ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Ufopolitics]

The Ferrolens IS SHOWING 100% AND ACCURATE THE MAGNETIC FLUX LINES AND FIELD OF A PERMANENT MAGNET.
Since they did not find the magnetic charge particle there is no such thing like magnetic current. There is only magnetic field and field potential.
The iron fillings experiment shows falsely I repeat the magnetic permeability (or else inductance) of the iron fillings as the magnetic field outline of a magnet.

This is wrong, the iron fillings suck out (steal) magnetic flux from the magnet's field essentially deforming it and align themselves across the two highest potential spatial regions of the magnetic source namely the two poles of a magnet. thus actually short circuiting the magnet!!

The Ferrocell or else ferrolens (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ferrolens) is the accurate one because it has single domain magnetic particles (superparamagnetism) meaning they can form dipoles between them following exactly the magnetic flux, tangent to the force lines (potential) of a dipole magnet field.

As far I am concerned the iron fillings experiment is a corpse...as proven R.I.P.

END OF STORY

Hello Markoul,

Thanks for your opinions!

I agree 100% that Iron Filings kills the Real Magnetic Field Visuals...as a matter of fact, I have dedicated a full video to prove why they are wrong, comparing it to Ferrocell, View Film and Color CRT (3 Guns R,G,B):

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4v5YsV_M5hc[/VIDEO]

According to Wheeler's Theory, Higher Pressures which bypass accretion disc, are Higher Speed Flux, which are not captured by neither ferrocell nor view film, BUT, Color CRT does show this lines from pole to pole, at the outer limits of screen, almost out of it.

Iron Filings as you wrote, freeze, shunt, chain the magnetic field, shrinking this higher pressure lines, while hiding the Mid-Pressure 3D Layers, which show two bubbles one for each pole.

When we step into what we all know as "Attraction" and "Repulsion" is when this higher forces field lines enter into stage to play the deciding roles.

On that video comments I wrote related to Attraction:

Attraction, as we all think off...as we have been taught...since the beginning of times...is that Alike Poles Attract...that is a wrong concept...they never do, they never blend, fuse together at all.

When we face a S/N Magnet with a S/N Magnet, like:

[S/N>>S1/N1]

We all perceive that the two end poles N>>S1 are the "Attracting Acting Poles"...but in reality S1 is seeking to Fuse with S from the other magnet...and so, N1 is seeking fusion with N.

Poles in a magnet are generated from the very center (equator) of whatever magnetic carrier volume, outwards, so we have a single magnet looks like:

[ N <<l>>S]

And Attraction between Two would then look like:

[ N <<l>>S] + [ N1 <<l>>S1]

And result from adding above would be:

[N+N1<<l>>S+S1]

Which would give Us a Double strong Magnet as is the sum from both.

Concluding: N1 seeks Fusion with N, since both Origins and Spin Directions are aligned Spatially.

And so S seeks Fusion with S1, also having same origin vectors.

We could be able to see this full interaction with Magnetic Viewing Film, which clearly shows the lighter center green stripe at very center of every magnet...

And when two magnets are attracted and contacted together...we can see how that light green stripe moved from each magnet's center towards the Intersecting Gap... Which means that each magnet Now, became a Full Pole...

And so for Repulsion I posted:

And so a Repulsion is the Opposite from Attraction on my previous post:

[ N <<l>>S] + [ S1 <<l>>N1]

Parting from Non Compatible Alike Poles, in above Interaction could not be Any Complete Fusion Seeking Pole, by approaching them, since all directional vectors from the like poles are opposing each others... However, both S+S1 blend together since they are both of same magnetic pressures. When we face two magnetic fields in repulsion we have pure, positive, compressed energy.

Regards


Ufopolitics

[aljhoa]

Therefore, this aligns with Ken's Theory perfectly well, meaning, the outgoing forces aligned (parallel) to axis, or zero degrees, are CENTRIFUGAL, stronger forces emanating into SPACE gradually loose strength and are SUCKED BACK into their ORIGIN, COUNTERSPACE, AETHER...which is the DIELECTRIC FIELD ACCRETION DISC.

Mercury vortex in a magnetic field

Rotation of liquid mercury generated by a magnetic field

Al

[Markoul]

So how far are these high potential lines you are talking about? 10 cm away 30 cm 1m? That does not make any sense!

Strongest force vectors are always the shortest between two spatial points or regions.

On the other hand attraction and repulsion can easily be explained by different spin directions of the vortices on the poles.

When opposite polarity poles of two magnets are approached from opposite directions the resulting effect is their vortices are in phase and therefore coincide and attract each other. That what is called magnetic attraction. It's like a handshake.

On the other hand same polarity poles of two magnets when approached they vortices are out of phase from each other and they hit against each other and repel. That what is called magnetic repulsion.

no fancy things here. simple.

