ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Iotayodi]

This image of a toroidal magnetic field using ferrofluid is something. Reminds me of the Rodin coil.

[Ufopolitics]

Magnetic Domains...the Reality.

MAGNETIC DOMAINS, THE REALITY

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVegpoWVB64&feature=youtu.be[/VIDEO]

Hello to All,

I really do not have the time to waste on this silly arguments based on so simple stuff you guys "see" or "hear" out there, then use it to "disagree" with me...like it is coming directly from your own experiments.

It ain't the Scientific Real Method to keep repeating what the Old School, and Old Theories have thought all of Us...and Obviously have absolutely NOT WORKED AT ALL.

The day you show me a TESLA Electric Vehicle that can travel from Florida to New York...without "Refueling" or "Recharging" its Batteries...

The Day You show me an Electric Generator Ran by an Electric Motor, effortlessly...

ONLY THEN, We will have the real truth.


ABOUT VIDEO ABOVE:

A very simple , one minute and 36 seconds of testing, with components that anyone here would have laying around... is ENOUGH to see that there is ABSOLUTELY NO OPPOSITE POLE between Iron and Magnetic Pole.

Simple Results that even a Retarded could notice...and I could have made this video much longer, showing Geometries, Spatial Lines, CAD's, etc...I do not consider that necessary...not here, where we supposedly have "L'Creme D' L'Creme...

IF THE COMPASS'S NEEDLE IS ABLE TO SEEK/AIM THROUGH THE IRON, EXACTLY TO THE CENTER POLE OF MAGNET, IN A VERY, STRAIGHT LINE ...JUST LIKE IF IRON WOULD NOT EXIST THERE AT ALL...THEN WE AIN'T GOT NO "OPPOSITE POLE" AT THE END OR ANYWHERE ON THAT PIECE OF IRON AT ALL.

IF WE WOULD HAVE A NORTH POLARITY AT THE END OR ANYWHERE ON IRON, WHEN WE APPROACH A SOUTH POLE FROM A MAGNET, THEN THE COMPASS NEEDLE WILL NEVER, EVER, WILL BE AIMING THAT STRAIGHT, SEEKING EVERYWHERE THAT MAGNET'S SOUTH POLE.


IF WE WOULD HAVE A SOUTH POLARITY AT THE END OR ANYWHERE ON IRON, WHEN WE APPROACH A NORTH POLE FROM A MAGNET, THEN THE COMPASS NEEDLE WILL NEVER, EVER, WILL BE AIMING THAT STRAIGHT, SEEKING EVERYWHERE THAT MAGNET'S NORTH POLE.


ANYONE KNOWS THAT WHENEVER A COMPASS IS APPROACHED TO A DUAL POLARITY OBJECT OR POLARIZED SPACE, IT WILL AUTOMATICALLY DEFLECT THAT NEEDLE TO A WEST OR EAST READING AND NEVER, EVER WILL POINT STRAIGHT TO JUST ONE "CHOSEN" POLE.





Ufopolitics

[Iotayodi]

like it is coming directly from your own experiments.

Thats it. Nothing is accomplished without experimentation. More focus on experimentation like Ufo does rather than just theories. One of the reasons I like Ufos work. My focus is on one experimental coil. I research anything that might apply to that coil. Ive been researching for about 6 years and am close to doing the experiments. When I get the models done Ill be passing it along to Ufo for his thoughts or experiments with it If he so desires.
To many backstabbers here wasting time with agitating demeaning rhetoric instead of trying to work on something.

[aljhoa]

It ain't the Scientific Real Method to keep repeating what the Old School,
and Old Theories have thought all of Us...
and Obviously have absolutely NOT WORKED AT ALL.

Faraday's Electromagnetic Rotation Device

FlipyFlux


Al

[Ufopolitics]

Faraday's Electromagnetic Rotation Device

FlipyFlux


Al

Al,

I was referring basically to MAGNETISM...and from the specific part to Generators, not Motors.


