Originally posted by wantomake
View Post
a pleasure again to speak to you sir.
just for information sake, I had spent the last week or so going back through some of my private B&L data which is pretty vast long story short!
I had noticed in B&L s testing and diagrams of the particular units in the test modes that there Never was described nor indicated a GROUND INPUT!
their two test modes were 50% MAINS and 50% BATT/INVERTER!
I thought it over for awhile and it came to me that with repect to the vmains system there WAS a GROUND INPUT! how ever it was not AT THE SITE WHERE THE GROUND RETURN system was located! it was AT THE CLOSEST SUB STATION.
evidently the distance away prevented it from interfering with the Captors ability to harvest ALL the modes of earth GROUND energy at the site and it did just that. their results proved it. so just recently I decided to test my unit again on mains. THIS TIME I disconnected my neutral to ground input wire and just set it aside. the reason being my MAINS ground rod was 40 + ft away and the mains substation Grounding about 8 miles away. so I perceived the ground input wolud only send mains power direct to the return grid and prevent the earth harvesting the Captor wanted to do.
so when i powered the unit up with just mains (no charger/batt/inverter)
and ran some of my household devices this time their performance was WAY better. I won't get into the measuremantalist of it or the test-icles of it as that would only start more pigeon drops.
the gist of it all I believe is to see what effect the inverter input to ground spacing or location has with regards to the Captor to ground return location
by moving it around how ever you can.
all assuming I had read your post correctly sir.
Just thoughts and appreciate your info also.
thanks,
Clarenbce
Leave a comment: