ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Ufopolitics]

The Workings of the Universe are “Elegantly Simple” as Wal Thornhill would say.

I’ve had a few sleepless nights with my brain stewing on the implications and actions of all this… Without question there is internal compression and external expansion of the magnetic flux, depending upon the interacting spins. This could be viewed as an inter and outer oscillation.

Playing with more magnets and washers, one can make two opposing sets, (same magnets, with the steel washers in between) N,N and then a second opposing set S,S, four magnets in total. Now when these two opposite, opposing magnet sets are brought together, now in attraction to each other, - I can hardly pull them apart again!

It is several times more force than the four magnets just all put together in standard attraction fashion.

Just how much can one compress the magnetic flux within a given medium or mass?

One could take opposing magnet process, two fold, take an opposing set and another “like spin” opposing set and force those together, to create an even more compressed, “highly pressured space”.

Then the question arises on how these concepts can be applied Electo-magnetically and what happens to electric flux when interacting with highly pressurised space?

Damn, more sleepless nights ahead...

Sputins,

Start by a simple fact...a North and South magnetic fields in one magnet are both spinning in the same direction, same axis...but this is not like a motor spinning...but, in space this curvilinear spectrum describes like a cork screw shape, not spinning, and what is moving are the magnetic particles within that spatial curvilinear spiral, basically the centrifugal which is the strongest end.

Now, when we face N-S from two different magnets, say same spec's, then both cork screws from N and S embrace within same particle spin, say you keep a gap...whether air, plastic or iron...the same spin prevails there no matter what you insert in between. This is exactly the same Interaction that takes place in the very center of every magnet.

When two magnets are attracted together they configure (add) into a newly formed magnet, stronger than the original two...double the strength.

Looking from the dielectric wall...once the two magnets are bound together, those two poles in the attraction gap literally disappear...(actually they bridge from one side to the other, meaning the South will enter the other magnet's South, as the North at gap will enter into the second magnet's North) this process that Ken calls "voidance" means just that...both poles at gap "disappear" strengthening outer extreme poles...and so, the new formed dielectric would be now at the gap where the two magnets were bound together.

Spatially, this new formed magnet will be stronger than just one...so the CRT captures exactly the right image...field increases spatially...

And this Expansion process works as soon as we start approaching two magnets by their alike poles. New, future Dielectric Wall would be exactly located at the very center of that gap between both opposed polarizations, no matter the distance between them...However, the closer (narrower gap) the wider the expansion would be.


In a Repulsion the completely different interaction takes place...first, both cork screw spins are Opposite, Counter Embracing each others...and the only difference between a North or South Spatial repulsion Interaction is the directions of their spins...and here I know this sound weird...what direction if both are counter-spinning right?...Ok, the way to figure this out is to imagine a "twisted body" right at center gap of repulsion will model kind of a threaded shape...well, North and South repulsions would create opposite threaded bodies...(like one Bolt...would be a right screw thread and the other a left screw thread) hope this example will be clear.

I am putting together a video about spatial interactions seen with all known methods...from iron particles (already familiar with) to ferrocell , view film and CRT...and it happens that all three modern methods are opposite in 180º to the iron old method...there Repulsion creates a "Sphere"...while Attract creates that four points star cross (a pattern I conceived to compare interactions) like iron particles reflect on repulsion.

So, the actual repulse pattern is a sphere of compression between like poles...just like iron shows on attract...


Could it be we all have been 180º wrong because using only the dogmatic iron particles?


What do you think?


Sorry, don't want you to have more sleepless nights...and hope this will enlighten somehow...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Redirecting My Posts to the right Thread...1

This are a couple of posts I wrote at http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...odynamics.html

However, I want them to be here as well, so all material is displayed in only one source.

Hello SidL,

My pleasure friend to welcome you here and also encourage to proceed in your work, you are definitively going in the right direction and right reasoning!

