ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Ufopolitics]

Keeping It Simple...Science.

Hello to All,

Great posts!!, Thanks to all contributing here!!

@Markoul: I believe you are establishing that Dark Matter is the Aether...am I correct?

According to K. Wheeler... Magnetism, Gravity as Electricity are All Aether Disturbances.

On my end, I like to keep Science as simple as possible, even having very positive and maybe unexplained results, according to conventional science...

In my point of view, complicating our language by using terms which are still in another scientific "limbo" does not help our research, as it would be worst for others outside our experimenting world to "digest" it.

So I do have to agree above with Mikrovolt post.

Getting back to magnetism, I have tried to respond to myself as to why the Mass Particles within the Magnetic Field carrier do not show an alignment which is the same as the Spatial Field (according to Wheeler) meaning, showing a center difference and aligning from center toward each pole?

Then after all my research with CRT Scan line Plane, concluding that North-South are spinning in the same exact direction, and so the whole magnet is just one single spin force, no matter if Spatial Field is being generated exactly from the Gravitational Center of Field Carrier, no matter geometrical shape...I clearly understood my original question above...

The Molecular structure of the Ferromagnetic Material is being Oriented based on what we could call a Single Directional Spin, no matter if it was originated in the center of the geometry towards the ends of the mass...still, it is one, and only one single direction.

I could have explained my question by using the Higher Pressure Levels of return which flow from pole to pole...but, (yes you are right Markoul) we have not being able to reveal them clearly with any one of the advanced techniques to image magnetism so far...


Regards to All


Ufopolitics

[Gambeir]

I can only say Ufopolitics that I agree with the author of the Article: "Flying Triangles and The Black Holes On My Fridge." Magnetism is an organized something, and that this something is evidently all around us in un~organized forms. We know that certain materials and certain patterns can focus this energy to create a detectable form which we call magnetism.
Flying Triangles And The Black Holes On My Fridge

When objects move sufficiently fast enough they can begin to emit light. Movement is energy and light is therefore a product of moving energy. As a crystalline form cannot itself be moving, then whatever creates magnetism must itself be moving, as any other conclusion is illogical.

A logical conclusion is that crystalline patterns (known as lattices) are capable of guiding hereto previously un~regarded energy to a point where it's condensed form is ejected outwards, and as the construction of the matrix which forms this lens is self enforcing, it then follows that the material which was injected from the focused point is self cycling caught up in the crystalline lattices motive powers.

As shape and form dictates energies action, then the shape or form of crystalline patterns dictate the outcome of energies, and factors like heat and cold influence those patterns physically and obviously whatever energies are conducted by them. Manifestly such changes are the result of physically altering the lattice structure by expansion and contraction, but other unknowns may exist which over time can break down the lattice bonds, or otherwise diminish the motive powers.

On the surface a magnet appears to be a magnifying lens of sorts, as this is the first thing to simply explain the whole, but undoubtedly the whole is more complex, and likely these patterns could be seen as acting like or forming accretion discs; for the whole of a magnet acts like a jet ejected from center core.

The entire and foremost quality of a crystal is that it replicates, and that what it replicates is itself, and that above all else, this replication represents a frozen moment since it does this in an endless cycle. It is therefore logical that the energies this form eject are then take back in and recycled on the whole.

A magnet is evidently functioning in a similar manner to an accretion disc, and so if that's the case, then whatever it is which produces magnetism is, for reasons completely unknown, first flowing inwards and then being ejected outwards from a center core: This is the behavior of an accretion disc.

So either the unknown material is moving or else this unknown material is guided by forms. To say it flows means it's capable of moving like water is capable of moving: It may be a raging torrent or a still pond but either way it's still water. Whether this unknown energy is actually flowing or just capable of flowing I cannot say: It may be either or both. In the case of a magnet this unknown energy must be moving in order to create the magnetic field, so either energies are already moving and simply being guided by shape form, or else the shape and form are acting so as to divert and accrete this energy. The nature of the crystal and it's lattice is suggestive of a mass~array, like a hundred million billion tiny magnifying lens all focused upon a central point.

Now if form alone can create a magnetic field than one might suspect that any type of form, that is a shape could produce an effect regardless of what the shape was constructed from. We of course know of pyramid power, and some may also know of the late great Joe Parr and his experimental work in this field of shape power energies.

