Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hey UFO

    I stopped in to read the other day and I see you have built a new generator.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Cornboy 555 View Post
    Hey UFO, count me in on builders thread, surely i can find something laying around here to modify to spec.

    Warm regards Cornboy.

    Hey old Friend!!

    It is great news to hear you will be joining Us in the Building Threads...

    I consider You one of the GREATEST BUILDER, on this whole FORUM.

    Then I will wait to hear from MachineAlive...another EXCELLENT BUILDER.

    We need You ALL, to help me demonstrate ALL of this Projects work, and they are real.

    TO THE MACHINES!


    Warm Regards


    Ufopolitics
    This is sort of what I already built, a while ago, except I used arduino to pulse the coils.
    You know, the arduino has, I think, 13 digital output pins. If you used arduino, you could make the generator completely motionless. Or is there a reason you don't want to use arduino. Maybe you used more coils then arduino has output pins.
    Anyway, I wish I had more time, but I got nothing, I'm swamped.
    Regards

    Comment


    • Originally posted by machinealive View Post
      Hey UFO

      I stopped in to read the other day and I see you have built a new generator.



      This is sort of what I already built, a while ago, except I used arduino to pulse the coils.
      You know, the arduino has, I think, 13 digital output pins. If you used arduino, you could make the generator completely motionless. Or is there a reason you don't want to use arduino. Maybe you used more coils then arduino has output pins.
      Anyway, I wish I had more time, but I got nothing, I'm swamped.
      Regards

      Hey my dear old friend!!

      It is great to hear from one of the few best builders on this whole site!!

      I do have Arduino...but I wanted to build first a raw model powered by my small rotary switch in order to capture the proper signal developed.

      And yes, I am using more than 13 inputs...it is a 20 Pole Motor Armature (fragmented) with 20 overlapped Coils to excite the generating fields. And what am doing is simple...just "motoring" those 20 coils fields without moving them at all....what I am moving are just the fields.

      I remember clearly when you were spinning a virtual field in that small Toroid, reproducing the Tesla Rotating Field...and it was awesome!!

      Thanks for stopping by and please find some time at least to check this place out!!


      Warm Regards old friend, always a pleasure to hear from you.


      Ufopolitics
      Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
        I found this old post from Vidbid...where He displays all new and working links to get the book.

        ARCHIVE.ORG.KEN'S_BOOK

        Try to read it Wonza...As all interested on this Thread...if You do not read this FREE ebook above...You will never get to understand the FULL concept(s) being developed here.


        Regards


        Ufopolitics

        https://ia802502.us.archive.org/31/i...tism1small.pdf
        Regards,

        VIDBID

        Comment


        • Enlightened Magnetism IV, Iron versus Light Spatial Interactions

          Hello to All,

          Even though I have been very busy, here is the Enlightened Magnetism Part IV.

          It is about the Optical Delusion that Iron Filings has created for so long...

          Revealed by Three State of the Art Methods...You will witness the Radical differences between Attract and Repulse Spatial Interactions Patterns...

          [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4v5YsV_M5hc[/VIDEO]

          ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM PART IV, IRON & LIGHT

          After optical delusions caused by "forced enchainment" of Iron Filings Method ...

          ...Maybe an "Attraction" was never meant to be the way we all still believe it is...

          But just a mere Repulsion of two never compatible alike poles, never fused together vortexes of different pressures...

          which, despite same facing direction of spinning...both actually are seeking disappearance (voidance) into the farther Field's of like Polarizations with
          equal pressures...and aligned origins.


          While a "known" "Repulsion" are just two perfectly compatible Counter Spinning Vortexes of identical Pressures...

          Blended together in harmony to deliver Highly Compressed Radiant Aether Energy...


          Sometimes reality could be harder to accept than Science Fiction...

          Hope You All would Enjoy it.


          Regards


          Ufopolitics
          Last edited by Ufopolitics; 11-06-2016, 03:49 PM.
          Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

          Comment


          • The Way


            Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
            Hello to All,

            Even though I have been very busy, here is the Enlightened Magnetism Part IV.

            It is about the Optical Delusion that Iron Filings has created for so long...

            Revealed by Three State of the Art Methods...You will witness the Radical differences between Attract and Repulse Spatial Interactions Patterns...

            [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4v5YsV_M5hc[/VIDEO]

            ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM PART IV, IRON & LIGHT




            Hope You All would Enjoy it.


            Regards


            Ufopolitics

            Comment


            • Magnetism Plasma Test...

              Hello to All,

              I am really pleased to share the following Video that a subscribed member in YT linked to me...

              [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2B-lKgcQJvg&t=0s[/VIDEO]

              PLASMA IN A MAGNETIC FIELD

              Awesome Views!!...it clearly shows the fantastic Magnetic Field Spin!!


