Tweet
So, everyone KNOWS what Teslas AC induction motor "is", likely built one or more, and studied its use 10000000 ways.
obviously,... but WHAT IF, knowing how a magnet works, you understood WHAT POWER GENERATION is in very simple terms as applied to the induction motor invention???
Ive got 100s of pages, and pictures and proof (at least 200 of which is yet unpublished) for the indivisible dielectric inertial plane in ANY and ALL magnets, always self-centering, the counterspatial 'center' of any magnet which is not LOCATED at the center, but FORCED there, CONCENTRATED there,..... no diff. really than simplex child level fluid dynamics.
SO, what IS an induction motor really? (sounds like a really dumb question, but is not). I forward that there is only ONE field, dielectricity, and that magnetism in true reduction is not , cannot be a field (as I was writing about endlessly for the past many months to be added to my work)
The absolute truth, as it happens, magnetism is NOT a field in definition, once finally reduced, rather a force of the loss of dielectric inertia
Magnetism is a FORCE, not a field, all spatially divergent Ether modalities are the loss of counterspatial inertia, expressed either as magnetism, or spatial condensates as matter, or as transverse expressions of electricity. There is only ONE FIELD, dielectricity, the rest are field modalities with divergent expressions.
and no, Im not contradicting myself,
however as a CONTRIVANCE, speaking about "magnetic fields" is acceptable for DISCUSSION, .......but the brass tacks are that MAGNETISM IS NOT A FIELD
An induction motor, in very simplex (divinely so) terms, is nothing more than an INVERTED MAGNET
And what the hell does that mean?
It means that any magnet has 'its magnetism' centered around a concentrated dielectric inertial plane with SPATIAL MAGNETIC DIVERGENCE reciprocating, ........ and its the lowest possible pressure mediation and simplex mass-form and dually expressed ether modality in the universe, counterspatial (centered) dielectric and SPATIAL divergent magnetism......
and the AC INDUCTION MOTOR? Just the opposite, the (whatever phase coil) coil is the spatial variant AT THE CENTER OF WHICH is a rotating magnet (or multiple magnets) {{{as driven by X, coal, nuclear etc}}}.
the AC INDUCTION MOTOR both cannot be anything more complex than an "inside out" MAGNET, the spatial variant is at the center of which electrical creation (magnetic and dielectric) is created and possible.
All electrical creation is nothing more complex than an "inverted magnet", with the dielectric (in this case the conductor, or as Dollard would say 'dielectric reflector') as the spatial binary to the centered (but divergent) rotating magnet(s).
that a magnet is a hyperboloid at the center of which is the dielectric inertial plane cannot be refuted by anyone on earth
electrical generation, the inverse HYPERBOLOID, is the AC induction motor
the opposite of magnetic convergence (the simplex magnet) is electrical generation (AC motor)
However, WHOLLY UNLIKE THE MAGNET.........Of course the AC MOTOR DOES NOT WORK AT ALL, and is upside down to nature....
No AC motor on earth EVER EVER EVER created electricity (of its own accord)
"upside down" (in this case inside OUT) 'mother nature' "Dont work" ....... we have to crank on our 'inverted magnet' to harvest the power we lust for.
I actually have a lot Ive written on the induction motor is nothing more complex (surely a child could grasp it) than an inside-out magnet.
More complicated than that? NO, impossible.
Not that simple? Yes, it is that simple.
Makes no sense? If you understand how a magnet 'works' and what magnetism 'is' and 'does', then YES it is just that damn simple.
“No amount of praise is too much to bestow upon Edison for his (lamp / bulb), but all he did was wrought (‘work’) in known and passing forms. What I contributed constitutes a new and lasting edition to human knowledge. Like his lamp, my induction motor may be discarded and forgotten in the continuous evolution of the (electric motor?) arts, but my rotating field with its marvelous phenomena and manifestations of force (from magnetism) will last as long as science itself” - Nikola Tesla
New York World Nov. 29, 1929, p. 10 col. 4-5. To the Editor of the World
Nikola Tesla November 1928 interview:
“No”, Dr. Tesla said with some feelings, “I would not give my rotating magnetic field discovery for a thousand inventions, however valuable, designed merely as mechanical contraptions to deceive the eye and ear!”
Then saying: “A thousand years hence, the telephone and the motion picture camera may be obsolete, but the principle of the rotating magnetic field will remain a vital, living thing for all time to come.” - Nikola Tesla
Article: “A Famous Prophet of Science Looks into the Future” (Popular Science Monthly)
sorry, I HAD TO include my latest picture creation.
obviously,... but WHAT IF, knowing how a magnet works, you understood WHAT POWER GENERATION is in very simple terms as applied to the induction motor invention???