However, I don't think anyone I know of has mapped out the lattice form of a magnet and replicated that in some other material, say perhaps cardboard, and that would be interesting to see the measured results. So if you then have a cardboard model of a magnets' crystalline lattice and that then produces a magnetic field, well that then would rather strongly suggest that there's unknown energies out there doing some strange things.

The debate here seems to be whether or not the magnetic field is flowing. A crystalline pattern cannot be acting as rock in stream. Those patterns cannot be creating eddies which then produce the manifestation of magnetism because that is a diminished form of energy, whereas a magnetic field is a condensed form of energy and we know this since adding magnets only strengthens the field. Whereas breaking a magnet in half leaves half the strength but now gives two magnets, or two accretion discs if you will.

Physics says that there is an inverse square to energy, wherein the breaking of a magnet would create greatly diminished magnetic fields if the fields were themselves only subject to inactive objects. Logic seems to say that the fields are created by activity. I suspect that the unknown energy does both. It can exist in both moving and un~moving forms as water or air can, but as to what it's doing in a magnetic field, then I think it's clearly moving and cycling for the most part.

The work of Joe Parr and our knowledge as the physical effects of pyramids show that this energy is all around us, and either it is moving and can be condensed by more movement, or it can be coaxed or enticed to follow certain shapes, possibly both. To focus in only on the action of electrons and orbitals ignores what we already do know about the effects of shape and form. There is clearly a cross correlation going on between geometry and relative action of power and there is clearly something we don't know practically anything about in the way that shapes can effect space.

[Markoul]

It's in your microwave oven

hehe! good one! I know what a ****ing magnetron is...thank you!

that was just for comparing it with the electron!...okay then call it magneto if you like... but please don't mix it this time with X-men

hahahahahaha!

[Markoul]

The real field of a magnet and concerning dark matter...

Ufopolitics,

Thank for your kind reply.

I am not complicated guy, all what I am saying essentially is at the exact spatial string where we have truly electric field E=0 magnetic radiation gets ejected out from dark matter into ordinary matter in two opposite 180 degrees distinct jets, thus a magnet and that is the reason why magnetism can exist in ordinary matter only as an dipole.

We all know that magnets are made by electrification by applying an electric voltage (potential) at its two ends with a coil wrapped around the magnet, thus every magnet has electrically charged matter and also unbalanced between its two ends (poles)(+/-).

Guess where the electric charge in a magnet gets balanced and E=0?...

Exactly an it middle (if it has a uniform charged rest mass) at the Bloch region!

Don't you see the connection?

Ken Wheeler was right about on one thing Electric vector is -180 degrees opposite to magnetic vector. The 90 degrees are applying only for travelling electromagnetism not for static.

He is however wrong about the image he sees in the ferrocell because the fact that ferrocell is completely transparent to magnetic flux coming from both poles of a magnet. there is no reciprocating fields.

The flux lines of the two poles are overlapping in 3D space and are projected essentially at the 2D ferrocell with a bit of depth of field information. So what you finally get on the ferrocell is a compressed 3D fully interlaced and overlapping image of the flux on both poles of the magnet.

To see the single true field on the pole of a magnet use not a cube or ring magnet but an enlogated bar magnet with its two poles quite apart and keep the approaching pole at a distance, couple of cm, away from the ferrocell:

wrong flux pattern of the pole of a magnet:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Mzi...ew?usp=sharing

correct flux pattern of the pole of a magnet:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VTS...ew?usp=sharing

The above last is the correct field flux on the pole of a magnet.

It's like a rolled-in slinky.

So yes Ufopolitics you were right in your initial ilustrations of the magnetic field the below illustration is the correct one:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yLp...ew?usp=sharing



Ken has to rethink this...

hahahahahahaha! Anyway he is a genius but even geniuses make mistakes.


EM

[Gambeir]

Ufopolitics,

We all know that magnets are made by electrification by applying an electric voltage (potential) at its two ends with a coil wrapped around the magnet, thus every magnet has electrically charged matter and also unbalanced between its two ends (poles)(+/-).

EM

Markoul, your statement grates because it's your assumption this is how things work. It follows convention, does it not, that you're making an assumption about the way things work. You then you go on to describe the results as a manifest cause and effect, when really all you're doing is explaining one way to create a magnet. It does not automatically follow that the results are the consequence of having applied polarity to each end with an electrical charge. That outcome seems to be a consequence of the now arranged molecules within specific matter and not for any other reason. It is natural to expect this outcome if the force used was an polarized electrical charge applied to the correct materials.

