Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Resonance Energy Device Explained

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Talking about amplification of energy- with your theory shoudn't be device destroied by itself in no time as with each pulse gain of amplified ambient energy?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by John.K1 View Post
      Talking about amplification of energy- with your theory shoudn't be device destroied by itself in no time as with each pulse gain of amplified ambient energy?
      can you please clarify your question.

      Comment


      • As there is magnification of the curent - magnetic field- it brings more free electrons into the system ,resulting higher potencial energy. So the voltage,curent grows with each cycle till it self destruct. Something like Steven Marks TPU. And if this is not happening, it looks there is not enough of gain of ambient energy?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by John.K1 View Post
          As there is magnification of the curent - magnetic field- it brings more free electrons into the system ,resulting higher potencial energy. So the voltage,curent grows with each cycle till it self destruct. Something like Steven Marks TPU. And if this is not happening, it looks there is not enough of gain of ambient energy?
          The idea behind this device is power amplification by replication, this is why a temporarily storage capacitor banks or even batteries are essential, in some experiments an internal arcing inside the E-TBC appear even there is spark gap which is a voltage limitation element... the internal arcing is due to the higher difference of voltage between adjacent plate...this device is subject to reactive power, there is no heat dissipation.

          maybe you know the book of Vladimir Utkin FREE-ENERGY : NIKOLA TESLA SECRETS FOR EVERYBODY, it's a good book to read, in that book he talk about electromagnetic feedback, the E-TBC is subject to electromagnetic feedback because electricity and magnetism live together in the same device, what we gain from this device is a squared electromagnetic flux, we flip electrons back and forth in turn using spin separation mechanism, the voltage turn into current and the current turn back into voltage this happen in all parallel LC circuit but in the E-TBC each side help the other side, in other hand there is no current as we know it , it's still an open circuit !! only spin separation mechanism, for example when the voltage turn into current the induced electric field charge the capacitor when its subject to power degradation, this is why there is near superconductivity condition in this device, because there is no current as we know it the capacitor turn into coil but still an open coil has a dynamic capacitor responsible for spin separation mechanism ...
          this device has :

          1- a special electromagnetic feedback mechanism 2 magnetism and electricity are the same things only electron spin which give either a voltage or current 3- the induced electric field is able to amplify the voltage or the current upon the oscillation process.

          now it's better to quote from Guidelines to Bucking Coils.pdf By Chris Sykes :

          It’s a very confusing subject. Science tells us Energy cannot be created or destroyed. But yet, at the same time we have Electricity Devices called “Electric Generators”! “Electric Generators” “Generate” Electrical Power and supply it to our Homes and Businesses and so on.
          “Generate” Definition: “the production or creation of something.”
          The definition of Generation Implies creating Energy from nothing, which Science tells us we cannot do. So is this subject already mystical Voodoo Science?
          “Generator” Definition:
           A person or thing that generates something.
           A routine that constructs other routines or subroutines using given parameters, for specific applications.
           A point, line, or surface regarded as moving and so notionally forming a line, surface, or solid.
           A dynamo or similar machine for converting mechanical energy into electricity.
          Here in lies a very serious problem! It’s not bought up anywhere as far as I can tell. This definition does NOT explain how Mechanical Rotational Energy is converted into Electrical Energy on the Output Terminals. Energy in the form of Mechanical Rotation simply is not the actual causality of the Energy on the Output Terminals!
          E.G: I could spend all day rotating a Shaft and get not a single microwatt of Electrical Energy out of the shaft, only with the correct configuration of Conductors and Iron Stators and Rotors will I get output Power! So Mechanical Energy is NOT the Source of the Energy Generation!
          It is the silliest assumption I have ever heard in my entire life! I can’t believe this is still an assumption that Science is still trying to lay out on people as the primary source of Conversion! See: Lenz’s Law for more information.
          Mechanical Rotational Energy is only a partial requirement of Conventional Electrical Generators, because of Lenz’s Law.


          power amplification by replication is the process of the E-TBC, the problem now is to learn how to use it effectively, we have to put voltage and current in the right order ... as i told you i did a very few experiment with the mixed E-TBC because i wasn't equipped with scope to see at least the direction of voltage or current so i am sure what i am doing, it's very difficult to work with such complicated device without seeing anything .

