ReGenX Coils and ReGenXtra switching

[Turion]

oops123456

[Turion]

And they prove you were WRONG

bi is WRONG
https://youtu.be/LFlnhVQLWPk
https://youtu.be/RvB3arCUPNg

The kicker is, that your statement: "Pretty much all they show are a lot of unbalanced forces." Which is referring to the videos is exactly why I am right and YOU are wrong. I never said there were NO unbalanced forces. I said the amp draw of the larger, heavier rotor was greater. YOU are the one who insisted that Newton's law proves I'm wrong, and now you are attempting to use that same law to justify being incorrect? You are an absolute JOKE! As if somehow the unbalanced forces are responsible for the increased amp draw? Well of COURSE they are!!! That was the whole point I attempted to make from the beginning of this argument when I said friction in the bearings and other things YOU WEREN'T taking into consideration came into play here and were responsible for the increased amp draw. And that Newtons law was not applicable to the REAL WORLD. But you weren't having any of that at the time. But NOW it's your excuse for being wrong? Talk about TWO FACED. Wait, if you're the JOKER and TWO FACE, that must mean I'm Batman.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHOVwy4b6kI

[bistander]

And they prove you were WRONG

bi is WRONG
https://youtu.be/LFlnhVQLWPk
https://youtu.be/RvB3arCUPNg

The kicker is, that your statement: "Pretty much all they show are a lot of unbalanced forces." Which is referring to the videos is exactly why I am right and YOU are wrong. I never said there were NO unbalanced forces. I said the amp draw of the larger, heavier rotor was greater. YOU are the one who insisted that Newton's law proves I'm wrong, and now you are attempting to use that same law to justify being incorrect? You are an absolute JOKE! As if somehow the unbalanced forces are responsible for the increased amp draw? Well of COURSE they are!!! That was the whole point I attempted to make from the beginning of this argument when I said friction in the bearings and other things YOU WEREN'T taking into consideration came into play here and were responsible for the increased amp draw. And that Newtons law was not applicable to the REAL WORLD. But you weren't having any of that at the time. But NOW it's your excuse for being wrong? Talk about TWO FACED. Wait, if you're the JOKER and TWO FACE, that must mean I'm Batman.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHOVwy4b6kI

... For the LAST time, increased weight of the rotor is an increase in resistance to turning or increased LOAD on the motor. ...

From the start of this you infer (IMO) that increased mass is responsible for increased current (increased power in the prime mover). And I, and Newton, clearly state application to mass only for the law. You repeatedly claimed this. It is unbelievable that you can deny the meaning in the post I quote above.

Newton states it in his law and I clarify it in my first reply quoted below in the third paragraph. Unbalanced forces are considered. Newton goes on to cover those in his second and third laws.

Hi Turion,
You've said this before and I have pointed out that it is wrong. The power, and therefore the motor current, required to turn the rotor at a constant speed is independent of the rotor mass. This is stated in Newton's first law of motion, paraphrased here.

An object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and direction unless acted upon by an external force.

External forces would include friction, aerodynamic drag and magnetics. Or since it is not actually the same motor, the difference in current may be due to a difference in the motor compared to the one used earlier.

Regards,
bi

[Turion]

Increased mass, (WEIGHT) causes increased FRICTION on the bearings, which is one of the FUNDAMENTAL unbalanced forces. Are you denying that the amp draw on the motor increase with the larger rotor in the video? Are you? ARE YOU? There are two choices. Either I FAKED the video, or I am correct. Which is it?

bi is WRONG
https://youtu.be/LFlnhVQLWPk
https://youtu.be/RvB3arCUPNg

That the amp draw increased with the larger rotor is an observable FACT. You can argue theory all day long, but the amp draw still went up, which is what I said would happen. Period. I was right. What does that make you?

[bistander]

Increased mass, (WEIGHT) causes increased FRICTION on the bearings, which is one of the FUNDAMENTAL unbalanced forces. Are you denying that the amp draw on the motor increase with the larger rotor in the video? Are you? ARE YOU? There are two choices. Either I FAKED the video, or I am correct. Which is it?

bi is WRONG
https://youtu.be/LFlnhVQLWPk
https://youtu.be/RvB3arCUPNg

That the amp draw increased with the larger rotor is an observable FACT. You can argue theory all day long, but the amp draw still went up, which is what I said would happen. Period. I was right. What does that make you?

All I am saying, and have ever said on the subject, is in total agreement with Newton's Law, that, when moving at a constant speed, any difference in power is NOT due to a difference in mass.

bi

[BroMikey]

Newtons law was not applicable to the REAL WORLD. But you weren't having any of that at the time. But NOW it's your excuse for being wrong? Talk about TWO FACED. Wait, if you're the JOKER and TWO FACE, that must mean I'm Batman.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHOVwy4b6kI

About 2+ amps for the new rotor, just the rotor, each additional coils adds 1.5 extra amp X 10 coils

I like your post above. Newton is talking about an object out in space near the edge of the galaxy where little gravity can pull on a solid mass. No heat, no light but even then space materials floating around in it that will cause friction. Newton's law is metaphysical not practical just like math equations. Or theoretical mumbo gumbo
And the people put in their $1 to see the movie to ooh and aah, Newton is our hero.

