If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I think this thing with three batteries, running load between the positives, has something to do with flow of the current, Conventional vs. Actual flow.
Conventional Current assumes that current flows out of the positive terminal, through the circuit and into the negative terminal of the source. This was the convention chosen during the discovery of electricity. This should be wrong. Electron Flow is what actually happens and electrons flow out of the negative terminal, through the circuit and into the positive terminal of the source.
So when you run a load between two positives, how do the electrons flow?
Basically, all current flows through the negative line.
So that line should be heavier than the positive line, if it's not heavy enough already.
That should be something as the first thing to do, the rest may know better those who practically experimenting.
Tesla had NOTHING to do with the Tesla Switch. Ronald Brandt designed it. Bedini modified it. The original name was POSSIBLY the Brandt-Tesla circuit. It was presented by Bedini at the Tesla Symposium. Then it became the Brandt-Bedini Tesla Switch and now the Bedini-Brandt Tesla Switch or just the Tesla Switch. At least as far as I have been able to discover. Everyone has their own take on history.
“Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
—Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist
Turion
I I believed Tesla wrote somewhere that for better efficiency the load should be between two positives. I'll look it up, I could be wrong.
And for some reason this circuit shows better efficiency than conventional one, i saw that here and on YT some examples.
regards
BroMikey, are these your videos or someone else? If yes, then you're really busy!!
I'm trying to get back to building a Adam's type small motor to use as switch on the 4 Battery Switch setup. Then I'll change some things to test with. Already tried the Carlos Benitez car relays switching that was really hard to get right. Burnt several wires with sticking relays. I've already taken apart the Peter Lindemann setup with 4 DPDT switches.
Just waiting to get cooler here so I can do more in the shop.
BroMikey, are these your videos or someone else? If yes, then you're really busy!!
I'm trying to get back to building a Adam's type small motor to use as switch on the 4 Battery Switch setup. Then I'll change some things to test with. Already tried the Carlos Benitez car relays switching that was really hard to get right. Burnt several wires with sticking relays. I've already taken apart the Peter Lindemann setup with 4 DPDT switches.
Just waiting to get cooler here so I can do more in the shop.
There are no known 800% Adam's motors, last years conference had one. The videos keep me from falling asleep and this way the poor can run a motor generator cheap when the power goes. Mean while the years roll by and still no practical solutions. I say use gasoline to beat them at their own game of maybe someday. I ran 1 full week on 2000 watts to 3000 watts for 20 bucks using lean burn tech.
Comment