              Regards



              Ufopolitics
              Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

              Comment


              • www.distinti.com

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QReGWNP5fSs

                Interesting discussion.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by pault View Post
                  emV027U4: The Sun: An Ether Dynamo


                  Al

                  Comment


                  • CRT Scanning a Magnetic Field Vortex Video

                    Hello to All,

                    Here is the B&W small CRT Video...I was talking about a while back...I finally repaired the vortexes directions for each polarization and did all lab work again...

                    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7OzMURRU_k&lc=z12fjdg4fvmuers0222sx5vggoi vdf05r04[/VIDEO]

                    CRT REVEALING MAGNETIC FIELD VORTEXES

                    I had to stop building my Generators...just because I consider this Video is crucial to understand future readings when I show you the Pulsing Primary Coils Sinewave...


                    Regards to All


                    Ufopolitics
                    Last edited by Ufopolitics; 04-10-2017, 03:10 PM.
                    Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

                    Comment


                    • I also align with ufopolitcs opinion and stick to model 2 and not Ken's model 1.

                      Model 1 in electrical and electronic engineering we call this a short circuit between the two poles!

                      Instead model 2 is the analogue of a complementary push-pull with symmetrical power supply +/- and the ground, amplifier circuit where the are two electrical current circuits one on each each supply rail and the ground.

                      I think Ken Wheeler's confusion comes from that he has not real knowledge or training of electrical engineering and is confused from the interlacing of the flux lines above the poles as shown by the ferrocell.

                      He overcomplicates things. With all these Greek talking, i am Greek BTW, and self invented terminologies and definitions.

                      I myself have tried to bring the matter on academia but they stick on the iron fillings model and kick back like mules!

                      look here this thread:

                      https://www.researchgate.net/post/Wh...ld_of_a_magnet

                      (registration needed on RG but it is worth just to read what it is told there)

                      Ufopolitics,

                      I had like to here your opinion why these interlacing of the field lines happens on the two speparate magnetic dognhout bubbles touching back to back at the Bloch region?

                      Why they don't turn all in parallel spin direction CCW (when watched from above the pole) for the north pole and CW for the south pole?

                      Kind Regards,

                      EM
                      MSc. Electronic and Computer Engineering, TUC, Greece
                      MSc. VLSI Systems Engineering, UMIST, U.K.
                      BSc. Electronic Systems Engineering, Victoria Univ. Manchester & UMIST

                      Comment


                      • Misunderstandings...

                        Originally posted by Markoul View Post
                        I also align with ufopolitcs opinion and stick to model 2 and not Ken's model 1.

                        Model 1 in electrical and electronic engineering we call this a short circuit between the two poles!

                        Instead model 2 is the analogue of a complementary push-pull with symmetrical power supply +/- and the ground, amplifier circuit where the are two electrical current circuits one on each each supply rail and the ground.

                        I think Ken Wheeler's confusion comes from that he has not real knowledge or training of electrical engineering and is confused from the interlacing of the flux lines above the poles as shown by the ferrocell.

                        He overcomplicates things. With all these Greek talking, i am Greek BTW, and self invented terminologies and definitions.
                        Hello Markoul,

                        I believe you are not understanding Ken's Theory well...

                        There are no "Model 1" and "Model 2"...but one single model here.

                        The confusion maybe -as I also had it in the beginnings- is between the Two different PRESSURES in Ken's Magnetic Theory.

                        The "Model 2" you are referring to (two bubbles) are the MID PRESSURES which do not have sufficient strength to bypass the center accretion (equatorial) Disc, therefore, return back to Counterspace (Ether) exactly at that disc PLANE.

                        However, the HIGHER PRESSURES can and DO bypass center accretion disk, therefore, travel to each OPPOSITE'S poles center (aligned with axis) to return (centripetally) back to dielectric field (center of magnet)

                        If you take a look at my video below, it will show pretty clear the differences between Hi-Low Pressures...through my animated CAD CGI's Images...

                        [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZhETcDHDRY[/VIDEO]


                        Originally posted by Markoul View Post
                        I myself have tried to bring the matter on academia but they stick on the iron fillings model and kick back like mules!

                        look here this thread:

                        https://www.researchgate.net/post/Wh...ld_of_a_magnet

                        (registration needed on RG but it is worth just to read what it is told there)
                        But of course they (Academia) will NEVER accept it!!
                        If they do...they will never be able to explain all the development done based on Lorent'z work...as to all the "corrections" he did to Maxwell Equations and Theories.

                        Iron Model is very convenient as it was appropriately "ADAPTED" (or better written: FORCED) to fit Academia requirements.