Are you following? I'm implying that the input helps to form the output, but the output is dependent upon the materials involved because their internal molecules are capable of being reorganized by this technique, and so it's possible to imagine other outcomes with other energies being the format for the crystalline lattice bonds which make up a magnet. It implies that something like say X~Ray's could be applied to another material with a similar result as the outcome.

To say a magnet has a storehouse of electrically charged matter suggests it is either a capacitor or a battery of sorts. Which may be telling, not sure, but interesting to think about as a kind of incomplete capacitor with the other half being in the so~called dark matter, or air around us as is more likely. Certain materials are conducive to having their molecular bonds assume a conductive plane with the application of an electrical charge. Otherwise we could take any old piece of material and should then expect that we could also magnetize that by the same methods which we know we cannot do.

We can, however, use alloys to produce organized crystalline lattice bonds in other materials and thus create magnets which were previously thought impossible. So really it's the structure within the magnet that is the key. It suggests that a load stone is a natural creation not formed through the use of electrical charge, but purely upon the arrangement of it's internal structure, and what that implies is this idea or notion of how magnets work is a partial understanding. For all we know there's something akin to X~ray magnets laying around or which might help to explain radioactive matter as another form not unlike magnetism.

[Markoul]

Gambeir,

It's the material magnets are made off that is more susceptible to the induced field but really it is the induced electric field which makes a magnet.

And of proof of this is the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Making an steel bar a magnet by magnetic induction (double touch method)

Place a steel bar on top of two strong bar magnets facing with opposite poles each other and an air cap in between less than lenght of the steel bar so that stee bar can sit on the two magnets.

Aproach two strong bar magnets from above with inclined angles and the same polarity as the bottom magnets.

On the steel bar slide several times on its one surface the two top magnets with opposite poles in this fashion of movement

<--N|S-->

starting from the middle (|) of the iron bar.


-----------------------------------------------------------------

That proves that magnetism originates from the Bloch domain region of a magnet, its middle (|).

Try to make the steel bar a magnet with the opposite movement as described above:

N-->|<--S

good luck!...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAL1huieyxk

EM

[bistander]

Proof?

Gambeir,

It's the material magnets are made off that is more susceptible to the induced field but really it is the induced electric field which makes a magnet.

And of proof of this is the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Making an steel bar a magnet by magnetic induction (double touch method)

Place a steel bar on top of two strong bar magnets facing with opposite poles each other and an air cap in between less than lenght of the steel bar so that stee bar can sit on the two magnets.

Aproach two strong bar magnets from above with inclined angles and the same polarity as the bottom magnets.

On the steel bar slide several times on its one surface the two top magnets with opposite poles in this fashion of movement

<--N|S-->

starting from the middle (|) of the iron bar.


-----------------------------------------------------------------

That proves that magnetism originates from the Bloch domain region of a magnet, its middle (|).

Try to make the steel bar a magnet with the opposite movement as described above:

N-->|<--S

good luck!...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAL1huieyxk

EM

Hi EM,

Doesn't this kinda disprove your proof?



From: Method of Magnetisation - Excel@Physics

Essentially same results.

Regards,

bi

[Markoul]

no it does not.

In your left picture the first halfway movement from the left is obsolete.


You can create the magnet just by moving the magnet above from the middle of the bar to an end.

However, if you move from an end of the steel bar to its middle no magnet is created. Try it out!

Best Regards,

EM

[bistander]

Nothing special about the middle

no it does not.

In your left picture the first halfway movement from the left is obsolete.


You can create the magnet just by moving the magnet above from the middle of the bar to an end.

However, if you move from an end of the steel bar to its middle no magnet is created. Try it out!

Best Regards,

EM

All of which demonstrates there is nothing different or particularly interesting in the middle of the magnetized bar. It is the same as the rest of it, composed of orientated microscopic domains.

[Gambeir]

Gambeir,

It's the material magnets are made off that is more susceptible to the induced field but really it is the induced electric field which makes a magnet.

And of proof of this is the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Making an steel bar a magnet by magnetic induction (double touch method)

Place a steel bar on top of two strong bar magnets facing with opposite poles each other and an air cap in between less than lenght of the steel bar so that stee bar can sit on the two magnets.

