ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Ufopolitics]

Nice Video...

Hi Ernst.
IMHO your explanation fits to the first part of the video, which is somewhat confusing as UFO apparatus has pointers that basically point in an east-west direction. So if you look carefully, it is actually confirming the field lines as would be indicated by a compass. However on the second part, where he turned the magnets 90 degrees, it gives the same indications as the viewing film.
I do recall a measurement with a flux meter that gave the same indication, a null reading right in the middle of the magnet, but also in the centerline of the magnets.
You may want to watch this guy. In my view he is spot on.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sUP_iL6NIU
Best regards,
Ben

Hello Ben,

Nice video, same guy like previous , and I do agree with him, basically about the Non Real Model rendered by the iron filings "Lines of Force".

However, he ignores that what he calls lines of force when observed through Viewing Film...is the very center division from both poles but seen from above (top view)...if he would have observed sideways with film, would notice they are exactly at the center of the magnet. So, from a wrong concept he starts developing all kind of interactions...which are true to certain extent...but are not the main and stronger forces that rule magnetism...actually that center or top viewed "ring" is the weakest magnetic field part.

Still I see that many smart people are reacting to these ancient methods to observe magnetic fields as rejecting in the open about the WRONG AND NON EXISTING LINES OF FORCE supposedly revealed by iron filings.


Therefore, I give Video a plus, basically for that part.


Thanks and Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hello to All,

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCAWPIRc7q0[/VIDEO]

ANALYZING MAGNETIC SENSOR BEHAVIOR

Ok, above is an Unlisted Video just for this Thread only (I have no intentions to broadcast it on YouTube since must of my subscribers will have no idea what's going on here...

On this video I am showing the way this Magnetic Seeker Sensor reacts under some fields influence...


Hoping this will Enlighten some minds.


Ufopolitics

[Ernst]

Hi Ernst.
IMHO your explanation fits to the first part of the video, which is somewhat confusing as UFO apparatus has pointers that basically point in an east-west direction. So if you look carefully, it is actually confirming the field lines as would be indicated by a compass. However on the second part, where he turned the magnets 90 degrees, it gives the same indications as the viewing film.
I do recall a measurement with a flux meter that gave the same indication, a null reading right in the middle of the magnet, but also in the centerline of the magnets.
You may want to watch this guy. In my view he is spot on.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sUP_iL6NIU
Best regards,
Ben

OMG!!! Just as I was starting to feel a bit awkward being here, for all the so called evidence is so easily and naturally refuted, you come up with this idiotic video.... there is a disease spreading, and it is not that Dutch one! What forces am I up against?
But ok, let's run quickly (hopefully) through this mess that Distinti created...
first pause at 1:19

if you have a like charge it will fly away along the lines of force

Exactly, now why is that? Because the lines of force indicate in what direction the force of the field is acting (remember this). The electric field is a vector field which applies a force on electric charges, + go in one direction, - go in the opposite direction and both follow the lines of force. In a gravitational field the forces act on mass and since everything has a positive mass, the forces are always in the same direction.
pause at 1:33

why are the filings not moving along the lines to one side or the other?

Can you answer this now? What would happen if I would use plastic filings? Nothing, right?
So why do iron filings behave different? Because a magnetic field works only on magnetic particles (Duh!) But iron filings are not magnetic! For if they were, they would cling together, wouldn't they? However, they DO get magnetized when in a magnetic field! How does that happen? Well, that can only happen because of the magnetic forces in the field. These forces pull a north pole towards one end and a south pole towards the other end in every little piece of iron. So naturally the NS line in these particles must be aligned with the magnetic field. And next the N from every particle attracts the S poles from neighbouring particles, forming a chain along the lines of force!
Now to answer the above question: because both poles of each particle are equally attracted but in opposite direction!
Any child could answer this, or am I wrong?
at 1:47 he actually draws this conclusion, yet he completely fails to understand the underlying principle.
at 2:47 an important remark:

we can be easily fooled by what we see

So true!
at 4:30 the bar-ball experiment
Same error as explained before, he is using an iron ball that can continuously adopt its magnetic field to the outside field. It simply does not work that way!
We are going against the lines of force???? No we are following the lines while the iron ball adapts its magnetism. On the side of the magnet. Hooray! it did not follow the flux lines!
The ball becomes a magnet in the opposite direction, the horizontal forces cancel out, the upward force remains!
How hard can it be to understand something so simple!
at 5:05 another important conclusion:

come on this is ridiculous

Now that is spot on!
at 5:55:

humans have it backwards...