                        Originally posted by Markoul View Post
                        Ufopolitics,

                        I had like to hear your opinion -as to- why these interlacing of the field lines happens on the two separate magnetic dognhout bubbles touching back to back at the Bloch region?
                        Like I wrote above...after you watch my video, you may understand it.

                        I will cite an example that Ken mentions...as when making (drawing) a line...

                        We draw a line either from left to right...or from right to left, depending if you are left-right handed...

                        Now NATURE, does NOT uses our "ways" to draw lines ...NATURE writes a LINE from a center towards both ends.

                        Now, for Us to do it that way, we will need both hands...moving at unison from a common point towards the TWO OPPOSITE extremes...

                        As an example...observe ANY seed development...say a tree, a big tree...first you plant seed, which is Nature's first dot, point where "line" STARTS...then, seed DIVERGES to TWO opposite extremes of growth...one end to the skies, searching the sun light, the rain, the air...while the other seeking all the nutrients from the ground...


                        Originally posted by Markoul View Post
                        Why they don't turn all in parallel spin direction CCW (when watched from above the pole) for the north pole and CW for the south pole?

                        Kind Regards,

                        EM
                        But, that is exactly how it works!

                        North aiming to your eyes will seem "CCW"...while South will be CW...

                        However, Both Spins are exactly same directional (parallel?) spin development.

                        Post from my Other Thread, which I believe answers your question:

                        Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
                        Hello,

                        The First thing this Instrument will clearly REVEAL, and ALWAYS IDENTIFY SAME WAY, is the Opposite Spin Directions between a NORTH and a SOUTH Polarization (Poles):

                        NORTH SPIN SEEN ON CRT SCOPE




                        SOUTH SPIN SEEN ON THE SAME CRT SCOPE SCREEN




                        And this FAST AND ACCURATE RESPONSE works the same way for an ELECTROMAGNET which is being fed with direct DC Currents...Or whenever we pulse it with ANY SIGNAL we would be working with.

                        Example: If we just connect our Coil to a Regulated PSU, and start dialing UP Voltage and Amperage...we will see the ANGLES WILL INCREASE, tending to reach the Vertical Line at center of screen, and perpendicular to ZERO LINE.


                        Ufopolitics
                        Even though, I have shown on my above quoted post, that a NORTH SPIN is COMPLETELY OF OPPOSITE NATURE to a SOUTH SPIN ...

                        When we get TWO of this CRT SCOPES, and set them according to below CAD DIAGRAM, meaning FACE TO FACE with the FIELD IN CENTER:



                        It is ONLY then, when we realize that BOTH SPINS AGREE ON SAME ROTATIONAL DIRECTION, from BOTH POLARIZATIONS...NORTH AND SOUTH.


                        Regards to All


                        Ufopolitics
                        Thanks for posting Markoul...our further understanding about Magnetism...will open up many unknown or denied fields of Science, like Antigravity, Free Energy, Motion Perpetuals...etc,etc

                        And then who would not like to make any one of above field-experiments in the future?


                        Regards


                        Ufopolitics
                        Last edited by Ufopolitics; 03-30-2018, 03:15 PM.
                        Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

                        Comment


                        • Thanks for your very detailed description of what is really happening here. I have watched the particle dynamics video in the past. Excellent job! Congratulations! much better that stubborn academia guys. I love your videos and explanations.

                          Understanding that different rotation of north and south swirls vortexes is just caused by their opposite mirror spatial location and that they actually spin exactly the same is very important.

                          The iron fillings experiment is actually the same as attaching an iron plate on the side of a magnet,a short circuited magnet. And i am not convinced still about ken's take about direct high potential N-S flux. I think he is repeating the same mistake as the iron fillings, thus the short circuited magnet field.

                          So in that point i have to disagree with you. Seems Ken changed your initial intuition which was the correct one.

                          This high potential flux is nonsense.

                          Show it to me in the ferrocell...? or in the CRT? The lines in your video with the big CRT may appear to come from one pole to the other but if you count carefully the lines coming out of the Bloch region match the number of lines returning to these poles and the change color tint midway at their curl. Maybe these bring the confusion. Anyway unless wi do a gigantic ferrocell to encompass the whole field we will never have real proof, i submit. The lines always brake on the ferrocell light strip perimeter on a side view of a magnet.

                          BTW, I am the guy who made radio waves on a transmitting antenna rod section visible...using Timm's ferrocell. Magnetic field on a transmitting radio antenna is coaxial in appearance.

                          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGcvh4Rb0G4&t=

                          article: https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...194?via%3Dihub

                          Keep up the good work Ufopolitics I am a fan of yours and I believe (although I am an academic) that underground movement is much closer to the truth than academia.

