ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Ufopolitics]

A Rough Sketch...

Hello Again,

This is the main idea about the second project...in the below rough sketch:

[IMG][/IMG]

However, this was one of the first designs I started working with...so, there have been several modifications to the inner armature structure.

But I think it will give you an idea of what I did...

I have just set the brushes and commutators from the power rotary switch on top for easy understanding of it...however, in reality I have it set remotely and transferred through wires into the windings for easier understanding of the whole device.

The winding inside the armature is NOT Asymmetrical, but Symmetrical with just one commutator. The reason why is very simple...we can NOT ALLOW that Field to Collapse as it will RESTART a New Magnetic Spin Cycle from zero...please refer to my previous Graphic-Post about Magnetic Cycloids.

The Symmetrical Winding do not allow the field to ever collapse. So, it is just a STATIC Symmetrical Armature wind, where we are spinning their brushes around a FIXED commutator.

By spinning just their connected and feeding brushes, we will be spinning JUST THE VIRTUAL FIELD within the STATIC Iron Core inside the STATIC Generating Coils from the Gen Head.

It is just the Reversed Engineering from our old knowledge about Symmetrical Motors...where Brushes kept the Main Virtual Field Static through their geometrical plane, while the Iron Mass Armature would spin... simple, we reverse the process in order to get the Virtual Field to spin along with the Brushes Geometrical Plane while the Laminated Iron Rotor Mass is static. These Motors were designed to Project their Field towards Stators, so I find them perfectly suitable for this primary development purpose.

I used continuous slip rings-brushes from an old car Alternator to constantly feed them, which is part of the Rotary Power Switch Assy.



Hope it is more clear now...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[interdesign21]

Hello UFO !
long time

Reading about your SCIFI I could not resist to post a pic with my actual line of experiments with same poles "bubble": induction at 90 deg.
See my pic
May be itīs out of the subject. If not appropriate say so and will delete it.

thanks for sharing
regards
Alvaro

[Ufopolitics]

Hello UFO !
long time

Reading about your SCIFI I could not resist to post a pic with my actual line of experiments with same poles "bubble": induction at 90 deg.
See my pic
May be itīs out of the subject. If not appropriate say so and will delete it.

thanks for sharing
regards
Alvaro

Long time Alvaro, is good to see you again!

Yes, it is related...I see you have the two external coils being swept by the magnets in the CD Rotor right?

That is the typical way we always think off...no matter if they are same polarization.

Mine is a bit different, since I have a Highly Compressed Field in the middle of Space...by two N52 ARC Segment magnets generating it on each side (actually I have quite a few of this rings in the rotor)...the static coils and core are in the middle of that invisible field. In order that when this mass-less Field runs through the coils and core they generate the Induced EMF.

This arrangement allows you to use very high Neo Grade...and the higher, the less magnetic drag against iron core. Because the Repulsion Field Forces would be greater than their attraction forces to iron core.

[IMG][/IMG]

What this Field does, is to create a Double-Cross Counter Spin within the ferromagnetic center core particles...in order that when You start Rotating-Translating the Field, A Gradient Wave would be generated in core then transmitted to all Coils in series. Accelerating the Iron Spinning Particles in a forward direction to the rotation...

The idea came from a very simple experiment...but it resulted in a Magnetic Particle Accelerator...much bigger and expensive project...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[interdesign21]

Thks for reply

Note that the magnets are N poles facing each other, not the coils. (upper rotor opposing lower = repulsion bubble ) the coils core are orthogonal to magnets face.

about your answer, something like this pic ? (the concept, not the setup of course ! )

[Ufopolitics]

A very simple warning...

To Whom it may Concern,

I want to state a very simple WARNING...

ALL Images as All Work is Copyrighted along with very, extremely complicated original 3D Scenery which is very easy to prove in a case-law, they are my Original Art Work.

Just one single image is harder to duplicate its original scene set up in any Animated CAD Software as it is trying to reproduce a new 100 Dollar Bill using a needle type brush...and just trying to look as real as the original.

So, please, refrain from running to a near Patent Law Office...to start an Application based on this shared knowledge.

Like before, all this work is free to share, but illegal to attempt to Privatize it!!.

Appreciate your responsible behavior.


Thanks


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Thks for reply

Note that the magnets are N poles facing each other, not the coils. (upper rotor opposing lower = repulsion bubble ) the coils core are orthogonal to magnets face.

about your answer, something like this pic ? (the concept, not the setup of course ! )

Yes, pretty similar, and the same concept...

So, you are "sandwiching" the static coils between two spinning discs having all north poles facing towards coils...right?

Now, do you have an iron core inside coils, in a ring shape which passes through all of them?

If You don't...then try installing one, but it must be split(cut with a small gap) at least in on one end where there is no coil.

Then You will see the difference...

