to magnetic field ‘breaking’ of inertia. Magnetism itself, being the dielectric field in discharge is definitionally a loss of Ether-inertia and represents the Ether-modality of magnetism, but denotatively this is the spatial vectorization of dielectricity due to its discharge /loss of inertia.





Ohhh, and bismuth just skyrocketed in price shortly after ordering several 100 pounds which are on a semi truck headed this way.


(pure coincidence however)

[TheoriaApophasis]

I am here because I need to know how to make a magnet self oscillate

you need to know about the gyromagnetic precession of magnetism which is 42.5


also called the LARMOR FREQUENCY

Gyromagnetic ratios, and magnetic precession is nothing of my discovery, this principle is part and parcel to all magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI), nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (NMRI) technology, however the entire field of MRI technology
is senseless and clueless that a permanent magnet exhibits this due to a special magneto-dielectric field geometry. MRI use enormous
power to generate these magnetic precessions, which field contrasts are then used to image and determine what is being scanned.
Enormous pulsing power is used in the creation of MRI images, however a single large pulse is used to create an identical precessional
magnetic geometry in the permanent magnet. As is the case with most technology, things are discovered and perfected without
actually understanding or caring about the principles behind them.

This angle is 42.492 (42.5~) degrees, which is also the frequency in Mhz/T of the proton,
however this is incorrectly published as 42.5781, it is at perfect equilibrium at 42.492, but this is a minor difference.



with NO coincidence this frequency of POLAR PRECESSION of 42.5 is exactly HALF of 1 which = 85 degrees or Mhz/T of the circular precessional growth of everything is in nature which is 137.5077 - 137.5077 and 85


Now, go google this :

"137.5 golden angle"

[ldrancer]

And what are things idrancer? Don't tell me a kind of words! Can you make the difference between a noun and a verb?

Try to deepen these two pages:
- Polarization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Polar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and then translate the meanings of the word "polarization" in the context used by Ken to explain the magnetism, as he see it.

Stop messing this topic with silly arguments!

thanks,
SaDAng

no whats water? whats a rock? whats wood? things right. tools you can use to make other tools with. water can be used to cool stuff with. rocks can be used to shape thigns with. wood can be used to heat stuff up.

things have properties. words are things. polarization has no properties. its not an actual word in the online or anywhere definition. its a word for sun.

and sun well.

since noone understands the sun magnets are near us and understandable to people. so when people dont understand something they use polar. so they never have to explain it and it stays, stupid.

[David G Dawson]

Magnetism Questions

Ken,
Thankyou for the extra info on Bismuth.
Will check your pages on gyroscopic action but not sure I can see a connection there.

Now the questions:
1. Why then is it that there are certain metals that are able to be strongly magnetically coupled to a magnet and others not so?
Is it that the NMR frequency of Iron for example is very close to that of the natural resonant frequency of the Aether where the other regulars like Copper and Aluminium are not?

We have already done the magnet down the tube dropping exercise and have noted that both of the above slow down compared to say a similar size and weight non magnetised steel ball with Copper being slightly slower than the Aluminium but a magnetic coupling is still visible.
So there is still coupling there but nowhere near as strong as with Iron/steel.
Resonant frequency of the Aether is given in many documents referring to energy and one coming to mind is 1.3Mhz and also 200 and 400 hertz associated directly with Iron.

2. Fiddling with the surface Math which I do a lot of (not the real depth stuff as I find it all too irrational and meaningless) and find:
360/137.53 = 2.618 = pHi 1.618 + 1.0 = 2.618
pHi is the organiser of 'packing' in that it gives the best fit to any complex arrangement and this was well illustrated in the work of 'The Primer Fields' by David LaPoint with respect to the magnets organising themselves and, of course, in the face of a Sunflower.
So what your 137.5º is representing in a circle is pHi and the remainder being 2pHi at 222.5º.
So a circle now becomes two angles of pHi with a '1' remaining and this with an angle of:
137.5 + 137.5 = 275º with 85º remaining from 360º which = 1.
Very good!
Harmonic 222 from Bruce Cathie and Jorge Resines which appears to be a natural resonant frequency of the Earth or Cosmos now fits into this complex mix.

As a summary to all of this, I do not see why we are not able to condition SOFT Iron in the same manner as we do an Electret with a high voltage and controlled heating and cooling such that it has a natural resonant frequency which can be activated by a magnetic coupling.
I know what one of your backroom Patent devices is all about as I took the liberty and courtesy of reading not only your pdf but also this Forum and I wish some others would have done the same.
No apologies for the questions as I note many others here seeking the same answers and in particular with respect to the Steven Mark TPU and
will advise on my progress as this is coming 'from the other side' and may be a better way to harness the energy.

