ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[ldrancer]

student training session university level. Higher learning
keeps correcting the inventor. Team players.



[img][/img]

wtf is this? You just might as well hit your keyboard and random keys post, cuase nothing you say is coherent. Moron. Ooh someone taught you how to spell words. But you are good at lookign for them pictures arent you?

Guys go make a vortex topic. Quit being off-topic and talk about what you really want to talk about.

Funny how wheeler doesnt want to speak about that middle part between teh N and S poles, he doest even want to name it. hahah but then all his, never seen anything before theories on it, surround that. It involves that, and when hes questioned on that, you guys pull out that other diagram where teh little lines you draw goign around fan out into, away into counterspace, which is pretty funny. how you avoid the topic. screw this topic. how a magnet works?

1.) u guys dont even know how to do science, the scientific method. The magnet would be the theory. the hypothesis is a vortex. You havent proved nothing.
2.) go make a vortex topic. You havent proved a hypothesis which is a concept, its not a hypothesis as NOONE has ever seen one. It can't be a hypothesis, its a concept, in any science method GO MAKE A VORTEX TOPIC

[Iotayodi]

Its quite clear that your usage of the English language and your statements prove your not a Physicist or even an Amateur scientist. In Physics there are no north or south poles. There is only cw and ccw. You really should stop embarrassing yourself.

[MRIGuy]

Hi UFO, sorry for the late response, I wrote up a nice long detailed response a few weeks ago and lost it completely, so frustrating. However, Im loving your work so far and your video on the particle dynamics of magnetism is truly amazing! I remain on the edge of my seat to see your future developments!

Question, when you say the so called "North" pole has CCW spin are you referring to the centripetal return? So then the centripetal return has the same spin direction as the dielectric inertial plane (flywheel)? Therefore the centrifugal discharge is CW?

So the reason why magnets attract is the same reason why AC power lines pull together? And the same reason why a balloon sticks to the wall after rubbing my head? And how gravity works? All through dielectric voidance?

Lastly, I'm stuck on a thought, it's understood there's no magnetism at the center of any magnet. When you look at the inertial plane through magnetic viewing film you can see this. Now picture the center of a vertical field 1.5T MRI magnet where you have N-S on top and N-S on bottom. Ken says if you place a gauss meter at the center of any magnet it will show no magnetism. However, when I place the probe of a magnetometer at isocenter I measure 63.87Mhz, using the Larmour equation that equates to 1.5T field strength, what's going on here?

image.jpg


Oh to answer your question I service MRIs, everything from install to calibration and repair. Repairing them can be difficult but correctly understanding how they work is very difficult lol.

Regards,
Guy

[MRIGuy]

Below is a pic from an excel file I created to plot what I thought was the magnetic field in the center of a vertical field MRI. When we "shim" a magnet we add or remove magnets in attempt to achieve perfect homogeneity as in the pic below, where all points along the circles measure the same frequency. What's fascinating is this looks just line the Dielectric field from Ken's book. Essentially we have 2 magnets seperated in attraction mode so the result would be the dielectric inertial plane spead out from top to bottom, Im guessing.

image.jpg

Regards,
Guy

[bistander]

Iron Filings in 3d

The Iron Filings Model somehow rendered those Lines of Force in some kind of a "straight fashion" which served as a "proof" to base those Straight Vector's Theories on.

That was it, regardless of a 2D or 3D Field...or Interactions to obtain an EM Induction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8llkHQtaOlg

[VIDEO]youtube.com/watch?v=8llkHQtaOlg[/VIDEO]

Vectors are straight, but the field isn't. This video shows a nice 3d pattern of the iron filings aligning with the lines of flux in three dimensions.

Regards,

bi

[Ufopolitics]

Hi UFO, sorry for the late response, I wrote up a nice long detailed response a few weeks ago and lost it completely, so frustrating. However, Im loving your work so far and your video on the particle dynamics of magnetism is truly amazing! I remain on the edge of my seat to see your future developments!

Hello MRIGuy!

Nice to hear from you again, and am sorry about what happen...I always back up (copy/paste) momentarily when it is a long post full text/links, etc into a Note pad...because it has happened to me...basically a crash from the Navigator...and you loose it all...I hate that.

Question, when you say the so called "North" pole has CCW spin are you referring to the centripetal return? So then the centripetal return has the same spin direction as the dielectric inertial plane (flywheel)? Therefore the centrifugal discharge is CW?

Nope, like I mentioned before on another post...CW and CCW are completely relativistic terms, and depends on the observers/clock positioning.

The "North" pole Centrifugal discharge spins CCW when mirrored and you, as the "observer" look at mirror then compare it to your wrist watch.

If you have that same magnet, and you set it on top of a table, North facing up...then look at your watch...it would be spinning clockwise (CW).

The reason why I insist on "Mirroring" Magnets to compare the spins...is just because of the new video am working on (still) which I face magnets against a B&W CRT rastering Lines at different angles...so it is clearly observed where does each polarizations really spin...

