Motor Generators

[bistander]

Thanks for editing, I did make a few typos in my haste, but it doesn't change the essence.

I added another slide where both anchor positions are fixed and in both the function of cutting the anchor wires by magnetic lines is impossible.

1.jpg?token-time=1743206400&token-hash=hkfeg3lNBd_aXFRm-IqgnNJOZzy7rS6ZkFcDpOmeuXg%3D.jpg

You're welcome Rakarskiy.

Your FEMM graphics look strange. Appears that the air gap is massively large.
bi

[Rakarskiy]

The modeling is done by taking the dimensions from the actual installation.
1.jpg?token-time=1743206400&token-hash=xWyCJnmtw1hN46brKF_29QOUR-7yWDRqO-6nH8lBwRE%3D.jpg

[Rakarskiy]

I have added a slide that explains how an emf is induced in a wire. Hippolytus Pixia's first generator was an alternator. | Patreon

2025-03-15_082544.jpg

If we consider the components of the magnetic circuit and the EMF diagram, we see that the induction of electromagnetic force occurs when the cross-section in which the magnetic circuit is closed changes. Induction is induced only in the wire that is in the focus of the changing magnetic circuit. At the same time, with a complete closure in the minimum or maximum value, the cross-section in which the magnetic circuit is closed, the induction of EMF is not induced. The main element in this case is the change in the cross-section of the conducting circuit in which there is a closed source of constant magnetic field.

Ф = Bm*S, where S = a*b changes

[bistander]

I have added a slide that explains how an emf is induced in a wire. Hippolytus Pixia's first generator was an alternator. | Patreon

2025-03-15_082544.jpg

If we consider the components of the magnetic circuit and the EMF diagram, we see that the induction of electromagnetic force occurs when the cross-section in which the magnetic circuit is closed changes. Induction is induced only in the wire that is in the focus of the changing magnetic circuit. At the same time, with a complete closure in the minimum or maximum value, the cross-section in which the magnetic circuit is closed, the induction of EMF is not induced. The main element in this case is the change in the cross-section of the conducting circuit in which there is a closed source of constant magnetic field.
Ф = Bm*S, where S = a*b changes

Notice the difference?

2023-11-09_085408 (1).jpg
versus

2025-03-15_082544 (1).jpg

bi

[bistander]

Mr. Rakarskiy,
Continuing my critique of your publication, in the section pasted below, please specify where the 9.3ohm value comes from. I see 11.3ohm for the load in the oscillograms.

We can calculate the current on the bulb using Ohm's law I = U/R = 3.4V / 9.3Ohm = 0.36A.
If we apply the general formula for determining the current in a closed circuit, we will not get equality with the measurement of the idle EMF.

I = (E-U)/(R+r) = (9,4V-3,4V)/ (9,3Ω+12,1Ω) = 0,129A

Because the current in the anchor, when the load is closed, contributes to the amplification of the magnetic flux in the circuit (which is visible on the second screen of the FEMM program). Self-excitation occurs, due to which the resulting EMF increases.

We can only calculate this level of the resulting EMF, it will be 26.5 volts.

Let's check: I = (E-U)/(R+r) = (26,5V-3,4V)/ (9,3Ω+12,1Ω) = 0,36A

Also, both the other two equations have math errors.
bi

[Rakarskiy]

Thanks again, yes, indeed, the resistance of the bulb when measured is 11.3 Ohm

I = U/R = 3.4/11.3 = 0.3A

I = (E-U)/(R+r) = (9.4V-3.4V)/(11.3Ω+12.1Ω) = 0.25A

Then the resulting EMF during self-excitation will be 11.9V (which is closer to the truth, this difference surprised me, but I have not checked my calculations, at the moment I am consulting with several garage craftsmen who are assembling an electric generator without rotating parts)

The correct resulting equation will have the values:

I = (E-U)/(R+r) = (11.9V-3.4V)/(11.3Ω+12.1Ω) = 0.30A

I am grateful to you for carefully reading the material, few people help me with publications.

I wrote in a private message.

[Rakarskiy]

Notice the difference?

2023-11-09_085408 (1).jpg
versus

2025-03-15_082544 (1).jpg

bi

My first slide (of the simplest alternating current generator with a magnetic rotor) refers to a rotating magnetic rotor and a stationary phase of the phase. If you make me the gap between the rotor and stator poles correctly, you will get exactly the position of the EMF shown on the slide. In the materials I give an example for engineers who design electromagnetic generators.

Hippolytus Pixia's first generator was an alternator. | Patreon

1.jpg?token-time=1743379200&token-hash=ZjMZK1QULptluTwyeZlSEmqLDLACkeLcW_9b9RTpEEI%3D.jpg

The picture is a screenshot from a lecture at Kharkiv National Technical University of Ukraine. (Figure 4.1 - Dimensions of rotor pole design elements). Where we see that the gap between the rotor pole and the stator has a curve that increases from the center of the pole tip to its edges: δ - δmax (highlighted in yellow).

[bistander]

My first slide (of the simplest alternating current generator with a magnetic rotor) refers to a rotating magnetic rotor and a stationary phase of the phase. If you make me the gap between the rotor and stator poles correctly, you will get exactly the position of the EMF shown on the slide. In the materials I give an example for engineers who design electromagnetic generators.