I have a perfectly working and pretty new electric motorcycle...and the Controller is programmable through my Laptop, I have redesigned its BMS (Battery Management System and the Motor Controller) so I can switch the Regenerative braking up to 20% as Max (Mine does not activate when braking, but whenever I stop accelerating...Normally Open/Normally Closed SPDT (Single Pole Double Trow Micro Switch) at accelerator) ...and when I do so (20%), this "enhanced option" will work like putting the bike on first gear...when going 65 MPH on fourth. Meaning, it just brakes/stops the movement to almost a full stop. The best working percentage is around 12%...but then again, when I have an 80Amps, 5000 Watts consuming Hub Motor...it is just a big joke to think that the batteries would ever be "regenerated".

The point above is just to explain that the actual (Only Known) type of Electrical EMF Induction Generators (in General, talking about ALL Generators in the market as of today) that we all know is also a Big Fraud.

And no matter how much we all try to get them installed or connected (wired)...We will still be fighting the Reversed Forces (Lenz Law) in a "face to face" arrangement...so no matter how much we try to generate electricity...Lenz will literally "take it all away" from Us...plus leave us in negative values...why?...just because it is a perfectly conceived Mirror Geometry...a Symmetrical Induction, The biggest Scam ever done to Mankind...

So why we have not developed a better way to generate electricity from magnetic fields for over 200 years?

Is the Human Race so stupid?

Nope, we are not stupid...we are all just trained by the Academia (I love that name you call them, thanks!) in the wrong way, the wrong model... about How Magnetic Fields really are and how they really work, plus the way they are structured...that is absolutely the whole "secret" behind all this fraud that have lasted over 200 years.

The only known Induction, since Faraday discovery in August 1831...is a Mirror Symmetrical one, Linear, at 180º...and the best demo is the typical cylindrical magnet going into an empty Coil (air core) as the perfect example...we go In, meter marks positive generation...we "try" to take it out and Lenz opposes linearly from us to pull it away...meter marks negative induction in exactly same magnitude!...And so we try to push it in again, then, like "magic" Lenz prevents from Us going inwards...Repeat.

That is plain BS...We can go 90º and still Induce...while Lenz miss our movement by 90º...but in specific ways...not like above.

The only known "Suitable Magnetic Field" to generate EMF Induction comes from the stupid, "Imaginary Lines of Force" Only conceived from what is known as a "Uniform Field"...meaning, from North to South...another plain BS.

We can generate an EMF from Repulsion Fields (North to North or South to South) where the "Imaginary Lines of force" from pole to pole, according to the "Iron Filings BS Method" (another complimentary "proof" Scam, Fraud that comes in the same package) does not "reveal" such lines...more BS...Repeat.

And the most, the top knowledge we are all missing here...:

Magnetic Fields can go through the Mass of any material in this Universe...just the Magnetic Field, not the "material field carrier" meaning whether a Magnet or an Electromagnet...and an EMF Induction WILL BE Generated.

So...a "Dancing Spiritual Field" going through a previously wired steel core sequence, just like water runs in a river...or clouds move in the sky by the wind forces...effortlessly...we can also obtain electricity...and the effort to do so?...almost no force required to move such a massless, weightless field through any material mass.

But absolutely no one would believe me when I write this things...all over this Forum...why?

Just because it does not "fit" with the "Academia Model" we all were trained to know about Magnetic Fields...


And yes...I am building this Machines...


And I will "Welcome You All to the Machine" very soon...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Redirecting My Posts to the right Thread...2

About the "Dancing Spiritual Fields"...We have demonstrations on record that dates back from the Nineteen Thirties...

Dr Thomas Henry Moray(1930's)

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrRuS4Pis-k[/VIDEO]

Don L. Smith 1996 Presentation:

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_ApR2IxBcY[/VIDEO]

Steve Marks TPU (1997)

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aDViLnziT8[/VIDEO]

Tariel Kapanadze

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVUN3GsekKQ[/VIDEO]

There are many, many more like this kind of demonstrations all over in You Tube...


Now, were all this guys Scammers, a Fraud that have been conceived for Decades?....absolutely NOT!

It is "the other way around" friend, We (the rest of the whole World) are the only ones who have been scammed for over 200 years!

And there is a Very Plain and Simple explanation for ALL their discoveries...together.

They All use Spatial Magnetic Field Mutations Method to obtain Energy...A very different Conceptual Method as the Only One we all know from the Old Faraday Discovery back in 1831...But We will need to Re-Write Magnetism in Full, in order to understand how all these Machines work...