Ive got 100s of pages, and pictures and proof (at least 200 of which is yet unpublished) for the indivisible dielectric inertial plane in ANY and ALL magnets, always self-centering, the counterspatial 'center' of any magnet which is not LOCATED at the center, but FORCED there, CONCENTRATED there,..... no diff. really than simplex child level fluid dynamics.
SO, what IS an induction motor really? (sounds like a really dumb question, but is not). I forward that there is only ONE field, dielectricity, and that magnetism in true reduction is not , cannot be a field (as I was writing about endlessly for the past many months to be added to my work)
The absolute truth, as it happens, magnetism is NOT a field in definition, once finally reduced, rather a force of the loss of dielectric inertia
Magnetism is a FORCE, not a field, all spatially divergent Ether modalities are the loss of counterspatial inertia, expressed either as magnetism, or spatial condensates as matter, or as transverse expressions of electricity. There is only ONE FIELD, dielectricity, the rest are field modalities with divergent expressions.
and no, Im not contradicting myself,
however as a CONTRIVANCE, speaking about "magnetic fields" is acceptable for DISCUSSION, .......but the brass tacks are that MAGNETISM IS NOT A FIELDAn induction motor, in very simplex (divinely so) terms, is nothing more than an INVERTED MAGNET
And what the hell does that mean?
It means that any magnet has 'its magnetism' centered around a concentrated dielectric inertial plane with SPATIAL MAGNETIC DIVERGENCE reciprocating, ........ and its the lowest possible pressure mediation and simplex mass-form and dually expressed ether modality in the universe, counterspatial (centered) dielectric and SPATIAL divergent magnetism......and the AC INDUCTION MOTOR? Just the opposite, the (whatever phase coil) coil is the spatial variant AT THE CENTER OF WHICH is a rotating magnet (or multiple magnets) {{{as driven by X, coal, nuclear etc}}}.
the AC INDUCTION MOTOR both cannot be anything more complex than an "inside out" MAGNET, the spatial variant is at the center of which electrical creation (magnetic and dielectric) is created and possible.
All electrical creation is nothing more complex than an "inverted magnet", with the dielectric (in this case the conductor, or as Dollard would say 'dielectric reflector') as the spatial binary to the centered (but divergent) rotating magnet(s).
that a magnet is a hyperboloid at the center of which is the dielectric inertial plane cannot be refuted by anyone on earth
electrical generation, the inverse HYPERBOLOID, is the AC induction motor
the opposite of magnetic convergence (the simplex magnet) is electrical generation (AC motor)
However, WHOLLY UNLIKE THE MAGNET.........Of course the AC MOTOR DOES NOT WORK AT ALL, and is upside down to nature....
No AC motor on earth EVER EVER EVER created electricity (of its own accord)
"upside down" (in this case inside OUT) 'mother nature' "Dont work"
....... we have to crank on our 'inverted magnet' to harvest the power we lust for. I actually have a lot Ive written on the induction motor is nothing more complex (surely a child could grasp it) than an inside-out magnet.
More complicated than that? NO, impossible.
Not that simple? Yes, it is that simple.
Makes no sense? If you understand how a magnet 'works' and what magnetism 'is' and 'does', then YES it is just that damn simple.
“No amount of praise is too much to bestow upon Edison for his (lamp / bulb), but all he did was wrought (‘work’) in known and passing forms. What I contributed constitutes a new and lasting edition to human knowledge. Like his lamp, my induction motor may be discarded and forgotten in the continuous evolution of the (electric motor?) arts, but my rotating field with its marvelous phenomena and manifestations of force (from magnetism) will last as long as science itself” - Nikola Tesla
New York World Nov. 29, 1929, p. 10 col. 4-5. To the Editor of the World
Nikola Tesla November 1928 interview:
“No”, Dr. Tesla said with some feelings, “I would not give my rotating magnetic field discovery for a thousand inventions, however valuable, designed merely as mechanical contraptions to deceive the eye and ear!”
Then saying: “A thousand years hence, the telephone and the motion picture camera may be obsolete, but the principle of the rotating magnetic field will remain a vital, living thing for all time to come.” - Nikola Tesla
Article: “A Famous Prophet of Science Looks into the Future” (Popular Science Monthly)
sorry, I HAD TO include my latest picture creation.
Comment