[URL="https://www.patreon.com/posts/122452345"]Hippolytus Pixia's first generator was an alternator. | Patreon

Okay then. Compare this

image_26138 (1).jpg
to this

2025-03-15_082544 (1).jpg

See the difference? Twice the frequency.
bi

[bistander]

Hi Rakarskiy,

Please tell me the source for the graph (on the right side) that you used in the graphic below. Is T(K) temperature in degrees Kelvin? Thanks.
bi

2025-02-17_090522 (1).jpg
.

[Rakarskiy]

Not more than the frequency. Period 2pi (360*) on the screen with the rotor position and the EMF oscillogram graph, 1/2pi (90*)

For the hysteresis graph, I took a screenshot of the magnetic induction from a free publication about this process with the corresponding graph. I don't remember the source, but it completely coincides with many that I did when calculating this process.

Magnetic Hysteresis Loop including the B-H Curve | Electrical Academia
B-H vs M-H Hysteresis Loops: Magnetic Induction vs Magnetization (Similarities, Differences, and Points on the Graph) – Materials Science & Engineering


I'm waiting for an email, my offer is valid.

[bistander]

System blunder.

[bistander]

..For the hysteresis graph, I took a screenshot of the magnetic induction from a free publication about this process with the corresponding graph. I don't remember the source, but it completely coincides with many that I did when calculating this process.

Rakarskiy,
Screenshot_20250316-124936.png
The above is a screenshot of how the subject graphic was used in your article. Below is result from my AI Google image search.

Google image search Generative AI is experimental.


The image displays two graphs related to magnetic properties at different temperatures. The first graph on the left shows a schematic representation of a magnetic hysteresis loop, with the x-axis labeled as "1/2T" and the y-axis as "U+". The second graph plots the coercive field (H) against temperature (T), showing a decreasing trend of H with increasing T. An inset within the second graph presents a family of magnetic hysteresis loops measured at various temperatures, ranging from 45 mK to 4.81 K, illustrating the temperature dependence of the magnetization (M/Ms) as a function of the applied magnetic field (H).

As one can read, there is inference that "T" represents temperature in degrees Kelvin and near absolute zero, O°K. I doubt that Kromrey, Pixie or Ampere were using materials or environment at absolute zero.

Your graphic makes no sense in the context.

Also, I question the need or benefit of your explanation to involve hysteresis in regards to the generated waveform displayed from the Kromrey device.
bi

[bistander]

Not more than the frequency. Period 2pi (360*) on the screen with the rotor position and the EMF oscillogram graph, 1/2pi (90*)
...


I'm waiting for an email, my offer is valid.

Rakarskiy,

Polish_20250316_145234444.png
I marked my comparison graphic showing the peak occurrence at 90° per the upper scope trace (#2) which contradicts your lower timeline showing a zero crossing and 180° for the same rotor position. Your diagram (the lower one) is in error.
bi

ps.
No thanks. I did reply to your message.

[bistander]

Another thing Rakarskiy,
In your article you say:

Because the current in the anchor, when the load is closed, contributes to the amplification of the magnetic flux in the circuit (which is visible on the second screen of the FEMM program). Self-excitation occurs, due to which the resulting EMF increases.
We can only calculate this level of the resulting EMF, it will be 11.9 volts.

Let's check: I = (E-U)/(R+r) = (11.9V-3,4V)/ (11.3Ω+12,1Ω) = 0,30A

This is a very important point in the generator design. A good generator is when self-excitation is minimal. In our case, the magnetic system is completely useless, to demonstrate to students that when the anchor rotates in a magnetic field, the light bulb lights up. That's why we get this result.

We refer to this as armature reaction. So I inquired about it with Google AI.

Does armature reaction in permanent magnet synchronous generators strengthen the field?


_________

No, armature reaction in permanent magnet synchronous generators typically weakens the main field flux, rather than strengthening it.


Here's a more detailed explanation:
Armature Reaction:
In synchronous generators, the armature current, which flows through the stator windings, creates its own magnetic field, known as the armature flux. This armature flux interacts with the main field flux, which is produced by the permanent magnets on the rotor.
Weakening the Main Field:
The armature flux generally opposes the main field flux, causing a reduction in the overall magnetic flux.

Look it up.
bi

one reference:
https://www.eeeguide.com/two-reactio...onous-machine/

[Rakarskiy]

Rakarskiy,

Polish_20250316_145234444.png
I marked my comparison graphic showing the peak occurrence at 90° per the upper scope trace (#2) which contradicts your lower timeline showing a zero crossing and 180° for the same rotor position. Your diagram (the lower one) is in error.
bi

ps.
No thanks. I did reply to your message.

No, there is no mistake here. It's just that when the anchor has the position (the middle picture of five) the EMF is maximum. At the same time, the magnetic induction lines physically cannot cross the conductors on the anchor. The main thing is that in this rotation position the system changes the winding conductors from the active to the passive side. The active side of the winding goes into the passive, and the passive into the active. The active zone of the winding is always in the focus of the magnetic Anapol (Toroidal magnetic dipole) changing in cross-section.

Regarding the temperature, this is absolutely true if we consider the operation of the magnetic system as a whole. Turbo generators at power plants have a very good and capacious cooling system. But I wanted to show that the hysteresis line has a non-linear characteristic and at the same rate of change of magnetic induction, the value of magnetic induction does not change significantly, then the EMF will change its value to the smaller side. This explains the oscillogram recorded on the Kromey generator.

But still, thank you, I will replace the slide with the controversial hysteresis.