All Solid State demonstrations use electronics to achieve this Method.

Tariel Kapanadze (in above video) uses a 9V operated Small Motor to run the Com-Mutation Sequence,(Mechanical Trans-Mutation) and once the 3KW Generator develops the proper RPM's.., it is very simple to understand the 9V Battery could be removed and replaced by a self feeding, small voltage circuit (Buck Converter) from the big generator.

At this time Kapanadze is also working in Solid State Devices (Electronics) that do the same work, except that the only moving parts..are the Virtual, massless, weightless Magnetic Fields..

What we all know as "Motion Less Generators"...and is still a "Mystery"...


Unfortunately, all this guys decided to "Patent" each of their Specific Inventions, and giving some explanations that made nonsense like gathering energy from the vacuum...or from Radiant Energy...or from the Quantum...or from the Aether, etc,etc...which all were true...but they all failed to pay attention to the wonderful Common Physic Phenomena being discovered here (The Big Picture in Common)...and fall in the Academia already set Traps for whoever try to Patent whatever has been hiding in front of our noses for so long...so...We know the end of the stories behind...and they are not exactly "Happy Endings"


It is only in our Minds...to either believe in this phenomena is real...or simply deny it...like it has been done for over two Centuries.


And I tell You, it is not an easy piece of cake to make one of these machines...there are Natural "Rules" for Magnetism (we could call them "Natural Laws") that must of us ignore their existence (thanks to Academic Dogma)...but they must be obeyed and followed very precisely otherwise devices will not work...And there are absolutely no "consulting" text books that can tell us about this either...only our own experimentation would give us the answers.


I, myself, have decided to pursue this line of work, and so far it is very successful as it is very exciting...Although it takes tons of hours and tons of money...

Same way I know, many here would write about all this posts is just plain BS...oh well, they have their right to do so...only time will tell...in the mean time I take "brakes" to rest my brain and post here...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

A helping post for this Forum Projects...

Hello to All,

Well, according to all my work and developments so far...I am definitively sure about some Magnetism Properties or Attributes:

1- Magnetic Fields are Rotational.

2- Magnetic Fields are Divergent.


And, yes, I know it differs from the very old statements from Hendrik Lorentz, who completely denied this two facts above.

In time I will be supplying all testing videos with the evidence this is completely and definitively true.

This two facts above changes radically the way we have been conceiving EMF Induction for 200 PLUS years.

EMF Induction does not takes place by "cutting" absolutely any "Imaginary Lines of Force" (I did a "typo" and wrote "Imaginary Lies of Force"...and I laugh...just because it is true, is a lie.

Induction takes place by the forward motion of the magnetic field, entering a coil (with or without core), if it has a ferromagnetic core, then the spatial field will be expanded, spatially to that core, and the curvilinear divergent, centrifugal forces from field will Influence an electron curvilinear flow within the copper wires, or in the case of a laminated or even a solid iron core, this circular influence will develop first on core, then transferred to copper wires.

There is no need of the physical, material magnet, or electromagnet to penetrate absolutely any coil when it has a ferromagnetic core. This happens every time in every Electric Generator out there...only problem is, we have been figuring all this take place by "cutting imaginary lines of force with coil wires"...therefore. we all have been off in this whole concept of EMF Induction by exactly 90º...

Big difference guys!!

I want to add, based on my discovery, that all your actual development searching for Free Energy, that involves any kind of devices which work based on Coils and Magnetic Fields, as the primary source to ever find the truth in those "mysterious" myths machines and circuits...

Just like in the Don Smith case...or any other that right now does not pop in my mind...let me just say this fact:

If you are trying -based on an electronic pulsing sequence- to excite any coil(s), to obtain an output...I just want to tell you one thing...do not Fully Collapse that Field to zero values!!

If You collapse Magnetic Field, then try to turn it back on, no matter how many milliseconds it is off...the new generated field will definitively be restored back to its initial state...meaning, if that curvilinear sequence, was following a pattern, a cycle...you, by pulsing feeding to zero, are just destroying that sequence and restarting another field exactly at the same Space/Time point where the previous Field was created...meaning, you are just doing one, zero, one, zero...meaning absolutely nothing, nada!

