Motor Generators

[bistander]

Hi bistander,

Any alternator in terms of inducing EMF is overunity, since to this day we do not know whether the magnetic field is spent to induce EMF or not. I will simply quote what I wrote to one of my opponents, a physicist from Ukraine:

...mechanical rotation of the rotor with permanent magnets or electromagnets is a condition for the constant magnetic excitation field to move in the stator core. When it rotates, the orientation of the Anapol foci changes (2, 4, etc. paired closed flows), and the lines of force simply physically cannot cut the conductor, they are always redistributed in the rotor and stator core. Rotation of this field is possible without mechanical rotation according to the algorithm for switching electromagnets. But there is a mandatory condition that, by the way, is implemented in any anchor of a DC motor. That is why Figuera combined everything with one another.
That is why this simple engineering solution is not applied is simply incomprehensible. The mechanical force of rotation of the rotor is a condition, although very expensive, and not a type of energy for transformation. ...

Regarding Figuer, Holcomb and others, I have long ago described the algorithm, even made calculations for the manufacture of this or that device. The question of whether to believe or not is a matter of choice, I do not insist. The Creator gave everyone the right to choose. One of my friends is also a stubborn admirer of the foundations of traditional electrodynamics, when he saw a drop in excitation current on his own devices when connecting the load to the phase wires and repeated the tests several times, now he just builds his own. I went further and calculated the most optimal design for a solid-state alternator. Now not only synchronous but also symmetrical.

Electromagnetic generator, without rotation of the magnetic rotor in self-propelled mode. | Patreon


370914545.jpg

Dear Rakarskiy,
You say
"The question of whether to believe or not is a matter of choice, I do not insist."

Yes. One can believe, or not. Their choice. But there is no choice for truth.

And "Any alternator in terms of inducing EMF is overunity"
is false. It does not produce more energy than what is input. Regardless of what you believe.
bi

[Rakarskiy]

Dear bistander,

Don't be so generalised. Distinguish all kinds of phenomena at mechanical generation of EMF (E). The mechanical power [P=Fv], applied to rotate a magnetic rotor with excited constant magnetic flux [Bm], is not converted into electric power [W=IU]. The conversion takes place according to the EMF (E) formula (of electromagnetic induction [curl E = -dBm/dt], where [Bm] is the magnetic induction of the external field). The magnetic field in the phase loop [Bi], arises from another phenomenon of electromagnetic induction (Maxwell's formula for Ampere's law [curl H = dD/dt + J], which I have expressed more precisely [curl Bi = -dE/dt]). The force of mechanical rotation is a condition, not a transformation. It is possible to rotate the field without mechanical force, it is enough to rotate not the collector in the brushes and the armature, but the brushes around the collector with a fixed armature , inserted stator with phase windings.

Electromagnetic generator OverUnity
Facebook

When you rotate the brushes around the armature collector, which is inserted into the stator with slots and windings, you get a similar pattern of magnetic field movement as when the magnetic rotor is mechanically rotated. (illustration from my edition Motionless ALTERNATOR)



86215320.jpg

[bistander]

Dear bistander,

Don't be so generalised. Distinguish all kinds of phenomena at mechanical generation of EMF. The mechanical power P=Fv, applied to rotate a magnetic rotor with excited constant magnetic flux Bm, is not converted into electric power W=IU. The conversion takes place according to the EMF (E) formula (of electromagnetic induction curl E = -dBm/dt, where Bm is the magnetic induction of the external field). The magnetic field in the phase loop Bi, arises from another phenomenon of electromagnetic induction (Maxwell's formula for Ampere's law curl H = dD/dt + J, which I have expressed more precisely curl Bi = -dE/dt). The force of mechanical rotation is a condition, not a transformation. It is possible to rotate the field without mechanical force, it is enough to rotate not the collector in the brushes and the armature, but the brushes around the collector with a fixed armature , inserted stator with phase windings.

Electromagnetic generator OverUnity
Facebook

When you rotate the brushes around the armature collector, which is inserted into the stator with slots and windings, you get a similar pattern of magnetic field movement as when the magnetic rotor is mechanically rotated. (illustration from my edition Motionless ALTERNATOR)



86215320.jpg

Rakarskiy,

What you describe amounts to a transformer. Real power output will never exceed power input.

Please show the world proof. Sorry, but nobody can. Because these OU/FE claims are false.
bi

[Rakarskiy]

Getting intercurrent mutual induction is also very possible if you do the electronic controller wrong. But if you put the correct armature from a DC motor, and organise the rotation of the brushes around the collector, you will get just the generation. My friend was also puzzled why at mechanical commutation generation, but having already replaced by transistors got mutual induction. I had to explain the difference in excitations. This question can be checked only practically.