          Comment


          • Generators do not generate electricity. They take it from air or ether or magnetic field around us as was explained by numerous inventors in the past...

            Comment


            • Originally posted by boguslaw View Post
              Generators do not generate electricity. They take it from air or ether or magnetic field around us as was explained by numerous inventors in the past...

              HI boguslaw

              It's a long time we didn't talked , i agree with you but sometimes we have to explain it so all memeber will understand the basic things...

              Comment


              • Hi Med.

                Thank you for your afford to explain the things

                I understand your thinking. I am not as much novice as you think.

                In the matter of the spin separation - it is quite controversial question.
                Current is not a different spin of electrons. Current is the electron on move (where is left or right in the multidimensional (more than 3D ) space? ) I know, it is something Donald S. mentioned, but I am a bit skeptical to what he says. I personally prefer the theory of T. Bearden. By his theory you can gain free energy by excitation of the electrons (by HV - voltage is for free) in the material to the exitation limit (its time depends on type of material used) - it means the electrons gain more energy to rotate on the place- and than give them small kick to get move (by sound or small electric kick etc.)

                Yeeh, CHris - EMJunkie,-- I folow his thread on Overunity.com for some time. So far he wasn't able to prove any of his theory. And if you tried to ask him for prove, all you get is just the personal insults.

                Vladimir Utkin- good documents. Especially his part of switching inductance and asymmetrical relations. Definitely worst to experiment with.

                I have read so many documents you name it and I did many experiments you name it. Some more some less successful. But with all the "sure" theories no over unity there so far.

                Comment


                • Hi John,

                  the field of over unity device is still a mysterious subject , but in the recent years things appear to be more clear, as you said a lots of document are available for download for free, the information are already available, but the most difficult thing is how to bring all these info together to build something that work

                  spin separation mechanism is a denotation for two different things that exist together namely electricity and magnetism or voltage and current :

                  take an isolated charged E-TBC , discharge it, be aware it's still charged, discharge it another time, what you think ? in reality it take a long time to be totally discharged.
                  i know this is not the reply about your question but it's a good experiment maybe you did it before.

                  the reply about spin separation is already solved in the mixed E-TBC, the idea here is to expand the magnetic side of the single E-TBC , in other words it create another opposite magnetic pole...
                  (where is left or right in the multidimensional (more than 3D ) space? ), you are right here we can't see the left or the right spin of electron because the are related to each other meaning only when you see this electron in spinning up the other will be spinning down and they are related to each other ... if you take only one electron and measure it you will be totally lost because you are not guided in this special space, for example when you enter a dark room and light it up the darkness will be gone, the question now is where is the darkness ? the darkness is a situation related to the absence of light ...

                  the same thing about electrons spin mechanism this one is spinning up only when the other one is spinning down, there is another option so we could use night vision glasses fro example so we could see the room object without the need to light the room... here we only changed the perspective of things because some animals has the ability to see at night .... now we use the light bulb even the room is already lightened !!

                  the current is another form of electricity because the nature work to bring things to the original state, this is why Tom Bearden call it the energy killer, when we treat the magnetism and electricity as if they are the same thing the bringing back behavior will increase either the magnetism or electricity providing something similar to super conductivity in room temperature, this process is used to generate electricity without great effort.

                  back again to the mixed E-TBC, the two side oscillate in the same frequency as if they are already united... here you have to understand the geometry behind this device, we only shifted the X point to be outside the system so both side share the same spin separation point and amazingly both side are out of phase in voltage , the symmetry in this device is rotational and related to electrons spin... the point where spin mechanism take action is the point X, which is X1+X2 !!

                  i know it's disappointing when you can't gather some excess power but you have to enjoy your learning, i am still learning and frequently i see myself novice..

                  i think i need a night vision glasses .....

