Tweet
Refreshing Lenz Law and Newton's Third Law...
Now let's review Newton's Third Law, which Lenz Law OBEYS:
Therefore, it may say that Lenz Law itself is "Qualitative" in description...However, it MUST obey Newton's 3rd Law which is completely Quantitative...meaning, a way of not "directly" assigning Lenz a Quantitative Property...However, it is.
I see all that above as a way to CONFUSE all of Us even more into something that works only on an assumption of a Theoretical Rigid Model which is based on Magnetized Iron Dust bridging.
Try turning a Fully Loaded Conventional Electric Generator...Then come back here and tell ME if Lenz is "Qualitative" and not fully QUANTITATIVE.
The verdict is simple, bolts down that ONLY the "Super-Herculean" Diesel or Gas Farting Engines would be able to do such work...very convenient Uh?
We keep pouring the stinking fluids by Gallons to get a light bulb turned on...pathetic!
And basically the point here is all about a Dogmatic Magnetic Model which forces all of Us to engage in this DIRECTIONAL* Action Reaction to obtain an EMF, where in reality it is absolutely NOT required to follow such linear vectors.
*DIRECTIONAL meaning where Both Vectors of Force, Plus(+) & (-) of identical MAGNITUDE travel within the same exact linear displacement.
It is so obvious that Two Forces, identical in Magnitude, opposed in Linear vectors gives Us a very big and absolute ZERO of definitively not "useful" work...So to obtain at least "some" Energy...we must spend minimum TWICE or Three times the applied Force to obtain some "drops" of power back...
And of course...forget about Overunity, or COP even equal to 1.
Such stupid constraints that they have imply for such a long time...but the worst part is that we all swallowed it, digest it, to defecated it later...to now witness how some of you still defend such stupidity.
On a side note...I really do not have the time to discuss this so obvious and very old Theories they have been feeding for over 200+ years... which eventually will collapse one after the other, like Dominoes chips... when just ONE SINGLE Model is presented here.
Regards
Ufopolitics
Lenz's law /ˈlɛnts/ is a common way of understanding how electromagnetic circuits obey Newton's third law and the conservation of energy. Lenz's law is named after German scientist Heinrich Lenz in 1834, and it says:
If an induced current flows, its direction is always such that it will oppose the change which produced it.
Lenz's law states that the current induced in a circuit due to a change or a motion in a magnetic field is so directed as to oppose the change in flux and to exert a mechanical force opposing the motion.
If an induced current flows, its direction is always such that it will oppose the change which produced it.
Lenz's law states that the current induced in a circuit due to a change or a motion in a magnetic field is so directed as to oppose the change in flux and to exert a mechanical force opposing the motion.
The third law states that all forces between two objects exist in equal magnitude and opposite direction: if one object A exerts a force FA on a second object B, then B simultaneously exerts a force FB on A, and the two forces are equal and opposite: FA = −FB. The third law means that all forces are interactions between different bodies, and thus that there is no such thing as a unidirectional force or a force that acts on only one body. This law is sometimes referred to as the action-reaction law, with FA called the "action" and FB the "reaction". The action and the reaction are simultaneous, and it does not matter which is called the action and which is called reaction; both forces are part of a single interaction, and neither force exists without the other.
I see all that above as a way to CONFUSE all of Us even more into something that works only on an assumption of a Theoretical Rigid Model which is based on Magnetized Iron Dust bridging.
Try turning a Fully Loaded Conventional Electric Generator...Then come back here and tell ME if Lenz is "Qualitative" and not fully QUANTITATIVE.
The verdict is simple, bolts down that ONLY the "Super-Herculean" Diesel or Gas Farting Engines would be able to do such work...very convenient Uh?
We keep pouring the stinking fluids by Gallons to get a light bulb turned on...pathetic!
And basically the point here is all about a Dogmatic Magnetic Model which forces all of Us to engage in this DIRECTIONAL* Action Reaction to obtain an EMF, where in reality it is absolutely NOT required to follow such linear vectors.
*DIRECTIONAL meaning where Both Vectors of Force, Plus(+) & (-) of identical MAGNITUDE travel within the same exact linear displacement.
It is so obvious that Two Forces, identical in Magnitude, opposed in Linear vectors gives Us a very big and absolute ZERO of definitively not "useful" work...So to obtain at least "some" Energy...we must spend minimum TWICE or Three times the applied Force to obtain some "drops" of power back...
And of course...forget about Overunity, or COP even equal to 1.
Such stupid constraints that they have imply for such a long time...but the worst part is that we all swallowed it, digest it, to defecated it later...to now witness how some of you still defend such stupidity.
On a side note...I really do not have the time to discuss this so obvious and very old Theories they have been feeding for over 200+ years... which eventually will collapse one after the other, like Dominoes chips... when just ONE SINGLE Model is presented here.
Regards
Ufopolitics
[/IMG]
Comment