ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[bistander]

How to test

Hi Ufo,

Do you have any other testing suggestion(s).......

You appear to be asking me for a test method to prove or disprove the existence of what you and Ken call the dielectric inertial plane which you say is located, among other places, in the middle of the magnet. I do not think I am qualified to do so. Among other reasons, I do not know what a dielectric inertial plane is, where it comes from, what it does, or how it interacts with the rest of the world. From listening to you and Ken, it pretty much mimics the magnetic field. Therefore finding it in the magnet without being influenced by the magnetic field might be impossible. Like I said, I do not see anything in your experiment which cannot be attributed to the magnetic induction.

I recall you telling someone that the permanent magnet is different than the electromagnet because there is no dielectric inertial plane in the electromagnet. If this is true, then it may be possible to devise an experiment using a tight magnetic circuit with exchangeable mmf source; a permanent magnet (PM) and an electromagnet (EM). Be able to use one or the other, PM or EM, with the rest of the magnetic path remaining the same. Verify the both PM and EM have the same area and flux density. Then excite or disturb the magnetic circuit in such a way as to influence your dielectric inertial plane and see if there is a difference between the two cases.

That is the best I can come up with at the moment.

Regards,

bi

[bistander]

Free Energy

I am sorry Bistander...but I don't believe you.

If You would be -FOR REAL- doing what you claim (underlined) above, You will be participating in all this projects, by seriously building, testing and showing, replicating and showing, objecting, but showing YOUR Counter-Proof, etc,etc...BUT Instead, you just enter to seat down in front of your PC to criticize, to deny, to set the doubt, to ask captious questions trying to set in the ridicule, or to prove "the guy don't know what he is talking about"...right?...and that extends to whoever is defending this fields of Free Energy...

While we, on this end are working very hard to present Visual evidence, construction, replications, images, some real testing where very easily could -AT LEAST- be granted The Benefit of the Doubt...but NOPE, you have never done that, in all your posts above, even that positive simple action of leaving it as just a "possibility" towards Renewable Energy Fields...

Ufopolitics

Hi Ufo,

This morning I attended a breakfast to recognize volunteers at a local county agency. I had participated with a team of 3 to implement an alternative energy system for one of their programs. In doing that, we were able to find a way to enable Free Energy. It was not some magnetic generator or complex contraption. It was system efficiency improvement which eliminated energy waste. Every kilowatt hour not wasted is a kilowatt hour which they do not need to buy but can use elsewhere. Isn't that a free kilowatt hour of energy?

So don't tell me that I never do anything in the fields of renewable energy or free energy. This was far from the first project of this kind for me. I suspect there is a good chance that I am responsible for more free energy than you will ever be.

Good luck and keep trying,

bi

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,



You appear to be asking me for a test method to prove or disprove the existence of what you and Ken call the dielectric inertial plane which you say is located, among other places, in the middle of the magnet. I do not think I am qualified to do so. Among other reasons, I do not know what a dielectric inertial plane is, where it comes from, what it does, or how it interacts with the rest of the world. From listening to you and Ken, it pretty much mimics the magnetic field. Therefore finding it in the magnet without being influenced by the magnetic field might be impossible. Like I said, I do not see anything in your experiment which cannot be attributed to the magnetic induction.

I recall you telling someone that the permanent magnet is different than the electromagnet because there is no dielectric inertial plane in the electromagnet. If this is true, then it may be possible to devise an experiment using a tight magnetic circuit with exchangeable mmf source; a permanent magnet (PM) and an electromagnet (EM). Be able to use one or the other, PM or EM, with the rest of the magnetic path remaining the same. Verify the both PM and EM have the same area and flux density. Then excite or disturb the magnetic circuit in such a way as to influence your dielectric inertial plane and see if there is a difference between the two cases.

That is the best I can come up with at the moment.

Regards,

bi

Thanks Bistander,

You misunderstood me, sorry it is my "Third World Country English"...

What I meant for your suggestion was only referring to the comparative testing of the Faraday Induction test versus Mine (since you objected about the speed differences while I was moving coil with my hands on video)...Now mine is what it is, the dielectric displacement is shown there as well as the charges out...so, means I will not change my end.

So, your requested "suggestions" were to adapt the suitable conditions in order that Faraday tests exhibits almost identical parameters as mine ...

Keep reading in that post lower sections and you will see.

I recall you telling someone that the permanent magnet is different than the electromagnet because there is no dielectric inertial plane in the electromagnet.

If I ever wrote that electromagnets do not have a dielectric field...I was either distracted or just made a mistake...the dielectric field/plane just can not be clearly observed under viewing film like with a magnet...I have not tried looking at it with others methods like Ferrocells or CRT Equipment.

An Electromagnet Dielectric is just a temporary ether aperture/gate that depends upon the signal type and length of feeding time...then is closed back into counterspace once coil is turned off...as magnetic field is also gone.