Let him speak for himself, PLEASE!
at 6:08

Don't fall for the voodoo explanations

Then why do this video, if you don't want anyone to believe in it?
at 6:37

that is a disconnection between action and reaction

Not true, add up ALL the forces and you will see there is no disconnection at all.
at 6:42:

Action and reaction will have to be in the same place

Who told you that? That can not possibly be true because that would make all (change of) motions impossible. If I were to push a door (action) then the door would also feel a reaction force cancelling out my push, and the door will remain motionless no matter how hard I push.
at 8:02 the disk-ball experiment
The ball goes right to the edge! Of course, remember what I said about iron? It turns into a magnet along the lines of force. So put the ball in the middle of a north pole, the lower half will become S and the top will become N. This top N is attracted by the other side of the disk magnet! And therefore the ball will move to the edge where the magnet N and S are closest together and also, for that same reason the field is strongest!
Now can you look me in the eyes and tell me this is difficult to grasp?
I am at 1/3 of the video now and my hopes for humanity are fading.
Do I have to continue?


Ernst.

[Ernst]

magnetic viewing film

from wiki:

It is a translucent thin flexible sheet, coated with micro-capsules containing nickel flakes suspended in oil.[1] When magnetic lines of force are parallel to the surface of the carrier sheet, the surfaces of the flakes are reflective, and appear bright. When lines of force are perpendicular to the sheet, the flakes are edge-on, and appear significantly darker. When the film is placed on a magnet's pole, the latter case applies.

That should help to understand what you see using that film.

from YT:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slVL5nbTXd4


Ernst.

[ldrancer]

you guys dont explain why a magnet works. you describe a transmission. not an engine. it has no power on its own. so how does it do what it does, why does it attract things at a distance, i mean, how? you explain a transmission and put some crap in the middle and then come up with a bunch of fake words for the entire thing then call it all a motor.

i was saying this and when you couldnt even start to begin to get one word in edgewise against me when you tried to pick apart my whole response you guys have ignored me. i take this as Im right and I really get tired of reading this thread with no movement forward, and it seems one guy, is trying ot reason with you guys.

it seems stupid, becuase you guys pretty much believe the earht is flat becuase you explain the working of a transmission but CLAIM its A MOTOR. ITS NOT. it needs other things to push it and to pull it. You dont understand how a magnet works. END OF THE STUPID TOPIC. ken wheeler is a black hole pusher just trying to put it in other words by destroying every word every description of it. you dont think theres a big market for this? proving black holes and every LIE about everyting? yea there is, cern, the big bang scientists grants. THere no proving or moving forward NOTHING> ken wheeler has never shown anything I said to be wrong. He only will attack me and call me names on little thoughts not big ones.

SO im tired of reading you and your continuing on without refuting me and only ignoring me cause you couldnt get a word in edgewise.

BUt who cares go get your greenpeace and yoru big bang grants you shills. you are worth 0 to the improvment of mankind. even talking to these idiots is a waste of time. Ou explain once, but if they dont take what you say and apply it to their own continue tests then hell with it. theyre paid shills..

so whatever ok all of you. tired of reading your crap, you prove nothing you are showing a trasnmission and you dont know how a magnet works. you show no input or output. ITS A TRANSMISSION not a motor. you believe the world is flat. you promote big bang and black holes. end of discussion

[Ufopolitics]

from wiki:

t is a translucent thin flexible sheet, coated with micro-capsules containing nickel flakes suspended in oil.[1] When magnetic lines of force are parallel to the surface of the carrier sheet, the surfaces of the flakes are reflective, and appear bright. When lines of force are perpendicular to the sheet, the flakes are edge-on, and appear significantly darker. When the film is placed on a magnet's pole, the latter case applies.