There is "something" called a Cycloid...and that means just what I mentioned above...Cycloids must be progressive and evolutive in your designs, otherwise no energy will be generated...

You may get very strong and sharp spikes...for milliseconds...but they are not usable and very hard to keep them "tamed"...not after you burn hundred of FET's and expensive diodes.

So, You must leave at least a very small amount of power to that coil, so you do not collapse that Cycloid sequence where all this secret is.


Respectfully


Ufopolitics

[nathan97]

Hello to All,

Well, according to all my work and developments so far...I am definitively sure about some Magnetism Properties or Attributes:

1- Magnetic Fields are Rotational.

2- Magnetic Fields are Divergent.


...

Ufopolitics

Ufo, are you saying that Magnetic field is divergent for all the surfaces in space ? Or you mean it is divergent for some specific surfaces in space ?

nathan

[Ufopolitics]

Ufo, are you saying that Magnetic field is divergent for all the surfaces in space ? Or you mean it is divergent for some specific surfaces in space ?

nathan

Hello Nathan,

We will have to start looking (imaging) Magnetic Fields as a Spatial Volume completely away from its embodiment (I call it "carrier" as a general term, as it could be a magnet or an electromagnet)

The Divergence as its curvilinear forces being propagated away from each others in the Effective Spatial 3D Volume located exactly Above each of the poles. These are the strongest part and is due to its Centrifugal Forces.

Two main Dynamic Spatial Geometries Displacements coexist in every Magnetic Field Polarization.

1- Singular Curvilinear Spatial Divergences (Centrifugal), which together conforms a 3D Spherical-Ellipsoid Volume.

2- The sum of each singular centrifugal curvilinear divergence generates the Spiral of Motion, which seats "apparently static" in Space.

Divergence is in charge to propagate this forces in a 3D Spatial Spherical Volume, away from magnetic embodiment (carriers) in front of each polarization (poles)

The Rotational, Spiral Effect is formed by the simultaneous centrifugal forces (from center outwards and away) from all the divergent curved lines.

Both Geometry Displacements are involved (together as one) in the Influence over ferromagnetics, transmitting this rotational-advancing movements to the inner particles within ferromagnetic cores.

Influenced Ferromagnetic Cores then transfer this forward rotational effect into the copper wires in the coils.

This is the way we obtain an EMF Induction in every Generator out there.

Some conceptual errors from the past would have to be rectified here:

When a Magnetic Field start entering into proximity to a ferromagnetic core (Air Gap in a Generator), this magnetic rotational and divergent forces iso facto start influencing the core, then the iron particles start this rotational inner alignment. And this Rotational Influence is just effected from the polarization approaching, whether a North or a South.

Therefore, this Influenced ferromagnetic core will only reflect the rotational direction from that pole.

The other opposite pole, located at 180º would be influencing the core in front of it at that exact time of rotation angle from the generator exciter (Rotary Stator)

So, no such a thing like we get a N-S when a North end is approaching an iron core...only a North rotation would be influencing the iron.

All this would be better understood by Graphics and if you have not seen my video below, I highly recommend it to visualize all these geometries:

MAGNETISM PARTICLE DYNAMICS

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZhETcDHDRY[/VIDEO]

...am working on more graphics (actually I have been doing it for a very long time)


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Wrong and Right Induction Process Interpretations...

Hello again,

Below I have made two CAD Graphics based on the typical type of AC Generator we must are familiar with, which consists of a center rotary stator (stator from the fact that it is always magnetized by A DC feed), DC converted from just two diodes inside casing, collecting from additional and separate induced coils set where generating coils are and transferred via couple of brushes sweeping to continuous slip rings.

But the main point here is to differentiate where the two main Induction concepts differ:

First I will display what we all know "believe" is taking place, as the Academia have taught all of us...:

[IMG][/IMG]

According to above position of the inner rotor-stator (Magnetic Poles Bisectors aiming at 0º and 180º), and based on the "Imaginary Lines of Force"...(represented by the Magenta lines)...the Induction, as originally explained by Faraday, back in 1831...took place where the two red circles are, meaning at 270º and 90º, based on the two Blue sweeping angles.

