Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Another method on not killing dipole

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Another method on not killing dipole

    I connect a 12V battery, a LED diode, a photodiode and an inverter in sequence to form a simple circuit. The LED diode emit light and the light is absorbed by photodiode and emitted as current to run the inverter. Possible? Is dipole not being killed in this situation by blocking electroncs flow but allow photon flow? Give me your opinions and what you think. Thank you!

  • #2
    Originally posted by holtage View Post
    I connect a 12V battery, a LED diode, a photodiode and an inverter in sequence to form a simple circuit. The LED diode emit light and the light is absorbed by photodiode and emitted as current to run the inverter. Possible? Is dipole not being killed in this situation by blocking electroncs flow but allow photon flow? Give me your opinions and what you think. Thank you!
    Can you please include a diagram or schematic?

    Postimage.org - free image hosting / image upload

    Regards,

    VIDBID
    Regards,

    VIDBID

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by holtage View Post
      I connect a 12V battery, a LED diode, a photodiode and an inverter in sequence to form a simple circuit. The LED diode emit light and the light is absorbed by photodiode and emitted as current to run the inverter. Possible? Is dipole not being killed in this situation by blocking electroncs flow but allow photon flow? Give me your opinions and what you think. Thank you!
      Hi Holtage,

      The problem is that you kill the dipole in your battery when you run the LED from it to get photons because LEDs need forward current to emit light, from some milliAmpers up to several hundred milliAmpers, depending on how strong light you need.

      The next problem is that the input current to output light conversion efficiency for LEDs is less than 100% albeit much better than that of incasdescent bulbs.

      The next problem is that a photodiode also has a less than 100% conversion efficiency when receiving light and converting it to current.

      The principle for NOT killing the dipole means that you do not take out current from a battery but utilize only the voltage difference, how this could be done, at least in theory suggested by Bearden, was already referred to you by member vidbid here:
      http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post261917

      It is okay that an optocoupler would isolate/prevent electron flow towards your inverter (hence towards your load) from the battery but any optocoupler or LED needs your input power to emit photons and add to this the conversion efficiencies less than 100%. The result is you kill the dipole and what is more: you do not get higher output than your input.

      Gyula
      Last edited by gyula; 08-13-2014, 11:00 AM. Reason: spelling

      Comment


      • #4
        Taking the concept of preserving the dipole and aether in an open system is knowing how to design using various types of dipoles. The Bearden model must be seen as an open system and most conceive this as a conventional closed system. So I will make a feeble attempt and someone better versed can confound it or improve it with a more accurate vernacular.

        Pushing a child on a swing in gravity at the right moment is one analogy that there exists an optimum point where just a little push keeps the swing moving. If the child puts down their foot this energy can be released let's call it a release point. If you create a mechanism to store that energy and release it at those optimum points or at those exact points in time the dipole can be preserved. It is easy to lose focus of this simple analogy by designing switches using closed system approach on an open system, instead I will try to use a step by step approach by employing a neon bulb for simplicity and the experimenter can later replace it with what ever switching deem necessary.

        If you pull or stretch the aether using electrical energy it is very elastic and it will snap back.


        If you build up 10 pulses in a secondary coil and transfer that energy to dielectric you can transfer current with or without an optical transmitter receiver and more efficiently when in resonance. A solid state design ( no moving parts) the secondary coil may serve as a virtual flywheel. The flywheel can be thought of as picking up speed until the 10th cycle is complete. This energy has a much higher pressure and is dominantly magnetic in character. It is transformed by the dielectric . The even release of this high pressure current by the dielectric material made possible by resistance over the next 10 cycles this flow accomplishes recycling of energy and the pressure continues to rise. An auto transformers could be used to do this however a Tesla coil is used for this example. In motors and generators certain axial geometries and flux paths that are somewhat similar but use mechanical movement.

        A neon bulb can serves as a pressure release valve is naturally set for approximately 90 volts.
        An example of the neon serving as a pressure release valve can be visualized with a little imagination in this video which is a resonance video and has no primary.
        so the circuit described above is not complete but starts design with a signal generator and you can find resonance or back off a tad,
        also you can see the typical distortion of the square wave on the oscilloscope.
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJQvqTpBdiQ
        Last edited by mikrovolt; 08-13-2014, 12:10 PM.

        Comment

        Working...
        X