That should help to understand what you see using that film.

from YT:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slVL5nbTXd4


Ernst.

WOW!...and that is IT!...Ernst went to Wikipedia and VUALÁ, problem solved Uh?...So we all are so stupid, and He is So Bright!...I mean, what a gift!...what a power of Scientific Research!

A minute before...in a previous post He did not know absolutely nothing about Viewing Film...BUT NOW, Oh Man!...He is an EXPERT on this Viewing Film specifications!



So Viewing Film "Captures" the NON EXISTING LINES OF FORCE in a way that if they are Perpendicular Film will turn Darker...and of course, the opposite, when Parallel to film that area should be lighter...Oh My GOD!...That makes so much sense...!!!

And the video...OMG!...Wonderful, anyone could see this guy is a real Scientist... from a Hardware Store

Did he explained why the film-all the sudden- reflects JUST one bright center line exactly at the very center of the stack of cylinders?...Yes sure, it was just a reflection.

Listen Genius...what about when we have two ATTRACTING magnetic fields facing each others in a perfect alignment...Then you put the film parallel to the supposed lines of force...like in the stator housing I previously showed :

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

SO NOW TELL US ALL HERE GENIUS...WHY IF THE LINES OF FORCE ARE PARALLEL TO VIEWING FILM...THERE IS THIS LIGHTER STRIPE RIGHT AT EXACT CENTER SPACE BETWEEN BOTH ARC SEGMENTS?

Aren't all the flakes on top of that center space supposed to be positioned in a uniform alignment? So according to that Theory they supposedly be all shaded evenly...whatever darker or lighter.

Maybe a defect from factory?...The Flakes got stuck in the oil...for that precise region?



Actually Viewing Film is CONTRADICTING THE VERY EVEN LINES OF FORCE that supposedly travel from pole to pole...?

[IMG][/IMG]

So according to the Theory of the flakes in Oil, lighter/darker...then the above picture tells us that Lines of Force" are EMANATING from the very CENTER of the cube magnet above going two directions upper/lower.?

While the lighter stripe at center is where they are parallel to film?

DON'T MAKE SENSE UH?

Listen Ernst, while you were constructing Tesla Coils...I have been working on MAGNETISM and ELECTRODYNAMICS and then some BIG time prior to it.

I have not idea what went wrong with your sudden frustrations and those experiments, but it is not my problem at all.

[Ufopolitics]

Originally Posted by Ufopolitics
Ernst, let me ask you...Have you ever been able to get out from Wardenclyffe Projects to do any other kind of experiments, basically referring to the field of Electric Generators or any kind of Electrodynamic Machines at all?

Hi UFO,

Hardly. I did build an electromotor once. DC-type.
I did some other experiments when I was younger, but I do not really recall much about those.


Ernst.

Well Ernst, unfortunately for you, this Thread is mainly about proving a Theory, NOT disproving it.

And the way I am going to prove it in the end is with Electrodynamic Machines where this Theory specifically applies, basically on Electric Generators.

So, since You do not have the experience in those fields, or building capabilities, sincerely, you will not be of any help here at all.

Your participation here so far has been only to object, to contradict or keeping your stubbornness that is really becoming annoying.

So, I really appreciate if you either try to OPEN YOUR MIND AND COOPERATE POSITIVELY or then Good Bye Guy.


Sincerely


Ufopolitics

[BroMikey]

Your participation here so far has been only to object, to contradict or keeping your stubbornness that is really becoming annoying.

So, I really appreciate if you either try to OPEN YOUR MIND AND COOPERATE POSITIVELY or then Good Bye Guy.


Sincerely


Ufopolitics

Hey UFO this is the way you talk to a resident genius.

