Single Wire Power - A Search for Ambient Power to do Wwork

[Duncan]

oh dear thx I never intended you suffer three hours of that video ! Sorry you did . As for flooding (HARRP?) there are thousands in a far worse state. Anyway as we conjecture and then conjecture again on that probable outcome the validity and truth of what we consider becomes more unlikely. It is really why I proposed a/one heavily sulphated battery and a brushed motor Then b/ capacitive charging . I knew each would work every time
without fail. conjecture is fine (in fact absolutely essential ) but here and there must be a dependable peg to hang our hats on.
You wonder at the feeble voltage Troweger records to be Honest I'm very surprised to see much at all I believe we are looking at a somewhat twisted and backward version of a RF receiver.
One of the sentences of EPD tells us that that for longitudinal wave work SWR must be infinity and not unity as with normal transverse wave RF work
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5ZWrjcrPl4 (1M40 – 1M 55)
This huge observation of yours ..

Researching the lead acid battery electrochemistry, sulfation, etc., I took a look at dendrites in lead acid batteries which are the lead crystals that grow in a battery that eventually short out the plates.

It kind of brought it all together - fractals, crystals, batteries, etc. Dendrite means "tree like". When examined under a microscope they clearly show their tree like structure and it immediately reminded me of Yagi antennas.

If any part of that could be shown true and definatly 'part of reception' and conversion are search would be greatly reduced. My train of thought was much the same as yours .. Where's the tuning ? This is a very simple construct for an SWR meter based on a wheatstone bridge

Simple Wideband SWR Meter | Circuit Diagram

I'm very aware that this isn't the 3BGS and am very eager to dive into the Dendrite fractal relationship which is where the answer has to be . Still if you redraw the 3BGS as a bridge circuit it seems quite possible Its a variable ATU unit thats also making overtones avaliable for cascading.
Troweger has no tuning at all . You might regard a radio example as being a crystal set with no tuning … ergo broadband and feeble .. stochastic background (if you like) in this case. I'm eager to get well away from the 3BGS stuff becuause simply looking at batteries and DC motors confounds people into thinking in terms of DC. Arsing about with motors and taking the path of least mental strain. Just my opinion you understand but I think the following applies … The sulphated battery is thousands of Dendrite fractals … A super demodulaor – It is (if you like) taking the place of the little crystal diode .. but in parellel and by the thousand . It isn't dealing with volts or Amps as you know it, nor the elecromagnetic wave . It is reciving Telluric current … reactive current; from the ground and converting it to intsant energy.
By a happy accident the rest of the 3BGS thing made up a balanced (ish) matched impedance – (maximum power transfer) ATU .
As you perhaps begine to see everythings balanced on a knifes edge but the bits fit . As for armature action thats a bit more 'fudge' 'back emf' we talk of in volts and amps too as if it were just a direct 'opposition' It is an opposition of sorts but an algerbraic oposition in all dimentions. Consider your yagi beam in normal radio use the conversion is from the pure (ish) sine wave to a different dimention , The electromagnetic wave – (unit wavelenghth) the conversion event happens at resonance.
Here then is why I suspect motor or di-electric breakdown action is so important

Harmonics, Triplen Harmonics, Adjustable Speed Drive, Power Quality

It can seperate harmonics from overtones .. as a Radio works on transverse electromagnetic waves So this contraption ideally requires tuned ,longtitudinal (waves) , at fundimental overtones This in turn attracts Telluric current into the series resonant circuit.
(just as a radio does with a parellel tuned circuit and the electromagnetic wave)
- The conversion you all ready seem to have a better grasp of than me .. that is already a step to far IMHO without another 'solid peg' still .. it fits .

[Bob Smith]

Lenz' Law - Our Best Friend

Hi Guys
Something I've been pondering quite a bit lately that seems like it might fit our subject at hand, as a piece in this jigsaw puzzle - perhaps a big piece at that.

If you take a high impedance coil and induce a voltage into that coil, Lenz' law tells us that an opposing voltage will arise to oppose the first induced voltage.

From whence does this opposing voltage arise? Well, it's the dielectric.

Now when we consider resonant systems how can we increase their interaction with the ambient medium, what do we need to do? One thing we can do is use high impedance coils. When a voltage is induced into these coils, we know that the dielectric realm will respond by giving rise to an opposing voltage into them. You want to get more ambient charge entering a system? Use strategically placed hi impedance coils.

Used in this way, a high impedance coil can turn what seems to be a closed system into very much an open system.