The TMT of Eric P Dollard actually works and I attempted to correct some of his calculations which I found by sheer accident were incorrect.
However, nobody was able to understand my theory or bothered to go deeper into the real problem and who was this guy anyway, contradicting Mr Dollard!
So there we have it, a working TMT where I am able to receive the local Radio Station radiating from the Extra Coil through a ground connection (Telluric) and not Hertzian, through the air, using a dual 1N34 Germanium diode pickup head into high impedance headphones.
This is an LMD signal and my belief is that this is the key to a working TMT, a resonance is set up between the Extra and Secondary coil which is of a TEM/LMD nature and is capable of amplification but much work still required here to find the best coupling requirements and organisation.
Note that the Extra Coil gets pulled out of shape by the direction of the wind over time.

I digress.
Not too many people really know how a Magnet is made and this video may help those that were in the dark like myself:

How SuperMagnets are made - YouTube

So what I got out of this was 2400 volts @ 12 amps and this for a particular Neo but what would you use for a Ferrite?
Not a great deal of information found on the making of Magnets.
I am actually making my own soft iron horseshoe Magnets here for an attempt at the Wesley Gary device as that was a demonstration of a Magnet self oscillating and was going to apply to the Hendershot 'resonator'.

Wesley Gary's Magnetic Motor

You are not able to buy thin horseshoe Magnets today as Gary used so am making my own out of thin sof iron sheets, laminated and bolted together and thus the reason for knowing just how many DC volts and amps to use to get a working product.
I bought some horseshoe types here but accidently found out that the magnets were actually mini Neos stuck into the face of the 'U' and clearly and distictly NOT a horseshoe Magnet.

A need now to reread your documents and bone up on the terminology used and fully understand the concepts.
Thanks.

Smokey

[TheoriaApophasis]

point non-specific self-similarity isnt that easy for most people to grasp or even deeper.


likewise the premise of incommensurability isnt taught in any school.


This fact of force precession and divergent/convergent 'movement' isnt studied or known or grasped.


It was inherently grasped by the Pythagoreans and Neoplatonists, but not by modern day educated (meaning brainwashed) college ejecta.



I wasnt looking for the gyromagnetic precession to be half of 85, which is 42.5, but it came out that way and was predicted beforehand by myself.


For several reasons, however it was and is impossible for it to even exist any other way, its utterly impossible.


MRI technicians know about the LARMOR frequency, but all of them are clueless boobs about what it REALLY means, and its implications, etc etc etc.


people study stuff today, nobody LEARNS anything, they have no capacity for non-linear synthesis of comprehension.


The world is FULL of descriptions, and DEVOID of explanations.


College is where you go to get descriptions to memorize,


Plotinus, Proclus, Damascius, Plato etc etc etc, are the ancient Greek texts I have went to , to learn a lost method of comprehension.

[admin]

@ldrancer

no whats water? whats a rock? whats wood? things right. tools you can use to make other tools with. water can be used to cool stuff with. rocks can be used to shape thigns with. wood can be used to heat stuff up.

things have properties. words are things. polarization has no properties. its not an actual word in the online or anywhere definition. its a word for sun.

and sun well.

since noone understands the sun magnets are near us and understandable to people. so when people dont understand something they use polar. so they never have to explain it and it stays, stupid.

Please refrain from posting in Ken's thread anymore. You're very antagonistic towards his views in his own discussion so if you disagree this much, post elsewhere. You're welcome to start your own thread and discuss your own viewpoints, but plenty of members are interested in the conversation here with the exception of your repetitive disagreements.

[ldrancer]

Polarization Is An Assumption

whatever an arguments something thats 2 sided and the 2 sidedness of you is you used some lacky to harass me over this then you didnt lke the outcome so you've came to attack me with moderator abuse.

so what i dont care. i only told him to use english and this was argued before and hes talking over top of me by being owned in the arguement he took part of cause i quoted him telling me to read when i said polarization isnt a word and he said read like i didnt know how to read, then when i came up with the whatever some site described that I guess you must agree with einstein also cause they'll put his stuff wherever you guys go on with your bs where youll attack someone and youll go along with something and NOT MENTION it to anyone. what your doing. then think that YOUR RIGHT.