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuUTABLz1Vk[/VIDEO]

[BroMikey]

Hello to All,

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCAWPIRc7q0[/VIDEO]

ANALYZING MAGNETIC SENSOR BEHAVIOR

Ok, above is an Unlisted Video just for this Thread only (I have no intentions to broadcast it on YouTube since must of my subscribers will have no idea what's going on here...

On this video I am showing the way this Magnetic Seeker Sensor reacts under some fields influence...


Hoping this will Enlighten some minds.


Ufopolitics

Keep it up UFO people will catch on in time. Your video is so clear
and so we can not use the old models to build things, we must go
with what we are observing in the video. It's the only way to go
and the math will come after a new model has been confirmed.

[Ernst]

WOW!...and that is IT!...Ernst went to Wikipedia and VUALÁ, problem solved Uh?...So we all are so stupid, and He is So Bright!...I mean, what a gift!...what a power of Scientific Research!

A minute before...in a previous post He did not know absolutely nothing about Viewing Film...BUT NOW, Oh Man!...He is an EXPERT on this Viewing Film specifications!



So Viewing Film "Captures" the NON EXISTING LINES OF FORCE in a way that if they are Perpendicular Film will turn Darker...and of course, the opposite, when Parallel to film that area should be lighter...Oh My GOD!...That makes so much sense...!!!

And the video...OMG!...Wonderful, anyone could see this guy is a real Scientist... from a Hardware Store

Did he explained why the film-all the sudden- reflects JUST one bright center line exactly at the very center of the stack of cylinders?...Yes sure, it was just a reflection.

Listen Genius...what about when we have two ATTRACTING magnetic fields facing each others in a perfect alignment...Then you put the film parallel to the supposed lines of force...like in the stator housing I previously showed :


SO NOW TELL US ALL HERE GENIUS...WHY IF THE LINES OF FORCE ARE PARALLEL TO VIEWING FILM...THERE IS THIS LIGHTER STRIPE RIGHT AT EXACT CENTER SPACE BETWEEN BOTH ARC SEGMENTS?

Aren't all the flakes on top of that center space supposed to be positioned in a uniform alignment? So according to that Theory they supposedly be all shaded evenly...whatever darker or lighter.

Maybe a defect from factory?...The Flakes got stuck in the oil...for that precise region?



Actually Viewing Film is CONTRADICTING THE VERY EVEN LINES OF FORCE that supposedly travel from pole to pole...?



So according to the Theory of the flakes in Oil, lighter/darker...then the above picture tells us that Lines of Force" are EMANATING from the very CENTER of the cube magnet above going two directions upper/lower.?

While the lighter stripe at center is where they are parallel to film?

DON'T MAKE SENSE UH?

Listen Ernst, while you were constructing Tesla Coils...I have been working on MAGNETISM and ELECTRODYNAMICS and then some BIG time prior to it.

I have not idea what went wrong with your sudden frustrations and those experiments, but it is not my problem at all.

Just for future reference, so that you have at least learned 1 thing in this thread:
"Voilà" is French and it comes from "see there", there is also a "voici" for "see here".

I do sense a strange kind of hospitality in your words.
I wrote I do not know how this viewing film works in response to someone else who didn't know. Of course everyone can look it up, but it makes more sense to include an explanation in this thread, for it is essential to understand what it shows before drawing conclusions. If that makes me an expert now, that would be very sad for all of you!
And it sure looks like (from your questions) you do not yet fully grasp how it works... After your years of experience... that would certainly be a sad thing.
But you are right, you should not add my frustrations to your problems.

Well Ernst, unfortunately for you, this Thread is mainly about proving a Theory, NOT disproving it.

OK, point taken. Everything must be explained in accordance with Ken's theory and different opinions/views do not belong here.

And the way I am going to prove it in the end is with Electrodynamic Machines where this Theory specifically applies, basically on Electric Generators.

Well, in the light of the above, there could be people who would not accept this as a valid proof. But this is your thread, you are the king.

So, since You do not have the experience in those fields, or building capabilities, sincerely, you will not be of any help here at all.

I found, I do have something that you are lacking and that would (under normal circumstances) be helpful in a proof. But indeed, not in the way you try to prove things.

