Is the Dielectric the Axis for Naturally Occurring Vortices?

[Bob Smith]

I'd like to start a thread to discuss how the dielectric might be the Z axis for every naturally occurring vortex (e.g., water, magnetism, light...).

This is my theory, based on what seems to be emerging in posts as of late, particularly with Ken Wheeler's posts, also corroborated by phenomena I've seen in the writings of Viktor Schauberger.
Bob

PS Out of town a few days, but checking back in after that.

[TheoriaApophasis]

I'd like to start a thread to discuss how the dielectric might be the Z axis for every naturally occurring vortex (e.g., water, magnetism, light...).

This is my theory, based on what seems to be emerging in posts as of late, particularly with Ken Wheeler's posts, also corroborated by phenomena I've seen in the writings of Viktor Schauberger.
Bob

PS Out of town a few days, but checking back in after that.

Dielectricity is inertial.

According to Faraday is most important

according to Maxwell is most important


according to Tesla, Eric P Dollard who said of dielectrics... "this is the source of the greatest of all future discovery".


1. we know that magnetism is electrostatics/ dielectric in discharge, or "the dielectric field"- Faraday

2. we know that electricity CANNOT exist without both dielectricity and its discharge-modality (magnetism) in combo (Phi x Psi = Q [ Plank in electrification]).



so, that covers 3 out of 4 Ether-modalities, dielectricity, magnetism, electricity.



3. While not proven, I stake my life on the fact that in Galactic and certain stellar formations ultra-powerful dielectric fields are transformed into mass particle formation. See matter creation in a google search on "Galactic Jets"

both gravity and dielectricity are centripetal in acceleration, however gravity/mass is spatially divergent (more mass = more massive) because magnetism is the ONLY think giving MASS(iveness) to all mass/matter in picometers of the atomic radius of ALL matter/atoms.


4. We know that protons are neutrons are really the same thing, beta decay and inverse beta decay will produce either, meaning a Proton and Neutron are energy modalities of one another, and therefore the same fundamental particle for every nucleus of every atom.




[insert attacks from others on this logical conclusions and premise]
















CURRENT UNDERSTANDING IS PURELY A MISUNDERSTANDING:

[mikrovolt]

To Bob Smith.

first is there a model to explore this question ?
example:electrical analogy often use water flow in pipes to form concept. probably not easily seen for vortex.

In the video it can be established that there exists both explosion and implosion.
conventional plumbing rarely uses implosion so it is difficult to find simple analogy so this is close.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iRHE-DzodU

differential shock has been known to have counter reaction but is steam or exo. not easy because we live in an exo driven world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBa7...gURvHBNp_cCFtd

vortex falls into the implosion category. In space the formation is in aether and no dielectric is present
regarding the subject is there an analogy ? what is a condenser what is a dielectric ? an interesting question.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OhdO88zKPI

There are very few working analogies. The observable that is (the cone shaped vortex) like water is visible while most others are neglected
as do most formations of aether rarely visible but occupy space.

An example of unobservable in science history is the microscopic world. This field of science had much superstition and
was not given much heed until the microscope was invented. The invention of the microscope made the largest
advancement in medicine and biology after the superstition was removed the academic community began to accept.
I give priority to development of instrumentation for that reason.

[TheoriaApophasis]

vortex falls into the implosion category.
and the subject of what is condenser what is vortex ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OhdO88zKPI

which vortex? nature has two, explosive divergent

and implosive convergent.



explosive natural vortex are magnetic radiation from dielectric discharge.



IMPLOSIVE vortex is one of dielectric inertia driven by counterspatial Ether-modality, the dielectric field.

[Bob Smith]

Thanks for sharing all this info Ken.
I have another question to put out to the collective consciousness

If we have vortices travelling in parallel, but opposite directions, will their... - radial components mutually attract and intensify, and
- will their dielectric components strengthen through this mutual attraction?

I'm kind of thinking out loud, trying to see if the mutual attraction between windings on a series-wound bifilar coil and its interaction with the dielectric is a kind of paradigm for the way any vortices (e.g., water or light) would behave in opposing directions.

Bob

[TheoriaApophasis]

will their... - radial components mutually attract and intensify, and
- will their dielectric components strengthen through this mutual attraction?

if bismuth is any indication, yes


Bismuth exhibits overunity since its 209 nucleus has a higher energy state that the sum of its components, which would be of thallium 205 and helium-4 nucleus. Meaning bismuth breaks the rule of conservation.

[Bob Smith]

Thanks Ken!
Verrrrrrrry interesting implications
Bob

[TheoriaApophasis]

Thanks Ken!
Verrrrrrrry interesting implications
Bob

The thorium series begins with thorium-232 and ends with the stable nuclide lead-208. The neptunium series is named for its longest-lived member, neptunium-237; it ends with bismuth-209. The uranium series begins with uranium-238 and ends with lead-206. The actinium series, named for its first-discovered member, actinium-227, begins with uranium-235 and ends with lead-207. Meaning ‘all roads end in lead’, except for neptunium which ends in bismuth! From this we can deduce that of lead we know it is naturally very abundant however almost all of it is the product of long-term uranium depletion; whereas neptunium is the only element that degrades into a non-toxic hyper-stable element, bismuth which is likewise on part with gold and platinum in rarity. Uranium degrades into lead, and neptunium into bismuth. Both neptunium and bismuth are extremely rare, all natively existent neptunium that was present at the formation of the earth has since degraded into bismuth, that it exists alongside lead in mining is no coincidence since neptunium is found alongside uranium as well naturally however it is extremely rare. The universe’s rarest heavy unstable element degrades into the universe’s rarest and most heavy stable element bismuth.


All indications are that bismuth does not exist natively whatsoever rather is the end product of depleted Neptunium. likewise is the case that most lead is depleted uranium. Additionally current plentiful presence of uranium with virtually non-existent Neptunium is further indication of this. Neptunium eventually decays to form bismuth-209, unlike most other common heavy nuclei which decay into lead isotopes. Unlike most metals bismuth expands on cooling from its molten state. It is no coincidence nor anything other than perfectly logical that the first transuranic element, Neptunium degrades into the LAST heavy stable element, bismuth.




Ive been taking molten drops of bismuth and photographing the resultant radial inertia of very very thin bismuth formations from these purposeful drops.

[Bob Smith]

Thanks TA
Very informative.
I'm sure we could do some interesting things with bismuth wire coils.
Happy Labour Day, and thanks for sharing the fruits of your labours with us!
Bob