Aproach two strong bar magnets from above with inclined angles and the same polarity as the bottom magnets.

On the steel bar slide several times on its one surface the two top magnets with opposite poles in this fashion of movement

<--N|S-->

starting from the middle (|) of the iron bar.

Magnetism can only result if there is an organized geometric formation. An electric charge organizes the bonds in limited materials. There's no evidence ~whatsoever~ that it's also sustaining the magnetic field. To say that a supplied electric charge results in magnetism is to lay a claim on perpetual motion.

The evidence suggests a more sensible alternative explanation: That the electric charge provides a formatting service by the simple method of inducing a temporary magnetic field in conductive matter, and it's this passing charge which then induces a realignment of the lattice structure since these are themselves electrically conductive.

Thus the electric charge is a primer; acting as a software to format the conductive bonds to another pattern. Thus creating an enabling path for subsequent energies which themselves provide the magnetic field.

Cycling of the original charge is corollary to it's innate attraction to the magnetic, and as having formatted the lattice bonds to function as a form of superior conductor for it's own energies, it then follows automatically that any other like minded energies are going to be equally obsessed with flowing inwards through these same conductive passages.

[Ufopolitics]

Nice Analogy...

Magnetism can only result if there is an organized geometric formation. An electric charge organizes the bonds in limited materials. There's no evidence ~whatsoever~ that it's also sustaining the magnetic field. To say that a supplied electric charge results in magnetism is to lay a claim on perpetual motion.

The evidence suggests a more sensible alternative explanation: That the electric charge provides a formatting service by the simple method of inducing a temporary magnetic field in conductive matter, and it's this passing charge which then induces a realignment of the lattice structure since these are themselves electrically conductive.

Thus the electric charge is a primer; acting as a software to format the conductive bonds to another pattern. Thus creating an enabling path for subsequent energies which themselves provide the magnetic field.

Cycling of the original charge is corollary to it's innate attraction to the magnetic, and as having formatted the lattice bonds to function as a form of superior conductor for it's own energies, it then follows automatically that any other like minded energies are going to be equally obsessed with flowing inwards through these same conductive passages.

Great post Gambeir!

I agree 100% with that way of thinking...

The electric FLOW through the wrapped wire around a ferromagnetic core, "stamps" a pattern on the ferrites molecules, particles or nano components...

So, We could say this SPECIFIC SPATIAL Electric Flow (WRAPPED) AROUND the Core acts as the "Software"...which sends the commands to the Core and its Inner Particles, which constitutes "the hardware"...

And it is very simple, we could wrap wire back and forth from end to end, straight along core axis surface ...not wrapped around axis like a normal coil method...and then we get NADA, NO MAGNETISM FORMED.

And so, on this analogy we have the software, and then the hardware...but what is the SPATIAL FIELD generated as a result of these two components?

IMO, the Spatial Field is the final product, the result in our space of an "anomaly" generated by the geometry of the dynamics exchanged originally...

Now, if we go a bit deeper on this...we all know that depending on the relationship to where we set the positive and negative terminals of the coil wire...OR the direction of the turns...will DICTATE the EXACT COMMANDS in order to generate the NORTH-SOUTH positioning on the ferromagnetic core...

Now, related to the molecular alignment on the core, (after magnetization takes place, of course) it would ALWAYS follow a STRAIGHT LINEAR ALIGNMENT, PARALLEL to Core AXIS...no matter where the North or South end is at...

Concluding that no matter where we set + or - on terminals (1), or what direction we choose to wrap our wire (2), the core molecular alignment would always be linear along axis...only the so called "poles" will change their positioning whenever we change either one of these two configurations (1 or 2 above).

Further on, if we sprinkle iron particles around magnetized core, all this particles would align, exactly as the core particles are aligned, meaning linearly along core axis...and of course, they will show a semi-round area around ends where poles are...

BUT, AT ABSOLUTELY ANY POINT, WE COULD DISTINGUISH, BASED ON IRON FILINGS DISPLAY OF THE MAGNETIC FIELD, WHERE THE NORTH OR SOUTH POLES ARE LOCATED.

Like we all can tell, -for example- when we approach a North or a South to a CRT SCREEN SCANLINE, We observe different (Opposite) SPINS for North and South Polarizations.

Like I have shown on my THREAD plus on all related YT Videos.


