Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Resonance Energy Device Explained

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Magnethos View Post
    I've been reading some information in Don Smith documents and I've been checking that the information I posted is partially wrong.

    Volts -> CounterClockWise
    Amps -> ClockWise

    In the picture I posted the direction of rotation is wrong.

    If you like I can make some small pictures with new information I've been watching these years. For example, the virtual photons are very elastic and they obey to Hooke's Law.
    you are right , they spin in the same direction ! your suggestions are welcome always.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by med.3012 View Post
      you are right , they spin in the same direction ! your suggestions are welcome always.
      I'm just editing the graphic and including some new information. I will post it when it's finished.
      "A knot cannot be undone, without knowing the way it was made" Aristotle

      Comment


      • I've just finished the new version and corrected different things.
        Here you've the result
        Attached Files
        "A knot cannot be undone, without knowing the way it was made" Aristotle

        Comment


        • Hi to All,

          In this post i will try to put some light on one of an interesting Tesla patent has the number 645,576 named SYSTEM OF TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY.
          The purpose is to understand the characters of radiant energy and separate it from ordinary hot electricity ( this an advanced physical model but simplified at the same time ) , after that we will see how to apply this new information on the E-TBC (in further posts).

          In this patent Tesla talked about the possibility of rendering the air to become a perfect conductor by rarefying its molecules with extremely very high voltage in order of million volts…
          in a brief Tesla was interested in transmitting the power into a higher air strata ( due to it's preferable behaviours )

          Tesla was able to use electrostatic induction rather then electromagnetic induction, one of the main difference between both is the geometry where they flow, electrostatic induction work in 3D mode, the following drawing show how radiant voltage flow compared to radiant current :




          radiant current flow perpendicular to radiant voltage, the induction process in this model has two way( mutual) , radiant current is capable of inducing radiant voltage and the same apply to radiant voltage because it's capable of inducing radiant current!

          this explain why a battery charged with radiant energy got charged without any source of power when disconnected from load ( i watched this in one of John Bedini video ), the plates inside his battery was charged with radiant voltage, this voltage induce a vertical radiant current which in turn capable to push more voltage and this mutual process will fill the battery if sufficient time allowed !!

          in this Tesla patent he combined two words together in 6 times, the words are collecting or receiving, it's clear there is a collecting mechanism in his wireless transmission system upon receiving the power, the efficiently of Tesla wireless transmitting system is another proof about this.
          this is possible because radiant energy stream flow in 3D space the current being vertical to the flow of voltage allow mutual induction process to amplify the power .


          In hot ordinary electricity we have problems with the current, in order to amplify the power we must increase the current but since the electromagnetic induction work in 2D mode this is not easy to do.


          In the electromagnetic induction the current flow in a closed loop being the same in the whole circuit, the voltage is the pressure cause the current to flow and have to have a value between the start and the end point where the current flow, in this mode we have serial current parallel voltage ( magnitude ), the idea here is that; because current and voltage flow in 2D mode they are parallel to each other ( vector ) , there is no conflict when I say : serial current parallel voltage here the voltage have to follow the current but in a gradual manner to cause a different of pressure in the closed loop, the practical proof about that is the voltage have to decrease in order to supply current , parallel voltage mean the magnitude of voltage have to be measured in parallel compared the flow of current , this is why a volt meter have to provide a maximum resistance toward current flow in order to measure the voltage correctly.

          The electromagnetic induction work in 2D because the electromagnetic flux intercept any closed loop providing an induced EMF in that specific loop even if that loop is a part from a 3D coil , if that loop form a 3D shape it have to be something like a hallowed cylinder, this 3D situation imply the presence of eddy current which is a lost power.

          in reality there is a strange relation between the behaviour of radiant energy where there is a mutual induction between current and voltage and the principle work of the E-TBC; in this special capacitor coil there a mutual relation between the current and voltage, as we know the electromagnetic feedback inside this coil cause the voltage to increase in electrostatic manner when the current increase due to the rotating induced electric field, the same happen when the current decrease in turn to charge the capacitor here the same induced rotating electric field keep the current high by providing a reversed electrostatic voltage

          in order to harvest the power from this multidimensional device we have to focus in the electrostatic side of the E-TBC and see it as a source of radiant current since it's able to supply both reactive electric energy and radiant energy stream, when this is fully understood it will be easy to amplify radiant current to very high level.
          Attached Files