Whenever I refer to Magnet's Polarization Spin is based on the Centrifugal Discharge...because that is where the stronger magnetic force is.

Question, when you say the so called "North" pole has CCW spin are you referring to the centripetal return? So then the centripetal return has the same spin direction as the dielectric inertial plane (flywheel)? Therefore the centrifugal discharge is CW?

[IMG][/IMG]

I repeated the same question, but this time is to clear some confusion I noticed you have related to Centrifugal and Centripetal spins...

I would like you to look again at the pic above from my video...then look at lower Image for the Centripetal return.

[IMG][/IMG]

Notice that both, Centrifugal and Centripetal Spatial Curves from both polarizations spins are based around the Two white dotted circles?

Both circles centers are off main field center, passing by magnet's center in an inclined angle, and I will just quote myself from a previous post...

This Two Spatially Polarized Spirals spin in the same direction, at opposed ends of an inclined axis (axial tilt, obliquity, axial precession, etc) to balance out spinning forces.

An Axial Precession that throws off main center.

However, no matter that precessed angle for both...note that spin direction does not change for either one...Centrifugal and Centripetal...or "North" and "South"?

Those two frames from video are a transparency, looking at magnet from above, South is on Top, North at bottom. You could go to min 9:00 of video to start from beginning looking at geometry Side View turning to Top View.

So the reason why magnets attract is the same reason why AC power lines pull together? And the same reason why a balloon sticks to the wall after rubbing my head? And how gravity works? All through dielectric voidance?

It could be...

Lastly, I'm stuck on a thought, it's understood there's no magnetism at the center of any magnet. When you look at the inertial plane through magnetic viewing film you can see this. Now picture the center of a vertical field 1.5T MRI magnet where you have N-S on top and N-S on bottom. Ken says if you place a gauss meter at the center of any magnet it will show no magnetism. However, when I place the probe of a magnetometer at isocenter I measure 63.87Mhz, using the Larmour equation that equates to 1.5T field strength, what's going on here?

[ATTACH]17121[/ATTACH]

I would like to see a rough diagram showing how each N-S Magnet is positioned spatially related to each other to give you a more accurate answer. However, since you said it is a vertical field with N-S Top and N-S Bottom, (and a space between both where you measured field) I would be assuming Top Magnet South is interacting -through space- with North Bottom Magnet.

When Two Magnets in Attraction (Voidance) have not made full contact, meaning, there is a space/gap in between, the exchange of High Pressures Gates between N-S from each separate magnet going to their still existing respective dielectric fields, will deliver a very strong center Common spatial magnetic force (spin) which is probably equal to measuring either one of them, as you just did.

And like I wrote in another post here...Two Magnetic Fields in Attraction stage...with a spatial gap in between, will have both Vortexes from the two N-S Polarizations facing/approaching each others following exactly the same spin direction.

Opposite spinning Vortexes approaching each others from two separate magnets will deliver a Repulsion, it means both are like poles.

Oh to answer your question I service MRIs, everything from install to calibration and repair. Repairing them can be difficult but correctly understanding how they work is very difficult lol.

Regards,
Guy

That is awesome!...beautiful job Guy!...I will really love to see those machines inside...


Hope my answers were of some help...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8llkHQtaOlg

[VIDEO]youtube.com/watch?v=8llkHQtaOlg[/VIDEO]

Vectors are straight, but the field isn't. This video shows a nice 3d pattern of the iron filings aligning with the lines of flux in three dimensions.

Regards,

bi

Hello Bistander,

I have seen that video, a nice one indeed!

Of course the Field isn't straight!!...I never said it is straight...it is All Curves, Spatial Curves.

The Iron Filings Model somehow rendered those Lines of Force in some kind of a "straight fashion"

Notice how I wrote "somehow" and "some kind" of a straight fashion...just because they are not.

However, this 3D Method in water is not showing clearly the outer lines (High Pressure Lines) traveling from N<>S...Instead it is showing clearly a blank "space" or a "Gap" between both poles right at magnet's center, where it seems iron is not compacting as much...what was that now?...

Related to "more straight lines" they could be better observed when you set two magnets in attraction separated by a spatial gap.

[IMG][/IMG]


Regards


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

magnetic field

Hi Ufo,

The flux travels S to N in straighter lines inside the magnet. And is at maximum density (maximum field) in the middle of the magnet as shown here:



I think the iron filings give a good representation of the field. And outside the magnet it is curved and 3d.

Regards,

bi

[Ufopolitics]

Below is a pic from an excel file I created to plot what I thought was the magnetic field in the center of a vertical field MRI. When we "shim" a magnet we add or remove magnets in attempt to achieve perfect homogeneity as in the pic below, where all points along the circles measure the same frequency. What's fascinating is this looks just line the Dielectric field from Ken's book. Essentially we have 2 magnets separated in attraction mode so the result would be the dielectric inertial plane spread out from top to bottom, Im guessing.

