ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[bistander]

Magnetic domains

You couldn't be more wrong. The domain wall is the reason why dipole magnetism exists.
...

In most materials the domains are microscopic in size, around 10−4 - 10−6 m.

From: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_domain.

Actual photo.

More info.




bi

[Markoul]

yeeeees!!...thanks for the info.

However, what this all has to do with the domain wall field discussion of a magnet? really escapes me?

We are NOT talking here about magnetic domains (metal chunks inside the magnet) but the field domain Bloch wall of a magnet which is one in number and in the middle of the magnet.

you are deluded in this one...

[Markoul]

Ufopolitics, please look at your yoututbe private messages. I have sent you a pm, kind of important. Thank you.

[Ufopolitics]

Ufopolitics, please look at your yoututbe private messages. I have sent you a pm, kind of important. Thank you.

Hello Markoul,

I got your PM here.
My time is now VERY LIMITED, so any questions or consults you need please leave them on my ufopolitics/gmail acct, and I will answer whenever I have the time to get back to you.

Sorry about the inconvenience.

Kind Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Arguments about Two Completely Different things...

Hello to All,

About your arguments (Markoul and Bistander)...sorry to say that you are MIXING TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PHENOMENA in ALL your above comments...

And please do not take it the wrong way, Many of Us have done it before or are still confused on this subject, since it has not been taught properly up to now.

There are TWO DIFFERENT EFFECT MANIFESTING IN MAGNETISM, and I will put it first in very general terms:

1- MATERIAL (MASS) EFFECT.

2-NON MATERIAL EFFECT (VIRTUAL, MASSLESS AND SPATIAL)

EXPLAINING #1- On the MASS of ALL Ferromagnetic Materials there is an Effect manifested as you guys have described and shown above, relating to the microscopic world, as are the molecular and atomic magnetic domains and domain walls, whenever these materials are under the effect of MAGNETISM, whether TEMPORARY (Electromagnets) or PERMANENT (Magnets).

As have been shown for years, a piece of iron "ALIGNS" according to the INFLUENCING Field directions, and yes, in this alignment, Bistander is correct, there are absolutely no "center" differences at all, meaning ALL Microscopic Particles within the MASS of the Ferromagnetic Material show DIRECTIONAL ALIGNMENTS, which does NOT have any particular change or difference in their gravitational center.

And as it has also been written before...there are certain ferromagnetic alloys who have all kind of different REACTING PROPERTIES related to the effected Magnetic Field.

Some materials have the capability to retain the Field exposure even if it is for a short period of time (Hysteresis, memory or retention)...As other ferromagnetic materials return "automatically" to previous alignments (or miss alignments) after Field is over, collapsed or REVERSED, etc,etc.

EXPLAINING #2- This part is the harder to "digest" or understand for most of "materialistic" people studying Magnetism...and simply it is due that it is not possible to see any magnetic fields at plain sight...nor to touch it with our fingers...reason why I call it SPATIAL-VIRTUAL-STATE.

And here please allow me to make a clarification about Iron Filings Method.

Iron Filings are Ferromagnetic Particles with DEFINED MASS AND WEIGHT, therefore, no matter how little or how many particles we sprinkle over a magnetic field, all these particles WILL ALIGN EXACTLY AS ALL MAGNETIC DOMAINS WITHIN THE MAGNETIC CORE MASS portraying the Magnetic Field.

All sprinkled iron filings over the Magnetic Field will become MAGNETIZED, PLUS ALIGNED, according to the Field Direction and volume geometries ON THE MASS FIELD CARRIER...AND AS SUCH, it WILL NOT SHOW ANY CENTER DISTORTIONS.

In even more simple words...

IRON FILINGS WILL EXACTLY MIRROR, MIMIC, THE MASS MOLECULAR ALIGNMENTS WITHIN FERROMAGNETIC CORE CARRYING THE FIELD.

As Markoul wrote...exactly reaction as that of a Compass Needle.

NOW, the VIRTUAL FIELD, emanated in SPACE, GRAVITATING around the ferromagnetic core SPACE, which has NO MASS, NO WEIGHT, HENCE IT IS INVISIBLE to plain sight...have properties which are the ones mentioned and shown in ALL EXPERIMENTS DONE WITH LIGHT, ELECTRON BEAMS AND EVEN FERROMAGNETIC PARTICLES, BUT, sustained in a COLLOIDAL STATE, allowing LIGHT TO PASS BY THEM, As to be set at a further distance from FIELD DIRECT INFLUENCE, where it can show these SPATIAL PROPERTIES to Human Sight.