                          Kind Regards,

                          Emmanouil
                          MSc. Electronic and Computer Engineering, TUC, Greece
                          MSc. VLSI Systems Engineering, UMIST, U.K.
                          BSc. Electronic Systems Engineering, Victoria Univ. Manchester & UMIST

                          Comment


                          • To Ufo

                            Dear Ufo,

                            for long I wanted to comment and ask you about you excelent animation of the magnetic field particle dynamics according Wheeler, the first video you referer to in you above post.

                            In your video you show the particles/field leaving the magnetic axis North/South (0 degree), spiraling out, for finally returnering in the disk plane, at the Bloch Wall 90 degree.

                            This to me, is counter intuitive. I would expect the particle to leave the center in an 90 degree angle (like magnetic field along a conductor), and from there the particle loose its strength, and depending of the particle ‘polartity’ or simple random fall out, it would then be spiraling back into either North or the South pole. To me the falling back into and the center in a more and more narrow spiralling along the axis, seems much more according how I see the law of nature elsewhere, being sucked back into a black hole.

                            Sorry for my English, not native, but may I ask you to consider, whether the ‘particle’ should be sprout out in 0 degree along the axis, or 90 degree along the Bloch wall. In the latter, the spiraling way back home seems much more natural to me.

                            Best of regards, Fessor

                            Comment


                            • The Ferrolens IS SHOWING 100% AND ACCURATE THE MAGNETIC FLUX LINES AND FIELD OF A PERMANENT MAGNET.
                              Since they did not find the magnetic charge particle there is no such thing like magnetic current. There is only magnetic field and field potential.
                              The iron fillings experiment shows falsely I repeat the magnetic permeability (or else inductance) of the iron fillings as the magnetic field outline of a magnet.

                              This is wrong, the iron fillings suck out (steal) magnetic flux from the magnet's field essentially deforming it and align themselves across the two highest potential spatial regions of the magnetic source namely the two poles of a magnet. thus actually short circuiting the magnet!!

                              The Ferrocell or else ferrolens (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ferrolens) is the accurate one because it has single domain magnetic particles (superparamagnetism) meaning they can form dipoles between them following exactly the magnetic flux, tangent to the force lines (potential) of a dipole magnet field.

                              As far I am concerned the iron fillings experiment is a corpse...as proven R.I.P.

                              END OF STORY
                              MSc. Electronic and Computer Engineering, TUC, Greece
                              MSc. VLSI Systems Engineering, UMIST, U.K.
                              BSc. Electronic Systems Engineering, Victoria Univ. Manchester & UMIST

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Fessor View Post
                                Dear Ufo,

                                For long I wanted to comment and ask you about you excellent animation of the magnetic field particle dynamics according Wheeler, the first video you refer to, in your above post.

                                On your video you show the particles/field leaving the magnetic axis North/South (0 degree), spiraling out, for finally returning in the disk plane, at the Bloch Wall 90 degree.

                                This to me, is counter intuitive. I would expect the particle to leave the center in a 90 degree angle (like magnetic field along a conductor), and from there the particle loose its strength, and depending of the particle ‘polarity’ or simple random fall out, it would then be spiraling back into either North or the South pole. To me the falling back into and the center in a more and more narrow spiraling along the axis, seems much more according how I see the law of nature elsewhere, being sucked back into a black hole.

                                Sorry for my English, not native, but may I ask you to consider, whether the ‘particle’ should be sprout out in 0 degree along the axis, or 90 degree along the Bloch wall. In the latter, the spiraling way back home seems much more natural to me.

                                Best of regards, Fessor
                                Hello Fessor, and many thanks for finally deciding to enter in a discussion with me, a pleasure.

                                Sorry that I rectified some of your sentences above for better understanding to others reading here...

                                It is ok, I did understand you perfectly well.

                                Ok, A Magnetic Field, whether generated by permanent magnet or electromagnet, posses its HIGHER POTENTIAL, or HIGHER MAGNETIC FORCE, exactly ALIGNED TO it's AXIS, namely POLES ENDS, whether North or South, or as you wrote, zero degrees to axis.

                                Unfortunately this greater force is not present at Equatorial area, or as you describe , 90º to Axis.

                                It is very simple to realize this whenever we construct a "TYPICAL" Motor or Generator...where Permanent Magnets or Electromagnets are set based on their zero axis alignment where stronger forces are reached for better forces or induction gain.

                                Therefore, this aligns with Ken's Theory perfectly well, meaning, the outgoing forces aligned (parallel) to axis, or zero degrees, are CENTRIFUGAL, stronger forces emanating into SPACE gradually loose strength and are SUCKED BACK into their ORIGIN, COUNTERSPACE, AETHER...which is the DIELECTRIC FIELD ACCRETION DISC.


                                Kind Regards


                                Ufopolitics
                                Last edited by Ufopolitics; 04-01-2018, 06:51 PM.
                                Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X