Basic Free Energy Device

[Turion]

Jim,
I am probably the least qualified person on this forum to answer your question and I mean that sincerely. What I know I know from what I have seen on my bench, so I am going to throw a bunch of crap against the wall and you can scrape off what you don’t like. These are the things I think about at night. We know electricity and magnetism are related. We talk about magnetic fields and electromagnetic fields, and electrical fields.

When a coil collapses, there is a spike. When a coil with an iron core collapses, is the spike larger? If there is a change in the spike...Is this change in the collapse spike because more electricity was put into the coil? No. It was because the core created a stronger magnetic field.

When John puts an iron core in the ZFM, it creates a stronger magnetic field for the same amount of input voltage. Because not as many amps are needed to drive the motor at the speed it is rotating, the amp draw immediately drops. When the coil collapses, this stronger magnetic field collapses creating a larger spike. Run a small magnet on a rotor past a coil and look at the scope of the coil collapse. Now run a larger magnet past the coil and watch the coil collapse. It is the collapse of the magnetic field, not the electrical field that produces the spike.

So here is what I think about late at night. For every action there is a reaction. If the magnetic field collapse produces a positive electrical spike (remember the magnet going past the coil?...that was a positive spike) maybe it is the collapse of the ELECTRICAL field that causes the “negative” energy spike. If not, what reaction DOES the collapse of the electrical field cause.

I know this is all babble and someone will show up and prove me wrong,?but this is what I am good at. Being wrong 99% of the time.

[SkyWatcher]

Hi all, sounds like good pondering to me turion.
Sounds like your almost going down this train of thought, from magluvin.
Exploring Resonance And Efficiency Of Speakers And Subwoofers
Add more coil/cores to generator or motor and we get possibly more work out for similar input.
And if we reduce some of the usual things holding us back, like attraction to core, then things look even better.
Just throwing a couple cents in the pond, carry on.
peace love light

[Matthew Jones]

The video you keep referring to was not related to your work. Don't know why you keep bringing it up or why you or Matt were so offended by it. Please point out anything in the video that refers it to your work.

But you made a blanket statement clearly in that video and people listen to you. You DID NOT say in the video this was referring ONLY to the thief, liar and hypocrite idiot Rick, what ever his last name is, You said ANYBODY who measures this system any other way than way I am measuring it is measuring wrong. But you were wrong.
This was explained and your only retraction was, If I am wrong prove me wrong. F*ck You, your wrong, is the only reaction I can think of that suits this brick wall type superiority thinking. And you were wrong when you said it and you still haven't done any thing to see if I was right. Prove you have done more.
You cannot know what is hitting the third battery and the only math to show you is a known load and known third battery. You have to test the system by hand and chart it.
You cannot make a blanket statement and hope people understand you are enthused about one or the other.
David/Turion can not have this argument with you because he does not know how to measure much and he does not know how the 3 battery system works.
I DO!! and what I told you was the truth. Ignore me if you chose too, maybe it hurts your ego, maybe it pisses you off but what I told you is the truth.

And BRO MIKEY you should shut the f*ck up and go away so real researches can come back here and work on problems, including their arguments with each other. You are a pestilence.

[Allen Burgess]

Deep cycle batteries.

But you made a blanket statement clearly in that video and people listen to you. You DID NOT say in the video this was referring ONLY to the thief, liar and hypocrite idiot Rick, what ever his last name is, You said ANYBODY who measures this system any other way than way I am measuring it is measuring wrong. But you were wrong.
This was explained and your only retraction was, If I am wrong prove me wrong. F*ck You, your wrong, is the only reaction I can think of that suits this brick wall type superiority thinking. And you were wrong when you said it and you still haven't done any thing to see if I was right. Prove you have done more.
You cannot know what is hitting the third battery and the only math to show you is a known load and known third battery. You have to test the system by hand and chart it.
You cannot make a blanket statement and hope people understand you are enthused about one or the other.
David/Turion can not have this argument with you because he does not know how to measure much and he does not know how the 3 battery system works.
I DO!! and what I told you was the truth. Ignore me if you chose too, maybe it hurts your ego, maybe it pisses you off but what I told you is the truth.

