ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Ufopolitics]

Ferrocell

After watching some of Ken’s videos showing the Ferrocell demonstrations, which I do find quite interesting…

A straight forward question: Has anyone purchased one of these Ferrocells?
Available from: Home

They are the invention of Timm Vanderelli, (they’re not Ken’s invention).

Hello Sputins,

The Ferrocell is THE BEST Higher Definition 3D Method to observe the real magnetic fields that I have ever tested.

I have tested magnetic interactions which are not experimented in Ken's Book...and the results are excellent.

In the first pages of the book Ken mentions the Ferrocell as the invention of Timm Vanderelli and Ferrocell USA.

They seem to be a useful tool for the experimenter. There are lots of videos viewing various magnets or lasers etc. But I can’t find any as yet showing the view from small electromagnetic coils.

Let alone what a resonant coil may look like through one of these Ferrocells.

For around $100 they seem like a good educational toy or piece of test equipment.

Any opinions?

They are very useful, but they are very fragile as well, the cell could be burnt if let for too long time exposed to a strong field and would take weeks to clear up in the best of cases...

I have a few of them, and thanks for posting the link to the new set that Timm is offering with the led ring assembly...that saves a lot of time to build one with the right spec's.

The perfect illumination is required to achieve best and stronger development of field in order to be captured properly by cam, normally the magnet must not make any reflections or refractions due to chromed surface that could lead to artifacts and wrong interpretations...so it is better to paint it flat black or just use some heat shrink tube...

It would be a great idea to use it to observe electromagnets as well

Regards


Ufopolitics

[Sputins]

Hello Sputins,

The Ferrocell is THE BEST Higher Definition 3D Method to observe the real magnetic fields that I have ever tested.

I have tested magnetic interactions which are not experimented in Ken's Book...and the results are excellent.

In the first pages of the book Ken mentions the Ferrocell as the invention of Timm Vanderelli and Ferrocell USA.



They are very useful, but they are very fragile as well, the cell could be burnt if let for too long time exposed to a strong field and would take weeks to clear up in the best of cases...

I have a few of them, and thanks for posting the link to the new set that Timm is offering with the led ring assembly...that saves a lot of time to build one with the right spec's.

The perfect illumination is required to achieve best and stronger development of field in order to be captured properly by cam, normally the magnet must not make any reflections or refractions due to chromed surface that could lead to artifacts and wrong interpretations...so it is better to paint it flat black or just use some heat shrink tube...

It would be a great idea to use it to observe electromagnets as well

Regards


Ufopolitics

Thanks for the feedback Ufopolitics

The Ferrocells do seem to be a unique viewing device for magnetic fields. I was after some feedback from people that may have had direct use and experience with them.

They do seem like they show up the field of strong magnets rather well, however noted the caution of them being fragile and not allowing strong fields near them for too long...

Do they work okay with the weaker magnets?

Would for example an alternating current (say 50Hz) through a small electromagnet show up a steady view of the resulting magnetic field? Regardless of the frequency? Or would there be a limit to the frequency response? (I would say at a guess, it would show the resulting average magnetic field at whatever response the ferro-fluid could react to..

Nevertheless, the 62mm demo Ferrocell with the RGB LED’s power supply and magnet for $99 seems like a reasonable deal for a 3D magnetic field viewing device that every experimenter should probably have. (Regardless of what people may think of Ken’s theories)

Now they’ll just have to invent a cell that shows what the Dielectric Field looks like in 3D.

[Ufopolitics]

Thanks for the feedback Ufopolitics

The Ferrocells do seem to be a unique viewing device for magnetic fields. I was after some feedback from people that may have had direct use and experience with them.

Hello Sputins,

Good luck...Honestly I do not think you would get absolutely any huge feed back on this Forum, related to experience with Ferrocells...except from just a few, maybe three or four members including Ken Wheeler and me...plus, of course Timm Vanderelli who is also a member on this Forum.

They do seem like they show up the field of strong magnets rather well, however noted the caution of them being fragile and not allowing strong fields near them for too long...

Do they work okay with the weaker magnets?