Why?...because this supposedly existing but imaginary lines of force, revealed only by the iron filings method, in this specific positioning...were "cutting" perpendicularly Only the Vertical Conductors within that circled area.

So, this is the peak output (top positive sine wave and top negative sine wave) for all the conductors numbered respectively on left: L2, L1, L8, L7...And on right side : L3, L4, L5, L6.

And let's make sure you all understand that this peak Induction timing according to rotor positioning is perfectly correct.

What is not correct (and very wrong) is the way of interpreting this Induction Process is taking place...:

First, such "Imaginary Lines of Force" ONLY exists under the Iron Filings Method over a piece of paper on top of field, but not in any other more advanced methods to image Magnetic Fields.

All the other Methods coincide on a separation from both polarizations, (a center waist) plus, in specific scanning with a B&W CRT (single electron beam) we can see each rotational nature and directions very clear.

And even whenever the iron filings are used on a 3D Liquid Volume, we can see that separation from both poles, while such "Imaginary Lines of Force" are not observed:



THE ACTUAL INDUCTION PROCESS:



So, the Graphic above shows the Real explanation and note that Peak Induction is taking place, exactly at the same angle from rotor as previous Graph (rotor has not been moved), except, that it is based on the spinning influence from each field polarization on the laminated iron core, then transferred to the respective copper coils winded around those specific core elements under the spinning spatial influence.

And below Graph shows the 3D Divergent Volume Area for both polarizations:

[IMG][/IMG]

Even though it seems this will not cause any difference in the final result (Peak Induction)...it does changes the way we all look at EMF Induction process nature, which in both above CAD Graphics is taking place exactly at 0º and 180º, meaning we have been "off" by a 90º rotation on both ends...so, many other things would be understood completely different...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Iamnuts]

When observing lines of force via iron filings or compass needles etc
what you are seeing is things in their lowest energy state?

[Ufopolitics]

When observing lines of force via iron filings or compass needles etc
what you are seeing is things in their lowest energy state?

Hello Iamnuts,

Yes, that is perfectly correct.

What you are seeing are the Centripetal (lowest magnetic return to discharge AT center plane) from both poles exchange plus also from the Higher Pressure levels from pole to pole cross flow exchange.

If you check any magnet, including Neos...at their center (equatorial zone) you will notice this is actually the lowest magnetic force area for either Attract or Repulse.

You could check with any sophisticated and expensive equipment...like a Gauss Meter...or simply and cheap...approach an opposite pole to this zone...then compare Attract Forces versus top pole.

Or, just approach a like pole to check repulsion, versus the top pole of magnet.

Even a piece of iron would do...

This zone is where both pole returns cross flows, so they are weaker there.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

About Induction Cycloids...

Hello to All,

I spoke on previous post about Cycloids in Induction...well here I would expand just a bit...

Cycloid is the Magnetic Field Rotational Continuity of Flow through Time.

To visualize this better, look at below Graph CAD:

[IMG][/IMG]

Above are the same basic concepts as previous generator I have shown, except that here it is based on Eight Single Independent Coils (Not Overlapped), and spaced apart in order to simplify understanding.

The Rotor is the same type, a main coil fed by linear DC, in order to maintain a static polarization. But it could easily be just a permanent magnet...

The point here is to show how each rotational polarization, by Influencing each ferromagnetic core, transfers its flow converting it in an electron traffic at the coil winds...that we all know as Energy...or Electricity...

So, North Spiral (Blue) is spinning CCW and South Pole (red) CW...and this is referenced based on setting our point of view right at the center of rotor axis.

Generator rotor, looking from above is turning CW (like most of them do)

And to picture this Sequence in a linear fashion let's look at Graph below, where we are observing only a half turn progression of rotor:


[IMG][/IMG]

The timings are matched every 180º where T1 is the position represented on graphic of rotor magnetic field aiming at Coil 0º North, and Coil 180º South. And if you notice the coils winding are both the same direction, except one in front of the other (don't get confused by the mirror geometry) however, each end terminals are generating opposite voltage polarities.

