Originally posted by Sawt2
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Basic Free Energy Device
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Yes!
blackchisel97,
If you can post that battery swapping circuit, that would beget. I'm sure there are some folks who could use it.“Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
—Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist
Comment
-
Sure, no problem. I haven't built this circuit and can't provide any feedback regarding code or operation but as far as I remember, it has been built and tried by someone on this forum.
VAttached Files'Get it all on record now - get the films - get the witnesses -because somewhere down the road of history some bastard will get up and say that this never happened'
General D.Eisenhower
http://www.nvtronics.org
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sawt2 View PostI went out to the shop this morning and rechecked the voltages and batt 1 lost .02 volt, batt 2 lost .03 volt and batt 3 was sitting exactly what it started at yesterday. That means after 2 hrs of a constant pull of 150 ma and about 6 hrs of various usage trying to figure out why it wouldn't work, running motors and loghts that pull way to much for these little batteries, it only "cost" .05 volts. I am hoping to test somemore soon, i will continue using the same batteries for now just to see what I can get out of them. Hope ya'll have a great Labor Day.
Comment
-
Voltage Sensing Circuit
I think what you will find with the above circuit is that the voltage sensing part of the circuit is all referenced to ground.
The issue is that with the 3 battery switch, the first battery's negative is not at the same "ground" as batteries 2 & 3. If you're using the ADC of a PIC for the voltage sensing, it will work fine for batteries 2 & 3 if your PIC ground is on the negatives of batteries 2 & 3, but you'll have to be creative to get a reasonably accurate voltage reading of battery 1.
When Bits and I were working on the Tesla Switch we ran into that problem, but we did find a solution for it. He went on to use the same logic for the battery swapper he had at the time.
John K.
Comment
-
Concern
I see that people are spending in incredible about of time trying to measure what is going on with the 3 battery system. I wish there were some way to keep all of you from WASTING your time.
1. It is only going to work correctly with large, deep cycle batteries.
2. It is only going to work if you rotate the batteries
3. It is only going to work if you are PULSING battery 3
4. If the load is too big for the size of the batteries you are using you are DOOMED before you flip the on switch
5. It is NOT going to run forever!!!!!!!!!! There are losses in the system. If you don't figure out a way to make the 'load' that you are pulsing between the positives produce some extra energy you can dump back into the system from time to time, the batteries are GOING to run down.
Those are the facts.
Step 1. is get some BIG deep cycle batteries
Step 2. is build a battery rotating circuit
Step 3. figure out what load you are going to run that will produce some power, and how to get it to battery 3“Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
—Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist
Comment
-
Originally posted by John_K View PostI think what you will find with the above circuit is that the voltage sensing part of the circuit is all referenced to ground.
The issue is that with the 3 battery switch, the first battery's negative is not at the same "ground" as batteries 2 & 3. If you're using the ADC of a PIC for the voltage sensing, it will work fine for batteries 2 & 3 if your PIC ground is on the negatives of batteries 2 & 3, but you'll have to be creative to get a reasonably accurate voltage reading of battery 1.
When Bits and I were working on the Tesla Switch we ran into that problem, but we did find a solution for it. He went on to use the same logic for the battery swapper he had at the time.
John K.
Sounds complicated till you get your first one done then its the only way to go.
Matt
Comment
-
Originally posted by Matthew Jones View PostThe most solid way is to use Isolated ADC's. Toshiba makes few that are reliable in high noise areas. Anyway you can build a module per battery or battery set. Each module can be independently switched on and off using an SPI enabled Power distribution switch(PDS). The PDS will turn the power on to the ADC module and the ADC will broadcast on 1 line isolated from the battery. So 4 pins total from your pic. Best part no power consumed monitoring when you don't need to.
Sounds complicated till you get your first one done then its the only way to go.
Matt
John K.
Comment
-
Originally posted by John_K View PostThanks Matt, I didn't know those things existed. I'll do some research in that area and see if I can find the device you mentioned.
John K.
https://www.silabs.com/Support%20Doc...Si8900-1-2.pdf
This is an Isolated SPI enabled ADC
http://www.st.com/content/ccc/resour...CD00238344.pdf
This is a Power distribution switch for digital or analog signals. Also SPI enabled.
Although in the past I used individual modules per battery I see now you can use one ADC module and use a power distribution switch to select the battery you want to read. Both the ADC and PDS can be communicated with via SPI on different channels. So essentially that would leave you using only 2 pins.
Call me a nerd but I am really glad I talked to David today and pointed the Data Sheets out to him. Lots of problems have just been solved.
Matt
PS this a brief on the SPI library for Microchips pic.
http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/devicedoc/spi.pdf
Comment
-
Matt,
See, that's where knowing nothing has its advantages. You're always explaining things to me and then you figure out cool stuff! LOL. That's why you gotta keep us guys who don't know anything around. We keep crap stirred up.
DaveLast edited by Turion; 09-07-2016, 08:00 AM.“Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
—Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist
Comment
-
OH automan!
The 3d printer still has the overheat warning. Because I haven't changed out that print head yet. With all the medical crap, I just haven't gotten to it. Recovering from KNEE surgery now. Once that is done I believe I have fixed every damn thing they have been able to find wrong with me. Going to AZ for a week, so maybe by the time I get back I will have recovered to the point I can go out in the garage and actually WORK on something, instead of sitting on my butt, whining.
I have at least ten different projects on my benches, and still have $$ put aside for another 3D printer, if I don't lose it playing craps in Laughlin on the way to AZ or the way back. (I've lost the last four times I played, which is a record for me. Never lost more than 3 times in a row in my life.) All the parts for the printer are already HERE. Benn buying parts every month. Just need to buy the frame. Wonder where I can get THAT? LOL.
Dave“Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
—Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist
Comment
-
Originally posted by automan View PostIIRC Arduinos' have SPI onboard. I have plenty (50) of Arduino Nano 3.0's w/o pins if anybody needs any contact me by PM. Greets Dave...Hows that fussy 3D printer working these days? Call me sometime eh?
Not familiar with arduino. what do you mean without pins?
Comment
-
The Arduino Nanos' come with long header pins usually, so you can use them on a breadboard or add small connector wires to them easily. I have the model without the extra pins added, more for use by developers who wish to mount them permanently or in a small case, which I also have if needed.
Comment
Comment