I' m not convinced about CRT showing these high potential lines you are talking about, could be anything...

Show me the lines...?

[Markoul]

Me explaining why iron fillings experiments is BS! And ferrocell displaying correctly

Ferrocell depicts correctly the field of a magnet, iron fillings does NOT!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCdu2TE_Wk8

Therefore, as far we can see 100% with the ferrocell the true field of a permanent magnet is illustrated below:




https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yLp...ew?usp=sharing

as also shown by the ferrocell:



https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EwR...ew?usp=sharing


all the rest are mere speculations.

EM

[bistander]

ferrocell

Ferrocell depicts correctly the field of a magnet, iron fillings does NOT!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCdu2TE_Wk8

Therefore, as far we can see 100% with the ferrocell the true field of a permanent magnet is illustrated below:




https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yLp...ew?usp=sharing

as also shown by the ferrocell:



https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EwR...ew?usp=sharing


all the rest are mere speculations.

EM

Your second link:



Obviously from: intro
Had you clicked on "More Info Here" under the image you would have seen this:



Had you continued to read that description you would have noticed this:

The center point between poles of the viewed image represents the Null Zone or more generally, the Bloch Wall. The 'lines' on either side of the null indicate magnetic vector potential. (Not field lines like iron filings show)

Had you clicked on this:

For more detailed information, see References

you could have found some really good papers detailing research into how the ferrocell works. Like this one:

Magnetically controlled reflection of a ferrofluid cell

http://www.ferrocell.us/references/M...uid%20Cell.doc

And when you understand that, you will learn that the ferrocell does NOT

Ferrocell depicts correctly the field of a magnet

as you say but rather shows the magnetic vector potential, which is NOT the same as the magnetic field or the magnetic lines of force or flux.

I've been trying to tell Ufopolitics this for several years. He, and you, and Ken are misinterpreting what is presented by the ferrocell when a magnet and bright lights are placed near it.

Regards,

bi

[Markoul]

What you mean by the term magnetic vector potential?

Before we start a conversation you must define exactly what you mean by that?


In a magnetic field as described with lines, there are only two things magnetic flux and lines of force. Nothing else, I don't know what you mean by this famous magnetic vector potential. This is not a correct scientific term for describing magnetic fields.

Potential in general is quantitative in nature and has no vector involved. How you can describe potential with vectors truly escapes me?!

On the other hand, force of lines in a magnetic field are always tangent to its magnetic flux lines shown by the ferrocell.

Magnetic flux lines are simple in the case of the ferrocell the ferrofluid nanoparticles trajectories or orientation under the influence of the force vectors (force lines) of the magnetic field induced into the ferrocell.

Flux lines shown by the the ferrocell are pretty close to the force vectors which I remind you are always tangent to the flux lines. This is because ferrofluid nanoparticles are single domain (google it) and can follow exactly the force vectors of an induced magnetic field (superparamagnetism) whereas iron fillings are not and essentially are deforming the field of a magnet and depicting it incorrectly.

I have proved in my video that it is impossible for them to enter into the Bloch axis of a magnet therefore they can not depict it.

There is no passive device in the planet that can more accurately depict the magnetic field of a magnet than the ferrocell today.

Potential or not, this is the field of a magnet as shown by the ferrocell and not the iron fillings one.

Iron fillings are distorting the field, not showing it!

Best regards,

EM

[bistander]

Magnetic vector potential

What you mean by the term magnetic vector potential?
...

Hi,

I mean the same thing as the author on the ferrocell website you linked (which is the developer and source of the product) when he wrote:
"The 'lines' on either side of the null indicate magnetic vector potential. (Not field lines like iron filings show)".
As you can see by what he enclosed in parentheses that he believes iron fillings show the field lines. Magnetic vector potential is a scientific term well defined physically and mathematically. Maxwell did quite a bit with it. A decent summary at:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_potential

Regards,

bi

[Markoul]

you know Timm?

[Markoul]

you can't be serious that is just the term grandpa maxwell used to describe the sum of magnetic lines in a field (vector potential meaning number of lines or sum). It is just a precursor for B thus the magnetic flux!!


read here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_field


you are confused...

nice talking to you anyway.

I know Timm, he is a great guy.

p.s. this is not Zero it is the Greek letter Θ , first letter of the ΘΕΟΣ meaning GOD...HE left his signature?... and if you go now in his side there no more arrows about this nonsense high potential 1km away lines of a magnet! Θ is the only field there is... wake up people... too much Ken Weeler

[ricards]

iron filings experiments shows flux lines of a magnetic field,

ferrocell only show the north and south, not really the magnetic field, but you can grasp a visual of it..
the white line (clear line) shows the area where the Iron compound was evacuated and the darker area shows where it was compressed, attracted by the poles of the magnet..

