Propulsion with Rotary Devices

[dmann]

I am very interested in rotory devices for propulsion. Here are two that are patented in the US. Both have a claim of Vertical Motion of Mass Transfer (VMT) as well as Horizontal Motion by Mass Transfer (HMT). The first is US Pat 4,884,465. The designer intended to make a simple design, one that can easily be replicated and scaled to any size. The second is US Patent 7,900,874. Again, this is a simple design that can be replicated in a garage. Figure 22 of this patent is very interesting. I have not replicated the devices. I have done some simple experiments with percesion and can see that this type of energy seems to be promising. Both of these patents can be found through Google and there are a slew of Youtube videos on percesion with bike wheels and gyrosopes. This is a good one here.
Gyroscope - Spacecraft control - YouTube It would be neat to see one powered by multiple Bedini Window Motors.

[dmann]

This is another machine which appears to express vertical propulsion. It uses mercury like in US patent 4,884,465. You can see the machine in operation at the 1:06 point of the video. It has to be stabalized in the air with four lengths of rope. Vimana UFO Engine with Mercury - how it works - YouTube

[dmann]

This is another video that I came across on Youtube. Fran McCabe (RIP) - Gyroscopic Dynamo - YouTube

This is a "Balls of Steel" design complete with duck tape and vise grips.

[Ufopolitics]

Excellent Thread!

Hey Dmann,


Excellent Thread my Friend!

Just haven't had a chance to get here before...

I love so much "Flying Machines"...basically if they are Propeller Types, and even better if they are based on Electromagnetics and Electric flow...I figure We all could have that desired "Flying Car" of the "Jetsons" such a long time ago...!

I believe the main big ERROR all this machines have...and that includes the Helicopter we see flying every day...related to their "Mechanics" point of view...is the existence of a CENTER SHAFT.

A Center Shaft is a VERY UNSTABLE arrangement...and just do a simple test they recommend before you learn how to fly an RC Heli...

Get a Broom, yes a Broom to sweep the floor...and turn it upside down...then put it on the center of the palm of your hand...and try to keep it straight up, maintaining a "perfect" straight position...I picture you are running from one end to the other of the room...

Hard isn't it?

A Perfectly Stable VTOL Machine should not have the propelling parts attached to a ridiculously small center shaft...besides...that actual center shaft never needed to be "physical" either...but "virtual"...Hollow...not existing in reality...

Then We need "Counter-Propellers" adapted to both send air flow downwards...creating that required lift force...

Ready to take off...permission to lift off...go...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[TheoriaApophasis]

You wanna see THE ULTIMATE gyroscope demos?

watch this 5 part video , it will blow your mind


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5qlaGN00HA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kmles_DF6KE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bS62jqCgQ9g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNAU4Wpz_40

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dp1OJU_nLWE

Professor Eric Laithwaite

[aljhoa]

You wanna see THE ULTIMATE gyroscope demos?

watch this 5 part video , it will blow your mind


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5qlaGN00HA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kmles_DF6KE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bS62jqCgQ9g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNAU4Wpz_40

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dp1OJU_nLWE

Professor Eric Laithwaite

Ken, what's your explanation of Eric's experiment, show in the following segments?

Anti-Gravity Wheel Explained - YouTube

Anti-Gravity Wheel? - YouTube

Al

[TheoriaApophasis]

Ken, what's your explanation of Eric's experiment, show in the following segments?

Anti-Gravity Wheel Explained - YouTube

Anti-Gravity Wheel? - YouTube

Al

WATCH THE VIDEO AT 44 SECONDS IN:::
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLMpdBjA2SU

He says it "looses weight ONLY when I drop it" well, DUHHH, the earth AND the weight are always trying to DROP towards each other, when he DROPS IT, it DOES loose weight.

He misses the WHOLE STINKING POINT!!!!




Yes, Ive seen those videos, the "Veritasium" videos on magnetism are so horrible Id like to slap him.