Now related to the magnets positioning, you have them too spread/spaced apart, which fragments your SCIFI field Inducing the Coils.

So, try grouping them much closer (you may need special fasteners to do so) ...in order that you Increase-Expand this Compressed Field.

The way I did it was to group them in Two Sets of half and half of the whole rotor circumference...and this is an advantage about repulsion fields...since they could be expanded Spatially in almost any direction, and by doing so they increase their Induction Capability.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[interdesign21]

Yes, pretty similar, and the same concept...

So, you are "sandwiching" the static coils between two spinning discs having all north poles facing towards coils...right?

Now, do you have an iron core inside coils, in a ring shape which passes through all of them?

If You don't...then try installing one, but it must be split(cut with a small gap) at least in on one end where there is no coil.

Then You will see the difference...


Regards


Ufopolitics

YES the ring core sandwiched between the two rotors. from a salvaged trafo made of steel tape. It is in two halves with two air gaps.
In fact, I am waiting for an iron powder toroid from china to make a better setup.

Your help would be very much appreciated with the wiring etc.
regards
Alvaro

[Ufopolitics]

YES the ring core sandwiched between the two rotors. from a salvaged trafo made of steel tape. It is in two halves with two air gaps.
In fact, I am waiting for an iron powder toroid from china to make a better setup.

Your help would be very much appreciated with the wiring etc.
regards
Alvaro

Ok, Laminated steel won't work as well as a solid rod of plain, solid iron tubing (which is what I am using...cheap. , recycled materials...

Except from the Neo's which I designed and ordered from China.

Just make a simple testing...attach a channel from your scope Probe to just one core without coils and spin the field...from there you could play to start increasing that signal.

Measure both types, laminated versus solid rod and watch the difference.

Group magnets closer then watch the difference...

This signal is the rough Amplified result from the Spatial Field to the iron core. As it would be greater when you transfer it to coils then measure their terminals...

Coils you also need to group them closer in two parts which is more or less the same length as the magnets whenever you get them closer...in order that each compressed field sweeps majority of coils-core in shorter time ...understand?


Regards


Ufopolitics

[interdesign21]

OK Thank you !!
regards
Alvaro

[Ufopolitics]

The Power Switch Assy...

Hello to All,

Ok, below are couple of pictures (actually they are frames from one of the video testing) of the Rotary Power Switch I designed and built.

It is a rough one, but it works, as you can not just go out there and get one that fits your needs...

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

Originally I started with regular linear spring motor brushes...however, they are not designed for that spinning at high speeds...so, by centrifugal forces they stop making contact to commutator...Then I had to also build this kind which have a weight that the more it spreads open due to centrifugal forces...the more they attach to commutator...simple and very old Archimedes "Law of the Lever Principle"... so they work beautiful at very high speeds (3600-4600 RPM's for this little Radio Shack Motor...)


So, simply, this very small motor...would be spinning the Virtual Field inside Generator Head...and getting an Induced EMF out...just as spinning the Original and Heavy Rotor would do...

[IMG][/IMG]

Now, honestly, did you ever, in your wildest dreams about Free Energy...ever thought that such small little motor could TURN a Home AC Generator Head and produce power out?





Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

The final cad design...

Hello to All,

[IMG][/IMG]

Above is the Main CAD for the Inner Rotor Assembly Design.

As you could see the Teeth-Poles are separated by a gap, they must be.

This are cut pieces of laminated 2.0 iron sheet with a center hole to attach them vertically. Then as a whole they bolt to a main ring of non ferromagnetic material.

The Center rotor, is just a solid mass of iron with grooves and having two magnets at each 180š apart in order to start the pre excitation of the static exciter coil. (same way some new Gen have at their rotor) This Rotor spins whenever we start spinning the Virtual Field, but it is loose, just attached to bearings and to case, could be used as a fan, or for future speed sensors to keep Monitoring the right RPM's.

The Size of the grooves between poles should be able to allow the proper winding as it goes on original rotor field, but every other sequence which represents the whole original face length.

I have decided to go fully on this designs as it is "The Biggest Toy" of them all, as is the easier and faster to replicate.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Rotating Virtual Field Circuit 1

Hello to All


Please find below Circuit 1 on the Rotational Virtual Field set up.

[IMG][/IMG]

This drawing is just a "Paused Frame" from rotation in order to analyze the components connections and their functioning.

On Left Side is the Static Armature Assembly which is conformed by 24 laminated Iron and Isolated Poles-Elements.

A Full closed iron armature from a typical motor will not work "as is" for this method, (I had to cut/fragment mine into elements, drilling each hole first and passing bolts-nuts through each, after I have wound a Full Armature Core a few times and tested, see image below) because when the spinning field is going at high RPM's, the whole iron piece would not follow an organized polarity distributional rotation. Then the output Sinewave will get scrambled and random spikes output.

