Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Ev Grey Tube Revisited

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Ev Grey Tube Revisited

    THE EV GREY TUBE REVISITED



    I have been studying the ev grey patent and in particular his tube for years and
    now and then I come across replication attempts you will also see a few on youtube
    But my interest was sparked again when I watched Peter lindams video on the grey tube.

    I have my own theory about how the tube works as do many others but there is a few things I can’t help but notice about replications I have seen, the placement of the grid in relation to the spark gap some show it correct as grey indicated in the patent and some do not by completely covering the spark gap, I think it is a significant error,

    I personally think when grey spoke of splitting the positive he is talking about the positive going into the tube taking two paths to the spark gap and to the grid he is only covering the positive anode with the grid I have not tested it yet but I think there is a negative radiant event in the spark gap at the point of the cathode and could be why the carbon rod is placed where it is and why it is important but most replications I have seen leave it out, I think it is to not disrupt the positive radiant energy grey even says in his patent can be a positive or negative event as does tesla

    the stuttering shockwaves were capable of forcing charges in the direc*
    tion of their propagation.
    Objects placed near this device became powerfully electrified, retaining a
    singular charge sign for many minutes after the magnetic discharger had been
    deactivated. Tesla found it possible to amplify these single charge effects by a
    Simple asymmetrical alignment of the magnetic discharger. By placing the mag*
    netic discharger closer to one or the other side of the charging dynamo, either
    force positive or force negative vectors could be selected and projected,

    I have not seen one person drive the tube with a high frequency spark something important according to tesla when generating radiant energy.

    I believe this site gives a better explanation of how the tube works

    Oly Tesla Society: DIY Tesla Radiant Energy Device

    I also think grey’s patent on the tube is not showing it all correctly to mislead people one lesser known patent grey has put out is uk patent GB2030802A there you will find some similarities to the tube and power supply patent but shown more correctly.

    Another observation is if you watch greys promotional video on youtube showing grey fireing the coils you will hear a pop pop pop sound a break then bang when it fires as though some event is charging a cap that is then fired. I personally think the charge from the grid is the actual energy being stored in a cap then fired into the coil.

  • #2
    Gray Tube

    Dom, thanks for bringing up the Gray Tube.

    It's a single fire event per cycle so isn't a high frequency device. The only thing that is at high frequency was the power supply giving 5000 spikes per second at about 5000 volts to the capacitor on the HV rod. The LV rod triggers the discharge of that as needed according to when the magnets needed to be fired to run the motor - is the triac or whatever tube you want there acting as a triggerable diode.

    I believe the bang bang bang pop you're talking about was from the lab demo where he was looking into his propulsion stuff and from what we know, he was using very conventional ignatrons for that and not his claimed overunity motor technology. Mark McKay would know better, but I'm pretty sure that was just ignatrons - all conventional. The motor circuits when running sounded like a popcorn machine with each cap discharge like this: Murakami-Gray 3 Point - YouTube but more clean and louder from much bigger discharges.

    Few more: Plasma with AND without Inductor - YouTube and Murakami-Gray 3 Point Plasma outside of tube - YouTube

    The best eye witness we have today that actually examined the working overunity motor of Ed Gray is John Bedini and the direction he put the diode on the low voltage rod is very important - it isn't how Gray showed. There are a few bogus things in Gray's patent including the connections of the overshoot gap at the bottom left, that triode direction, etc...
    Sincerely,
    Aaron Murakami

    Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
    Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
    RPX & MWO http://vril.io

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks aaron for the reply
      at the moment i am building an exact replica of the tube glass tube with carbon rod and all I have even silver tipped the gap
      I am working on the grid now i will test my theory and see what i come up with the only way to know is to try it.
      I have done some work building inverter circuits when you get above 10khz or so the power that comes out the transformer behaves very differently from normal ac even at low voltages of about 300v will be interesting to see what the tube does.

      Comment

      Working...
      X