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Magnethos View Post
            I've just finished the new version and corrected different things.
            Here you've the result

            Hi Magnethos,

            Thanks so much for the corrected drawing and sorry for not replying you yesterday , i was busy with my new post.

            your observations are extremely bright about the similarity between Hooke's law and a resonating LC circuit, the compression;rarefaction take action in longitudinal waves and this is compatible with past/future light cone concept discussed in my document.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by med.3012 View Post
              Hi Magnethos,

              Thanks so much for the corrected drawing and sorry for not replying you yesterday , i was busy with my new post.

              your observations are extremely bright about the similarity between Hooke's law and a resonating LC circuit, the compression;rarefaction take action in longitudinal waves and this is compatible with past/future light cone concept discussed in my document.
              Don't worry about that. I saw that you posted a new post in this thread and it takes time.


              Check out also this thread because I've also posted some information about 'The elastic ether'.
              http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...o-wwork-2.html

              I only post this information because I think someone can find it interesting and he can extend the theory with more knowledge and new findings.
              "A knot cannot be undone, without knowing the way it was made" Aristotle

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Magnethos View Post
                Don't worry about that. I saw that you posted a new post in this thread and it takes time.


                Check out also this thread because I've also posted some information about 'The elastic ether'.
                http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...o-wwork-2.html

                I only post this information because I think someone can find it interesting and he can extend the theory with more knowledge and new findings.
                this is a repeated reply about your question in the above thread : So, how could be possible to "translate" 1D energy to 2D energy?


                my point of view tell me, the process of amplification start from 1D , for example the one dimensional capacitor in the E-TBC imply the interconnection between positive energy side and negative energy side to work together in harmony, this bring an amplification toward 2D dimension now the electromagnetic flux is amplified but as i understand it recently this is not the point !! there are further amplification toward 3D dimension which is radiant energy streams this is obviously visible if we see the static charge as a plane for the amplified 2D energy toward 3D radiant energy !

                to extract the power it's important to go in a gradual manner! from your 3D environment start by lowering only one dimension and take into consideration the symmetry here ! from decompressed state go to another compressed state, this is why Tesla himself was interested in the shape of radiant energy stream and he suggested they look like cylinder or sphere., Tesla was aware about these dimensions this is why in one of his patent he say : the insulated plate or conducting-body should present as large a surface as practicable to the rays or streams of matter here he was talking about extracting the power from 3D ( radiant stream) into 2D the insulated plate! from 2D now toward 1D which is the final extraction point he has to close the loop externally not internally using two different 2D plane which is the radiant voltage and the the ground!!!

                Comment


                • Originally posted by med.3012 View Post
                  this is a repeated reply about your question in the above thread : So, how could be possible to "translate" 1D energy to 2D energy?


                  my point of view tell me, the process of amplification start from 1D , for example the one dimensional capacitor in the E-TBC imply the interconnection between positive energy side and negative energy side to work together in harmony, this bring an amplification toward 2D dimension now the electromagnetic flux is amplified but as i understand it recently this is not the point !! there are further amplification toward 3D dimension which is radiant energy streams this is obviously visible if we see the static charge as a plane for the amplified 2D energy toward 3D radiant energy !

                  to extract the power it's important to go in a gradual manner! from your 3D environment start by lowering only one dimension and take into consideration the symmetry here ! from decompressed state go to another compressed state, this is why Tesla himself was interested in the shape of radiant energy stream and he suggested they look like cylinder or sphere., Tesla was aware about these dimensions this is why in one of his patent he say : the insulated plate or conducting-body should present as large a surface as practicable to the rays or streams of matter here he was talking about extracting the power from 3D ( radiant stream) into 2D the insulated plate! from 2D now toward 1D which is the final extraction point he has to close the loop externally not internally using two different 2D plane which is the radiant voltage and the the ground!!!
                  Well, I think the more dimensions we understand, the better. I'm trying to read some information about 3D plane dynamics to amplificate power and trying to understand higher dimensions relations. The 3D plane dynamics is complex to understand because it involves a lot of big calculations.