Your participation here so far has been only to object, to contradict or keeping your stubbornness that is really becoming annoying.

No, I see that different. I think the classical theories can explain your experiments perfectly well and that is what I am showing you.
Also I have tried to get some clear definitions of the terminology that you are using. So far the score here is 1 term "counterspatial" and its opposite "spatial". I have shown how the terms "polarized" and "ether" can (in my understanding) not be used together. And that "counterspace" remains undefined.
Then there is something called the "occam's razor", saying that if two theories can both explain a phenomenon, the simpler one is to be preferred. Seeing the complexity of Ken's theory it should come with overwhelming supporting evidence!
Further I have tried to show you the meaning of field lines, a concept that escapes you, but I failed to get that across.
But I can understand how all this annoys you.

So, I really appreciate if you either try to OPEN YOUR MIND AND COOPERATE POSITIVELY or then Good Bye Guy.

In my opinion my mind is open and I am cooperating positively, but not if you wish to provide a half-baked and invalid proof. Full proof should be able to override all my objections and answer my questions.
Well, we are going to leave it here then, I am not here to upset or annoy you!

Ernst.

[Ben2503]

Hello Ben,

Nice video, same guy like previous , and I do agree with him, basically about the Non Real Model rendered by the iron filings "Lines of Force".

However, he ignores that what he calls lines of force when observed through Viewing Film...is the very center division from both poles but seen from above (top view)...if he would have observed sideways with film, would notice they are exactly at the center of the magnet. So, from a wrong concept he starts developing all kind of interactions...which are true to certain extent...but are not the main and stronger forces that rule magnetism...actually that center or top viewed "ring" is the weakest magnetic field part.

Still I see that many smart people are reacting to these ancient methods to observe magnetic fields as rejecting in the open about the WRONG AND NON EXISTING LINES OF FORCE supposedly revealed by iron filings.


Therefore, I give Video a plus, basically for that part.


Thanks and Regards


Ufopolitics

Hi Ufo.
Did you also see part 2.
If not please do.
Best regards,
Ben

[Ben2503]

Double Dutch

The ball goes right to the edge! Of course, remember what I said about iron? It turns into a magnet along the lines of force. So put the ball in the middle of a north pole, the lower half will become S and the top will become N. This top N is attracted by the other side of the disk magnet! And therefore the ball will move to the edge where the magnet N and S are closest together and also, for that same reason the field is strongest!
Now can you look me in the eyes and tell me this is difficult to grasp?
I am at 1/3 of the video now and my hopes for humanity are fading.
Do I have to continue?


Ernst.

I do agree with you that charge will indeed follow the 'classical' force lines. This is what is used in old TV sets. The electrons from the 'canon(s)' are deflected by magnetic fields. If you place a magnet properly on an old b&w tv, you will see just that.

How do you explain that if you put a small disc magnetic on one of the poles of a larger cylindric magnet, the small magnet doesn't flip, nor moves to the edge of the pole. Instead it moves to the centre of it. Which indicates to me that there are repelling forces rather than attracting.

Are you saying that the magnetic fields are stronger at the edges of a magnet? If thats true, why isn't the ball then following the field line, overshoot the middle of the magnet (where the gblochwall is supposed to be, and in your theory the field is the strongest), move back again towards the middle and the after some cycles settle in the middle?
This is what actually happens with a magnetic ball when you place off centre on one of the poles. It will move towards the middle, overshoots it etc...

You may or may not agree with Distinti, but his explanations make more sense to me that yours. Actually his gives a rather acceptable basic explanation of what causes magnetism and how the attraction works, whereas you only make statements. IMHO similar to dear Ken's way of explaining things.

Ben

[bistander]

Disc magnet

How do you explain that if you put a small disc magnetic on one of the poles of a larger cylindric magnet, the small magnet doesn't flip, nor moves to the edge of the pole. Instead it moves to the centre of it. Which indicates to me that there are repelling forces rather than attracting.

Are you saying that the magnetic fields are stronger at the edges of a magnet?

