Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can get all 4 modalities of Energy/Aether archetypes from straight lines?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Can get all 4 modalities of Energy/Aether archetypes from straight lines?

    Euclidean method,......pen and paper to the rescue!!!




    Just print the SAME SHEET about 10 times, then roll 2 up into cones. etc etc.......

    (were'nt we supposed to be shown simple stuff like this in school????)


















    Newly created model of a magnet, same as before, but more detailed.
    Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-19-2014, 07:57 AM.

  • #2
    Originally posted by TheoriaApophasis View Post
    Euclidean method,......pen and paper to the rescue!!!




    Just print the SAME SHEET about 10 times, then roll 2 up into cones. etc etc.......

    (were'nt we supposed to be shown simple stuff like this in school????)
















    Newly created model of a magnet, same as before, but more detailed.

    This is just what I was talking about, 2 toroidal vortex's one atop the other spinning opposite directions.

    I think this is a huge step forward, thank you for the info and time and I will keep studying the links you gave me.

    Thank you again!

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Pembelton View Post
      This is just what I was talking about, 2 toroidal vortex's one atop the other spinning opposite directions.
      Thank you again!

      Well, they're both spinning in the same direction, only seemingly so due to out spatial perception of them as 'different'


      Spin anything, you wife, your dog, a ball, a rope, its being spun in the same direction, only perspectively so CW from one end, and CCW from the other "end".

      polarization as = space is the premise for all spatial antinomies (CW / CCW, etc etc)

      The Platonists were fascinated with this subject and flapped their lips about it endlessly.


      The fulcrum of field conjugation between a counterspatial dielectric and a spatial magnetic creates this 'twisted' field reciprocation.

      For a LONG TIME its been called it the "pinch effect of a magnetic field"



      Comment


      • #4
        A vortex tube is an interesting device which illustrates many of the principals discussed here. By rotating air at a very high speed, the principal of centripetal and centrifugal force become manifest. The centripetal force acts as constrictive, cold and small in volume. The centrifugal force is expansive, hot, and larger in volume. Both flows separate and rotate counter to one another.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Ted Ewert View Post
          A vortex tube is an interesting device which illustrates many of the principals discussed here. By rotating air at a very high speed, the principal of centripetal and centrifugal force become manifest. The centripetal force acts as constrictive, cold and small in volume. The centrifugal force is expansive, hot, and larger in volume. Both flows separate and rotate counter to one another.



          Awesome stuff!!!!!!!!!



          I inspired this guy over on another forum with the "magnetic vortex" idea.......


          I posted this book over on another forum, and a neat Australian tinkerer and electrically minded chap posted 2 very nice videos just today......


          He electrifies a magnet in a tank, and zaps his magnet and then tinkers some more, and proves you cant get a vortex from the same condition (which I knew) from mere steel slug.


          Then he makes a second video using an electromagnet in a TANK, and gets (of course), no vortex.


          Lovely to see his great videos !!

          magnetic vortex with genuine permanent magnet
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV8D...2rm-4w&index=2

          NO results of a Magnetic vortex when using same conditions with an electromagnet
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIli...5GsZGLcj2rm-4w


          Also new:

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pc8I...5GsZGLcj2rm-4w

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-37E...5GsZGLcj2rm-4w



          AWESOME STUFF !!!!



          He wonders why he gets no vortex with the electromagnet, but TONS of (he calls them a tornado) vortex using a permanent magnet!


          I told him:

          NO SPIN with EM vs. PM because:


          A: electromagnet is "driving" the magnetism via electricity, >>>>NOT dielectricity<<<<, as is the case in a PM, of which the dielectricity is 'driving' the vortex from the inter-atomic made coherent into the incommensurable geometry of the PM

          B: Electromagnet is spatially divergent IN/AS a coil, and does NOT (almost the exact opposite) have the properties of dielectricity as found in a PM which is "driving" a genuine PM !!



          He seems to be a great chap and experimenter !

          Comment

          Working...
          X