..And Ken Wheeler has a full explanation and more details about its differences on his free book..

From listening to you and Ken, it pretty much mimics the magnetic field. Therefore finding it in the magnet without being influenced by the magnetic field might be impossible.

A magnet's Dielectric Field exist in Counterspace, and when it enters into the Spatial Plane (Space)(due to electrification, magnetization or whatever methods) just becomes the polarized ends or the magnet's poles...

Actually what we are seeing through viewing film is just the mutation/conversion/transfer 3D plane "exchanges" from dielectric field in counterspace to spatially polarized fields (Centrifugal)...as well as returning spatial polarizations back to counterspace (Centripetal)..

So far I don't think there could be an actual equipment or method(s) to be able to see counterspace while we are all here in this Space-Dimension.

So, it could be understood that whenever we move the dielectric, we move both polarized fields (N-S) as well through any ferromagnetic mass (the magnet).


Ufopolitics

[Dog-One]

An Electromagnet Dielectric is just a temporary ether aperture/gate that depends upon the signal type and length of feeding time...then is closed back into counterspace once coil is turned off...as magnetic field is also gone.

..And Ken Wheeler has a full explanation and more details about its differences on his free book..

@UFO,

If you wouldn't mind, could you please post a bit more about this phenomena. I'd like to try a few experiments with it based on the Daly device since it's a perfect test fixture for this application.

Thanks much.

[Ufopolitics]

@UFO,

If you wouldn't mind, could you please post a bit more about this phenomena. I'd like to try a few experiments with it based on the Daly device since it's a perfect test fixture for this application.

Thanks much.[/LEFT]

Hello Dog-One,

There is actually not much to explain about my previous statement...it is just the same effect of electrifying a Coil (with a typical iron core) and observing a magnetization on the ends, except the way I see it all now through Ken's Theory about the dielectric counterspatial field generating the polarized magnetic fields.

The great deal by being able to see it all differently based on this Theory...is that many possibilities come to your mind, as you keep understanding it...and the number of satisfied/positive results from the many "what if's..." whenever you run any type of verification tests is very, but I mean very rewarding...so you keep adding more and more what if's...and is great friend...

I have a lot to share here, a lot of new and very different kind of testing to then build...build and keep building as you will see things never expected.

Unfortunately, I must keep the thread line in order of development, so whenever a newcomer starts reading see the development perfectly aligned.

What I wrote on that post...is just the tip of the iceberg...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ernst]

So you don't think Aaron and Eric have mental problems like
Keshe huh? Isn't that special.

Like I said about typo's (Cited) and some taking advantage? You don't
listen very well either. But you go ahead and send us your proofs
so we can see your side of this more.

You are such a smart man. You think.

Normally I won't point out typo's, but in this case.... It is just too funny!
Everyone has mental issues, bro', and so do I. Nobody is perfect. But in Keshe's case it is quite serious. Aaron and Eric, and even you are better of. I'm sure!

Now, come on, lil'bro'!
Get your act together and show us your videos!
Don't be shy!
You're so quick to ask this from others, now, how about you?
(please don't refer to videos done by others, such as Gerard Morin! Show us YOURS.)
I bet you still have to make your first.


Ernst.

[Ernst]

Give it a rest.

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFq1eT9tMJ4[/VIDEO]

Too much to ask from you, something that you yourself like to ask from others?

I knew it, lil'bro'.
That is why you are lil'. And if you don't get a grip on your emotions you will always be lil'.


Ernst.

[dR-Green]

This is how I know you have never once replicated Tesla in anyway
due to the fact of your closed mindedness of others viewpoints.

You just hung yourself Judas.

Like I said it is your words that will
show us who you are at heart.

I hate everything about the system.

I hate for good reason.

Ernst has done a good job of replicating Tesla and he has gone out of his way to help others at his own expense.

The whole gov school scenario is a plot to dumb down.

It seems to be working!

[SlickDick]

The whole gov school scenario is a plot to dumb down.

It seems to be working!

I think Mike do has a point there:
[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQn9koeshws[/VIDEO]

Ernst has done a good job of replicating Tesla and he has gone out of his way to help others at his own expense.

He has done excellent work. AND it is posted right here on the forum.

This statement

... - are you personally doing the experiments on the bench yourself and if so, post your pics, videos, results because so far, we haven't seen anything you've done.

And Mikey's rant, are both uncalled for. At least show some class, take responsibility for these statements and acknowledge the man's work.

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzT4pG0Bnyo[/VIDEO]
I mean, its beautiful

[aljhoa]

An Electromagnet Dielectric is just a temporary ether aperture/gate that depends upon the signal type and length of feeding time...then is closed back into counterspace once coil is turned off...as magnetic field is also gone.

