Free energy is a myth

[BroMikey]

I remember 7 years ago a member of this present forum show a demonstration to Peter Lindemann about an experiment that Peter could not explain..

The guy nickname was Sephyroth..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1g3DwpshYxU

Enjoy!!

Oh but ever since then Peter has made sure we all knew that

the radiant chargers can be used to make a cap charge itself.

Also it has been shown for years that a joule ringer circuit which

is an off shoot of the Bedini SG circuit can so condition a capacitor

so it can charge up itself to some level after discharge or shorting.


[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K12kqDNrTgs[/VIDEO]


This conditioning is being done with batteries too.

This is very very old news, well documented.

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgJcZ1dPfQ8[/VIDEO]



Anyone thinking that if

their mainstream news agency has not released all of these fine details

that is must be false and like the news at 5 boys all say, don't listen

to the internet. Never mind that these mainstream news people are

puppets for the money many of them use nettles and snort the white

dust off of a mirror. These news people are nasty yet the people

would rather listen to them because they have a suit and tie on.


[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mIEwXWUQs4[/VIDEO]

Plus the fact that they sound so sure of themselves(Hold on while I get down with a line BRB) Now where was I? Yeah they'll say anything.


Youtube is a great place to share. Some of the mainstream planners

have been angry about all of the fair use materials making it possible

to go around THEIR dogma, so they put plants all over the internet to

discredit everyone, including and especially John Bedini.


Anyone who might make a difference is the target for the control

perv's.

The cap recharging itself is real and I know some folks who are able

to ping just one terminal of a cap with radiant and it goes up real high.

They recover the energy in their circuit and the system keeps rising.

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6k3MtH6gZw[/VIDEO]


You are on the right track. Of course there is always another way to

get the job done but that is besides the point. You are right and CAP

conditioning does exactly like your video has shown.

Not with hot current.

[peper10]

If you go back and read post number 35 where Sep asks for Peter's input you will see Peter is agreeing with Sep's calculations. And if you read all of post 35 you will see no where do the calculations show any energy gain. They all show a loss. He just shows that some ways to transfer the energy are more efficient than other ways.

Then Peter goes on to talk about the Bedini machine which was using a better way to charge batteries. I also agree that charging batteries with high current pulses appear to give extra energy to the batteries and will keep them charged better than any other way I have found.

But that is not the what I was addressing when I said you didn't gain energy by transferring charge from one cap to another. And I haven't seen anything in that thread that shows otherwise.

Respectfully,
Carroll

All respect to you to Carroll!!!
My point was to unleash the curiosity to open new avenue to explore..
The guy that have start this tread is a SEEKER just like us..
The cap charging method is only one way to observed strange behavior of back EMF dodging the doors of physics
I have seen experimenters here in the past rewriting some LAWS that were imposed by PHD`s and high ranked members of academy...

Like Bro Mikey say{ Let the experiment take place with the cap conditionning}

[Farmhand]

To see the results with your own eyes you just need to do the experiment yourself.

I only watched the first part of the video because that's all I needed to watch. There is no OU in that clip.

This page looks like it might explain some things. (I'll even post the link before I read it.)
Energy Loss in Charging a Capacitor


Carroll good to see you remember these threads. Caps are strange in a way
but it makes sense when the entire picture is considered. As you say in series
two 10000 uF caps is actually only 5000 uF and going with the example of
12 volts and 2 x 10000 uF caps we would have.

12 volts on one cap and zero volts on the other cap = 720 Millijoules
12 volts across the two caps connected in series = 360 Millijoules
6 volts on each cap is the same as if they are in series = 180 Millijoules each = 360 Millijoules

For a conservation of energy the caps would need to end up at about 8.49 volts each,
which of course is 16.98 volts, so with a loss of less than 50% the total voltage
of the two caps will be more than 12 (starting voltage of one cap). Simple.

It all works out and it makes sense.

..

I found the "Energy in a capacitor" converter to be very useful for determining roughly the HV on the primary capacitor of a Tesla coil,
and how much input power is being consumed ect.

If I know the primary capacitance and the input power I can determine the
voltage developed on the caps, assuming a total discharge that is.
Or if I test and know the voltage developed on the caps I can determine the
bulk of the power consumed roughly.

eg 10000 volts on 20 nF = 1 Joule. So if the break rate is 500 per second then that is 500 Joules of Energy per second, or a power rate of 500 watts.

If that runs for 1 hour then that is 500 Watt Hours. Lots of joules.

I think that's all correct. EDITED.