It depends basically on the sensitivity of the cell...If you would be dealing ONLY with weak magnets, then make sure you specify Timm to build it for this type of magnets...HOWEVER, You must realize that a higher sensitivity Cell would definitively get burnt VERY EASY under an N-52 huge Neo long exposure...or at least it would loose sensitivity once you start playing with stronger magnets.

So, you would need a specific one for lower intensity fields and another one for Higher ones.

Would for example an alternating current (say 50Hz) through a small electromagnet show up a steady view of the resulting magnetic field? Regardless of the frequency? Or would there be a limit to the frequency response? (I would say at a guess, it would show the resulting average magnetic field at whatever response the ferro-fluid could react to..

Like I wrote before, Ferrocells take some time to fully develop the whole visible field, they do not react fast or immediately to field influence...then obviously they would not be good for a constant and fast changing magnetic field, like from an AC or pulsed Source.

Nevertheless, the 62mm demo Ferrocell with the RGB LED’s power supply and magnet for $99 seems like a reasonable deal for a 3D magnetic field viewing device that every experimenter should probably have. (Regardless of what people may think of Ken’s theories)

I agree, also believe so...

Now they’ll just have to invent a cell that shows what the Dielectric Field looks like in 3D.

Dielectric Field is not a Spatial Field...so the only way to show this kind is by observing how a spatial entity will be sucked inwards this "crack" of counterspace.

Someone posted here a video from Ken where he shows how a green laser beam disappear when reaching/passing by this middle part of a magnet, and filmed through a Ferrocell lens...I don't have time to look it up now, but link is a couple of pages back.

Like I posted before, and like Ken has written originally on his book...Magnetic Viewing film shows clearly the dielectric plane right at center of any magnet, weak or strong...no matter.

Some people would not believe this is the dielectric field...but like Galileo once said..."it still moves"...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[ldrancer]

it dont matter anyway. you havent explained a magnet, which noone understands or the galaxies which you show to prove that You know what you're talking about. Either way your wrong.

And I'd like to think since your wrong and can't even prove your theory theoretically, like imagined or in real life, like a working model without throwing out other thigns that noone understands to pretend you know what your saying, which is the opposite of the truth you dont know what your saying your full of crap you dont know what your doing you are LYING.

Id like, to think kens idea is just a model, since he cant prove it himself and neither can ANY of you, show, prove, theorize or try to attempt to give an answer without using something else that noone understands either.. then I SAY ITS just a THEORY OF PERPETUAL SLAVERY. it goes around, then around without being explained and keeps on keeping you guys, going on and on and on about, nothing. Bwahahhhaaa. Yea. It goes around then you guys talk about it and talk about it, then nothing gets explained. Then it comes around, again and you guys, go off again.

ITS PERPETUAL SLAVERY AND tHEORY THEREOF you ****ing idiots. i dont want to hear about this BULL****.

wheres those vortex lawn mowers ken? oh wait thats right hahaha. vortex hardrives? oh right nothing. but a big mouth.

his idea of an invention is screwing you over until your forced to give him money to do something. like the mechanics that break your crap. car mechanics, yea the same idea he is and einstein the physics monkey mechanics.

You guys think in all your mouths openning and running yuo can explain yru stupid theory without it being a model for perpetual slavery, and get it away from that model or you gonna pull a race card every 2 seconds to get through another discussion arguement..

I believe you brought up this topic so you could DISCUSS it, and have it being a big thing on this forum since it is a model for perpetual slavery. there. now, can you shutup or sway away from the model or not talk about it. then. or is this how, you guys, engage in conversation daily?

[aljhoa]

it dont matter anyway. you havent explained a magnet, which noone understands or the galaxies which you show to prove that You know what you're talking about. Either way your wrong.

A magnet is, in reality, a magneto-radiative mass due to A: magneto-dielectric ‘elasticity’ of ferrous materials B: electrification of theferrous mass which causes greatly increased dielectric capacitance and macro-magnetic preponderances. Magnetism itself is the inter-spatial circular atomic medium (Ether), which mediates between the atomic charges and dielectric capacitance of the atomic volume.

W/o Aether there is 0.

Al

[mikrovolt]

A magnet is, in reality, a magneto-radiative mass due to A: magneto-dielectric ‘elasticity’ of ferrous materials B: electrification of theferrous mass which causes greatly increased dielectric capacitance and macro-magnetic preponderances. Magnetism itself is the inter-spatial circular atomic medium (Ether), which mediates between the atomic charges and dielectric capacitance of the atomic volume.