Now what might this have to do with sulfated batteries and flipping magnetic polarity. A sulfated battery is going to have its own high impedance. If we are inducing a potential difference across its terminals, the dielectric is going to respond with an opposing potential, and perhaps it is this opposing potential that produces its flip in magnetic polarity. In this way, perhaps Lenz is our best friend .

Bob

[Duncan]

I don't like this turn of events overmuch ! The lenz law seems an effect not a cause . It is the rush into this line of thought that dragged the 3BGS ,Don Smith ,TK and many other threads 100 s of pages into oblivion with no conclusion..
That the lenz effect disappears under certain circumstances is true … It was made clear (I thought) in the link I posted to Dr Prof P.T.Pappas and his work . Open circuit = no back emf.
This is nothing new we are looking for, its suppressed technology . (Of course there is a huge force that wish to keep it suppressed. ) This particular law however is simple basic and over-riding IMHO

Energy cannot be created or destroyed; it can only be changed from one form to another.
Without exception all the giants in this field point out we are in a sea of energy . (radiant , aetheric ,ambient et.al …...)
there is no accounting for this suppressed energy source entering a system using lenz law alone. (Although of course the lenz thing happens)
There is however if you accept that the wireless system of Tesla exists .
That the electrostatic longitudinal wave is being converted directly to energy at resonance by crystal action
(much like an ordinary radio) …. Just as with Radio where there is a total energy transform from KW/h to the electo-magnetic wave (unit wavelength) It makes perfect sense There is going to be a transform of the wireless wave at resonance . (whatever form that energy takes is locked in the secret of those crystals)
Isn't this what we are watching ? If you think not then please try to convey logically in a coherent order - first the energy source .
Then its transformation method . It is this contemplation of a different dimension with no volts ,no amps and no units we are familiar with, where all our usual toys don't work that forces us back to a comfort blanket and then around and around the same loop … for pages & pages & hundreds of bloody pages.
Still I may be wide of the mark but there is a source , there is a logical progression , there is a transform , there is certainly suppression all around wireless and the longitudinal wave. (still is)
I don't mean to ruffle feathers just invite a different train of thought where at least the 'bits fit'

[thx1138]

I don't like this turn of events overmuch !

Not to worry, Duncan. I don't think Lenz law applies in the case of a lead acid battery or any chemical battery for that matter. First of all Lenz law applies to current, not voltage, and induced current at that, i.e. induction via magnetic fields. In a lead acid battery we aren't dealing with induction but electrochemistry which is, indeed, current but not induced current. It is charge transfer via ions. There will be magnetic atomic and molecular magnetic fields associated with the charge transfer but they are not induced fields.

[Duncan]

To expand on these thoughts ,and please keep in mind I am making a glove fit many other systems quite apart from this crystallized battery situation. .first wanttomake using two batteries only, it would be remarkable (but not impossible) to see an energy gain.
If you regard what you are attempting to use is an exceptionally high power wireless receiving system then there are many variables . The science and mathematics of the wireless system are suppressed but I think a few parallels to the Radio system can be drawn especially with big clues offered by Tesla and EPD.
As Tesla fought for the rights to his wireless patent through the law courts (recently acknowledged to be rightfully his) he states time and again “Its not an electro magnetic system” … Ergo Its Electrostatic
Just staying with the Radio system for a while wantomake (because we are familiar with it and know something about it ) even though its feeble compared to the wireless system. These things come to mind .. maximum power transfer by impedance matching . Efficiency of the resonance circuit which transforms energy from one form (dimension) to another (Q factor) . From the words of EPD we can deduce it is series resonance and the transmission of the wave is predominately by ground . (Wantomake you might recall Randy adding big earthing to his system and melting internal battery connections) --- 100s of reactive amps!
Looked at this way its a big surprise that so many people saw that huge energy gain from a simple system – but they did ! Even with these variables somewhere near we get to the miracle of huge parallel (demodulation ?) carried out by those crystals .
There are no volts ,amps or any known units. Like Tesla says 'Its not electro -magnetic' sooooo .. Its not in our books.
The point of introducing two batteries wantomake was to point out that physics of the lead acid battery particularly 'approaching infinite impedance' is confused you would find energy gain but only over a small part of your run …. (quite apart from anything else the natural longitudinal wave follows a hyperbolic function.)
The observation that for that motor to turn at all. DC in this situation must be AC at phenomenally high frequency . What I suggest then is energy from a dimension not acknowledged officially in electrical engineering. running through a sulphated crystallized battery doing things the text books say shouldn't happen .
Even if my conjecture is right off line we do well to take a big breath and pause right here.
Regarding Lenz law Bob if forward current is regarded as a harmonic construction and Back emf a overtone construction . It then fits in the scheme of things. I guess that forced consideration that this is UUHF is a different science altogether. (Even if it were radio and not wireless) It does however offer a way forward rather than around in a circle.
Its a very thin thread right now wantomake but the evidence is there that it can be made to hang together.