WEIGHT IS (this is undeniable by ANYONE) A: location specific and B: MEDIUM SPECIFIC


(for example, a 10 year old could lift a 500 pound fat person if both were on scuba gear and underwater)

and LOCATION--------- If you were about to INSTANTLY move instantly 2X as close to the sun, your weight would change INSTANTLY, due to the field strength.....obviously faster than light.


heres a bit on same:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7QmsngMRpE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvWeYJg9Oxs


READ THIS LITTLE GEM (down about 3/4 way down the document):::
http://www.iseti.us/WhitePapers/MARS...5-09-11%29.pdf

"None of my critics could ever explain to me
how a 50 pound spinning wheel loses weight," - Prof. Eric Laithwaite


Gravitational polarization is the principle behind gyroscopic weight loss. All weight is location and medium specific. High rotational gyroscopic masses moving centrifugally as against the Ether field of gravity which is centripetal, changes both the center and geometry of mass of the gyroscopic mass in motion. The weight loss has nothing to do with torque or angular momentum.
Gravity is centripetal, gyroscopic motion is centrifugal, THIS is why the flywheel "loses weight”; weight is location specific AND medium specific. In the case of the gyroscope, its movement is counter to its field.

The insane postulation of GR that “gravitational mass was the same as inertial mass” is incorrect, inertial mass is centrifugal and motion based, whereas gravity is centripetal and dielectric in basis, as the terminator of the dielectric. The former is a motional replica of the later. Gravitation and acceleration are identical in that both are based in fields and centripetal towards an inertial plane of lowest pressure, however centrifugal inertia is motional and polarized. Polarized inertial plane torque produces electrification in the case of a
dielectric reflector; likewise polarization can create the illusion of centripetal gravitation inversely by centrifugal inertial polarization of a mass.




Real Anti-Gravity is / will be produced by dielectric flywheels in COUNTER-Voidance

see mention here, same as my model of field termination and conjugation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VzwOFCSFms4



Pardon this crude drawing, I have better but not a digital copy yet.

[aljhoa]

WATCH THE VIDEO AT 44 SECONDS IN:::
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLMpdBjA2SU

He says it "looses weight ONLY when I drop it" well, DUHHH, the earth AND the weight are always trying to DROP towards each other, when he DROPS IT, it DOES loose weight.

He misses the WHOLE STINKING POINT!!!!




Yes, Ive seen those videos, the "Veritasium" videos on magnetism are so horrible Id like to slap him.



WEIGHT IS (this is undeniable by ANYONE) A: location specific and B: MEDIUM SPECIFIC


(for example, a 10 year old could lift a 500 pound fat person if both were on scuba gear and underwater)

and LOCATION--------- If you were about to INSTANTLY move instantly 2X as close to the sun, your weight would change INSTANTLY, due to the field strength.....obviously faster than light.


heres a bit on same:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7QmsngMRpE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvWeYJg9Oxs


READ THIS LITTLE GEM (down about 3/4 way down the document):::
http://www.iseti.us/WhitePapers/MARS...5-09-11%29.pdf

"None of my critics could ever explain to me
how a 50 pound spinning wheel loses weight," - Prof. Eric Laithwaite


Gravitational polarization is the principle behind gyroscopic weight loss. All weight is location and medium specific. High rotational gyroscopic masses moving centrifugally as against the Ether field of gravity which is centripetal, changes both the center and geometry of mass of the gyroscopic mass in motion. The weight loss has nothing to do with torque or angular momentum.
Gravity is centripetal, gyroscopic motion is centrifugal, THIS is why the flywheel "loses weight”; weight is location specific AND medium specific. In the case of the gyroscope, its movement is counter to its field.

The insane postulation of GR that “gravitational mass was the same as inertial mass” is incorrect, inertial mass is centrifugal and motion based, whereas gravity is centripetal and dielectric in basis, as the terminator of the dielectric. The former is a motional replica of the later. Gravitation and acceleration are identical in that both are based in fields and centripetal towards an inertial plane of lowest pressure, however centrifugal inertia is motional and polarized. Polarized inertial plane torque produces electrification in the case of a
dielectric reflector; likewise polarization can create the illusion of centripetal gravitation inversely by centrifugal inertial polarization of a mass.




Real Anti-Gravity is / will be produced by dielectric flywheels in COUNTER-Voidance

see mention here, same as my model of field termination and conjugation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VzwOFCSFms4



Pardon this crude drawing, I have better but not a digital copy yet.

Ken,
thank you for the explanation,
which is consistent with information provided @
http://www.kathodos.com/magnetismsmall.pdf ,
continue sharing your work.


Al

[Ufopolitics]

Real Anti-Gravity is / will be produced by dielectric flywheels in COUNTER-Voidance

see mention here, same as my model of field termination and conjugation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VzwOFCSFms4

Hello Ken,

Again, many thanks for sharing all your great work!!

One thing about the above statement, and forgive me if "my translation" or understanding is completely off...

