Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is the untouched powerful magnet just 'sitting there' generating heat? YES

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is the untouched powerful magnet just 'sitting there' generating heat? YES


    FLIR , thermal IR


    Hmmm, is that a 6" giant neodymium that has NOT been touched in days just "sitting there" hotter than the environment???

    YUP

    Is that thermal reflectance? Nope.



    The object sitting there not moving is SPINNING at tremendous speeds.


    Took these pics today

    Proving once again all us humans are crazy, we see no motion and we think that means = NO SPIN, .....But, there IS TREMENDOUS reciprocation and field movement.

    Sounds like a riddle ..."That object there covered in dust and not touched in years is spinning so fast its making HEAT"
    LOTS OF readings of my diff magnets, seems its average of 2.2 to 3.5 degrees hotter.


    Fields dont care about physical movement, nor "see same", they only see field mediations along lowest pressures.
    We see a stationary object, the "Ether sees" enormous magnetic reciprocation going on due to a coherent dielectric system, the "magnet".


    first 4 pics are a huge 6" NEO, she weighs about 30 pounds or so










    3 3/4" NEO balls:





    Well, nobody has EVER seen a magnet doing this before


    2 part video series........

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZJvIMU7JYM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=synLMIGGLk4


    ……………..Better yet, i EXPECTED THIS to happen before doing it.



    Lux et Veritas






    Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 08-15-2014, 08:54 AM.

  • #2
    Hey Ken
    Great discovery. One more reason to re-write the science curriculum from grade school up!

    So now I'm wondering what exactly is responsible for this heat.
    - Could it be the friction between centripetal and centrifugal vortices?
    - Could it be a by-product of the dielectric being forced (by the axial atomic alignment of the magnet) to express as magnetism?
    - Could it be produced by rapid atomic precession within the magnet?
    I don't expect an answer, and perhaps no one really knows at this point.
    FWIW, O Sensei
    Bob
    Last edited by Bob Smith; 08-15-2014, 08:46 PM. Reason: Clarification

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Bob Smith View Post
      Hey Ken
      Great discovery. One more reason to re-write the science curriculum from grade school up!
      There is no curriculum regarding magnets. I inquired in grade school, high school and again in college. Zip, zero, notta. The classical egghead professors could tell me nothing about how a magnet works. Hence why I'm soaking Ken's work up like a sponge. Took 50 years to get here and I'm not leaving anytime soon.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Dog-One View Post
        There is no curriculum regarding magnets. I inquired in grade school, high school and again in college. Zip, zero, notta. The classical egghead professors could tell me nothing about how a magnet works. Hence why I'm soaking Ken's work up like a sponge. Took 50 years to get here and I'm not leaving anytime soon.
        Amen. Sponge number two right here. I think there's a bunch of us sponges in the line!
        Can you relate to this guy? -
        http://www.sbmania.net/pictures/69b/147.png
        Last edited by Bob Smith; 08-15-2014, 10:28 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Bob Smith View Post
          Hey Ken
          Great discovery. One more reason to re-write the science curriculum from grade school up!

          So now I'm wondering what exactly is responsible for this heat.
          - Could it be the friction between centripetal and centrifugal vortices?
          - Could it be a by-product of the dielectric being forced (by the axial atomic alignment of the magnet) to express as magnetism?
          - Could it be produced by rapid atomic precession within the magnet?
          I don't expect an answer, and perhaps no one really knows at this point.
          FWIW, O Sensei
          Bob


          the spatial magnetic reciprocation is responsible for the 2 -2.5 (average) degree diff. in the heat.

          Radiation, discharge, heat. Same as your stove top, discharge the charge.

          However nobody is going to COOK anything with 2 or 3 degrees of heat.


          Any circulatory radiative discharge necessitates HEAT, including the very iron in the magnet and its other constituents


          gyromagnetic precession indeed, called the LARMOR FREQUENCY, 42.5



          see these new pics.



          i made sure i was not getting thermal body heat reflection in the shots









          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Bob Smith View Post
            Amen. Sponge number two right here. I think there's a bunch of us sponges in the line[/url]


            Made 2 videos last night , as a START last night.
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZJvIMU7JYM
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=synLMIGGLk4




            Will make more and more tests, kind regards





            FLIR USED ON THE FERROCELL


            showing more light being 'sucked' in along the dielectric inertial plane


            more light, more heat




            I made these pics tonight






            Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 08-15-2014, 10:38 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              FLIR is ok also there is another method that picks up distorted light.


              If Schlieren Optics could see magnetic trails of heat we could see more things previously unobserved.

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLp_rSBzteI

              plasma and gases have a sand blasting effect or characteristic as catalyst and transmutation.

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atVSxvbiPg0
              Last edited by mikrovolt; 08-16-2014, 03:19 AM.

              Comment

              Working...
              X