@UFO,
If you wouldn't mind, could you please post a bit more about this phenomena. I'd like to try a few experiments with it based on the Daly device since it's a perfect test fixture for this application.

WHY?

MAGNETS: How Do They Work?

How Special Relativity Makes Magnets Work


Al

[Aaron]

ferrous vs non-ferrous

Hi Aaron,

This appears to contradict your earlier statement:


Ferrous or non-Ferrous? And could it be conducting metal which is slowed by induced eddy currents caused by motion in the magnetic field and those induced currents produce a magnetic field themselves which opposes the external field and motion in that field? In which case, it is due to the low resistivity and not the permeability of the material.

Regards,

bi

I apologize for that, when I said, "When ferrous objects fall," - I meant non-ferrous.

Silver will fall slower than iron for example.

[Ufopolitics]

WHY?

Why?...That was very simple:

Ferromagnetic particles get polarized due to the wire field, according to the way wire was ran through them, retain that orientation (magnetic reminiscence) until their mass-weight-gravitational force is greater than their particle momentary "bonding" alignment, and that could happen by taking them out of their equilibrium.

This could be done with small ferromagnetic objects...that will be aligned with a small voltage like 12 V...

No Magnetic Field here, therefore, no dielectric.

Just magnetic alignment orientation by "momentary inertia".

MAGNETS: How Do They Work?

How Special Relativity Makes Magnets Work


Al

Al, man, those videos, besides full of crap, are VERY Boring!

Poor children...they have been taught with all that crap so wrong, for so long!!

That is the reason why...we have all this "Conservative Party Members"...running around this Forum...criticizing everything that disagrees with that stupid DOGMA.

Did you really read Ken's book?...and did not understand it?

Or just disagree with his Theory?

Or did not read it at all?

My recommendation is...if you wanna understand what is gonna be exposed and discussed here...better read it and try to understand it...

@ALL:

First: All of You must come here (to this Thread I meant) with an OPEN MIND.
Second:To do the above, you MUST try to -at least- put on a "stand by" all you've learned before throughout your lifetime related to Magnetism.


Take care guys


Ufopolitics

[Dog-One]

WHY?

MAGNETS: How Do They Work?

How Special Relativity Makes Magnets Work

Al

Hmmm, not a single reference to dielectricity, Aether or dielectric inertial plane.

Instead we have quantum mechanics and special relativity, not to mention electrons. Sorry, this isn't very helpful unless I'm going to spend my time watching football.

Instead of dissing what UFO is trying to prove, lets focus and see if we can learn something we can use.

[dR-Green]

You've changed your tune since discovering that Ernst has actually built something.

But that does not give him the right to degrade
others saying they have mental problems, or did you dumb dogs miss
that?

I guess it's the same thing that gives you the right to call me a dumb dog.

The people here who express themselves on Eric's work or Ken have
a right to free thought and should not be poked at with your big
nerve.

Someone asked for an explanation of something and doesn't see the need for it, that's up to them. Why is it so unacceptable for someone else to have an opinion that's different to yours?

Calling folks mentally ill for
having deep understanding is filthy talk.

Based on the evidence, Keshe seems to be playing some sort of game. No one else was called mentally ill as you already know. Also I believe that it was on the grounds of claiming to be Jesus and not scientific knowledge.

So you don't think Aaron and Eric have mental problems like
Keshe huh? Isn't that special.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander so go away
and stop this little soap opera distracting from the excellent materials
on display

It seems to me that you're the one running this show. The only reason I entered the conversation is because of your nonsense directed towards Ernst. The same core group of people always tries to belittle the person who dares to ask a question.

Where are your Tesla
replications? Where?

This is how I know you have never once replicated Tesla in anyway
due to the fact of your closed mindedness of others viewpoints.

The day you show me a Tesla replication is the day I laugh myself
silly

It's there, so what now? What's the next move?

You are attacking every leader ever involved with learning new
ways to get outside the box and at the same time telling us that
you have it wrapped up, down pat, knowing Tesla like the back
of your hand.

You say Tesla got the extra but he is probably the only one and
everyone else besides you has misinterpreted what Tesla meant,
except you. Because you are the only one who see clearly.

Tesla is always misrepresented. And I think the thing being referred to here is some guy on youtube reading a description of an experiment given by Tesla while doing something completely different in his demonstration which is claimed to be a replication, apparently completely oblivious to the fact that he's not doing what he says he is. But not even that stops the audience who are equally oblivious from liking it and cheering along. As a matter of fact, the audience thinks it's magnificent. A magician would be proud of such a performance. No one noticed a thing, and they get mad when you tell them. The irony is that they refer to themselves as the truth-seekers.

[Ufopolitics]

About keeping TOPIC Please?

Hello to All Members posting on this Thread,


Please, let's keep comments focused on the Main Topic of this Thread.

Really appreciate that.


Regards


Ufopolitics