W/o Aether there is 0.

Al

There is a less complicated approach but it is Howard Johnson.
If you don't mind Ken, I am bringing up magnet flipper video.
I think your book is really incredible work.
Reference can be made to publication "Uncovering the missing secrets of magnetism" page 86
The pictures of a dielectric plane (Johnson labels it zero) in both a strong and weak magnet. A helpful distinction.

magnet flipper video:
There are 4 vortices that lead somewhere ?
This video trys to explains an opinion by Howard Johnson in simple terms.
Here is the point trying to be made by Magnet flipper and raises question why has science not taught this ?
Howard Johnson makes this statement:

" Here is really what the magnetic particles look like !! "

The diagram shows a line perpendicular to the pole N and S that is labeled zero and
is there are width measurements indicated and 4 vortices; north has 1 CW and 1 CCW and the south has same.

Later in video he shows the N S flux is spinning.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wR7c4iXum-A

What about the width of the bloch wall ?
the round or elliptical or egg shaped anomolies possibly distorted by the monitor ?
these 4 vortices are inside the inscribed square ?

What are they good for in better using magnetic energy ?

[Ufopolitics]

The Key to Everything...We ever dreamed off...

There is a less complicated approach but it is Howard Johnson.
If you don't mind Ken, I am bringing up magnet flipper video.
I think your book is really incredible work.
Reference can be made to publication "Uncovering the missing secrets of magnetism" page 86
The pictures of a dielectric plane (Johnson labels it zero) in both a strong and weak magnet. A helpful distinction.

magnet flipper video:
There are 4 vortices that lead somewhere ?
This video trys to explains an opinion by Howard Johnson in simple terms.
Here is the point trying to be made by Magnet flipper and raises question why has science not taught this ?
Howard Johnson makes this statement:

" Here is really what the magnetic particles look like !! "

The diagram shows a line perpendicular to the pole N and S that is labeled zero and
is there are width measurements indicated and 4 vortices; north has 1 CW and 1 CCW and the south has same.

Later in video he shows the N S flux is spinning.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wR7c4iXum-A

Nice video Mikrovolt,

There are absolutely NO FOUR (4) Vortexes on a Magnetic Field, Each Polarized End have a Main ONE (1) Spiral.

Like when He does the first part of video on Color Monitor...This below is what actually we are observing:

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

So, what happens is that Color CRT Screen serves as a splitting surface that cuts a SINGLE VORTEX in TWO(2) Parts, so it looks like two vortexes, but they are absolutely NOT!

A closer approach (right On) he shows with a Single Electron Beam TV (B&W):

At minute 2:51 He is actually showing the North Pole which when projected against a B&W TV it shows CCW Spin, on a SINGLE VORTEX/SPIRAL.

At minute 3:00 He shows CW Spin which is the South Pole.

Once he loads more magnets the image gets distorted...lots of magnetic strength for the Electron Beam Vector of force...so it goes crazy and makes that Black Hole on screen...however, still sees the rotation sense clearly.

What about the width of the bloch wall ?
the round or elliptical or egg shaped anomolies possibly distorted by the monitor ?
these 4 vortices are inside the inscribed square ?

We are trying to view a Three Dimensional Field with a Flat 2D Screen...so a lot of distortions are going to take place...while a lot of "artifacts" will merge as wrong imaging.

What are they good for in better using magnetic energy ?

The understanding of the REAL MAGNETIC FIELD will lead Us all to horizons we never, ever expected to walk through, my friend...NOT only Free Energy, MPM, Gravity Control...BUT, Healing ourselves...fixing our DNA...Repairing Terminal Diseases/Sickness in every Biological entity...we can ever think off...

Other words...Paradise on Earth..."Tomorrow's Land..."

Hang on am making a video where it shows the real MAGNETISM PARTICLE DYNAMICS...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[ldrancer]

The aether is a concept. what is 0 if aether is everything??? that is nothing, like, you know? what, is 0? i mean then? there isnt one. unless then you gotta have big bang black holesand that concepts, but.. or you know retarded ideas, but,
if you say aether is a concept and odesnt explain this, great.