[IMG][/IMG]

Once we fragment armature and set the iron rotor, this later one would close the magnetic circuit like a bridge magnetic chain connection alternatively as it spins, allowing the Virtual Field to transfer in organized polarity distribution among all the 360š armature elements.

Like I wrote before, the winding type is Symmetrical, which means winding coils in Series all around the 360š Circumference, and I am just showing the Group of Coils which are being energized according to the brush positioning on the Right side Power Rotary Switch diagram.

This Rotary Switch is based on Four(4) Brushes, which allows Us to regulate the Original Rotor Field Surface, until matching exact Angle of Interaction at North Coils (Blue Group) and South Coils (Red Group), therefore, NOT using All Coils at armature per rotation time.

The rest of the coils winded in series "in between" the energized coils (not seen on this Diagram) are just conducting the Positive and Negative feed respectively from the two positive and two negative Brushes, but not energized, since they are not receiving plus-minus charges, but same charges type, therefore, not generating a Magnetic Field.

Looking at the Rotary Power Switch at right side of diagram, note that I have set the brushes making contact with the lighter blue commutator segments, which are showing a connecting line to the left side North (Blue) Coils Outer connectors, so it is understood that the "in between" coils are energized in series as well, closing the circuit between the two Positive-Negative Brushes on left.

And so on the right side South (Red) Coils are attached to the two outer commutator segments at switch (magenta comm segments).

I know this setup could create some confusion, as we are not used to spin brushes, ever...but, see it from the Geometrical Plane defined by the Positive-Negative Brushes, which in this case is a "V" like Plane to open the North (Blue) Coils, and another "V" Plane to open the South (Red) Coils. Therefore, when we rotate Brushes, we are rotating this geometrical plane.

Remember that Commutator is Static at Switch, where all its connections attach to the Static Armature windings. So, we rotate the Brushes and the copper slip rings.

Copper Slip Rings Brushes are Static and they connect to the Self Exciting Circuit from Generator Head. Represented in the lower right side of drawing.

Every Generator Head must have a Running Capacitor connected to the Exciting Coils at Stator, if it is a Brushless type gen head, it would have an AC Cap, and, if it is the old style brushed type, it would have an Electrolytic Type Cap receiving the DC from the Diode Bridge, which sometimes, it is based just on Two Diodes, connected to the self exciting coils.

A Brushless Generator transfer the energy to the Rotor Field by Induction, (it is a reversed induction process from stator exciting coils to rotor field coils) then the Field Coil must have the Diodes connected in a loop to coil terminals, along with a Varistor (connected in parallel to diode), in charge to keep regulated induced current values.

[IMG][/IMG]

Above Diagram is from a Brushless Type Generator Head. This Gen have two separate Coils at Rotor, disposed in a N/S-N/S Magnetic Chain. Note the Varistor and Diode looping each coil's terminals.

This set up I am displaying here is from an old, brushed type generator which is much simpler to hook to the Rotary Switch as I am showing on the first diagram.

I have not tested a brushless type generator into this System as of now, but I see absolutely no problems at all, and it should be even simpler, since we would not need the slip rings or its brushes, but just looping each positive-negative brushes by diodes and varistors should work...again, I do not know as I have not tested this type yet.

In the case self exciter reverse induction to field coil will not work, we could just connect diodes bridge after the AC cap terminals and feed it the "old style" through the brush-slip rings...so, no big deal at all.


Regards to All


Ufopolitics

[Cadman]

Suggestion for improvement

UFO,

Ingenious design, my hat's off to you.

After studying what you have presented here I understand what you are building, but I have a question, of course.

Referring to your drawing Rotary Virtual Field Circuit 1, the free rotating central shaft has a shape that reminds me of a two pole armature. This shaft revolves following the rotating magnetic field and completes the magnetic circuit between the two shifting field poles. Correct so far?

My question to you is: Why not provide this central shaft with two windings similar to a two pole armature, and energize them with a constant current (through another set of slip rings) from the static exciter coils making a stronger N-S field as it passes through this shaft? The added magnetic field would reinforce the fields created in the static armature assembly and increase the generated emf.

Regards,

CM

[Ufopolitics]

UFO,

Ingenious design, my hat's off to you.

Hello Cadman,

Hey, many thanks Cadman!

After studying what you have presented here I understand what you are building, but I have a question, of course.

Referring to your drawing Rotary Virtual Field Circuit 1, the free rotating central shaft has a shape that reminds me of a two pole armature. This shaft revolves following the rotating magnetic field and completes the magnetic circuit between the two shifting field poles. Correct so far?

YES!, Perfectly correct!

As a matter of fact, when I saw you post, I was making the post below where it shows the magnetic "Map" for better understanding...

Yes, You are right, it is similar to a two pole design rotor.