[thx1138]

Historic discovery: huge electric field occurs spontaneously

A very interesting article published December 22, 2014:
Historic discovery: huge electric field occurs spontaneously in laughing gas | ScienceNordic

"They came upstairs and knocked on my door, saying ‘David, there's something not right’. At first we thought the experiment had gone wrong, because it wasn't supposed to be possible for a current to pass through the film and be detected. No external voltage was applied," remembers David Field, Professor at the Department of Physics and Astronomy at Aarhus University. Highlight added.

"This is the first time since the 1920s that anyone has discovered a new electrical form of solid material. The incredible thing is that work has been done on thin layers of materials -including laughing gas films - for more than half a century. Even so, no one has discovered this powerful electrical phenomenon" says Field.

Google search on topic:
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q...electric+field

I've been thinking for some time that if OU or "free energy" is going to be developed it would involve the material engineering sciences. That's what got me interested in BaTiO3, PbTiO3, crystal lattices, and and crystals. This article seems to support that idea.

I'm not sure this is useful to us because of the laboratory needed to reproduce it but I think it does indicate that it can be done.

[aljhoa]

Einstein's confusion over aether


Al

[thx1138]

The one thing that keeps being reaffirmed to me - particularly by one friend who is further along in this than I - is the importance of stressing the dielectric through a difference of potential within (and without) the system.

I don’t know if stress is the right word but I agree with the idea. I differ, however, on the within and without portion. I would say we need to create an imbalance between our system and the ambient medium that the medium will naturally attempt to balance. That simply means inserting our system between the components of a naturally occurring imbalance in the medium, not creating an imbalance “without”. Giving nature an easier way to correct the imbalance by providing a path through which to equalize the imbalance is essentially what a Franklin lightning rod does – provides an easier way to equalize charges between the cloud and the ground once the imbalance becomes sufficient to produce lightning. Or we can continually rebalance the medium to prevent the lightning strike as in Tesla’s lightning preventer. There are some interesting photos at the second link below.
Tesla Lightning Protector

Modern Lightning Protection
http://www.lightningprotection.com/l...ng-protection/
Agro Bio Energy ? Lightening Protection System

A lead acid battery is a similar device but in that case it is us rather than nature that creates the imbalance when we give the battery its forming charge. Attaching our device, whatever it is, between the terminals of the battery gives nature a path to rebalance the charges in the battery.

I haven’t yet bought into the counterspace/dielectric hypothesis. If it exists how do we connect a device to it, does a natural imbalance exist, and how do we provide a path for the imbalance to neutralize itself? Which leads me to one of my favorite sayings: in theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is.

If we look at lightning - we see a difference of potential between ionosphere and ground. The difference of potential stresses the dielectric (air) and results in dielectric breakdown: Lightning. Looking at the shape of lighning strikes, there is that same dendrite-like progression of shape, I think.

We usually think of dielectric breakdown as destructive because of what it does to our capacitors. But in the case of lightning I think of it as a phase transition between the gas and plasma states of matter. In that regard lightning is a self-healing breakdown.

I think there is a lot of misunderstanding about the “ionosphere to ground ionized channel”. Except in the case of very severe thunderstorms the potential difference that causes lightning in a thunderstorm is all developed in the layer of atmosphere nearest to the ground, the troposphere. In very severe thunderstorms the cloud may rise somewhat into the first layer of the stratosphere and result in discharges up into the upper atmosphere (sprites and ELVES) but that is the potential difference between the cloud and the upper atmosphere. So the cloud is discharging in two directions. It isn’t a single path from the ionosphere to the ground.

There are a few interesting points to be made about lightning. One is that the dendrite-like progression of shape is essentially the same whether the strike is cloud to ground, ground to cloud, or cloud to cloud. Another is that there are two unseen parts of lightning called stepped leaders and streamers. In the case of the cloud to ground strike, the stepped leaders emanate from the cloud toward the ground in roughly 50 meter segments. They are reacting to local charge rather than ground charge which is why they branch rather than making a straight line to the ground. They set up the ionized path that the visible lightning takes. The streamers emanate from the ground, attracted by the stepped leaders making their way toward the ground, and are of the opposite polarity.

