If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Ken, if you start helping private joker with these videos, I'm going to quit buying your books.
I didn't know Theoria was a little boy name, I thought Theoria was a female chicken But the definition is SEER or High One. Super wiseman? You smoke a pipe Too
Now that I know better I will just call this book writer Kenny
Really great video's!
And they belong in this place, because I know a few people here who would certainly be fooled by them. Sometimes I really wonder what people learn at school.
Of course they are all false:
1 - The force acts perpendicular to the plane of contact, meaning radial in this case.
2 - The force acting on the larger area can be split into 2 forces, 1 downward and 1 horizontally outward. The latter being equal and opposite to the force acting on the smaller area.
3 - If one magnet pushes the other, the other also pushes the first. Action - reaction. Both magnets are pushed apart and both are connected to the car. Net force = 0.
But, that said, I really like them and more people should see them.
Make one with a gyroscope! That is bound to trick people. See "prof"(???) Laithwaite's video's. Example: a force acting on a gyroscope creates movement at a 90 deg angle, thus it does not perform work, but is does create movement. Using this you can make a car run on gravity.... Tons of tricks can be done.
EVERYTHING non-Christian means "witch doctor" to Xtianity
So those definitions mean nothing when it says that this practice of summoning up gOds or and spirits and or guides to become one with the multitude of all or some of these, Is wrong.
So rewrite the definition then?
Did I get it right?
You see the definition is clear, you will not agree? With the definition? No?
The definition is all I have to go on. So this is wrong?
Then what should be the definition of these terms? I have never heard these specific terms nor paid them any mind til today.
So on your word I looked for the definitions. If this is not proper then I need a new definition.
I don't care if this is what people think, they have the right to think any way they like. On the other hand though I don't completely understand every view, all I have is the dictionary to give me some sort of answer.
The term that you gave me says this the practice of rituals centering on summoning up deities to become one with.
Is this not correct? Do not take offense for the question. This is your desire and you are free.
So those definitions mean nothing when it says that this practice of summoning up gOds or and spirits and or guides to become one with the multitude of all or some of these, Is wrong.
So rewrite the definition then?
Did I get it right?
Mike
No, you got it wrong. You made the typical low-brow ERROR of confusing ORIGINAL DENOTATION with LATER DAY CONNOTATION.
Such as the Pentagram, original a Pythagorean DENOTATION model of golden ratio incommensurability..........LATER DAY CONNOTATION however is Satanism etc etc
The later day CONNOTATION is one thing,..... the original DENOTATION is another thing.
But such fine nuances are what differentiate the pedestrians (intellectually) from the drivers.
However thats hardly a FINE nuance.
Same way the term fag used to mean cigarette , and gay meant you were happy.
I guess they didnt teach that in your school Connotation VS. original Denotation.
Comment