Thanks


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Motor Generator

Speaking of electrical machinery, there's no difference between motors and generators. Any motor can operate as a generator, and any generator can function as a motor, when properly excited.

[Ufopolitics]

Speaking of electrical machinery, there's no difference between motors and generators. Any motor can operate as a generator, and any generator can function as a motor, when properly excited.

Bistander,

I have to disagree on above statement.

It does not necessarily apply to "every generator" out there and "not yet out there"...

For example, Steven Marks TPU is a Solid State Generator...nothing moves...how could you make that into a motor by just "properly exciting it"?

And so on and on...like Dr Thomas Henry Moray's...etc,etc

Therefore, we can not consider such statement as unique and consistently true to every Machine out there.


Cheers


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

You're kidding

Hi Ufo,

I was referring to electrical machinery like I said, which in context means electric to mechanical and mechanical to electric energy conversion devices. Devices having no moving parts don't qualify.

Regards,

bi

BTW, I conducted tests with magnet, iron bar and compass. I was able to get different results than you did. I need to sort out some photos and will post later.

[MRIGuy]

Ah huh!! So the hypotrochoid pattern when looking down from either pole is the leaving centrifugal and returning centripetal magnetism! I understand exactly what that means now, thank you for the explanation!

Also, I see what your saying about like on like spin during dielectric avoidance, fascinating!

Below, would be the typical configuration used in vertical field MRI (ignoring those lines of force of coarse lol) with 2 "coliseums" of magnets used to shim the field, that's to the best of my knowledge as far as the permanent magnets go.

image.jpg

Regards,
Guy

[aljhoa]

Superfluid Interaction With
The Polarized Giant Plate
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4

A Frog in a Strong Magnetic Fields


Al

[bistander]

Magnet Induction Test

Hi Ufo,

Here's my test from yesterday.

test 1: Red tape on magnet S pole. This does not change through test. Red tape on one end of iron bar. The red tape remains on this end of the bar throughout the tests however the N and S will change ends later. For now the magnet induces a field in the iron bar so that the red tape is on the S pole. Compass has a red colored arrow end which is N seeking so is a S pole. Therefore the white end of the compass needle is a N pole. Compass needle colors and poles remain the same throughout the tests.

Tests are conducted on a non magnetic table top in a East West orientation to minimize natural fields.



test 2: Compass re-positioned between magnet and iron bar. Red end of iron bar remains S pole.



test 4: Magnet is removed from test. Red end of iron bar remains S pole.



test 5: Magnet is returned to the test in opposite orientation from test 1. The induced field in the iron bar is now reversed and the red end is now a N pole. Magnet needle remains same color/polarity but the red arrow (S) now points towards the iron bar red end (N). The induction in the iron bar has reversed due to the magnet being reversed in orientation.



test 6: Magnet removed from test. Iron bar reverts back to previous polarity because it had been more strongly magnetized in that direction (it actually had touched the magnet in the previous orientation). The iron bar red end is S and attracts compass white (N) needle end.



test 7: Compass needle follows iron bar when moved 90º.



To me, these test are consistent with domain and dipole theory. Magnets always have 2 poles which we call N and S.

In these tests I have a very strong permanent (N42) and the iron bar is a piece of 1/4 inch square key stock probably really cold rolled steel. The iron bar is easily magnetized by induction from the magnet and had medium residual or retentivity. The magnet's field is stronger than that which it can induce into the iron bar. And the field of the compass needle is weak but retentivity is high. It is not permanently affected by the fields from the magnet.

As Ufo posted his test I could not help but think: The compass needle is behaving the same as the iron piece except his iron piece is not allowed to rotate. But the induced field from the magnet and/or iron piece is inducing a field in and on the compass needle causing the compass needle dipole to rotate, the same as it would on any ferromagnetic piece in the field. He appears to attempt to use the very behavior which he is testing to disprove that behavior.