My question to you is: Why not provide this central shaft with two windings similar to a two pole armature, and energize them with a constant current (through another set of slip rings) from the static exciter coils making a stronger N-S field as it passes through this shaft? The added magnetic field would reinforce the fields created in the static armature assembly and increase the generated emf.

Regards,

CM

Your idea for improvement is great!. and definitively we could test it on later designs, However, think of Lenz Law...if you reinforce the Magnetic Field Source right from the very center of this structure, Lenz reversed forces will go easily through the Static Armature and hit your Rotor Main Source, delaying the whole process from the supplied energy to all coils plus magnetic field point of view.

That is the reason why I have been playing with an empty solid iron rotor core so far, (which eventually I will replace by a Laminated one, once I have the final and best structure) and just inserting two small magnets as to keep the reminiscence magnetism present (in case our Exciting Coils Caps, loose charge and we need to pre-excite by spinning rotor shaft)

Now, Lenz WILL crash definitively against the Static Armature Core...but can not "follow" nor delay -in Full- a Virtual, Mass-Less, Weight-Less Field.

What happens when Lenz appears by loading this generator Mains, is a slight increase of sparks at Main Commutator and Slip Rings, due to the Electric Field increased by reversed currents.

Now, going back to iron rotor...Lenz will "hit it" also...but, since it is a loose -not connected mechanically- rotor, it would just slow it a bit...where the Virtual Field Spinning will "take over" and keep pulling Rotor to follow movement.

In further designs we could play with this rotor further development, as to set a speed sensor, which determines when it is slowing down, to then increase the Virtual Field acceleration, when Generator have heavy loads...sort of a compensating circuit, like the Carburator Governor works in the Gas Engine attached to a Gen Head...

Now Lenz originates at specific Momentarily Energized set of Series Coils at the Static Armature...and as soon as Brushes "refresh" the circuit, by braking it and restarting a new one, that Lenz originated in the previous broken circuit is now gone...then a new Lenz would originate AFTER We excite the new set of Coils...and so on...

The main point above, to think off, is that Lenz is a Reactive response that takes place AFTER we Energize a set of Coils and their respective iron core elements, so, once we brake that circuit, Lenz fades away there, and we will keep leaving it always behind.

Picture how a Two Pole DC Brushed Symmetrical Motor works at its Armature...picture its Magnetic Field is STATIC defined by the Brush Plane, however, this design keeps "replacing" leaving single coils by the ones coming In ...which makes Rotor spins, but, it is constantly reversing the voltage polarity at each coil that enters a magnetic pole plane, as the ones leaving the plane are also reversed when entering to the other pole across reversed voltage.

We have an enormous advantage here by being able to spin the field this way...

Thanks Cadman, and I hope you decide to join me in the Building Thread!


Kind Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Static Armature plus Rotor Magnetic Map

Hello again,

Below is a CAD on the Static Armature plus the Rotor Magnetic Polarity MOMENTARY Map.

[IMG][/IMG]

Also note the corresponding MOMENTARILY Excited Coils.

I have also pointed out the Contacts receiving the Momentary Voltage Polarity from the ROTARY Brushes.

I have emphasized on "Momentary" because I need you to realize this is just a Paused Frame on this Rotational Sequence of the Virtual Field.

Now, related to electrical measurements that we must have in mind about the coils on this set up, versus the Original measurements on the replaced Rotor Field Windings...

This Measurement Ratio is VERY Important to have in mind:

The "Old" OEM Rotor Field Coil (if it is based on a Single Coil, from a typical Brushed Gen Head) is in SERIES receiving the feed from the Two Brushes contacting the two slip rings, meaning, if we measure the resistance on coil TWO terminals at slip rings, it would give us the TOTAL Resistance that Polarizes BOTH FACES (NORTH-SOUTH) of Rotor Core.

Let's call this Total OEM Rotor Coil Resistance as R OEM

If We look at our Diagram above, the way Brushes are connected to BOTH Sequential Pair of Coils Group in series, generating BOTH POLES...IS IN PARALLEL.

Which means the current received from our NOT MODIFIED Exciting Sourcing Coils located at the Gen Head... would be SPLIT IN TWO.

And like I wrote before, this Applies ONLY to a set up like the one shown, based on the Spec ific OEM Rotor Face Angle of Interaction, where it takes Four (4) Total Coils per Energized Sequence Group.

If it is different, then everything changes.

These values are more or less approximate to reality related to the R OEM...where this Field Coils run on Lower Voltage than Mains Generating Coils (Note their AWG (Gauge) is always finer).

I hope everything is pretty clear up to here...and please ask me whatever, as later on, like I said, am going back to my work...and be there for a long while.

As, If anyone believes I have made any errors in my calculations, please feel free to let me know.


Regards to All


Ufopolitics