Originally posted by bistander
View Post
Became a Monopole after being removed from the Field??!!
Don't try to BS me. Don't try to get me upset...by being an "ASS" UMING BS I NEVER WROTE HERE!
I never wrote here we all could make permanent Monopole Magnets back and forth this way.
I know Monopoles by it self does not exist, it is not written on Ken's Theory...nor I never wrote such stupidity.
I wrote that whenever iron was under the influence of a magnetic field near a pole it will NOT create an opposite pole in between, and that was the end of it.
What happens after iron is removed from the magnetic field influence depends specifically to its retentivity..and that was NOT part of this test or discussion at any point.
The ideal iron for this testing should be one that does not retain magnetism. So when it is removed from magnetic field goes back to zero.
We all know that if you approach a magnet to a retentive piece of iron then remove it, it will develop the two poles after is off the field...but that was not the discussion here.
Then I see that 90 percent of your pictures are based on the iron being analyzed without the magnet present??
WTF are U doing?
Are you trying to demonstrate that Monopoles don't exist?....
BS Bistander...
Comment