And it is about this SPATIAL FIELD that We (Ken Wheeler and I) refer to, as having a CENTER PLANE (COUNTERSPACE, DIELECTRIC, etc,etc), PLUS MANIFESTING PARTIAL SPINS in a ONE WAY DIRECTION FORCE FOR BOTH POLARIZATIONS (POLES).

Hope this post Mainly, RECONCILES all arguments, plus clears some doubts which refer to two different phenomena, even though both are dependents upon each others...


Kind Regards to all.


Ufopolitics

[mikrovolt]

There are components to the magnetic field that were previously not included.
Because the terminology refers to only the previous components we cannot go forward.
By the time everyone agrees that the composite field should include these other parts the sub atomic
comportments will be observed sufficiently and the magnetic field model will again need further modification.

It is normal to have a preference to certain names given to these components.
In a forum like this we should use the best definitions and the simplest of names.
( my opinion a disk and bubbles works fors me ) while this gets us to a little
higher concept level of understanding we cannot escape the fanciful language.

On the other hand consider a mathematician having to use the term bubble as the
officially declared variable that also would be an imposition. Like unification theory it is an endless occupation.

The in your face method of presenting concept does not work for me personally.
Honestly when this topic arrived again I said to myself "Oh look what we have here."
Appreciating the history of Bloch and Neel wall for some time I feel the story should be told more
smoothly less defensively even though there is credit for ferro viewing technology the drama distracts from the progress.
I rarely refer to Ken Wheeler's pdf maybe even avoid it because of the in your face drama. Sorry need a better approach.

[Gambeir]

Personally I can't get too caught up in the details; one cannot see the forest if they are insisting on standing with their nose to the bark of a tree. I don't want to lose sight of the forest whilst looking at the beetles eating the tree, for the forest still exists and billions of beetles still haven't managed to munch their way to extinction. True science is the theoretical put to test and made to stand before empirical forms of testing. Beetles live in the theoretical bark of trees, and like all creatures of time, some survive and others do not; both trees and beetles. What we think we know "today" is probably not a truth. We are all beetles munching away right now and we are working with theories, some of which seem pretty solid I will grant you, but a theory is a momentary truth because all knowledge is fluid. Always be aware that what you think you know might be entirely in error and exploded by tomorrow's new found knowledge.

What I think I know is that magnetism is produced by multiple factors. It's unlikely to involve a single element alone. Materials don't transport anything but for their intrinsic geometry inside of them at the molecular level, and it's the geometry which we call crystalline lattices which transports everything; so that geometric forms do dictate movement of energies and do dictate the results of those energies.

We know that geometry leads to specific outcomes for specific energies: That's as old as the pyramids. It's about as solid as our knowledge gets. Things become fuzzy afterwards, believe me we don't yet know the half of what's really going on and this is where we are right now; we are working with notions about what's going on, not what we know is going on: There's a big difference between knowing and believing.

All we really know is that a complexity of interactions exist between geometric formations and energies. We have some little understanding right now. We are only now becoming aware of how complex reality really is; how energy creates forms which are geometric because the energy itself follows the rules of geometry, and so geometry is encoded in lattice structures of matter created from energy as defined by the molecules within matter. Carbon probably being the most studied since it's linked to magnetism and humans, and possibly then to UFO's and diseases, some of which may themselves be linked to the appearance of UFO's.

The study and classification of crystals is itself a relatively new field. Not seriously begun until the 1960's when it was realized how significant these formations of nature really are.

So much of what we think we understand is really very recent in this regard, and it's from this push to understand the molecular geometric structure, that sprung out of the study of the nature of crystalline patterns, which has given rise to the super materials of today. It's really this understanding of energy transport at a molecular level through or along the lines formed by the geometry of lattice structures within matter which defines what the potential outcome is to given energy input.

We think that this energy and geometry relationship exists because we are now looking at engineered materials which have magnetic qualities previously thought impossible and that were based on this sort of general understanding. This is important for all of us because to really understand the magnetic field is likely to be critical in finding solutions to significant rising diseases.