One of the things I haven’t seen explained about lightning is how large accumulations of the same charge occur in the thunderhead. Most diagrams show regions of charge within the cloud but nothing I’ve seen explains how those charges, being the same charge and therefore repulsive, are contained in separate regions. There must be some kind of boundary condition to keep the charges from neutralizing each other within the cloud. This relates to crystals in that crystals grow at their boundaries with the medium in which they are grown.

There is a lot of info on lightning at the following link. Some of it may surprise you.
Understanding Lightning

Speaking of tree-like, what could be more tree-like than a tree? A tree has the same seen and unseen parts but in this case it is the roots that are unseen. The veins and capillaries in the tree provide the same branching energy transfer path but the energy is stored in chemical bonds which are really electromagnetic bonds. Consider the relationship between trees and lightning.

Riverbeds also have the same tree-like structure and have a seen part, the riverbed or river, and an unseen part, the water vapor that condenses and falls to the ground to feed the river which then forms the river bed. Again, phase transitions – gaseous water vapor to liquid.

In all three cases the seen and the unseen is not, however, energy but the path that the energy takes during energy transfer. There should be a lesson in that for us. That is the path that nature uses to transfer energy whether it is accumulation or dispersion. The lightning involves charge transfer. Chemical energy is transferred by chemical bonds. Flowing water involves gravity. It’s interesting to note the similarity in the path taken regardless of the type of energy. There seems to be something fundamental there.

All of these involve equalization of an imbalance of potential which goes back to stress but not specifically the dielectric unless we consider “the dielectric” the source of everything. Some do. I’m not there yet. I think of dielectric as a property of materials, not a thing itself.

I wonder if we also find the same potential difference and dielectric breakdown of sorts (facilitated by sulfate crystals) within the LA battery.

In a lead acid battery it is not dielectric breakdown as such. Maybe it could be considered a slow, controlled dielectric breakdown in that charge moves from the electrolyte to a plate under discharge but charging is the reverse of that. Since both plates and the electrolyte are all conductive I wouldn’t call it dielectric breakdown. Attaching our device to the battery’s terminals is what allows the imbalance created by the charging to be neutralized through our device. Our device is what gives the stored charge the impetus to move but the battery has no charge to move other than what we put into it.

I found some interesting info about dendrites as related to snowflakes. I know snowflakes don’t seem related but in both cases (and maybe all cases) dendrites are essentially about accumulating energy (growing) and dispersing energy (melting) via diffusion from and to the medium in which they exist so bear with me. The following link shows how an electric field can influence crystal growth in snowflakes.
Electric Snow Crystal Growth

The most recognizable form of snowflake is dendritic. They’re called stellar dendrites because they are star shaped and the branches are dendrites. Scroll down a bit at the following link.
Stellar Dendrites

For the growth of snowflakes the water in the air has to reach the already formed ice to accumulate and it is diffusion that controls this process. This link explains it much better.
Snowflake Branching

That’s the same process that the lead acid battery uses to transport ions via the electrolyte. In fact, modern batteries have barium sulfate included into their plates to act as seeds for the dendrites. These dendrites grow during discharge to form the sulfate coating on the plates. The dendrites are beneficial in the battery application because they expose more surface area so it is easier for the sulfate to disperse back into the acid when charging.

The reason the snowflakes seemed interesting to me is that ice moving in both the updrafts and downdrafts in the cloud of a thunderstorm is what is theorized to enable the charge separation that causes lightning. The description of the process at the following link reminded me of EMF and BEMF in the same conductor and Edward Leedskalnin’s description of north pole magnets and south pole magnets “running one against the other”.
How Lightning is Created

It appears from my small amount of research that dendrites can be grown with any conductive metal as long as it is immersed in a medium containing that same material diffused within the medium and the proper voltage is applied to the medium and/or the seed for the dendrite. This applies to mercury (Hg) as well as solid metals and it should be noted that Tesla’s patent for his radiant energy device said the insulated elevated plate should be “highly polished or amalgamated”, meaning an alloy containing mercury.

I haven’t yet researched the size of the dendrites grown on metallic materials but one of the illustrations in the work on snowflakes showed the sizes. If taken as Yagi antennas, they would be for sub-millimeter wave lengths. I suppose dendrites of different sizes could act as Yagi antennas for many frequencies, i.e. broadband reception.

