ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[bistander]

B field

...
Mr. Nutz here is the UCLA study on reconnection.
UCLA BPPL - Magnetic Field Anhilation
...

Interesting article. Thanks.



Ufo,

Notice in this figure all the B vectors. The magnetic field is a continuum with a B vector at every point, not a single vector for the whole thing.

Regards,

bi

Figure is from the article linked by mikro.

[Markoul]

Ufopolitcs,

That's ingenious what you did there with the double electron beams experiment.

Proves 100% what the ferrocell shows matches the CRT electron beam deflection when magnetic deflection is not applied at the end point of the electron beam but at the middle. Exactly the case with the ferrocell shown flux line where the magnet pole is placed face down at the center (middle) of the ferrocell!

Therefore proving that ferrocell and crt is depicting the true field 3D geometry of the pole of a magnetic field. Although in a ferrocell as also Ufopolitcs stated, flux lines coming from both two poles of magnet are magnetically projected and shown by the ferrocel simultaneously as a single combined interlaced and overllaped 3D image.

So ferrocell gives us much more information about a magnetic field than crts but sometimes for some people who are not able to conceptualize 3D info, ferrocell can be a brain twister.

My advice for these people is to start with the CRT experiments observations and if that you find also hard, then stick with the iron filings experiment and don't bother to post in this thread here.

Because You don't understand it that doesn't mean that it is NOT CORRECT...it just means you lack the brain power...

EM

[Iamnuts]

https://youtu.be/0hk66QYFeqk

[Iamnuts]

Right, I'm taking what Markoul says as fact.
This arrangement must be ubiquitous so it must have implications in
the bigger picture.
What is the effect influencing in say an MRI scan or the MMS mission.
Most of you lot are so narrow minded, how can we see the effect in Earth's
magnetic field? .
Seventy years ago when I was a kid a lot of the things we know today hadn't
even been dreamed of, in our house we still used candles and hauled water
from a well.
I love the Einstein thought experiment with the photon box and the dialectic
between him and Bohr.

[Iamnuts]

https://youtu.be/x8zEWJzglN0

Hi, I found this and it seems to be a really good ferrocell.
John

[mikrovolt]

The technical terms on light and this threads huge complexity
can touch on words like saturation as used in adobe lightroom
Where the slider changes the hue and saturation.

The introduction is easier from a colorful designer perspective
getting comfortable with moving the sliders,what they do to the image.
Since saturation has been covered (another endless occupation)
I would like to compare gradient and the multi pin light source
consider the width of the beam of each led. We want to let the ferro
adjust itself to the magnetic field. yes it is a wire frame 2d to 3d
the wire frame should expand the usefulness helping optical clarity.
There are many controls. This video plays with the gradient filter.
The brush size, nope hit undo button
great now what happened to the mountains. bottom line whatever works, if it is correct !

Making sense of visual adjustments is touchy feely not completely limited to the ferro parameters ?
This is another challenge is getting someone to see the value in advancing in the technology before it is available.
Taking a defensive position help ? It is how you cope with unknown and unresolved issues in new technology.
For example someone is interested in a specific detail in a specific location on a ferro cell.
the use of term saturation professional photography. Here is another tool to enhance sharper detail. Only some will accept it.
It is defining a perspective the purpose of narrowing subject temporarily to address a specific need. Another boring video by mikrovolt sooory.
The gradient settings and brush size to filter sets a gamma programmed into pin lights for ferro enhancement.
https://youtu.be/XZc0ISalAbQ?t=75

secret to understanding magnets fast is to use ludicrous speed.
https://youtu.be/ygE01sOhzz0

[Iamnuts]

Screenshot_2018-05-08-13-26-36.png

There must be something going on.

[Iamnuts]

Screenshot_2018-05-08-13-26-36.png

Ive got 70 pet lambs and do some thinking as I'm tending to them.

[Iamnuts]

What I found out after seeing the lovely big square cell someone had made
on YouTube was that basically its an iron filings experiimet. Whats happening is
that the particles line up just like iron filings and its the Rayleigh or Mie scattering
which is conducting the light along a path to give us the lines that we're seeing.
Now if we had a bar magnet under a square cell with the lights on one edge
perpendicular to the length of the conventionally magnetised bar would we see
any skew?
I find it very difficult to believe that present day science doesn't know about
the actual configuration of a magnetic field when they reckon they know some
things about electrons to a precision of about eleven places.
John.