It seems clear that magnetism is a fundamental part of our reality, of why life itself exists, and it's been through a formalized study and classification system of crystals undertaken in the 1960's, covertly seeking to understand magnetism, that there likely hides darker secrets which can be linked to diseases and the transmission of diseases. Some of which have come about only after the last Global War and the mass arrival of UFO's.

Today we call these Prion type diseases. Prions were themselves a huge source of debate, no one was even sure such a disease could exist because prions were thought to be a crystal based disease, and these were linked to transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) such as BSE (Bovine Songiform Encephalopathy), Alzheimer's Encephalopathy, Kuru Encephalopathy, Creutzfeldt Jacobs Encephalopathy, and others.

You see the problem right? How can a mineral create a disease that kills which isn't a poison? Makes no sense at all huh? So right away there was a titanic battle over the causes and rise of diseases like Alzheimers and Creutzfeldt Jacobs. Certainly the farming and cattle industry didn't want that one getting out.

https://www.the-scientist.com/?artic...ide-of-Prions/

Although a few of these were known to exist prior to the last Global War they had only rarely been documented in humans. Kuru, or laughing death, was almost the only known form outside of possibly three or four other individual cases. Today it's a virtual daily roll call of death by what amounts to Kuru: Call it whatever else you want, but it's all fundamentally the same disease in layman's terms. Many reading this can probably relate: I know I can.

How the body creates is certain to involve a magnetic field and a magnetic field is certain to involve crystalline patterns. What is a crystal anyways but a self assembling form? Isn't that a lot like a bunch of magnets bunching up?

Magnetism is enabled by geometry and geometric formations. We know this is the case because we now know that crystalline patterns have specific net outcomes from energies put into them that result in this outcome, and we can surmise from the nature of a crystalline form that there are energies which might then exist, but which we don't know about. These energies might also be all about us since nature produces the ones we do know about without our assistance. This says we were not aware of the possibility that of all energies which do exist all around us, there might be energies we don't yet know about, waiting to be discovered, and which could re~write what we think we know.

That is not to say we do not know many or even all of these energies; it is to say that these energies may be behaving in ways we have not widely imagined. I say widely imagined since Telsa obviously did imagine something along these lines when he said that Gravity exists in the shadows of magnetism.

[Markoul]

sorry guys... I had to delete it.

This was classified information not for the public.

The reason why mainstream research on this matters is deliberately discouraged and sometimes prevented secretly is because it is simple dangerous and can not be researched randomly by anyone. Even black projects are extremely reluctant....

...suffice to say that since ordinary matter consists only 4% of the total matter in our Universe and life exists here... what makes you to believe life it can not exist at the other 96%?

If you are doubting the existence of dark matter and dark energy it will suffice to say for you who know a bit of physics or electrical engineering...in dark domain there are neither electrons nor photons. It consists from different set than ours of particles and quanta.

As a matter of fact you sitting now in your chair, you can occupy the same space exactly with another intelligent life form, from the other side...

Also if you follow science news and published papers, lately there is a directive the dark matter topic to be pulled down from mainstream science and slowly forgotten as a not valid anymore theory. So there are scientific papers now explaining expansion of universe and galaxy rotation without the need of dark matter.




EM

[Gambeir]

Ya know I spent a good deal of time examining the topic of dark matter, and like many I found it an interesting subject, but ultimately what I concluded is that it is was an idea injected in to the realm of science in order to hold back real understanding of the nature of reality.

For me, and I can only speak from my personal experiences, I would be deeply un~trusting of any voices coming out of officialdom, and really the origins of dark matter and dark energies really have their formation in the birth of black holes and the marketing of the whole dark matter, black hole meme comes out of Hollywood and then by way of officialdom and Ivory League shills.

The Black Hole concept was marketed by no less than Disney whom made a very interesting movie creatively titled; "The Black Hole." Prior to the Walt Disney movie some science fiction works had hit the market to grease the grounds as it were.
https://film.avclub.com/the-black-ho...ell-1798270862

Of course I was quite young an totally unaware that I was being manipulated and run like a rat in maze, but I was and I too bought in to the whole idea and continued to to do so for quite a long time as well. After all, it has a lot of appeal and explains so much.

What I didn't realize, at the time, was that this film wasn't just a film featuring the latest understanding from science, but that rather it was a false construct: It wasn't a film about scientific discovery set in science fiction format; like I thought it was when I first saw the movie. No, it was propaganda, and it was propaganda targeted at young people during their formative years where they were susceptible to adopting beliefs as intrinsic parts of their own personality.