                  It's a little bit difficult to understand all the things you say because I haven't read about that. Maybe reading more slowly I can understand it better. But the thing I see you're interested is in the radiant stream geometry, right? That it happens in the 3D plane.
                  "A knot cannot be undone, without knowing the way it was made" Aristotle

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Magnethos View Post
                    Well, I think the more dimensions we understand, the better. I'm trying to read some information about 3D plane dynamics to amplificate power and trying to understand higher dimensions relations. The 3D plane dynamics is complex to understand because it involves a lot of big calculations.

                    It's a little bit difficult to understand all the things you say because I haven't read about that. Maybe reading more slowly I can understand it better. But the thing I see you're interested is in the radiant stream geometry, right? That it happens in the 3D plane.

                    i agree with you about the necessity of understanding energy dimensions, i like to simplify the complicated phenomena through simplified geometry instead of doing big calculations, finally big calculation are based on very small elements when gathered together correctly through simplified geometry the whole picture will be visible and easy to manage.

                    the E-TBC and its neighbour the mixed E-TBC are based on a simplified geometries, the mixed E-TBC is a proof for the E-TBC and this itself was a big success, these two device are based on 3D models, but i wasn't able to see the order where the energy flow until recently with the aid of some friends, the following drawing show some dimensions that exist in the E-TBC .



                    the principle works of the E-TBC are based on conserving the induced rotating electric field that known as no conservative electric field ! this big move from 2D electromagnetic induction system toward 3D energy system change things completely, the radiant voltage now is able to move the same way as the current flow in ordinary hot electricity... radiant voltage look like electric charge that are condensed in a capacitor but he has a serial motive force the same as normal voltage! the only difference is the geometry where it flow which is reversed compared to hot ordinary electricity, radiant current flow in 3D mode being something similar to the electric field inside a capacitor where it flow with the whole radiant energy streams, this special amazing geometry allow mutual induction to work in this mode ... now notice the similarity with the electromagnetic interference inside the E-TBC , air grounding or ground grounding is a necessity for this energy to be finally harvested as useful energy.

                    Mr Tesla the forgotten great scientist was able to synchronise radiant energy stream with the electric pulse generate this power using his unique understanding of the field .
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                    • It seems that you're right, but I think we have to have a deeper understand because it can be seen in a simple way without a lot of complex calculations, but it's needed to understand something more I think.

                      Eric Dollard, for example explains tons of different informations that I don't understand and I consider that information would be very useful to learn. Apart from E.Dollard there are other men explaining different points of views.

                      I would like to answer more, but I cannot because I don't fully understand it.
                      "A knot cannot be undone, without knowing the way it was made" Aristotle

                      Comment


                      • Take a look at this, maybe it will be useful for your.
                        You've been explaining to me information about 3D and you've drawn a cone


                        It seems that you see the inner structure of the cone as follows. Your model is similar to K.Meyl model.




                        I think the way I'm going to explain it to you is very similar to your model. Replace the inner struct with this one:


                        As you can see, it's very similar to your pink-circle structure but it's also a little bit different.
                        In your document I can see


                        It's like seeing the cone in this direction


                        So, you understand what I mean in this point. So the next thing is to understand how to translate from 1D to 2D.

                        What I understand is the next:
                        Think about a 1D potential as the scalar potential. As we know, 1D is only 1 plane. So we consider 1 plane in the following picture:

                        As you can see, all the interactions can be described in one plane only.
                        So, to translate from 1 plane to 2 planes we need to introduce some mathematical modifications.

                        This is the empty 2 plane, that means 2D:


                        Now thing that the vertical plane is the electric field and the horizontal plane is the magnetic field.