Hi Ben,

Perhaps this can help visualize that the field is strongest at the edge. Here is a FEMM of a half inch diameter disc magnetized along its axis (poles top and bottom on the diagram).



That was found here: https://www.kjmagnetics.com/blog.asp...nets-are-weird

Towards the bottom of that page there is an explanation and diagram of a small disc on a large one.

The white circle seen on the viewing film around the edge of the disc magnet is due to the flux bending tightly around the edge heading to the opposite pole and not traveling perpendicular upwards to the film.

from wiki:

It is a translucent thin flexible sheet, coated with micro-capsules containing nickel flakes suspended in oil.[1] When magnetic lines of force are parallel to the surface of the carrier sheet, the surfaces of the flakes are reflective, and appear bright. When lines of force are perpendicular to the sheet, the flakes are edge-on, and appear significantly darker. When the film is placed on a magnet's pole, the latter case applies.

That should help to understand what you see using that film.

Hi Ernst,

I agree with that and tried to inform Ufo about similar behavior with ferrocells here:

I think the line on the images results from the directional flow of magnetic flux which is all parallel to the magnet's axis at that location meaning no flux in the perpendicular direction to intersect with the viewing film and react with the medium and light. * A quote from Timm@Ferrocell USA at the Ferrocell reply #4 appears to support my thoughts.

A Ferrocell will pass light where the flux "isn't" (the lowest potential), and appears in a different vector in relation to the location of incoming light.

He wasn't interested in that even though it appears to be supported by Timm who invented and makes the ferrocells.

Regards,

bi

[BroMikey]

Evasive Mind Control

Don't look at this hand, look at that hand, watch me pull a rabbit
out of my hat. See I told you everything is happen stance.




What is known as Occam's razor was a common principle in medieval philosophy and was not originated by William, but because of his frequent usage of the principle, his name has become indelibly attached to it. It is unlikely that William would appreciate what some of us have done in his name. For example, atheists often apply Occam's razor in arguing against the existence of a god on the grounds that any god is an unnecessary hypothesis. We can explain everything without assuming the extra metaphysical baggage of a divine being.

[Ufopolitics]

About Magnetic Viewing Film...revealing the True Fields Interactions

Source:VIEWING FILM FOR DC MAGNETIC FIELDS
A DISCUSSION
By: Vincent A. Ardizzone, EE
Executive President Product Development
Magne-Rite, Inc.

A unique process of micro-encapsulation was developed which allows a very thin 2-mil layer of magnetically sensitive slurry to be bonded to a 5-mil sheet of plastic film. In the encapsulation process, colloidal nickel particles suspended in the slurry become engulfed within gelatinous membranes. The slurry is then coated onto the plastic film and allowed to dry. After complete drying, the particles maintain freedom of movement within the gelatinous membranes.

When a dc magnetic field is applied to the bonded film, the nickel particles congregate in alignment with the flux lines emanating from the dc magnetic source. This mass grouping together of nickel particles causes a darkened appearance to the film directly where the magnetic field is impinging on the film. As a result, an exact two-dimensional image or impression of the magnetic pole or pole pattern (if there are more than one) is produced. This image is easily erased once the film is removed from the magnetic source and the nickel particles are allowed to freely re-disperse within their gelatinous cells. A common bar magnet can be swiped across the film to ensure complete erasure of the previous image, or by reapplying the film to another magnetic source the new image produced will completely replace the old one.

It should also be pointed out that, due to the small size of the colloidal nickel particles, the film can detect fields as low as only a few gauss and still produce and clear image.

A particularly useful application of this viewing film is in the identification of changes in magnetic polarity. As an example, if two magnets identical in size and shape were placed adjacent to each other, as shown in figure 1, and one wished to quickly determine if they were identical or opposite in polarity, for instance, placing the film on the magnet's surface would immediately reveal the answer. If the magnets were opposite in polarity, for instance, the film would show the typically darkened areas where each magnetic pole is located but would also clearly reveal a much lighter line where the magnetic fields change polarity. See figure 2. The lighter line is produced because no flux lines are present at the border where magnetic fields change over in polarity and hence the nickel particles in the film do not congregate along that line. If the magnets were of the same polarity the film would show a solid darkened region over the entire area of both magnetic poles with no line of separation.