[mikrovolt]

Harold Johnson's diagram depicting a width of what he calls zero possibly means that
the dynamic nature of that zone is variable with respect to the boundry or square.
This is to help us to see that calculating this uses probability. The self centering
as the temperature decreases eventually changes the resistance and pinning seen in
superconductors.

The anomalies do exist and have been repeated so that there is a basis to
investigate them as artifacts. They do not have to be magnetic but are an entity
of what we call magnetic.

The rigid wire model having only two ports is insufficient at this level.
The artifacts can reside outside the glass when the magnet is present
just as a residue when water evaporates.

[aljhoa]

A Concept?

(2) Dark matter is exactly like the aether. The inferences are unsound because the assumptions are unwarranted, and
we are waiting for the discovery of a new fundamental principle of physics, a new annus mirabilis from a new Einstein if you like,
to tell us what that new, previously unknown, principle is.

My money is on (2), because for all of the elegance and explanatory power
of the standard model (at large scales) and quantum mechanics (at small scales), we can be absolutely certain about one thing.
They are wrong (or at least incomplete) in at least one particular. How can I be so sure?
Easy, because even the most ardent supporters of the theories admit that certain of their conclusions are currently irreconcilable.
This means that one is wrong or the other is correct or they are both wrong. As a matter of simple logic, they cannot both be correct.
Is Dark Matter the 21st Century Aether?


Al

[ldrancer]

Aether is a concept. or you dont know what, a concept is? like the definition.
Dark matter is a lie. you win the big lie spammer award in this topic. unless ken comes back.
..why the big reverse in the thread for. who cares about dark matter thoughtwe wanted to talk about how magnets, pull things. right the only thing about them we dont get? or push?

anywayyy me trying to make sense here made me realize the whole concept heree. Dark matters only ****ing thing that matters about it, is it argues about push which is something that they cant come up with why it happens. screw dark matter retarded crap, you think things are floating out there?

[aljhoa]

Dark matter is a lie. you win the big lie spammer award in this topic. unless ken comes back.

“In our new study, we obtained for the first time a direct observational proof of the presence of dark matter in the innermost part of the Milky Way,” co-author Miguel Pato from Stockholm University explained in a press release. “We have created the most complete compilation so far of published measurements of the motion of gas and stars in the Milky Way, and compared the measured rotation speed with that expected under the assumption that only luminous matter exists in the Galaxy. The observed rotation cannot be explained unless large amounts of dark matter exist around us, and between us and the Galactic centre.”

Prior research has found evidence of dark matter in the outer reaches of the galaxy, but this is the first to report it from the inner region. Because dark matter does not interact with light or radiation at all, it cannot be seen, and therefore must be observed indirectly. This can primarily be done by watching the effects of gravity acting on ordinary matter, such as the rotation of gas and stars within a galaxy. Detecting dark matter is easier to do on the outer fringes of the Milky Way, but it becomes difficult to see these effects on the inner galaxy because of our proximal vantage point and high mass density.
Researchers Claim To Have Found Evidence of Dark Matter In Inner Milky Way | IFLScience

Al

[Ufopolitics]

Magnetism particle dynamics video

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZhETcDHDRY[/VIDEO]

MAGNETISM PARTICLE DYNAMICS

Enjoy and Regards


Ufopolitics

[solitech]

Thanks UFO!

I really appreciate the work you've put in to make it possible to give a visual understanding of the aether flows in magnetism, it's helped me to get a much better grasp on the theory. Keep up the great work!

[ldrancer]

Your lyign and making stuff up that isnt there.

draw it and i already PLAIN AS DAY SHOWED YOU GUYS but too STUPID.

it doesnt matter anyway its not me its you guys. making me absoilutely sick. get off this forum.

youve proven nothing your movies dumb.

your wasting time just like, black holes and warped space, dark matter wastes everyones time. when you have no arguements against me you bring up time wasting topics like that dumb movie up there, that dark oooh ghosts and apparitions energy video.

you guys are believing in religion and saying your seeing things. THis topic is ****ed up. i told you guys plain as day nose on your face, ken wheeler had a analog version of that in his hands in a video and it locks in on itself. you guys are trying to claim an infinite sign is free energy or how a magnet works.