When you mentioned:

Real Anti-Gravity is / will be produced by dielectric flywheels in COUNTER-Voidance

I understand the Dielectrics in Magnetic Fields as per your whole and excellent explanation, but,

flywheels in counter-voidance

You meant We "intersect" Two Magnetic Fields in order that Both Dielectric Planes are using same space, but counter repelling each others?

Note: I know you do not like the "repulsion" word...but we are all so used to that term...so attached to it...

Or in "Plain English"...You just meant two Flywheel Discs Counter-Rotating around same/common axis and Repulsing each others by opposed magnetic fields?

To Illustrate my question below...

[IMG][/IMG]

We have Two Discs or Flywheels, counter-rotating to each others, plus a center stator where they both turn around...and their magnetic poles facing at interior (Equator Line) are both Red or South, opposing each others.

Would the whole assembly become "Anti-gravitational" or -at least- start loosing weight at certain Speed achieved by both counter discs?

Or I got it all wrong to begin with!...

Thanks for taking your time on this!


Regards


Ufopolitics

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hello Ken,

Counter-Rotating around same/common axis and Repulsing each others by opposed magnetic fields?

No, not the same common axis. They aren't repulsing each other, dielectricity seeks dielectricity, the same way magnetism seeks itself through lowest pressure gradients.

'repulsion and attraction' isn't driven by magnetism but by the dielectric inertial plane, or the "electrical inertia" as Heaviside called it.


As per my chart above, that flashed into my mind in less than a millisecond, and working backwards to get electricity via magnetism (which everyone knows) is a known, that electricity terminates AS magnetism everyone knows.

But I knew and know that dielectricity (in enormous configurations [galactic, solar etc]) terminates into the creation of the fundamental particle we call the neutron which (as has been observed countless times), any free neutron becomes a proton in (what is the exact time?) less than 7 mins.


I knew that working backwards to get anti-gravity one had to turn mother nature up on her head and "adjust" the inertial plane (for lack of a better analogy I wont get into).


If I show you something, without too much detail.......I'm afraid everyone here is going to think I am 100% nuts and 10,000% insane.



(dont be too harsh!)

But I have made 3 prototypes, The device contains 5 parts, ONE part of which is a magnet, and by all that is holy, and all that I hold dear on this earth, I swear to you on my life I get genuine low level anti-gravity effects from this device.

I have shown this device to several people, they all confirm the effects. I had it taped up and hidden, its 3 inches by 2 inches, by "X" thick.


Ive tested it in the free air, my concrete basement, wood floors, outside, on a GIANT stack of books, the driveway, on my LEG, on the......etc etc etc everywhere.

Honestly if you (nothing against you) said this, or anyone on earth made this claim, I would call them insane, and roll my eyes.

Here is a field viewer of the device (below). and other than saying it has 5 parts, and one part is a magnet, that is all I will say.

And trust me, feel free to call me insane for making this statement, because I would do the same.

Extraordinary claims REQUIRE (demand) extraordinary proof [[[unless you are seeking a patent and other known sundries]]]


THis is the inertial field as seen with a film with it "ON", however its hard to see the correct view of this without moving it and seeing it fully via video



Here is the same field of inertia DRAWN OUT how it accurately looks.



Feel free to call me insane, nuts etc. I would do the same.


Lets just say "I said it" but Im not out to prove it to anyone but a few who have tested it in private with me, and confirm that YES, there is low to mild anti-gravity with the device.


Yes, god, I know I know I know how insane that sounds.

[Ufopolitics]

Anti-Gravity...

And trust me, feel free to call me insane for making this statement

Have you ever seen an Insane Mind calling another Insane Mind...Insane?

I don't think so...so, don't expect Me to EVER call you Insane...





That was a joke...an Insane Joke...

No, not the same common axis.

Hello Ken, and many thanks for your reply!

I see...not a common axis.

As per Physics concepts any object have a Gravitational POINT, or a point of balance, no matter if its Geometry is Regular or Irregular shape...and two points generate a line, an Axis...which is "virtual" between two objects apart but, say "attached" by Magnetic Fields/Dielectric Interactions...then by playing with the positioning of that Virtual Axis by rotation-translation within, say "orbits", of those two objects, could determine translation of the whole assembly composed by those two objects, maybe by "Gravity Unbalance" between them?

They aren't repulsing each other, dielectricity seeks dielectricity, the same way magnetism seeks itself through lowest pressure gradients.

'repulsion and attraction' isn't driven by magnetism but by the dielectric inertial plane, or the "electrical inertia" as Heaviside called it.

