Motor Generators

[bistander]

...

With these RegenX type coils a 5000watts of produced output costs no increase to the drive motor turning the rotor. A 20,000 watt output does not raise the drive motor input.
...

What a bunch of BS. False. No proof. Just fantasy. Show a single case of sustained real output power exceeding input power, measured, simultaneously, without using stored energy in a flywheel or battery or such.

[bistander]

False fake and fony. Cores drag rotors down with open circuit winding all very close to the same. Common sense. Stop depending on the debunker lies and run the tests like I have.

...

Show a clear easy to understand video of your test like the debunker has. Otherwise it's just BS from you. While you're at it, show input and output power like he did.
bi

[BroMikey]

Also looking at the true data not some debunker guy we find that once rotational equilibrium is reached (rotor +core drag) all generated power is close to a 1:1 ratio. This means that if 5000watts is produced from a regularly designed coil, 5100 watts must be added to the drive motor. If the rotor and core drag is 500 watts, EE call this a zero and is the same as rotational equilibrium. Once the system is up and running then efficiency calculations can be made based on the output VS what much input power is required.

In the case of an electrical utility supplying it's maximum output during air-conditioning season they will run at 60% efficient for short periods as systems reach overloaded conditions. Breakers blow and additional units must be engaged to supply the demand and your bill skyrockets.

With these RegenX type coils a 5000watts of produced output costs no increase to the drive motor turning the rotor. A 20,000 watt output does not raise the drive motor input.

So looking at this 200 year old mind set to get 6500watts you need to add 10,000watts to the drive motor and so on.

[BroMikey]

160 watts is the increase the debunker observed going from a conventional wound coil to bifilar coil.
bi

False fake and fony. Cores drag rotors down with open circuit winding all very close to the same. Common sense. Stop depending on the debunker lies and run the tests like I have.

Further you missed the whole point. Conventional calculations show a 3watt increase for a generated 3w output. All coils are able to generate conventionally and RegenX format all with the same core.

Not so with Regen Coils. One liner man strikes againDrowning man grasping at straws "DEBUNKER SAYS"

Hi John yes that is a good point. here let's look another way. Take a rotor out of the box and throw a set of bearings on it and then set 24 magnets into the rotor. Congratulations you just spent a bunch of money and time. Okay well we won't itemize the task but be sure you get the spacing 100% right on, no mickey mouse (like Bye-Slanders) rotor will replace a machined unit.

Now you are almost there. Next take the head off of a state of the art conventional (MOT) transformer and you have an E-Core with some windings. Start up your rotor and run it at 3500rpm to 5000 rpm, some where in this range is fine. If you are able to do that without being struck by flying magnets (congrat's again) you probably spent enough money on it so it does not self destruct and take you with it.

Now you must record the voltage and amp draw of the little motor driving the rotor. Let's say it is a 36 volt motor that draws 3 amps to make the rotor go with no cores anywhere around it.

Next thing is to bring the transformer E-Core (This is what Thane did) up close to the rotor magnets say 60 thousandths of an inch spacing. Congrat's you put a feeler gauge between all of your magnets (not like slander did) and the rotor is so true that every magnet around the entire rotor has a 1/6th inch gap.

.060-.062" is nice. Just to bring the core up to the rotor magnets costs you some drag. Now your meter is reading 36 volts at 3.5amps. You are about to generate some power.

Next using the low voltage side (Not the 5000v winding) connect a 12v light bulb. It only will produce about 6v and the bulb will be dimly lit. Not a very good test but it works. You are going to need a better coil to raise up the voltage if you want 50-100 volts But for now let's use this one. The car headlight bulb can draw3-5 amps 12v or even 15volts but yours is dimly lit coming in at 6v at 1/2amp. Now you are generating 3 watts. Not very impressive is it?

Nope not very impressive like all the fancy torque machines and the latest fluke meters calibrated to high accuracy. While you are thinking about my measly 3 watts and how cool your dynamometer is I am winding a fresh coil of magnet-wire. Oh yeah my 3amp draw went to 3.5amps a 18watt increase just on core drag and the generated power is only a 3 watt drag.

So here is what we have. 36v X 3A = 108w for just the rotor no cores

Then an additional 1/2A core drag or 36V X 500ma = 18w

It is time to generate at 6v X 500ma = 3w

Now the blind people all laugh because they don't see where this is going.

We have 108w + 18w + 3w = 129w

Next do the same thing with a fresh wound RegenX coil. 108W + 18w (core drag) just like the conventionally wound E-Core. Now comes the 60watt Regenerative acceleration generator output. The cores were already the additional 18w as we said. But now we are getting 60watts from the new coil.

Before we would have had a number like this:
108w (rotor) + 18w (core drag) + 60watts = 186w regular coils

Same every but 1 sixty watt RegenX coil. Now the figures read like this:

108w + 18w - 40watts - 60watts = +26w

The 40watts came when the coil was engaged which means the coil has been wound in such a way that it offers electrical watts (60w) plus it also lowers the drive input by 40watts.

This is for 1 coil. Now add 1 more and you have the so called free energy

[bistander]

...

Next do the same thing with a fresh wound RegenX coil. 108W + 18w (core drag) just like the conventionally wound E-Core.
...

108w + 18w - 40watts - 60watts = +26w
...

No. You forget to add in 160 watts increase with RegenX coil disconnected. So it would be 268W + 18w (core drag). 160 watts is the increase the debunker observed going from a conventional wound coil to bifilar coil. Remember his test? The actual value of increase power may be different, but no reason to believe it won't be significant. You guys always, conveniently, forget that, making your comparisons invalid.

So instead of make-believe numbers, why don't you run a real test with conventional coil against RegenX coil and use real data?
bi