I don't just go to Wikipedia to Copy/Paste There/Here an "abstract" with many errors and wrong names trying to short cut the real definitions, then creating confusion galore by not explaining the deeper and truthful reactions from a much more trusted source:...The designers and makers of the product.

(In above text I have bold and underlined the essential parts that concern ME to Explain to You ALL here.)

FIRST OFF, there are not one single description above, telling Us the Magnetic Viewing Film Nickel Volume shape is based on "Flakes"...but PARTICLES

SECOND, this particles are submersed in a COLLOIDAL GEL forming a Slurry compound (Slurry definition:a semi-liquid mixture, typically of fine particles suspended in a viscous liquid).
RESUMING, PARTICLES WERE NOT FLAKES ROTATING "FREELY" INSIDE OIL...NOT AT ALL!

Why go so much in detail?

Just because the movement of this particles is very limited once they are encapsulated within the gelatinous membranes.

NOW GOING TO THE ATTRACT INTERACTION BETWEEN A NORTH-SOUTH IMAGING BY VIEWING FILM, AS DESCRIBED ABOVE:

if two magnets identical in size and shape were placed adjacent to each other,If the magnets were opposite in polarity, for instance, the film would show the typically darkened areas where each magnetic pole is located but would also clearly reveal a much lighter line where the magnetic fields change polarity...The lighter line is produced because no flux lines are present .

Above is a briefing from previous main quoted text, same words, same paragraphs, just arranged to compact them for analysis below:

OK, now if we have two magnets (N-S) in attraction, adjacent (next) to each others, and we throw iron filings, then the "Imaginary Lines of Force" would reveal...right?...Right,

However, Magnetic Viewing Film will NOT DEFINE ANY LINES OF FORCE AT ALL, between two attracting magnets., JUST A GAP, THAT CONTAINS NO FLUX, (SO, COMMUNICATION BREAKDOWN, My Friends...

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoqQnR8NOVI[/VIDEO]

[IMG][/IMG]

Magnetic Film WILL DEFINE just Two Magnets opposite poles, which are approaching each others, HOWEVER, still keeping their respective polarities VERY WELL DEFINED BY BEING SEPARATED BY A LIGHTER LINE, Where BOTH FIELDS CHANGE POLARITIES, BUT MAINLY, THAT LIGHTER LINE MEANS THERE IS NO FLUX IN THAT REGION!!!.

CONCLUDING That IF both Fields poles in attraction maintain their polarities separated BY A "NO FLUX GAP" until reaching contact, then there could absolutely NOT EXIST ANY FIELD PRESENCE AT ALL.

[IMG][/IMG]

IN ORDER FOR A FIELD TO EXIST, THERE MUST BE A CORRELATION, AN EXCHANGE OF FORCES BETWEEN BOTH OPPOSITE POLARIZATIONS, WHICH "SUPPOSEDLY" CREATES THE SO CALLED "LINES OF FORCE" or LINES OF CONSTANT EXCHANGING FLOW/FLUX...AND EXACTLY NONE, ZERO, ARE REVEALED BY THE MAGNETIC VIEWING FILM.

LET'S REMEMBER THAT THE MAIN, OLD FARADAY THEORY STATES THAT:

...By the Lines of Force (understood ONLY in ATTRACTION MODE) "cutting" the conductor(s) in a Perpendicular Fashion, this action will Induce a spinning charge within conductor's mass.

The ONLY REALITY is that there are absolutely NO STRAIGHT LINES OF FORCE , My Friends, in ANY Magnet, In ANY Coil, BUT SPINNING VORTEXES OF FORCE for each polarization...AND THREE DIMENSIONAL, NOT TWO DIMENSIONAL FLAT PLANE AT ALL!

And so far NONE of You have the slightest Idea what this could mean...and how we could have been able to manipulate this Fields...!



Regards to All




Ufopolitcs