LIARS. you, you know you cant' even like have a position?

i just told him to use english he even had a mouth on him about it to me, so i took him up on his bluff and raised him. i put the definition.

im just saying your all saying when you use that word some make believe up theories, i guess You think are real. Cause thats the exact definition of that word. Im not going along with it and asked him to use some real words.

Like rock or water or tree or something i can understand.

if i see a magnet it does things and i dont know why. it makes things come to it, but in a vortex type situation, I kind of get it.

what noone else unless their licking his butt can comment? He also acted very snobby too me too in private messages instead of leaving me alone talking about how he discovered this and that.

i can see how a magnet can attract something it acting as a vortex, up and down on top. but you might of explained to say it goes around, back around on the south. butttt then how can a tool like this be made? can a machine be made like this?

no it cant so no its not explained, its your theory.

so anyway I'll ask any questions I want to and if he can't explain. I dont want to hear your theories, and I'll ask any questions say what I want and tear your theories apart in anyway I can.

OH why dont you write a website if thats what you want to do is Just tell every people, things. If you want feedback then shutup or get on a website.

Im not going to be ingored, talked over then laughed at later by theorasis and his assumptions.

thats all that polarization is, is an assumption. So your no better than step 0.

People have been mean trying to get me to leave this topic. but Im totalllly being nice. Your being 2 sided by messaging me in private using 2 accounts and not liking the outcome DOG-ONE of the results as you tried to tell someone in private youd rather them not post. I told you in no unneccassary terms NO. didnt I? and now moderator abuse by yelling at me over that.

POLARIZATION IS AN ASSUMPTION.

Dont debate me though continue to attack anybody with relative questions.

Hes the one who said he'd explain magnetism. Alright if you cant then, just admit it, that you can't. noone making you. But you'd rather use the word polarization then see how many people will believe you. instead.

or maybe our other discussion fake user moderator abuse guy?
you never messaged me back after sending me a message.

[ldrancer]

Please refrain from posting in Ken's thread anymore. You're very antagonistic towards his views in his own discussion so if you disagree this much, post elsewhere. You're welcome to start your own thread and discuss your own viewpoints, but plenty of members are interested in the conversation here with the exception of your repetitive disagreements.

quote me out of context a lot too to make me look bad.

i quoted him and then his 2 facedness. the last thing said was an insult to me. You pretend anyone really cares what you think while you point out certain things.

as i told you in message what hes come out with here, is repeat. people have known this stuff and its also open.

Write a website if you want to HAVE EVERYONE LISTEN TOEVERYTHING YOU HAVE TO SAY. then you cant complain when noone comes to it. quit getting on a forum to pretend everyone has to hear the crap youve got to say.

Im just stating what I don't want heard. Can I not hear, non-real words?
cant you guys since you know everythign about words, telling me to read, explain what the word means? you couldnt to me. so when you used the word again

your talking over top of me and trying to overthrow the topic. you dont own it.

fine have your communist discussion.

you guys wont even ask becuase you dont know. or have alterate agendas one..

the last post i made anyway, before replying to sadang was QUOTING him. much of a post huh?

and heres dog-ones abusive post to me.

Dog-One Dog-One is online now
Member

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 43
Arrow Secrets of Magnetism
Quote:
Originally Posted by ldrancer View Post
word means to define something.
polar is the sun
now define magnets again.

im the one who put the definition... according to that up here. why don't you grow up.
and start using language. people who use words to communicate with.


ld,

Ken has been kind enough to share his knowledge and experiments with us. Must you continue to bash his posts?

If you have some great insight, please start your own thread and leave Ken's alone. You are not being helpful, or even humorous. For the moment I'm asking you nicely. Please be considerate of my request.

D1
Forward Message

so dog-one or moderator abuser one?? um so me asking someone to use language and real words and not assumption words, and you trying to message me to censor me is, bad?

well ok then.

by the way theorasis i watch your vidoes for like 1:30 then I get bored of you rambling on. Ive got the point. its neat to look at. Bored. nice lots of attacks on muslims you have on your video site thing too.

oh yea join the other topics so ken can start to use words to talk over me then im thrown out and then not be able to talk like i am in them, no because, He'll have something... to say.

why you guys take that like anybody has to hear the, crap you gotta say? ?

polarization to me is not a word. it pretty much means sun. but you guys dont know what it is, i dont know what it is. and i want to know. yuo should want to know, if you don't know. what something you dont know anything about, is.

and admin me and you dog-ones conversation i also said my other theory which i think would be the only thing you'd be relating to.