All this "data" tells Us that the iron (ferromagnetic) molecular configuration (whether on inner core or the sprinkled filings) follows the "linear" representation of the electrical flow...while the Wraped Copper Wire Direction effects basically the spinning direction of the SPATIAL FIELD...which iron particles fails to reveal at each pole...

Only an electron spatially forced flow, at very high speeds, screened on fluorescent material like we have on a B&W CRT, then rastered into a scanline...will clearly reveal these polarization's spins.


Regards to All


Ufopolitics

[Gambeir]

*Note: I slightly/significantly ~ revised this post for clarity

My main purpose is to help uncover truth. Not to assist one side or another unless it helps to obtain the truth. My advice is to consider dark energy suspect and to instead focus on time. Time is rotationally connected to magnetism as magnetism is connected to spin through time frame dragging.

High spin states in radiation says that time is controllable through crystalline patterns found in specific forms and in specific materials. Radioactive matter acts like a magnet in the sense of very high spin states. Meaning that whatever produces that energy is also very likely to be doing so in the same manner as a magnet produces it's own: Logic would say both magnetism and radioactivity are acting in the time field via time frame dragging at a sub~microscopic level. Time exists and to explain the excited state of matter it must flow and there must be conductors for time; as it is with any other energy: Make sense?

We know that time is a part of the magnetic field because it's associated with magnetism and anomalous events. There appears to be a clear connection between magnetic anomaly and time warps, so magnetism is therefore also a quality of spin state in passing energies which are focused and accreted through the passages within the magnets crystalline patterns. A magnet condenses the magnetic field out of thin air. It is not pulling in another dimension in the traditional sense of a hidden unknown hypothetical, such as dark matter, but time is itself the divider; time creates partitions which can be understood as dimensions.

Previously I mentioned X~ray's and radiation as other possible forms of energies which, in the case of radiation, might be better understood by understanding radiation as a kind of super magnet taking in time. Radiation is time dependent. It's like a kind of accretion disc or mass arrayed lens focusing or condensing time. I would bet a dollar to a donut that there is a unique crystalline pattern which radioactive materials share. Thus the idea here is to understand the format produces an outcome, and in this sense of organized lattice bonds, then the outcome is radiation and not magnetism. Both however are energies being focused or accreted by conductive structure.

We are ourselves creatures of time, locked in time, and what's interesting to me is that the treatment for radiation involves crystals like iodine or salt. Which suggests that the introduction of these chemicals interacts to break the crystalline bonds in radioactive materials, thus reducing their intake of radioactive energies, which I can only think of as being time.

[Gambeir]

Nature has always been humanities first teacher: Nothing has changed in that department. We don't know half of what we think we know. It isn't that we are a stupid species as some have suggested, rather it is we have been interfered with and monkeyed with, had our creativity wiped. That's actually one of the functions of public schooling: to destroy the innate creativity in each one of us. Here we are thousands upon thousands of years after the pyramids and still we can't even explain a magnet with certainty: You think that's accidental?

The question is, are we are ready to begin solving this mystery, or will we continue to march down a pathway to extinction. Either we solve this or eventually Universe will give up on us, and it doesn't want to give up on humans, it's standing right in front us ready to help just as it always has. These energies, magnetism and radiation, they are manifestly interacting with nature to produce an outcome.

Stop trying to explain magnetism solely by convention because it's not working. This means that there is something unknown. It doesn't mean that electrical theory is wrong, it just means it's not capable of explaining the net outcome all by itself. It needs the addition of new information, most of which is hardly new information, it's just information which is compartmental and shuffled off in to astrophysics, geology, geometry, and few others. What it means is that a new understanding is required, one which does away with compartmental knowledge, because that's what's required in order to understand the basics of Universe. Once we adapt to this idea, then we are very likely to discover new ways forward, and very likely new energies as well.

[Markoul]

great replies guys...

but i am still waiting for an answer Why a magnet is not created when swiped from one end to the middle?

[bistander]

Answers flow both ways

great replies guys...

but i am still waiting for an answer Why a magnet is not created when swiped from one end to the middle?

Hello EM,

I could easily answer that but await your answer to my question which I posed first. Doesn't stroking the entire length of the metal bar with a single pole and causing equal magnetism to your method demonstrate there is nothing in the center of the magnetized bar different from the rest of its length, and why would a logical thinking person believe otherwise?

Thanks,

bi