                        In this point, you see a linear polarization in each one of the planes. Both electrical and magnetic plane are linear polarized in the 1D plane. This is where Hooke's law takes place, in the 1D plane.


                        Combining both, horizontal and vertical polarization gives as a result the electromagnetic wave.


                        When you project the horizontal and vertical planes, while they're 90º phase (reactive power), you get as a result an indirect elliptical polarization (pink line):


                        That eliptical polarization if observed in front (like the picture in this post of the blue man observing the cone), can be view as a fibonacci



                        To be continued in the below posts
                        "A knot cannot be undone, without knowing the way it was made" Aristotle

                        Comment


                        • The next point is to see what the cone-spring means. Take a look at these pictures:


                          That elliptical polarization extract energy from the ether because it translates 1D potentials to 2D electromagnetic waves. Think about a scalar potential as a 1D representation (like Meyl):

                          This representation is in 1D.

                          So, if we try to translate to 2D, we've to introduce a spiral phase angle. This means to engineer the "angular momentum":


                          The above picture means transformir a potential, 1D, to a electromagnetic wave in 90º phase (reactive power), 2D. For that, you need to give a second dimention to the original planar potential to see the elliptical polarization.


                          It's like the next picture. A 1D scalar potential is when both graphics are at point zero. They don't move. Where there is movement is when the values are highger than zero. If you want to see more easy think that you've to give movement to the pendulum that basically it's an oscillator and Hooke's law applies. The dynamic follows a Fibonacci.
                          "A knot cannot be undone, without knowing the way it was made" Aristotle

                          Comment


                          • Imagine that the scalar potential, 1D, is the bottom part. Call it the Ether:


                            More detailed description is here:


                            This means that the ether is in a quiet-relaxed state. You've to stimulate it to obtain energy from it.
                            If we see that picture, we can think about the similatiry with water in the sea. As you know the water in the sea or in a glass is in a relaxed-quiet state:

                            If there are not stimulations (no plane is disturbed/changed/altered/stimulated) in the 1D plane, there won't be activity in any of the other N-D planes (N = 1, 2, 3... call it 1D, 2D, 3D...) because each plane is connected with the other plane. All is unity. If you change 1 characteristic of one plane, the other planes will change to adapt to that characteristic. For that reason I told you to understand the whole picture. This is multidimensional dynamics.

                            When you alter 1 plane, then you have effects in the other planes, but if you want to have a 3D representation, you've to alter different planes to have a 3D representation when you project the planes:


                            For that reason, you need to stimulate different planes to get a 3D effect. That starts by the stimulation of 2 or more 1D planes:


                            Look and think about the next relation:
                            Ether - Sea water /// Sound Waves - Speaker
                            The sound waves are longitudinal waves.
                            The emissor is the ether and it's like a speaker.
                            The medium is also the ether, and it's like sea water.

                            When the speaker is resting (silence), nothing moves and nothing happens.
                            So, there are no effects (sounds).

                            If you want to hear sounds (electricity), you've to switch on the speaker and play some information (CD, Radio...) to produce sound waves (electricity). To stimulate the spaker, just "play" functions (waves).


                            As we know, the ether is an elastic medium, so the movements are 1D longitudinal, like when you release an object in the water:



                            These pressure waves have to be projected from a group of 1D planes to a 3D plane to see more easily the dynamics involved.

                            So, if you want to get electromagnetic energy in the 2D plane. You've to know how to stimulate (dynamics, sequences and patterns) that the 1D plane follows to get a specific 2D projections from a group of 1D planes.
                            "A knot cannot be undone, without knowing the way it was made" Aristotle

                            Comment


                            • I've found another correlation. This time is about magnetic field lines and the doppler effect. Look at the similarities:



                              Last edited by Magnethos; 05-30-2015, 02:18 PM.
                              "A knot cannot be undone, without knowing the way it was made" Aristotle

                              Comment


                              • Take a look at this:



                                Last edited by Magnethos; 05-30-2015, 02:56 PM.
                                "A knot cannot be undone, without knowing the way it was made" Aristotle

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X