And BRO MIKEY you should shut the f*ck up and go away so real researches can come back here and work on problems, including their arguments with each other. You are a pestilence.

@Matthew Jones,

Both you and Turion should know that deep cycle batteries are designed to self charge chemically and that stimulation from pulse motors can trigger it. This kind of power has nothing to do with any over unity feature from your alternator.

Furthermore; Lay off BRO MIKEY you stinking rat!

[gotoluc]

Dear Matt,

Glad you dropped in.

It wouldn't of been wise to mention a persons name in the video. However, if you look at the date it was published it coincides to be around the time a certain person was publishing long videos and making those claims.

I may be wrong and my ego would have no problem admitting it

All I ask is to be proven wrong. If you or anyone can do that I'll be more than happy to admit publicly that I was wrong.
I'll also be happy to take down the videos and make new ones to demonstrate the correct build and results.

Are you or anyone up to the task?

Regards

Luc

[Matthew Jones]

Dear Matt,

Glad you dropped in.

It wouldn't of been wise to mention a persons name in the video. However, if you look at the date it was published it coincides to be around the time a certain person was publishing long videos and making those claims.

I may be wrong and my ego would have no problem admitting it

All I ask is to be proven wrong. If you or anyone can do that I'll be more than happy to admit publicly that I was wrong.
I'll also be happy to take down the videos and make new ones to demonstrate the correct build and results.

Are you or anyone up to the task?

Regards

Luc

I told you the right way to measure those systems. You have to know the expected conventional loss of your load and the efficiency of your battery under conventional charging (Pulsed or otherwise) to assume what is hitting the battery. And as proven by several people those number will be low. I do not have any intention of documenting anything beyond that, I do not share anything anymore. What I have is mine and it will stay that way until I decide otherwise. Your letting yourself down if you believe what you said.
I'm going to leave again. Have fun arguing with the other people.

Matt

[Turion]

My thoughts

Matt is correct. I do NOT know how to do the proper measurements. In fact, when I fist started posting about this stuff on the OU forum they ran me off because I didn’t know how to defend myself and they kept insisting I “prove” that this is for real. So I quit. I put it all on the shelf. I moved on, figuring I would have nothing to do with this crap EVER again. Then that damn Luther Goodman contacted me and told me he was seeing what I was seeing and the circus started up again. I tried different motors connected to all kinds of different loads. Sometimes it worked and sometimes it didn’t. Then Matt introduced the pulse motor and the instances of it working became more frequent. But because I had been run off and because I let “experts” convince me I wasn’t seeing what I really WAS seeing, I needed something to prove this to myself. The motor runs st different speed when run between the positives than it does normally, and I looked for quite a while for a method of proving TO MYSELF that this is for real. So here is what I did. I charged up my best set of four batteries and put all four in parallel. Then I took one of my Matt modified motors and connected it to a water pump I got that had its own motor, which I removed and shaft connected to the Matt motor. This was an RV pump of some kind and also had a meter that could be reset. Then I pumped as much water from one five gallon bucket to another and back as the four batteries would pump until the pump no longer had enough power to pump anything. Then I recharged the batteries and did it a second time. I would have done it a third time but the results were pretty much the same and watching water pump is kinda like watching paint dry. Then I recharged the batteries, put two in series and two in parallel and ran the same test. I was able to pump over two and a half times as much water as the BEST result I got running straight off the batteries. Yes the pump ran slower and at the end when I was switching back and forth more often it ran really slow and it was extremely tedious, but work is work. There is no substitute. I didn’t run the test a second time. But from that moment on, NO ONE has any hope of EVER convincing me this does not work. And that test was done early on. We have made improvements since then. So you guys can rattle off all the expert opinions and reasons this can’t work all you want to. I have seen what I have seen. I owe you absolutely NOTHING and if you choose NOT to experiment with this, it is your loss. But don’t come whining around that I don’t share.

[Turion]

Luc,
In your video you stated it was to investigate claims "SOME Experimenters" are making about running a motor and charging batteries at the same time. THAT is why I brought this to your attention. Matt and I were doing that long before Rick ever dreamed of doing it.

