Watch out!
From a comment on the other forum made by MileHigh:
So with a RESISTIVE load, after the RPM increase (which Faraday tells us will lead to an increase of the induced EMF) we end up with less electric power.
Watched again Erfinder's videos and one question comes to mind. Is this phenomenon related to what has been called "Reactive Cross Section"?
Regards.
PS: A conclusion though. It is apparent to me that acceleration under the load is not an end game goal, but only a tool inviting us to inquire more.
From a comment on the other forum made by MileHigh:
Starting at about 20:00 minutes into the clip you have the most dramatic "acceleration under load" when the 10-ohm resistor gets changed to the 1-ohm resistor. Luc even acknowledges that the electrical load decreases when he does this.
With the 10-ohm resistor, the total electrical load is about 1.58 watts.
Then the load resistor is changed to 1-ohm, the prime mover speeds up, and the total electrical load is about 0.98 watts.
So, "acceleration under load" is really "acceleration (to a higher final RPM) under reduced load." In that sense there is no "effect."
With the 10-ohm resistor, the total electrical load is about 1.58 watts.
Then the load resistor is changed to 1-ohm, the prime mover speeds up, and the total electrical load is about 0.98 watts.
So, "acceleration under load" is really "acceleration (to a higher final RPM) under reduced load." In that sense there is no "effect."
Watched again Erfinder's videos and one question comes to mind. Is this phenomenon related to what has been called "Reactive Cross Section"?
Regards.
PS: A conclusion though. It is apparent to me that acceleration under the load is not an end game goal, but only a tool inviting us to inquire more.
Comment