Tweet
No probs, I'll be doing more badge tests soon, now that I know that I won't be triggering false alarms I will be exposing the badges for longer periods.
-
-
The Basis of this Technology
I believe this technology is similar to the technology that the Russians are employing in their electronic weapons, which they used with great ease in disabling the USS Donald Cook. See story: Russian Fighter Jet Disables US Missle Destroyer Using Electronic Warfare Weapon - YouTubeOriginally posted by pomodoro View Post
See: Khibiny
By the way, I remember a report that a captured military Russian jet had vacuum tubes instead of solid-state components. I thought, "How primitive." However, there is a reason for this. From what I have read, they are able to survive an EMP.
Reference: http://www.energeticforum.com/genera...20422-emp.htmlThe majority of the on-board avionics were based on vacuum-tube technology, not solid-state electronics. Although they represented aging technology, vacuum tubes were more tolerant of temperature extremes, thereby removing the need for environmental controls in the avionics bays. With the use of vacuum tubes, the MiG-25P's original Smerch-A (Tornado, NATO reporting name "Foxfire") radar had enormous power – about 600 kilowatts. As with most Soviet aircraft, the MiG-25 was designed to be as robust as possible. The use of vacuum tubes also makes the aircraft's systems resistant to an electromagnetic pulse, for example after a nuclear blast.
Source: Broad, William J. "Nuclear Pulse (I): Awakening to the Chaos Factor." Science, Volume 212, 29 May 1981, pp. 1009–1012
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-25
Reference: Former Federal Employee Reveals Shocking Info-Russia, EMPs & Martial LawComment
-
Pomodoro,Originally posted by pomodoro View PostThe monitor resuts are back!
And I have to eat my words.
The badge received zero uSv of photon energy.
I'm still confused, but it looks like no Xrays are produced.
I'll have another look at this one day, but hopefully someone else can do some further investigations with faraday cages and the like.
It is quite pleasing to hear about nil micro Sv/hr dose report with the TLD Badge.
However it angers me that you seem to have tried to accuse certain persons of exposing bystanders to X-rays, but cleverly wrapped in a safety or health warning. Are you trying to provoke some kind of suit to disrupt their current situation, or cause trouble?
As I have already stated many Geiger counters produce a false positive around RF currents or fields.
Eric has stated repeatedly, that there is a difference between the Rays Tesla produced compared to modern day X-rays. The modern day X-rays can kill, Tesla’s Rays were harmless… (But how would anyone prove that in court)? One can read Tesla’s writings on the production and characteristics of his Rays. So what this might be is particle radiations of a not-yet recognised kind.
Also your particular apparatus does not exactly replicate Eric’s experiments. You are using a standard Tesla coil device with the high tension terminal running the bulb, just as an X-ray tube would be connected. Whereas Eric’s coils run the bulb off the neutral terminals (displacement current), which is a completely different situation, electrically…
Anyone playing with Tesla coils should already know that there may be a situation where production of (standard) X-rays could be possible, particularly with apparatus containing a vacuum where there are impacts. I.e. an X-ray tube can be driven by an induction coil apparatus. (Although most X-Ray tubes are driven by HV DC).
Giving you the benefit of doubt, if the energetic particles being detected are not standard X-rays, then what are they?Last edited by Sputins; 03-21-2016, 12:29 AM."Doesn't matter how many times you kick the coyote in the head, it's still gonna eat chickens". - EPDComment
-
Originally posted by Sputins View Post
Hi Sputins, all I've proven is that the minimum 1uSv was not detected in 45 seconds. Having recently used another counter I borrowed, there are 2.5mr/hr at three feet away and since these badges only seem to register a minimum of 1uSv it makes sense that nothing showed up.
My setup is not like a standard xray tube either, the 'missing' terminal is not grounded to earth in the device, which makes the HV terminal neutral too.
May I suggest that you run a similar experiment, making sure that there is a strong attraction to the tube by the foil and expose a badge for a much longer period, or keep it next to the tube. I have to wait a few months for the next pickup.
As far as suing Eric, well someone would have to have money and time to waste, as not much will come out of it, as few uSv of Xrays probably don't do much. Tesla lived a long time and he exposed himself to his unipolar Xray tube for many hours, mastering the art of x-ray pictures, suffering burns and headaches but still did not get cancer. Perhaps someone should get some notes on that device of his.
Make no mistakes, in a court room, some Xrays will be detected, nobody knows anything about the 'other' rays.
So for now, I'm saying there is no massive amount of Xrays from my setup. I have no idea about Eric's setup, but the heated filament still worries me, and when I do the next badge test, I will also report on that. If in the mean time someone can do some similar tests properly, it would be of great benefit.
Cheers for Now
Comment
-
Ernst, have you had time to play with the bits you ordered?
I'll be able to do another badge exposure soon.
Comment
-
Not much, but I tried a few things.
My GMC responds to HF radiation near the Tesla coil (small SEC). There seems to be no difference with or without the lightbulb attached.
One of the bulbs now has its filament broken because a discharge to the outside of the bulb.
As I said, not much time yet.
Ernst.Comment
Comment