Yes, I understand, and I have felt that "inertial plane" right at the very center between the two poles of a Magnet..(anyone could do it)

So, let's "imagine" we have "non existing" Material, but by playing in our minds with it...we could get a better understanding/interpretation of the above statements.

Say, We have a Magnetic Material that has No Mass, at least not solid, but able to be "felt" by touch...just like a Magnetic Field could be felt by another magnet...where this rare magnet has those properties of "no mass" identical to the Field (a better and simple example would have been "A Magnetic Field without a Magnet"...but then, They would call me Insane...)...say We have two of those 'Rare Magnets'...If We get them close enough to each others...in order that their Fields enter same Space...then they should not align/stick just like our known/typical magnets will...but instead, each of their Dielectric Planes will seek for the other Magnet Dielectric Plane...so their approach would result in a type of Intersection/Fusion to just "please" the Dielectric Planes to be stock together as close as possible...as also, pleasing the magnet polarity lower pressure gradients between all Four Poles of the Two 'Rare Magnets'...can you see this?...so what is your opinion about this?

As per my chart above, that flashed into my mind in less than a millisecond, and working backwards to get electricity via magnetism (which everyone knows) is a known, that electricity terminates AS magnetism everyone knows.

Right, agree, and precisely the main recognized process We all know so far to achieve this back and forth(still same method from Faraday times) requires Mechanical Motion...and that consumes Energy...reason why We could not travel back and forth from one process to the other without "loosing" energy...and those are the fundamentals of all the "Non Possibles" that We all learn in School...

But I knew and know that dielectricity (in enormous configurations [galactic, solar etc]) terminates into the creation of the fundamental particle we call the neutron which (as has been observed countless times), any free neutron becomes a proton in (what is the exact time?) less than 7 mins.

Yes, and so many thanks again, for establishing the perfect location and existence of that Dielectric/Inertial Field...it is not simple to digest...but it makes perfect sense, and could be tested in many ways.

I knew that working backwards to get anti-gravity one had to turn mother nature up on her head and "adjust" the inertial plane (for lack of a better analogy I wont get into).


If I show you something, without too much detail.......I'm afraid everyone here is going to think I am 100% nuts and 10,000% insane.



(dont be too harsh!)

But I have made 3 prototypes, The device contains 5 parts, ONE part of which is a magnet, and by all that is holy, and all that I hold dear on this earth, I swear to you on my life I get genuine low level anti-gravity effects from this device.

I have shown this device to several people, they all confirm the effects. I had it taped up and hidden, its 3 inches by 2 inches, by "X" thick.


Ive tested it in the free air, my concrete basement, wood floors, outside, on a GIANT stack of books, the driveway, on my LEG, on the......etc etc etc everywhere.

Honestly if you (nothing against you) said this, or anyone on earth made this claim, I would call them insane, and roll my eyes.

Here is a field viewer of the device (below). and other than saying it has 5 parts, and one part is a magnet, that is all I will say.

And trust me, feel free to call me insane for making this statement, because I would do the same.

Extraordinary claims REQUIRE (demand) extraordinary proof [[[unless you are seeking a patent and other known sundries]]]

Feel free to call me insane, nuts etc. I would do the same.


Lets just say "I said it" but Im not out to prove it to anyone but a few who have tested it in private with me, and confirm that YES, there is low to mild anti-gravity with the device.


Yes, god, I know I know I know how insane that sounds.

So, let's "decipher" that 'Anti-Gravity Device'...(One Insane Mind deciphering another one... )

So, You have Five(5) Parts...and One(1) of them is a Magnet...right?

Prior You wrote:

I knew that working backwards to get anti-gravity one had to turn mother nature up on her head and "adjust" the inertial plane (for lack of a better analogy I wont get into).

I underlined the essential above.

Then You have those Four Parts positioned in order to Alter mother nature...and "adjust" the inertial plane...right?

Mathematically using "Possibilities & Probabilities" plus your own Concepts, a Magnet has Two(2) Poles, and One(1) Dielectric Field.

Then We could have:

1-Two(2) of each of the Four (4) Parts could be dedicated to each one of the Two Magnetic Field Poles. In order to "indirectly" adjust...or could we say..."Upset" the Dielectric Field?

2-One(1) of the Four Parts dedicated to One(1) of the Magnetic Poles, and so Another One(1) of the Parts to the other Magnetic Pole...while we get Two (2) to play or "entertain" the adjustment of the Dielectric Plane...

That was a Symmetrical Analysis...there could be Asymmetrical also.