[Ufopolitics]

What I found out after seeing the lovely big square cell someone had made
on YouTube was that basically its an iron filings experiimet. Whats happening is
that the particles line up just like iron filings and its the Rayleigh or Mie scattering
which is conducting the light along a path to give us the lines that we're seeing.
Now if we had a bar magnet under a square cell with the lights on one edge
perpendicular to the length of the conventionally magnetised bar would we see
any skew?

Sure...and also we all could say that same scattering...are ALSO affecting COLOR CRT's...(scattering e-beams?... )PLUS the super low resolution Magnetic viewing film...which do not require specific bright lights...but just room light...

Or is it just "coincidence"?

I find it very difficult to believe that present day science doesn't know about
the actual configuration of a magnetic field when they reckon they know some
things about electrons to a precision of about eleven places.
John.

Sure...that's why MOBIL & EXXON OIL has gathered together a bunch of high level Scientists...to also seek for free energy...and UFO research...

Keep sleeping together with sheep's....


Ufopolitics

[Iamnuts]

Screenshot_2018-05-08-13-26-36.png

The effect must be here?

[Markoul]

You will be amazed of how many theories the so called established theories are never been proven experimentally.

Iron filings experiment is the reverse. It is an experiment which was never really supported by its own theoretical analysis or peer reviewed but rather supposedly explained by the general EM theory of Maxwell. However, no one really bothered to apply the MX theory in order to verify the iron filings experiment or vice versa. It's taken de facto as a dogma more or less saying the iron filings lines represent the force lines of the field.

However no one until now has examined for what it really is, thus, how ferromagnetic materials interact with a magnet and not really the magnetic field itself generated by the magnet.

It is a 2D map showing actually the minimum magnetic reluctance paths of the ferromagnetic iron filings when placed close to a magnet and not the field of the magnet affecting the iron filings!

Iron fillings can not flow like the nanoparticles inside the ferrofluid do, therefore are incapable to show really the flux (movements or flow paths under magnetic force vectors) and what they realy do is to show not flux but to align with the single force vector each pointing to the nearest pole relative to their position in space.

They just point to the poles that's all.

Also notice that the classical magnetic lines representation in all magnet cartoons and schematics showing with an arrow going from North to South pole, the histoy behind that is that the took the imagne from the iron filings to experiment and the put by choice the arrow just to show where the South pole is!... Norhing special and scientific about IT IS JUST A CONVENTION!

And how could it be any differennt than that? since mainstream says it is a static field nothing is moving. Else if you take the arrow seriously that would mean that a flux line comes out first from north pole and the goes in to the south pole!

[mikrovolt]

I showed how using a crt is a poor demonstration.
Next I compared a better demonstration using Helmholtz coils.
I had to bring the uniform field into this to correct the error.

When a uniform magnetic field is perpendicular to the electric field there
is a Deflection and the electron beam's trajectory is curved.

The physics teacher should be accountable. UFO will survive a small correction maybe even switch to uniform field shown.
I appreciate his effort in what he was trying to explain and more crt experiments might benefit the art. They can be sensitive not always accurate Being critical of metal filings and not being critical of cathode ray tube as an indicator let's the reader decide if the use of semantics to influence a bias
against a me trying to show others better way. UFO showed perfectly along with divisive semantics being reflecting on Wheeler.

On the Helmholz coils and e-beam I use a 48 inch level and a large square to set up this experiment and worked the equations so I remember proving that it is something I could recommend. Bad science ?

Get ready for absolute large lettered antagonist words to spread disinformation against the gnomes who originated the cone hats. Used lodestone long before the reptilians.

[bistander]

Fe in magnetic field

Iron fillings can not flow like the nanoparticles inside the ferrofluid do, therefore are incapable to show really the flux (movements or flow paths under magnetic force vectors) and what they realy do is to show not flux but to align with the single force vector each pointing to the nearest pole relative to their position in space.

They just point to the poles that's all.

In nuts' picture the Fe particles are floating in a fluid and free to move about, of course influenced by gravity, fluid forces and magnetic field.



I've added a couple of red arrows showing areas where these particle do not point to the nearest pole but follow the magnetic field lines.



This ferrofluid appears to be attracted to the pole and form structures pointing away from the pole as would be expected using the classic magnetic field model. That ferrofluid is composed of the same nanoparticles as the thin film in the ferrolens.

Regards,

bi

[aljhoa]

these particle do not point to the nearest pole but follow the magnetic field lines.

How To Make Magnetic Pole Detector With Hall Effect Sensor Circuit


Al