[IMG][/IMG]


Regards,
Guy

Hello Guy,

Yes, that is what is referred as a Voidance Approach (Attraction)

I have done a very short video to show as well the two spirals spinning at same direction from both interacting and opposite polarizations:

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Czbn55UnER0[/VIDEO]

ATTRACTING MAGNETS (SHORT VIDEO)

And below is the last frame (without text)

[IMG][/IMG]

Also have to realize that this Spiral on each pole are just a visualization from the Total Sum of all single events from Centrifugal forces.

This Two spins of high pressure generates right at the center gap, an Accretion Disk...as a spatial counterspace where the interlacing from all pressure levels start discharging to.

As we approach the two magnets, this center spatial counterspace field gains inertia, as each magnet's dielectric field starts approaching center space of interaction (loosing inertia) until it becomes one single Dielectric Field, when the two magnets are making contact (end of interaction) then we have a single, stronger magnet as a result.

In your example of the MRI, the two magnets never meet, separated by an air gap, just like in the Stator from a Motor...so all the Spatial Parameters remains the same.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Repeating Old Posts...

Hi Ufo,

The flux travels S to N in straighter lines inside the magnet. And is at maximum density (maximum field) in the middle of the magnet as shown here:



I think the iron filings give a good representation of the field. And outside the magnet it is curved and 3d.

Regards,

bi

Bistander,

On 12/18/2015 you and I had about the same argument...

Your old post Link

My Answer at that time

And my answer is exactly the same as I wrote then...

FEMM is completely based on Iron Filings Model, Software has been written in order to comply with such method.

Anyone who could write code, could also make a software which process all data according to Ken's Theory...

So what?...it don't mean absolutely nothing.

What I do really recommend, if you could, is to load all this Geometries into an animated CAD Software of easy Interface ( or you could start from scratch, from easy geometrical shapes)...and start playing with it, like I have done...It absolutely would be of very much help to understand the architecture of this Model.


Cheers


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8llkHQtaOlg

[VIDEO]youtube.com/watch?v=8llkHQtaOlg[/VIDEO]

Vectors are straight, but the field isn't. This video shows a nice 3d pattern of the iron filings aligning with the lines of flux in three dimensions.

Regards,

bi

Bistander,

About this Video above...

Take a look at the final still frame below (10 minutes later):

[IMG][/IMG]


Then compare it with the Sketch below, which I did a while back in this Post:

[IMG][/IMG]

Don't they look similar?

Cheers


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Iron Filings in 3d

Hi Ufo,

I'll elaborate on your recent post later, but for now, I just wanted to say that I posted that video to counter your claim that the iron filings or powder method of demonstrating the magnetic field was only 2 dimensional. It obviously works in 3d. At 29-30 seconds into the video, he turns it and you can see the end view.



More on this later. Regards,

bi

[bistander]

Induced magnetism

Hi Ufo,

Just a short one. I ran across this interesting graphic and description on the subject. You remember this:



Here is what I think happens:



Regards,

bi

[Ufopolitics]

So simple and yet so difficult to accept!!

Hi Ufo,

Just a short one. I ran across this interesting graphic and description on the subject. You remember this:



Here is what I think happens:

[IMG][/IMG]

Regards,

bi

Bistander,

I agree up to certain point with above image...

I agree that Iron is Highly Influenced by being near the presence of a magnetic field polarity.

I agree that it will get "induced" by that polarity influence.

Where I disagree is that it is NOT the Opposite Pole what gets induced to that near pole. But the same Pole it is near to.

[IMG][/IMG]

Magnetic Fields are "EXPANDABLE" into Ferromagnetic materials molecular structures.

How is that expandability taking place?

The Field Polarity tries to expand its spatial domains into that piece of iron.

If you let that piece of iron loose, it will try "self alignment" to the top of that pole, where the main Vortex of Forces are.

Expandability final action is to adhere that piece of iron exactly at the top end of nearest pole, physically.

That old explanation is just to justify the attraction taking place between iron-magnet.

However, it is VERY EASILY DEMONSTRATED it is completely WRONG.

Why don't you test it yourself Bistander?

All you need is a cheap compass...

You do it or I will do it in a video and post it here...then I hope this concludes all this argument to keep repeating over and over.

It is obvious you don't believe me...but I do not see yourself making a counter claim against mine, except to keep searching for old stuff to instruct little kits in elementary school and posting it here.

Be more yourself!

And please take it as a constructive criticism nothing more.


Cheers


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,

I'll elaborate on your recent post later, but for now, I just wanted to say that I posted that video to counter your claim that the iron filings or powder method of demonstrating the magnetic field was only 2 dimensional. It obviously works in 3d. At 29-30 seconds into the video, he turns it and you can see the end view.



More on this later. Regards,

bi

Bistander,

Based on "Probability and Statistics"...that 3D Model on Iron Filings...submerged in a liquid solution...is ONE in a Trillions of tests done for 200 plus years...based on a raw piece of paper on top of a field as a demonstrator.

Of course it will work on 3D, the point here is that it is not revealing the whole field structure...nor its vortexes.

Iron Filings just freezes over the field in 2D or in 3D...it don't matter.


Ufopolitics