The Materials should be "Magnetic Interactive"...to cause Distortions of the Fields...combinations of Magnetic, Diamagnetic...and even Paramagnetic for "Insulation" purposes...

Am I close, warm?...

I am fascinated by Anti Gravity Fields...and You should know that any Anti Gravity Device is considered a Threat to US National Security...so trying to Patent it...would come along with a signed Inventor Secrecy Act Form... before the granting of such Patent takes place...Meaning, it is better to Open Source it Ken...that way gets you out of the "Red Target Center Point"...

By the way am reading your Book, and it is so much fun so far!, the way that it is written is very entertaining and fun at the same time it is amazingly educative !

I am sure when I finish it, I will have a completely different perspective about Magnetism, therefore, I could understand your posts perfectly well.


Kind Regards



Ufopolitics

[TheoriaApophasis]

As per Physics concepts any object have a Gravitational POINT, or a point of balance, no matter if its Geometry is Regular or Irregular shape...and two points generate a line, an Axis...which is "virtual" between two objects apart but, say "attached" by Magnetic Fields/Dielectric Interactions...then by playing with the positioning of that Virtual Axis by rotation-translation within, say "orbits", of those two objects, could determine translation of the whole assembly composed by those two objects, maybe by "Gravity Unbalance" between them?

My conclusion from the effects of my device, since moving my device towards the earth I am getting what feels like what you feel if you slowly drop a air hockey puck on a air table with a shrinking ball of air underneath it. It feels EXACTLY like that.

In the movement I am getting a 180 degree induction opposite to the direction of movement. (my premise at any rate)

Rather than thinking of counter-voidance, or 'repulsion', I am getting a 'pulling' away from the centripetal gravitational field of the earth.

Interestingly OR MAYBE ABSOLUTELY NOT, I get a stronger reaction late at night when I have both the earth AND the sun 'underneath' me.

I however have not quantified that yet, but i can most definitely feel its effects.

Just as you would get a 'pulling' from any object hung from a rubber band that you move towards the earth, as a crude analogy.

Since my prototypes run off very little power, their effects are very low anti-grav effects. But very easily felt as well.

I have tried laying on my back endless times and pushing the devices skywards and get absolutely NO effect at all.

However I have YET to do that with the sun high in the sky either, which is something I had meant to try the other day but have been very busy.

Crudely I am merely thinking of it as gravitational counter-voidance, (same as two "like pole" magnets coming together).

Another possibility is that rather than getting a 'genuine' anti-gravity effect definitionally, which I AM getting, I am creating a spatial torque in moving towards the earth with 180 degree 'pulling' resultants.

Then laughingly I wonder , so?, maybe logically that is true anti-gravity.

http://www.rexresearch.com/jefimenko/jefimenko1.pdf

see here:
A GRAVITATIONAL AND ELECTROMAGNETIC
ANALOGY.

BY OLIVER HEAVISIDE
A GRAVITATIONAL AND ELECTROMAGNETIC ANALOGY BY OLIVER HEAVISIDE

Either way you look at it, as long as the results pan out. And they ARE.

Say, We have a Magnetic Material that has No Mass, at least not solid, but able to be "felt" by touch...just like a Magnetic Field could be felt by another magnet...where this rare magnet has those properties of "no mass" identical to the Field (a better and simple example would have been "A Magnetic Field without a Magnet"...but then, They would call me Insane...)...say We have two of those 'Rare Magnets'...If We get them close enough to each others...in order that their Fields enter same Space...then they should not align/stick just like our known/typical magnets will...but instead, each of their Dielectric Planes will seek for the other Magnet Dielectric Plane...so their approach would result in a type of Intersection/Fusion to just "please" the Dielectric Planes to be stock together as close as possible...as also, pleasing the magnet polarity lower pressure gradients between all Four Poles of the Two 'Rare Magnets'...can you see this?...so what is your opinion about this?

My device, while containing 1 part "magnet", is extremely weak (almost nill) in magnetic 'attraction'.

well, every proton IS a magnet (so magnetic field without a magnet isnt crazy at all, but pure logic, however it needs a power source to generate it), and as is the case, any "free neutron" (the only particle that exists) becomes a proton within a few mins due to it spinning up and creating a polarized charging field (which is the "electron" since electrons as particles dont exist) and ergo you have hydrogen.