This starting Coils are generating the starting Cycloids for North and South, being South Negative (Magenta half Sinewave) and North Positive (Cyan color half upper sine). So, it is understood that when rotor pole face is fully aligned with coil core face the Cycloid (half sine) would be at peak level, whether negative (South) or Positive (North))

I know by first time looking at this Graphics seems complicated...but it is not, and the more you familiarize with them, the more you understand the simplicity behind this process. It is just a matter of comprehending the 3D Space and getting inside of them...

In the real Electric Generators Coils design is overlapped, having a much wider center common core configured by many elements, normally this center core area is about the same area of each rotor pole, this is in order to obtain one full sine wave cycle (Half Positive-Half Negative) in just half turn of rotor, based on a simple two pole home generator.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[BroMikey]

Thank You UFO, I see my answer now. You are a fun wiz-kid
cause you know how to explain things and have some great graphics
tools at your disposal. Let the nay sayers perch on a limb and roll their
eyes cause that is all they were pre-programmed to do

As for you recent entries? God Almighty fella I am still reeling from the
overload/back slash dude I love your stuff.

I been waitin on you and you have gone the extra mile here.

The Modified Motor works something like this if I read my UFO's right.

[bistander]

Hello again,

Below I have made two CAD Graphics based on the typical type of AC Generator we must are familiar with, which consists of a center rotary stator (stator from the fact that it is always magnetized by A DC feed), DC converted from just two diodes inside casing, collecting from additional and separate induced coils set where generating coils are and transferred via couple of brushes sweeping to continuous slip rings.

But the main point here is to differentiate where the two main Induction concepts differ:

First I will display what we all know "believe" is taking place, as the Academia have taught all of us...:


[IMG][/IMG]

According to above position of the inner rotor-stator (Magnetic Poles Bisectors aiming at 0º and 180º), and based on the "Imaginary Lines of Force"...(represented by the Magenta lines)...the Induction, as originally explained by Faraday, back in 1831...took place where the two red circles are, meaning at 270º and 90º, based on the two Blue sweeping angles.

Why?...because this supposedly existing but imaginary lines of force, revealed only by the iron filings method, in this specific positioning...were "cutting" perpendicularly Only the Vertical Conductors within that circled area.

So, this is the peak output (top positive sine wave and top negative sine wave) for all the conductors numbered respectively on left: L2, L1, L8, L7...And on right side : L3, L4, L5, L6.
And let's make sure you all understand that this peak Induction timing according to rotor positioning is perfectly correct.

What is not correct (and very wrong) is the way of interpreting this Induction Process is taking place...:

First, such "Imaginary Lines of Force" ONLY exists under the Iron Filings Method over a piece of paper on top of field, but not in any other more advanced methods to image Magnetic Fields.

All the other Methods coincide on a separation from both polarizations, (a center waist) plus, in specific scanning with a B&W CRT (single electron beam) we can see each rotational nature and directions very clear.

And even whenever the iron filings are used on a 3D Liquid Volume, we can see that separation from both poles, while such "Imaginary Lines of Force" are not observed:



THE ACTUAL INDUCTION PROCESS:



So, the Graphic above shows the Real explanation and note that Peak Induction is taking place, exactly at the same angle from rotor as previous Graph (rotor has not been moved), except, that it is based on the spinning influence from each field polarization on the laminated iron core, then transferred to the respective copper coils winded around those specific core elements under the spinning spatial influence.

And below Graph shows the 3D Divergent Volume Area for both polarizations:

[IMG][/IMG]

Even though it seems this will not cause any difference in the final result (Peak Induction)...it does changes the way we all look at EMF Induction process nature, which in both above CAD Graphics is taking place exactly at 0º and 180º, meaning we have been "off" by a 90º rotation on both ends...so, many other things would be understood completely different...


Regards


Ufopolitics

Hi Ufo,

Interesting read. The conventional terminology defines stator as the stationary part and rotor as the rotating part of the machine. Also in these dynamos, all the flux lines are considered radial across the air gap. So essentially all the armature conductors cut that air gap flux at 90° (tangentially at the air gap).