Another interesting similarity between crystal dendrites and lightning is that they both depend on instability in the medium in which they occur. Instability in the atmosphere in the case of lightning and at the interface between the medium and the crystal in which the crystal dendrites are grown. I’m not sure that phase change is involved here but it seems possible that the starting point of the phase change is the location of the instability. I guess the instability could be considered an imbalance or stress.

[thx1138]

Batteries, Dendrites, Fractals, & Boundary Conditions

More thoughts on accessing the medium. Reply to Duncan' post #436.

Sorry it took me so long to get back to this. I had family obligations to handle.

I tried to post directly but it was too large and it wouldn't post even after breaking it into pieces so I put it in the attached PDF.

[thx1138]

This is nothing new we are looking for, its suppressed technology .

IMO, the whole suppressed technology dialog is a dead end. If it is suppressed, those who are suppressing it on such a scale have resources far beyond anything we can overcome. If it's not suppressed, it's simply misunderstood in today's terminology.

Without exception all the giants in this field point out we are in a sea of energy.
...
There is however if you accept that the wireless system of Tesla exists .

IMO, you're mixing apples and oranges. Generating electricity (transforming one energy to another) and transmitting and receiving that energy are two separate processes. Wardenclyffe had a steam powered generator. The beauty of the wireless transmission was that the generating plant could be located at the source (hydro, coal, whatever) and there would be no need for transmission lines to be built and maintained. Nor would there be a need to transport the fuel (coal, oil, gas, whatever) to the generating plant.

What Tesla failed to consider in his world wide power system was politics. Leaders of countries don't want to be dependent on another country for their power simply because the supplier can shut it off whenever they want for whatever reason. Look at Ukraine and Russia today. For that matter Europe and Russia. Generally there are more dictators than leaders and dictators won't give up that kind of control.

Isn't this what we are watching ? If you think not then please try to convey logically in a coherent order - first the energy source .
Then its transformation method . It is this contemplation of a different dimension with no volts ,no amps and no units we are familiar with, where all our usual toys don't work that forces us back to a comfort blanket and then around and around the same loop … for pages & pages & hundreds of bloody pages.

Yes, we are surrounded by immense amounts of energy. The problem as I see it is energy density. We live in a huge magnetic field but at any one location the magnetic energy density is only sufficient to move a needle that is balanced on a nearly frictionless jewel. There is a huge amount of electricity in the atmosphere and again the energy density is low because the atmosphere itself is huge. Think of the scale of the "machine" that is a thunderstorm that produces lightning. It collects electrical energy in the volume of the cloud of that thunderstorm yet the lightning bolt is tiny in comparison. Gravity? Ditto. There's a huge amount of gravity but we can overcome it with nothing more then chemical energy in our muscles because the density is low.

I don't think the solution is so mush a transformation from one form of energy to another as it is collecting large amounts of energy rapidly and channeling that energy to do work. That's what got me into the fractal flows of lightning, rivers, capillaries, etc. That's the y way nature does it. Think about the water cycle. Water evaporates, rises, moves, condenses, falls as rain and the ground collects it in creeks, streams, and rivers and that water flows through a hydroelectric generator and on to the ocean and the cycle repeats.

In essence, that's what every fueled generating system on earth uses. Heat the water to steam to spin a turbine connected to a generator, cool the water, and repeat. The point of the fuel is the energy density, be it coal, gas, oil, or nuclear.

Still I may be wide of the mark but there is a source , there is a logical progression , there is a transform , there is certainly suppression all around wireless and the longitudinal wave. (still is)

Look at the logical progression above. The water cycle uses the heat from the sun (nuclear) to heat the water. The sun also causes the weather with the tilt of the axis and the rotation of the planet that moves the air to carry the water vapor and mix warm and cold air to get the condensation and gravity pulls the condensed water to the ground and through the rivers and so through the generator. I guess you could call the phase changes of the water a transform from liquid (storage) to gas (for movement) to liquid (to exert force).

Those are phase changes of matter. Are there similar phase changes of energy? In particular, energy fields? Are gravity, magnetism, and electricity just different phases of some fundamental energy? If so, are there others?