Outside the nucleus, free neutrons are unstable and have a mean lifetime of 881.5±1.5 s (about 14 minutes, 42 seconds); therefore the half-life for this process is about 10 minutes, 11 seconds). Free neutrons decay to become a proton, a process known as beta decay

I am 100% certain you could create a localized magnetic field from a focused dielectric charge. Im even more certain Tesla did same.

Well, all fields are Ether modalities, reductively gravity and magnetism and dielectricity and electricity are all basically, crudely like silicon, liquid glass, sand, glass, and conductors (very crude analogy).

So, let's "decipher" that 'Anti-Gravity Device'...(One Insane Mind deciphering another one.

I dont want to 'decipher' it here for many reasons, half being great hopes from the people who have witnessed its effects and seeking rights for its design.

However discussing same here is
A: an extremely EXTRAORDINARY claim I dont want to convince or persuade anyone of

B: It looks insane definitionally. Even the very mention of "anti-gravity" is the scientific equivalent of screaming RAPE! in a crowd.

Then You have those Four Parts positioned in order to Alter mother nature...and "adjust" the inertial plane...right?

Turn 'her' upside down and head-slam her a little bit. Yes.

I initially used my own chart which I know can work both ways AS WE ALL know how to do with getting magnetism, and then reversing (so to say) magnetism to get electricity (thru a dielectric reflector).

Using retroductive logic based upon the premise that my chart was unconditionally accurate in premise (and am 100% certain that at least HALF of it is, since that's a well known entity).........THEN asking myself.....----


"Ok, how do I invert gravity, which is a stable form of dielectricity (which Walter Russel himself said, but he never uses the term dielectricity, he was ignorant of this, rather he only used the term 'electricity') by nature (as the spatially accumulative nature of matter), but has the counterspatial field it generates....., or centripetal field it has".

I began with the premise of taking the dielectric and inverting it (without too much detail) by using dielectric 'flywheels'.

Mathematically using "Possibilities & Probabilities" plus your own Concepts, a Magnet has Two(2) Poles, and One(1) Dielectric Field.

No:-----
Every 360 degrees of a single cycle of the turn of a magnet you have:
2 Ether-field modalities: dielectricity and magnetism (of course).
6 total pressure domain fluctuations, 2 centripetal, 2 centrifugal, and 2 dielectric
and.....10 field-boundary gradients

"Upset" the Dielectric Field?

More like twist it into a pretzel without getting into details

Am I close, warm?...
I am fascinated by Anti Gravity Fields...and You should know that any Anti Gravity Device is considered a Threat to US National Security...so trying to Patent it...would come along with a signed Inventor Secrecy Act Form

Oh I know, thats why I have shown it to several lifelong associates in case I 'vanish' etc.

This is one device I am certain (and the nasty part, really nasty) that I believe I have NO HOPE Of getting a patent on.

However there is another avenue I wont mention that has JUST as strong a legal weight, but wont raise flags.

By the way am reading your Book, and it is so much fun so far!, the way that it is written is very entertaining and fun at the same time it is amazingly educative !

It contains MORE than a few typos, and my writing style is despised by most (likely due to reading too much Greek Neoplatonic style I'm so very used to.

...and a 3rd edition with much more content due out in a month or so.

Kind regards for the comments however.

it still needs another 30+ pages to be "full" however.

However I greatly fear talk about anti-gravity much AND having a device with weak anti-gravitational phenomena, everyone will (as I WOULD) assume I am "full" of XXXX






I DID proof same beforehand, since I have been working on this solution now for 4+ years, and got it a few months ago.


But anyone looking at it will make NO sense out of what it means or implies.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Ufopolitics

I test my "DEVICE" almost every day, TONIGHT, I was testing it (both of them)

I found out "what the HELL?????" Its REALLY POWERFUL (so to say) tonight, whats up?????


Got a hunch, and checked, and the moon is between the earth and sun, so there is MUCH MORE collective gravity "under my feet" right now.



Will test more LATE tonight

[shylo]

#3

Theo, Nice collection of Erics' , in #3 where he has the gyro out over the edge of the table,Well that just throws everything out the window, Gravity, momentum, centrifugal force..???
That should fall to the floor , but it doesn't???
How little I know.
artv

[TheoriaApophasis]

Theo, Nice collection of Erics' , in #3 where he has the gyro out over the edge of the table,Well that just throws everything out the window, Gravity, momentum, centrifugal force..???
That should fall to the floor , but it doesn't???
How little I know.
artv

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMxmSwJK9m4



I dont MAKE ANY CLAIMS IN THE VIDEO, ONLY REPORT ON THE EFFECTS FELT