In the diagram below you show the rotor and stator fields in alignment. Those fields are actually in a quadrature relationship or nearly so (90°). This is the basis for advanced motor control methods called vector or flux vector control used by VFDs.

[IMG][/IMG]

According to above position of the inner rotor-stator (Magnetic Poles Bisectors aiming at 0º and 180º), and based on the "Imaginary Lines of Force"...(represented by the Magenta lines)...the Induction, as originally explained by Faraday, back in 1831...took place where the two red circles are, meaning at 270º and 90º, based on the two Blue sweeping angles.

Why?...because this supposedly existing but imaginary lines of force, revealed only by the iron filings method, in this specific positioning...were "cutting" perpendicularly Only the Vertical Conductors within that circled area.

So, this is the peak output (top positive sine wave and top negative sine wave) for all the conductors numbered respectively on left: L2, L1, L8, L7...And on right side : L3, L4, L5, L6.

{The peak generated voltage occurs in the unlabeled and E1, E2 conductors (slots).} edit... incorrect statement in brackets {}... my bad. See posts 645 & 649 for details.

Regards,

bi

[Ufopolitics]

What is really the Lenz Effect?

I believe that by now would be easier to understand what is really the Lenz Effect?

The Lenz Effect is just whenever we pull away the Rotational Magnetic Field from a ferromagnetic Core (or Air Core as well) which has been previously Induced .

The effect repeats when we try to push field again to the same coil-core (after rotation being influenced by Lenz) this time opposing from our positive field to "screw" back in.

The analogy for comparison would be the same one that Herman Minkowski mentioned way back...The Cork Screw Mechanical Effect.

Whenever we push forward a magnetic field into a generating coil, it "screws" an influence on core and wires according to pole direction...so, when we pull back, a reverse flow would be created on both, core and wires, generating an opposite spin, which opposes our pulling movement.

This effect applies when we are migrating (by rotation or linearly) the magnetic field from core to another core (lowest point on Cycloid) within same polarization, or whenever we are entering a previously induced opposed spin polarization (example: from North to South, or South to North, when switching to a new Half Cycle).

It would be also understood that when generating coil is loaded, meaning closed, the reversed field effect would be much stronger, therefore, generator rotor would become very stiff to turn.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[nathan97]

Ufo,

nice explanation. While thinking about your view of magnetism I'm trying to understand how the model you are presenting fits some very basic experimental results. The simple case is the single straight wire where a current is forced into: how does your model fits in this case ? How does the model explains the force and magnetic field associated to that ?

Thanks,

nathan

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,

Interesting read. The conventional terminology defines stator as the stationary part and rotor as the rotating part of the machine.

Hello Bistander,

I just call it "rotary stator" like I mentioned before...because of being a fixed fed DC coil, whether it is a brush or brushless, talking from the magnetism point of view, it always delivers a fixed, static polarity at those ends.

Also in these dynamos, all the flux lines are considered radial across the air gap. So essentially all the armature conductors cut that air gap flux at 90° (tangentially at the air gap).

There is always a climbing sine (slope up)...a peak sine (top)and a downhill sine stage (slope down) ... if all conductors are cut with same magnitude, angle, etc, like you are writing above...how could this happen according to you?

In the diagram below you show the rotor and stator fields in alignment. Those fields are actually in a quadrature relationship or nearly so (90°). This is the basis for advanced motor control methods called vector or flux vector control used by VFDs.


The peak generated voltage occurs in the unlabeled and E1, E2 conductors (slots).

Regards,

bi

The CAD I have shown of this Generator are from a real 3kW Head I have for experimenting...I copied, exactly every slot, every wiring...exactly as they are.

Below are the complete CAD:

[IMG][/IMG]

E1 and E2 are just the Exciter Coils connected to Diodes, then to Rotor via brushes.

The green coils are the Generating Coils.

The empty gaps are just like that, empty.

But maybe you did not understand the diagram windings, I am just representing the upper side of each coil, but they wrap around below as well which is not shown. Label L# are for each coil to correspond with the other side. like L1 to L1, L2 to L2 and so on.

I made Graph bigger and without any fields, just plain wiring to see it better:

[IMG][/IMG]


Regards


Ufopolitics