[Duncan]

thx thanks for the info -- I'm still digesting. for consideration I post this link and draw attention of interest to circa 4 mins -high voltage effects on crystaline structure.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uidD...&nohtml5=False
kind regards Duncan

[thx1138]

thx thanks for the info -- I'm still digesting. for consideration I post this link and draw attention of interest to circa 4 mins -high voltage effects on crystaline structure.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uidD...&nohtml5=False
kind regards Duncan

Thanks. I've seen that video before but didn't catch the importance of that pasrt at the time. Consider the properties of lead titanate (PbTiO3) and barium titanate (BaTiO3) due to their crystal structure. The are members of a class of ceramics that have both piezoelectric and ferroelectric properties. Ferroelectricity presents a spontaneous electric polarity that can be reversed by the application of an external electric field. And the piezoelectric property presents an electric charge when encountering a mechanical stress. So would applying the high voltage, as mentioned in the video, create the physical stress to trigger both properties at the same time? Could it be used to apply a high voltage with a near zero current to the material to get a larger current response from the piezoelectric property with reversing polarity at the same time? I know barium titanate is used in solid capacitors (a fairly recent development) but I'm not sure how to go about testing this. More to ponder.


I saw this a couple of days ago World's smallest diode developed. If we can created diodes chemically it stands to reason that they can also be created naturally which raises the question, does this happen in lead-acid batteries and we've just been unaware of it?

[wantomake]

Good thread

thx thanks for the info -- I'm still digesting. for consideration I post this link and draw attention of interest to circa 4 mins -high voltage effects on crystaline structure.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uidD...&nohtml5=False
kind regards Duncan

Wow Duncan good link!

It's worth research of the "floating" effect that was discovered in 1900 or so. Forgot when or whom he said. Will watch again.

HV, crystals, levitation, seems would make good thread to discuss.

wantomake

[Duncan]

seems we are fighting to learn and focus on something that is just beyond the reach of each of us. That the pieces fit from so many different angles makes it ridiculous to think we are not padding about some thing important.
That different disciplines have the greatest difficulty touching a common base doesn't surprise, I'm sure its intentional (by design) and to a certain extent explains why there is no accepted unified field theory.
What seems clear (to me at least) is that zero power factor is an important component which might be regarded by some as resonance … Ah resonance. a word that appearers in almost every post on the forum. so much so we treat it with indifference --- The panacea . It is series resonance I consider here . It has very different effects to its parallel cousin --- (The kiddie on the swing or the pendulum we tend to bring to mind)
It was in this series resonant state that the 3BGS worked its amazing magic . (The chemical aspect of this obviously evaded me) as did a reliable method of altering the supply square wave (frequency/DC pulse ?) to track the changing state of the (crystals?) and stay in resonance.
I was Minded that Stan Meyer (and by extension the many water car guys) all faced the same problem (holding series resonance in very changeable conditions) Stans approach (or at least a little bit of it ) is explained by Stan in this lecture at circa 33 min
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdtN_K2tHFo
He calls the design 'a voltage intensifier unit' being two chokes 'counter ' wound there is now much in common with Tesla's Bi-filar winding and likewise Edward Leedskalnin's PMH (both counter wound)
In common with the battery/ crystal effects we consider the crystals like Stans water are a 'di-electric'
Stan goes to great lengths not to reveal any clues as to how series resonance is accurately maintained . But perhaps a look at another approach by another researcher may offer an easier route in a round about way. To hold a resonant state on the crystal /battery?? structure.
MJN built a water fracture unit. As I recall he used far higher frequencies than Stan. His method was rather different in that he sacrificed a little energy in order to stabilise the wildly changing series resonant conditions within the cavities to known physical conditions and reactions of 'perfect' (clean)sine waves .
At the limits What isn't a sine wave or co- sine - must be longitudinal. for within a sine wave is every other shape ?? Michael explains himself how to heterodyne two 'perfect' sine waves in such a way and with the correct frequency spacing such that that the resultant occupies its own 'free space' and so go's on re-mixing using no energy (as there is no collision) 'ad infinitum'
.
So, naturalists observe, a flea
Hath smaller fleas that on him prey;
And these have smaller still to bite 'em;
And so proceed ad infinitum.
Thus every poet, in his kind,
Is bit by him that comes behind.
Dean Jonathan Swift

http://www.energeticforum.com/111774-post102.html
So (as I see it) Michael was using fourier's transforms
Fourier Transform
in a rather novel way to guarantee a very low energy fracture I start to ponder if the same might apply across this crystal structure we consider ?

[thx1138]

It's worth research of the "floating" effect that was discovered in 1900 or so. Forgot when or whom he said. Will watch again.

Thomas Townsend Brown. Search "ionic lifters". It's not anti-gravity.