Pop 2 coils on that thing. I'll bet it jumps up 3 amps everytime. Happy Quikcrete SEE-Ment Man
Better hurry the sun is going to be blazing hot.

[bistander]

... And that Newtons law was not applicable to the REAL WORLD. ...

This statement from you says to me that you think you know more about the physics of motion than Newton. You've made similar similar statements before.

I'm certain that Newton formulated his laws to apply to the real world. And they do. You do not have the option to apply or reject law to your liking. It's there. You don't understand it and choose to deny it. You'd benefit from learning and using fundamentals such as Newton's Laws of Motion to your advantage.

bi

[Turion]

bi

That the amp draw increased with the larger rotor is an observable FACT. You can argue theory all day long, but the amp draw still went up, which is what I said would happen. Period. I was right. What does that make you? I'll give you a clue...WRONG.


bi is WRONG
https://youtu.be/LFlnhVQLWPk
https://youtu.be/RvB3arCUPNg

I can do this all day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfYie-NRL2Q

[bistander]

bi

That the amp draw increased with the larger rotor is an observable FACT. You can argue theory all day long, but the amp draw still went up, which is what I said would happen. Period. I was right. What does that make you? I'll give you a clue...WRONG.
...

Your logic is like this:

2 rotors.
Green one and a blue one.
Green rotor draws 2 amps.
Blue rotor draws 5 amps. That is observable fact.
Your conclusion is blue rotors draw more amps than green rotors.

Yes, I believe you. The amp draw increased with the heavier rotor, but not because it is heavier.

That's what I've said from the start. But you don't believe me which means you reject Newton's First Law.

bi

[Turion]

bi

That the amp draw increased with the larger rotor is an observable FACT. You can argue theory all day long, but the amp draw still went up, which is what I said would happen. Period. I was right. What does that make you? I'll give you a clue...WRONG.


bi is WRONG
https://youtu.be/LFlnhVQLWPk
https://youtu.be/RvB3arCUPNg

I can do this all day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfYie-NRL2Q

[bistander]

bi

That the amp draw increased with the larger rotor is an observable FACT. You can argue theory all day long, but the amp draw still went up, which is what I said would happen. Period. I was right. What does that make you? I'll give you a clue...WRONG.

What was I wrong about?

bi

[BroMikey]

Your logic is like this:

2 rotors.
Green one and a blue one.
Green rotor draws 2 amps.
Blue rotor draws 5 amps. That is observable fact.
Your conclusion is blue rotors draw more amps than green rotors.

you reject Newton's First Law.

bi

Where does this space chicken get blue and green for the color of the 2 rotors. The amp draw is 1.8amps and 2.9amps respectively. If you can't get that right you need your head examined. The rotors are black dimwitts.

Dave what planet does this guy live on? Are you serious about a conversation with a low IQ #@&^%? Seriously?

[BroMikey]

................................

Part 2 Cancellation Magnets thanks to MadMack, present company not excluded
That tiny 10mm shaft is as smooth as a silky garment plus my fingers are calloused and dry yet with
no effort I can move the rotor along out of the locked position while running drag has been cut to a minimum. Not bad, I am patting myself on the back. Someone needs to do it I will get the job done you slugs.

[BroMikey]

Thane Heins releases a video had been working on since the early 2000's and then posts one of many experiments. For all you late bloomers. Before he moved on he let his work be noticed in 2008. It takes years guys better get going.

Old thinking

Complete with university speech tick and tape measure clicking

[Treacle]

...
Suppose there are 2 high-speed multipolar generators with the same groups of coils but with cores of different materials: 1) iron; 2) ferrite. 1) generation compensates for a part of the expended energy and replenishes the source so that the same consumption as in 2) at idle and no more comes out. TE will be idle consumption with a ferrite core is equal to the consumption of loaded with an iron core. Too high magnetization reversal frequency for 50 (60) hertz transformer iron leads to its (induction) heating for a better understanding of the link to researchers below and the experiment with ferrite:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAXtB_7RkEg
(you can watch from the middle), of course ferrite is less suitable for motors ... and not practical ... <br> Regen-x technology is a bad core + high inductive resistance of the winding works like a bud to compensate for the Lenz law, but in fact, compensation only occurs which can be avoided. Modern generators and motors make of higher quality iron capable of working at 400 or more hertz and almost do not create losses on the twentieth. Researchers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUoyuiQTrRA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfRxsC9yumQ
ETC Or am I wrong?