The film itself signaled (to the aware) that the powers that be were going to take science down a rabbit hole, and they would do that by creatively inventing a black hole in space. The whole idea was a play on words which goes back to the 1960's which some reading this might have already guessed. Out this has sprung, unsurprisingly, dark matter and dark energy, which just happen to have appeared like the magical constructs they truly are right out of the rabbit hat.

Dark matter and dark energy is actually a makeshift counter tool designed to combat rising issues that were foreseen to take place in our own time, and these issues include the questioning of officialdom as previous explanations for how things work came into conflict with observed phenomena conflicting with the official narrative. The foremost of which happens to be how our galaxy works, what is gravity, why do the stars stay in place, how come there's this, that, and the other thingy?

So all this dark matter, dark energy, black hole business really has to do with combating scientific discovery, not assisting it, and what these things do is enable the maintenance of the existing lies about how the Sun works, how stars are formed, and on and on. This is a lot like the tactics of the church which used such methods to hold the doors closed for as long as possible and then fled to the next door to repeat the cycle once again.

I have to conclude that there is no dark matter nor are there any black holes anywhere. The Whole Hole conspiracy is really one which is designed to combat the rising belief in the Electric Universe. Once you get to through the black hole conspiracy time warp you will discover that you've arrived back on the front porch with the electric universe staring right back at you, and it's here where you can once more resume the work of unmasking where magnetism comes from.

[Markoul]

Yes you are right there is no dark matter it's BS!...also there is no black color and magnetic poles (black holes) do not exist.

Thank you.

[mikrovolt]

I did understand the simplified ideas. Everyday we are looking at different combinations of aether and gravity. A variety of published papers are available.
General theory expressions we often delete. Sometimes it might be viewed as specific to some other program even if it is published the actual existence
or non-existence proof has not been disclosed in any detail that I am aware of.

Thank you we appreciate your sharing.

[Markoul]

no really general proof needed.

You get an effect only when two or more things interacting.

Electromagnetism is an effect or phenomenon of electrons interacting with...what?

If electron is the electric energy carrier which is the magnetic energy carrier?...

Is is called electromagnetism for a reason...wake up people...

why they don't call it electromagnetro? but magnetism? I tell you why. They don't have a clue what magnetism is and where it comes from.

What is the magnetron and equal importantly... where is it?

EM

[bistander]

Magnetron

...
What is the magnetron and equal importantly... where is it?

EM

It's in your microwave oven.

[mikrovolt]

Possibly a typo on magnetron. It may be worth effort to pursue magnetron theory.

general definition: A magnetron is a high power microwave oscillator in which the potential energy of an electron cloud near the cathode is converted into RF energy in a series of cavity resonators.

Could there be the cross coupling or transfer mechanism fig 2 ?
I Thought it had the tendency to go thermal and sputter ?
http://www.cpii.com/docs/related/2/MAG%20TECH%20ART.pdf

[Gambeir]

Yes you are right there is no dark matter it's BS!...also there is no black color and magnetic poles (black holes) do not exist.

Thank you.

My opinion is to pay attention to what accretion disc's do. On cosmic scales accretion disc's do have event horizons, they do/can compress matter back in to pure energy, and they do alter time.

Until black holes are proven (somehow) then I personally consider them to be in the same league as Spectral Evidence. I would question the reasons for their sudden appearance in scientific circles, and would point to their use to divert discussion away from delicate areas which I believe have to do with the nature of accretion disc's on the whole. Why energies unknown or undetected by science should be labeled dark matter and dark energy say's more about the sources whom invented the new vocabulary than it does about the energies themselves.

I've already said it's likely we don't know all the energies around us right now. It's almost absurd to suppose we would given our state of corrupted science, but that doesn't mean it's dark matter or dark energy anything. A magnet is like a magnifying glass which focuses light rays. Why is it a surprise that the source out of which this energy springs is the precise point of center? Isn't that what a magnifying glass does at the most intense point of its' focus?

What does this tell us then? Isn't the real suggestive truth that magnetism is all around us right now as light is itself? It's said that a magnetic field can only exist when energy moves, but the reverse is equally true as well. Whatever the magnetic field is, it is all around us all the time, and it can be condensed as a ray just as rays of light may be brought into focus.