I have had my fair share of the Iron filings experiment and to me it is not BS as you state.

[Markoul]

Look,

let's put it this way.

You can't show really the complex magnetic field geometry even at 2D of a magnet with something that aligns always parallel to the poles N-S direction.

Unless you believe that field of a magnet is just a bunch of straight or slightly curved lines, you need something that can also align as well, with the vertical component of the force vectors in a magnetic field to show correctly the total flux of the field.

And that is exactly what the Fe3O4 magnetite single magnetic domain nanoparticles inside the ferrofluid in the ferocell are doing. Since they are superparamagnetic (google it) single domain they can align perfectly with the magnetic flux of a magnet at any direction and strength therefore showing it at its full, even the magnetic flux passing through the Bloch axis of a magnet which is impossible (as i shown experimentally) for the iron fillings to enter there and therefore can not depict it.

Iron fillings are strongly ferromagnetic an are always attracted at the direction where the strongest magnetic potential is located in space.
They act more like a compass. So its the other way around really iron fillings
are not really showing the flux but more where the poles are located thus the regions with the most potential. Also you will notice if you springle too many iron fillings, because their strong ferromagnetism they attract each other and totally fail to show any field.

EM

[bistander]

Demonstration incorrect conclusion

... even the magnetic flux passing through the Bloch axis of a magnet which is impossible (as i shown experimentally) for the iron fillings to enter there and therefore can not depict it.
...

You refer to this, right?

...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCdu2TE_Wk8
...

That which you show has nothing to do with the mid region of the magnet(s). The two ring magnets attract each other in the shown orientation due to the North and South poles of one attracting the South and North poles of the other, respectively.

And the orientation of the the steel washer on the ring magnet is caused by the force to minimize the reluctance of the path between the poles of the magnet.

bi

[Markoul]

Sorry but i have to disagree with you, magnetism is not the same as ferromagnetism.

Magnets when put side by side get attracted and align themselves in parallel with each other (with the opposite poles of course as you correctly pointed out).

Whereas ferromagnetic materials put aside a magnet since they always point out towards the N-S poles direction of a magnet like a compass are always aligning vertically to the midpoint axis (Bloch) of a magnet.

That is why iron fillings fail to show the lowest potential flux passing through the Bloch region axis of a magnet and give the incomplete and therefore false macroscopic imprint of the field of the magnet. This is also inescapable proof that iron fillings are not really showing magnetic flux (trajectories or paths of movement) but more lines of force and magnetic potential and only these towards the highest potentials of a magnetic field namely the two poles of a magnet.

(important clarification: force line vectors in magnetic fields are always depicted as straight directional arrows or vectors whereas magnetic flux lines can be any type of curved line or other line shape indicating path of travel of an magnetic object under the influence of a magnetic field force vector. Force vectors on a magnetic field are always tangent to the flux lines at any point)

But if you still insist and believe that iron fillings are showing correctly magnetic flux of a magnet then you must also accept what iron fillings is telling you thus magnets don't have domain walls, which is utterly wrong of course.

In a nutshell iron fillings is a macroscopic depiction of the magnetic highest potential of the field of a magnet whereas ferrocell as a modern nanomagnetic device it is operating more at the quantum level than the macroscopic, can depict the quantum image of the field of a magnet.

That's all there is.


Kind Regards,

EM

Below: 2x2x1” block neodymium, sitting on top is a disk magnet, on the side is a steel disk, sitting perpendicular to the
dielectric inertial plane (Bloch Wall), bottom is a steel ring with a knife-thin edge also sitting perpendicular to the dielectric inertial plane.
Middle picture is same but with the ring on the side. On the far right, a different angle of the middle picture. The dielectric
inertial plane is marked with a green line.

photo: https://drive.google.com/file/d/10Pf...ew?usp=sharing
CREDITS TO ŠKEN WHEELER FROM HIS BOOK HERE:


https://ia902502.us.archive.org/31/i...tism1small.pdf

[bistander]

...
But if you still insist and believe that iron fillings are showing correctly magnetic flux of a magnet then you must also accept what iron fillings is telling you thus magnets don't have domain walls, which is utterly wrong of course.
...

What? A magnet or piece of ferromagnetic material (like steel) will have thousands of domains and therefore thousands of domain walls. And there is nothing particular interesting about the midpoint of a magnet.

photo: https://drive.google.com/file/d/10Pf...ew?usp=sharing
CREDITS TO ŠKEN WHEELER FROM HIS BOOK HERE:
...

Nice photo. Shows much better than your video that the two magnets align pole-wise, opposite attracting. While the metal washers align to minimize reluctance between magnet poles, like I said. Really nothing due to anything happening with the middle of the magnets.

bi

[Markoul]

You couldn't be more wrong. The domain wall is the reason why dipole magnetism exists.

Next time try to walk without your waist...

Bye

EM