Can I prove you are wrong in what you showed in your video? Heavens NO! That system was a failure before you connected the wires together to start it. So no, there is no way I could prove that what YOU built would work. Everything you show in that video is correct EXCEPT your statement that you cannot make gains when running a motor between two batteries in series and two batteries in parallel. You give us a perfect example of what NOT to do when putting together the system we have been discussing. It reminds me of when Myth Busters built the Bedini machine. LOL

First, according to YOUR words on the video, you used 5 amp hour batteries. We have stated MANY times that you must use large (amp hour) deep cycle batteries because the impedance in small batteries will KILL any chance of getting it to work.

Second, the motor you are using is drawing (according to the video) 2.85 amps from a pair of 5 amp hour batteries. We have said time and time again that the load cannot exceed the C20 rate of the batteries. That's like drilling a two inch hole in a gallon jug of water and trying to keep it from going empty by filling it with a teaspoon. The C-20 rate on those batteries is probably around .25 amps. Your load ALONE prevents it from working.

Third, that is NOT Matt's pulse motor. That motor is designed to NOT output the coil collapse OR the generated power of the motor to fight against the input. That means when run between the positives there is no charge PULSE hitting battery three. No collapse of the motor coil, no spike. All you have is voltage to charge battery 3.

Fourth, I will cut and paste what Matt said when you posted your videos on YouTube: "You probably need to regulate the potential difference to higher voltage ensuring the bottom 2 batteries are receiving enough of a charge to actually go into a charge state. All your doing now is hitting them with a trickle charge. Test the power delivery of a trickle charger. The other option is to regulate the power coming out of the motor to ensure the same thing. Its kind of amazing that you of all people start with a test that is set to fail. There are rules for both sides of the assembly that are conventional but still applicable. Discharge and charge rates are real and you have to hit them for the battery to respond. Don't just assume the batteries know what to do."

Finally, to see anything you have to go back and forth, moving each par of batteries from the top to the bottom OR you must send energy from the bottom two batteries back to the top.

If you choose to do a REAL test of this system, I would be happy to help you make sure it is successful. But no, you want me to prove it works before you try it. Good luck with that.

[ron48]

Well gotoluc do now a proper test with daves guidance. Then their will be no doubt in anyones mind

[gotoluc]

Well ron48, giving advice is one thing. Demonstrating the advice to work is another.
Somehow I feel you have nothing to demonstrate but ready to advise?

Like I said, I've followed this topic over the years. Many have built, tested and shared their results. However, you cannot find one single post that shows an overall gain let alone similar or consistent results.
If I would of seen such a post I would of replicated to confirm.
Also, doesn't it look kind of odd that not even one of the 20 or more replicators would step forward at this point to show their results?

Sorry Dave, I'm not trying to do a character assassination here. I'm looking for positive results from just one replicator and can't find any.

Regards

Luc

[Turion]

Conclusion

Not a problem. We each have to find our own way. You have your correct path and I have mine.

[citfta]

Hello Luc,

I don't know why more people are not speaking up. I have been very busy the last few days and just haven't had time to post a response to the latest comments. As I have explained before I have done many of the same tests as Dave and have gotten good results. By good results I mean that I have seen loads run much longer using the 3 battery generating system than they have run using the same batteries in parallel. This to me proves there is something about being able to recycle the energy that DOES work. I have also taken the time to rewind some motors according to Matt's design to make the motor a pulse type motor. I have seen when that motor is used it extends the run time even more just like Dave and Matt have said. I have also built and contributed to this forum a design for an automated battery cycling system that helps to keep all batteries rotated through the various positions of the 3BGS.

As Dave has said, how you set up the system makes all the difference in the world in whether you get good results or bad results. To get any results worth considering you MUST use large enough batteries. At a minimum for small test purposes I would not use anything smaller than the lawn and garden tractor type battery called U1 at Walmart. You can get them for sometimes $19.95 on sale and around here usually for $29.95. And you have to keep the load small for the smaller batteries.

And yes I do know you can't judge what is going on in a battery just by looking at the voltage. That is why Dave and I and I think also Matt have bought and use battery analyzers. These tell us the internal resistance and actual capacitance of the battery.