I'll believe the experts, text books and lessons from history that all magnets, PM, EM or induced, have 2 poles.

Thank you,

bi

[bistander]

Magnet Induction Test Part 2

Here's the last frame of the tests. I was limited to 6 attachments.

test 8: Showing the iron bar rotated 180º. It has a N pole on the end opposite the red tape as expected.

[Ufopolitics]

Here's the last frame of the tests. I was limited to 6 attachments.

test 8: Showing the iron bar rotated 180º. It has a N pole on the end opposite the red tape as expected.

Bistander.

I don't know why you have complicated so much this so simple tests!!

First off, it seems your iron is retaining magnetism too much...NOT Good., so discard it and user one that does not retain enough for compass to even move when in front of it.

If Iron retains magnetism, when you flip it it will retain an opposite pole from previous facing opposite magnet pole...this throws off test.

And of course I MUST keep at least either Iron or Magnet FIXED during tests, otherwise they both will fly together!!


HERE IS A VERY SIMPLE TEST, WHERE MAGNET AND IRON ARE FIXED, YOU JUST MOVE COMPASS:

[IMG][/IMG]

You will see Compass, never makes that "imaginary" 180º turn, like supposedly happens in test at right, IF there would be an opposite pole on Iron, right next to Magnet's South Pole.

Compass behaves just like Test on Left, and depending on Iron size, and Magnet Strength needle could deflect more towards center space between both Iron and Magnet.

Keep it simple...and please, do not mark the iron...it confuses even more.


Cheers


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

About the test

Bistander.

I don't know why you have complicated so much this so simple tests!!

First off, it seems your iron is retaining magnetism too much...NOT Good., so discard it and user one that does not retain enough for compass to even move when in front of it.

If Iron retains magnetism, when you flip it it will retain an opposite pole from previous facing opposite magnet pole...this throws off test.

And of course I MUST keep at least either Iron or Magnet FIXED during tests, otherwise they both will fly together!!


HERE IS A VERY SIMPLE TEST, WHERE MAGNET AND IRON ARE FIXED, YOU JUST MOVE COMPASS:

[IMG][/IMG]

You will see Compass, never makes that "imaginary" 180º turn, like supposedly happens in test at right, IF there would be an opposite pole on Iron, right next to Magnet's South Pole.

Compass behaves just like Test on Left, and depending on Iron size, and Magnet Strength needle could deflect more towards center space between both Iron and Magnet.

Keep it simple...and please, do not mark the iron...it confuses even more.


Cheers


Ufopolitics

Hi Ufo,

Why does the retentivity matter? I thought the issue was about this diagram and your contention that the soft iron piece became a monopole. Retentivity matters only after the magnetizing field is removed. Obviously the magnetizing field is present in the picture. It does not say "how soft" the iron piece is. So what is wrong with the piece I used? It will not retain enough magnetism to adhere itself to the vertical wall of my steel toolbox after the removal from the magnetizing field. So I'd say it is relatively soft, magnetically.



With regards to your sliding compass test: The fact that the magnet's field is so much greater than that of the iron piece, through induction from the magnet, the N pole of the iron will not attract the N seeking compass needle when it is that close to the magnet. I can spread out the distance between the magnet and iron and in fact get the compass to show that opposite pole, or I can replace the iron with a magnet identical to the first one so all poles are equal and show the opposite pole.

Also, from my test 1 to test 2, all I did was move the compass and it shows both the S and the N pole on the iron bar. Between test 1 and 5 all I did was rotate the magnet 180º and it reversed the polarity in the iron bar. That shows the induction from the magnet was passing thru the iron bar.

Regards,

bi

[aljhoa]

Bistander.
I don't know why you have complicated so much this so simple tests!!

Compass has a red colored arrow end which is N seeking so is a S pole.
Therefore the white end of the compass needle is a N pole.
Compass needle colors and poles remain the same throughout the tests.
bi

Bi's compass has only N-poles.


Al