                  Comment


                  • Hi John,

                    i think it's a good idea to share your experiments here, if you replicate something and some change are done tell us, what about the mixed E-TBC did you tried it ? especially the scope graph , at what conditions you are loading your device?

                    Comment


                    • Hi Med.

                      " the darkness is a situation related to the absence of light ..." Not true. The light is everywhere around us. Even when you see dark. The only way you can see light is when the particles/waves interacts with the other matter and change the light frequency in to the visible range for human eye. Erric Dollard for example says that you do not see light in the space, because there is nothing the light can interact with (of-course there is, the space is not empty) But this is just out of topic.

                      Now to the E-TBC - Is it possible that using "non-controlled" sparks can "set" and "dump" your resonant frequency of the device at the same time. Dump in the meaning of reducing efficiency. I would say we might think of control of timing when to spark. What you think?

                      Comment


                      • Proposed circuit to be tested


                        the following pick up circuit wasn't tested it's only an idea to avoid Lenz's law on L2 coil , it's suitable to be tested on the mixed E-TBC, a scope is needed to see the voltage direction so it can be built correctly.

                        it's formed using a bifilar wire but connected to make the current circulate in opposite direction in the same coil, so the magnetic field generated which will be translated to Lenz's law will cancel each other, in each coil there is no difference in potential that make the current circulate but using two of them each one represent a pick up coil related to each side that form the mixed E-TBC will make the change, the current will flow without disturbing the E-TBC process .

                        this is just an idea, i don't know if it work or no .


                        Attached Files

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by John.K1 View Post
                          Hi Med.

                          " the darkness is a situation related to the absence of light ..." Not true. The light is everywhere around us. Even when you see dark. The only way you can see light is when the particles/waves interacts with the other matter and change the light frequency in to the visible range for human eye. Erric Dollard for example says that you do not see light in the space, because there is nothing the light can interact with (of-course there is, the space is not empty) But this is just out of topic.

                          Now to the E-TBC - Is it possible that using "non-controlled" sparks can "set" and "dump" your resonant frequency of the device at the same time. Dump in the meaning of reducing efficiency. I would say we might think of control of timing when to spark. What you think?
                          edit
                          i didn't understand the question.


                          sometimes i think to short circuit CD connection and use a diode after the regulation capacitor so we could avoid the turn back oscillation and let the E-TBC oscillate naturally since it oscillate in MHZ when the combination E-TBC + regulation capacitor oscillate in KHZ .... here you have to achieve natural resonance when CD in short circuit condition.

                          about your question can you tell how controlling when sparking ?
                          Last edited by med.3012; 04-27-2015, 06:34 PM. Reason: mistake :)

                          Comment


                          • I think we agree there is not occurring just a spark in one (correct) frequency- There is a mess of sparks of different frequencies. And this "other" frequencies can dump the effect. If you strike in one incorrect frequency, the coil will still resonate on its own frequency. But if there is more than just one incorrect frequency I believe it might have seriously dumping effect. Thinking about Tesla's rotational spark-gap.

                            Comment


                            • @John

                              Just some ideas:

                              i think it's better to work with low voltage oscillator the one presented here is easy to build, then you could test different arrangements, for safety reason it's a good idea, you could move to work with the mixed E-TBC decisively, the idea behind it is proven now.

                              in my point of view the key success for this device to work as expected is involved in the spin separation mechanism which have to be maintained all the time, which lead me to think to close the junction CD.
                              the process itself depend on it, the spark gap in CD position make it very difficult if not impossible to achieve a good regulation... the spark gap in CD mean the dynamic capacitor is changing its value all the time which give a wide range of harmonic dumping oscillation, i see this as the replication point i told about this before but i didn't mentioned to close the dynamic capacitor decisively for stability reason.
                              Last edited by med.3012; 04-27-2015, 08:38 PM.

                              Comment


                              • med.3012: Have a look at this youtube video: Don Smith's over unity extended Tesla Bi filar Coil by Electric Celery, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UC29rHxx6Es

                                I may be wrong, but beginning at the 5:18 mark, I believe I see a picture of your device which he uses in his demonstration.

                                Best regards

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X