I do know at least one other person that I have actually visited that has done some amazing things using the 3BGS and large deep cycle batteries. He has gone completely off grid and until recently lived in the middle of Tennessee with only solar cells as his source of electricity.

The only claim that Dave has made that I have not had time to verify is his design of coils that speed up under load. My life has been very hectic for the last year and a half with the illness and passing of my father and then the time my brothers and I have had to spend cleaning out all his collection of stuff from over 70 years of living in the same place. When we get all that settled I will certainly be working on Dave's coil design and testing it.

One last thing I will say. Dave has said he has a way of overcoming the drag from the magnets attraction to the core of the coils. He has shared that with me and I can say for certain that it does work. Dave is holding on to that idea and that idea alone in hopes of getting a patent on it to try and recover some of the vast amount of money he has spent over the last several years of his research. As you well know wire and magnets and having rotors machined and all the other things involved in research cost a lot of money. I don't understand why anyone would begrudge Dave a chance to recover some of what he has spent when he has been so generous with all that he has shared. And I don't understand why more people have not taken the time and a little effort to try some of the things he has shared. I know of only 4 of us that have actually built and properly tested the 3BGS with a Matt designed pulse motor. I sincerely hope there are more that just haven't spoken up.

Respectfully,
Carroll

[Wistiti]

Quick step in to also comfirm that I see many time, with my experiment, that the 3bgs share by Dave and Matt, extend the run time of a load compare of using the same 3 batt //. As said use big batt and preferably a dcdc converter.

[Turion]

Just something think about.

Luc,
I know Bob French has tested it. It worked for him.

I know Luther Goodman has tested it. It worked for him.

I know Peter L. has tested it, and SHOWED it working at the conference in his LAST appearance.

I know RS Stafford has built it, tested it, showed it at the conference, and is currently selling a video of how to build a system running between the positives with a battery swapping setup like Carroll is talking about using parts from Home Depot or Lowes rather than electronic parts that have to be ordered like resistors and transistors.
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...-stafford.html

I only listed folks who have come out and said this works in public that I can think of off the top of my head. You can add Matt, Carroll and I to that list, and that's seven right there.

There are others who are not posting on this forum who I also know have tested it. It worked for them, and I have emails from them that I could look up. But I would want their permission before disclosing their names. Whether they come forth or not isn't the point. The point is, it works if you know what you are doing. When you post videos on YouTube saying there is NOTHING to be gained by this system, not only is that false, but it causes folks who might actually give this a try and who might then CONTRIBUTE to the shared knowledge, from ever taking a chance on this. And THAT is harmful to our efforts. Incorrectly labeling something as worthless (not your words, but that is the impression people are left with by your video) when it is NOT is far worse than simply not sharing something in the first place. It puts a big roadblock across a path that could and WILL lead people to exactly where they want to be if they follow it long enough and begin to understand what is happening in these systems.

I really DON'T care whether you try this or not, because I DO believe we each have our own path to follow. My ONLY request is that people do NOT publicly dismiss this when they OBVIOUSLY have not built the proper setup to give it half a chance of working for them.

People need to build it, see it work, understand it, and then think about how to apply the principles. Like I have said before, NOTHING that runs on low voltage should run on any method except BETWEEN THE POSITIVES, or that energy is just being wasted.

Dave

[jim glinski]

Hi guys

Hello I think running your system with the three battery's to dead and then running it as the the battery system .is the only way to test because not everybody can afford a lot of expensive test equipment anyways .and in the end its performance that counts using what you have . please stop the arguing .its not productive . just look to the results and move forward .. you don't have to bust your ass trying to convince any one of anything .just a simple test will do .its will only cause you and evey one else to get discouraged .and that the last thing that's needed here . might be deliberately done to knock you out of the subject don't fall for it . man everyone on the forum is fighting today . I was on YouTube and downloaded a vid with a guy running Matt's rewound motor .and he had to drill holes into it because it was getting hot with long runs . I don't think he was pulsing it ..? Can you give me a thumb nail skich of were the tec is at today ? I mean last was three battery's ...buck converters ...rewound motor... Has anyone found a good low lens generator yet ?for the unit ? Jim out