If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
What do you believe would be the difference between this design and simply putting a large flywheel between the motor and generator with one weight out at the rim at one point? I do not believe you would gain any mechanical advantage. You are not allowing the rotating weight to do any real work. It is just a strange flywheel, which will of course help the shaft to continue to rotate, but I believe that is ALL it will do. If you PULSE the motor, this flywheel helps to give you some "free"rotation, but you have to compare the free rotation you gain to the extra energy it took to get this thing to rotate in the first place, with all that weight out on the end of a single arm like that, or on the rim of a wheel.
All Watson did was build a much larger version of Bedini's machine. That is something I know a bit about, having spent the better part of the last two years working on a successful replication of it, but with THIS device (Franco malgarini's post) it is a question of whether or not there is a MECHANICAL advantage gained, and I see none.
Dave
“Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
—Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist
All Watson did was build a much larger version of Bedini's machine
It was a Titanic business. Would you want to reveal details of your implementation? I started with a car starter motor but the bearings on all those starter motors are so bad that i shelved the project.
I do agree with you about Franco's proposal. I can't see the point of the considerable added complexity with the out of balance force.
In a motor-generator system you can use even gravity.
The gravity machine works on the principle of resonance; so that this machine can operate continuously, needs a boost that provides them to overcome the dead angle. This is achieved through an auxiliary motor intended to intervene for a very short time, of the order of tenth of a second: It is a DC motor powered directly from the dynamo.
Have you built this device and seen it work? Or is this just the posting of another theory about how it SHOULD work? Because I have built such devices, and to assume they will work is, as far as my experience with them goes, an INCORRECT assumption. You have friction and inertia to overcome, not to mention what will happen when you connect the output of the generator to the motor you are trying to run with it. As far as I can see, too much energy is wasted in this system that the design makes no attempt to reuse or capture. But if you have built it and can prove me wrong, I would like a little salt on my crow before I eat it please. And I promise you, if you build a working design, I will replicate it.
wrtner, I am sending you a PM. Don't want to detract from this thread talking about what i have built. It is too different.
Dave
“Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
—Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist
Comment