who is exactly having a problem theorasis? ive made my claim to him.

i cant see a reason for anybody else. except dog-one or the admin. you act like some big deal has been made. ken did state he knew everything about magnets, and polarization when i said id ont know what it means and he said read.

like i cant read or havent read what he's read. but right off the internet.

then he brings the arguement back up again. i just stated to use words that mean things. i already stated my case. it wasnt argued against. sO i WON by default. then you start it again.

so now your going to have to end it by explainign and aplogizing to me or censoring your forum with your 2 facededness, and 2 fake accounts. and moderator abuse. wooh

[sadang]

@idrancer

If you do not understand the terms and language used by Ken, does not mean that I or others do not understand what he wants to convey. I try to understand what is magnetism (and many others) for many years, and in Ken's theory found many of my disparate ideas placed in a logic ordinance.

To understand the terms used by him, must have years of alternative and comparative studies. You will never understand what he wants to convey by calling the dictionary or Wikipedia. That's your problem, you do not notice or maybe do not want to see.

When someone want to explain something new, he use natural words, normal words, day by day words, because that is human language. And eventually use jargon specific to that domain. Do you know or understand this?

Have you ever asked what someone wants to say, when he can not make understandable to you? Have you ever thought you don't understand him due to yourself? That the problem belongs to you not to him? Reflect deeply on these issues, and do not post here nonsense, but only come with specific questions or concerns!

SaDAng

[ldrancer]

your dealing with theories and assumptions. if you understand you could tear it up backwards and forwards. have an understanding of it. build it yourself. since noone understand what the sun is, its used as a fake thing to make a fake word out of it to describe it to everything you dont never know and wont using fake words.

and noone has even argued i defind it as the sun. when polar,
.. the poles of the earth or a magnet
poloar, ... bear

lots of things point to this not being and being the opposite of what polar is, but i think about and know that polar means sun.

which is way more of a description of what magnetism is if theorasis says thats, what it is, than what he says, which is just polarization. You dont know what the sun is you dont know what the meaning of the word polarization means.

ive at least descrbied it the best i can. and do i think magnets are polarization?

.. like no not really. because...

one reason. i was looking at that figure. if you can answer this question for me it would help.

the one that shows the up and down on the wavy display of the magnet. i cant find the picuture.

ok, question can this be build, like a machine? can i make a machine that does that, makes that kind of mechanical motion?

actually i dont htink it can. thats what im saying cause of the weird way it acts. but can you? cuase that would be.. pretty neat and maybe usable. in some way. to propel or something plus really fun to play with.

but it seems its your concept of what a magnet is.

so your agreeing its not even a real feasible thing that i can grasp, hold in my hands, or make a machine into. ?

so my theory then would be, and maybe im not adding new things maybe im not coming up with new stuff. but i am trying to make the topic move forward..

the middle part. you have no evidence its spins around on itself in the middle like that. you can draw out the map of the waves in it. so, the middle or diaelectric plane. could be, anything. you dont know thats how it propels itself. cause the whole concept would twist in on itself doing that.

so its not a feasible thing. its not a machine i can use to propel stuff with.

if you could, this is the thing, if you could figure out the middle. figure out as in turn into a working diagram, machine. then you could harness the power of the magnet.

[ldrancer]

@idrancer

If you do not understand the terms and language used by Ken, does not mean that I or others do not understand what he wants to convey. I try to understand what is magnetism (and many others) for many years, and in Ken's theory found many of my disparate ideas placed in a logic ordinance.

To understand the terms used by him, must have years of alternative and comparative studies. You will never understand what he wants to convey by calling the dictionary or Wikipedia. That's your problem, you do not notice or maybe do not want to see.

When someone want to explain something new, he use natural words, normal words, day by day words, because that is human language. And eventually use jargon specific to that domain. Do you know or understand this?

Have you ever asked what someone wants to say, when he can not make understandable to you? Have you ever thought you don't understand him due to yourself? That the problem belongs to you not to him? Reflect deeply on these issues, and do not post here nonsense, but only come with specific questions or concerns!

SaDAng

ive asked him, in messages to give me an understanding. he just sends me some message back saying how he discovered cetripetal and centrifugal movements of a magnet on video, is all. and im like, yea i could of showed you that.

i do know one thing there wouldnt be no langauge at all if everybody could just use sounds and letters assembled in anyway they wanted to portray any sort of funny idea to each other.

its a communication tool, language is. if i ask you about something you cant explain is it my fault you cant describe it?